The signature of a wind reverse shock in GRB’s Afterglows

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Many different acceleration mechanisms: Fermi 1, Fermi 2, shear,... (Fermi acceleration at shock: most standard, nice powerlaw, few free parameters) main.
Advertisements

Understanding the prompt emission of GRBs after Fermi Tsvi Piran Hebrew University, Jerusalem (E. Nakar, P. Kumar, R. Sari, Y. Fan, Y. Zou, F. Genet, D.
Collaborators: Wong A. Y. L. (HKU), Huang, Y. F. (NJU), Cheng, K. S. (HKU), Lu T. (PMO), Xu M. (NJU), Wang X. (NJU), Deng W. (NJU). Gamma-ray Sky from.
2009 July 8 Supernova Remants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era 1 Modeling the Dynamical and Radiative Evolution of a Pulsar Wind Nebula inside.
Yun-Wei YU 俞云伟 June 22, 2010, Hong Kong. Outline  Background  Implications from the shallow decay afterglows of GRBs  A qualitative discussion on magnetar.
From Progenitor to Afterlife Roger Chevalier SN 1987AHST/SINS.
Yizhong Fan (Niels Bohr International Academy, Denmark Purple Mountain Observatory, China) Fan (2009, MNRAS) and Fan & Piran (2008, Phys. Fron. China)
Formulation for the Relativistic Blast Waves Z. Lucas Uhm Research Center of MEMS Space Telescope (RCMST) & Institute for the Early Universe (IEU), Ewha.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Tsvi Piran Re’em Sari 2nd EUL Workshop on Gamma-Ray Bursts.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Re’em Sari Tsvi Piran GRBs in the Era of Rapid Follow-up.
GRB afterglows in the Non-relativistic phase Y. F. Huang Dept Astronomy, Nanjing University Tan Lu Purple Mountain Observatory.
Gamma-Ray Burst Jets: dynamics and interaction with the progenitor star Davide Lazzati, Brian Morsony, and Mitch Begelman JILA - University of Colorado.
Gamma-Ray Burst Optical Observations with AST3 Xue-Feng Wu Xue-Feng Wu Chinese Center for Antarctic Astronomy, Chinese Center for Antarctic Astronomy,
Reverse Shocks and Prompt Emission Mark Bandstra Astro
GRB B: Prompt Emission from Internal Forward-Reverse Shocks Yun-Wei Yu 1,2, X. Y. Wang 1, & Z. G. Dai 1 (俞云伟,王祥玉,戴子高) 1 Department of Astronomy,
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Krakow Oct. 6, 2008.
GLAST Science LunchDec 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/21 Can emission at higher energies provide insight into the physics of shocks and how the GRB inner.
Temporal evolution of thermal emission in GRBs Based on works by Asaf Pe’er (STScI) in collaboration with Felix Ryde (Stockholm) & Ralph Wijers (Amsterdam),
Physics 777 Plasma Physics and Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) Instructor: Gregory Fleishman Lecture 13. Astrophysical Plasmas 02 December 2008.
Ehud Nakar California Institute of Technology Gamma-Ray Bursts and GLAST GLAST at UCLA May 22.
Gamma Ray Bursts: a new tool for astrophysics and cosmology? Guido Barbiellini University and INFN Trieste.
 The GRB literature has been convolved with my brain 
1/39 New Relativistic Particle-In-Cell Simulation Studies of Prompt and Early Afterglows from GRBs Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/CSPAR.
K. Alatalo - Extensions to the Standard Model1 Extensions to the Standard Afterglow Model Katey Alatalo October 10 th, 2005.
Probing Magnetic Field Structure in GRBs Through Dispersive Plasma Effects on the Afterglow Polarization Amir Sagiv, Eli Waxman & Abraham Loeb GRBs in.
Modeling GRB B Xuefeng Wu (X. F. Wu, 吴雪峰 ) Penn State University Purple Mountain Observatory 2008 Nanjing GRB Workshop, Nanjing, China, June
A New Chapter in Radio Astrophysics Dale A. Frail National Radio Astronomy Observatory Gamma Ray Bursts and Their Afterglows AAS 200 th meeting, Albuquerque,
Monte-Carlo Simulation of Thermal Radiation from GRB Jets Sanshiro Shibata (Konan Univ.) Collaborator: Nozomu Tominaga (Konan Univ., IPMU)
Recent Results and the Future of Radio Afterglow Observations Alexander van der Horst Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek University of Amsterdam.
Simulation of relativistic shocks and associated radiation from turbulent magnetic fields 2010 Fermi Symposium 9 – 12 May 2011 Rome Italy K.-I. Nishikawa.
A numerical study of the afterglow emission from GRB double-sided jets Collaborators Y. F. Huang, S. W. Kong Xin Wang Department of Astronomy, Nanjing.
Amir Levinson Tel Aviv University Levinson+Bromberg PRL 08 Bromberg et al. ApJ 11 Levinson ApJ 12 Katz et al. ApJ 10 Budnik et al. ApJ 10 Nakar+Sari ApJ.
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
22 nd February 2007 Poonam Chandra Unusual Behavior in Radio Supernovae Poonam Chandra Jansky Fellow, National Radio Astronomy Observatory Astronomy Department,
The acceleration and radiation in the internal shock of the gamma-ray bursts ~ Smoothing Effect on the High-Energy Cutoff by Multiple Shocks ~ Junichi.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
Radio and X-ray observations of SN 2009ip Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics January 4, 2013 Collaborators: Raffaella Margutti (Harvard),
Stochastic Wake Field particle acceleration in GRB G. Barbiellini (1), F. Longo (1), N.Omodei (2), P.Tommasini (3), D.Giulietti (3), A.Celotti (4), M.Tavani.
Circumstellar interaction of supernovae and gamma-ray bursts Circumstellar interaction of supernovae and gamma-ray bursts Poonam Chandra National Radio.
Magnetohydrodynamic Effects in (Propagating) Relativistic Ejecta Yosuke Mizuno Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research University of Alabama in.
Colliding winds in pulsar binaries S.V.Bogovalov 1, A.V.Koldoba 2,G.V.Ustugova 2, D. Khangulyan 3, F.Aharonian 3 1-National Nuclear Research University.
High-energy radiation from gamma-ray bursts Zigao Dai Nanjing University Xiamen, August 2011.
Expected Gamma-Ray Emission of SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (d = 50 kpc) E.G.Berezhko 1, L.T. Ksenofontov 1, and H.J.Völk 2 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute.
Y. Matsuo A), M. Hashimoto A), M. Ono A), S. Nagataki B), K. Kotake C), S. Yamada D), K. Yamashita E) Long Time Evolutionary Simulations in Supernova until.
Gamma-Ray Bursts and unmagnetized relativistic collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Caltech.
A New Window on Radio and X-ray emission from Strongly Interacting Supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada Collaborators: Roger Chevalier,
Stochastic wake field particle acceleration in Gamma-Ray Bursts Barbiellini G., Longo F. (1), Omodei N. (2), Giulietti D., Tommassini P. (3), Celotti A.
American Astronomical Society – Austin, TX (2008) Patrick Slane (CfA) In collaboration with: D. Helfand (Columbia) S. Reynolds (NC State) B. Gaensler (U.
Radio afterglows of Gamma Ray Bursts Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics - Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Collaborator: Dale.
Simulation of relativistic shocks and associated radiation from turbulent magnetic fields 2009 Fermi Symposium 2-5 November 2009 Hyatt Regency Washington,
The prompt optical emission in the Naked Eye Burst R. Hascoet with F. Daigne & R. Mochkovitch (Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris) Kyoto − Deciphering then.
Gamma-ray bursts Tomasz Bulik CAM K, Warsaw. Outline ● Observations: prompt gamma emission, afterglows ● Theoretical modeling ● Current challenges in.
Fermi Several Constraints by Fermi Zhuo Li ( 黎卓 ) Department of Astronomy, Peking University Kavli Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics 23 August, Xiamen.
Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept., IMAPP, Radboud Universiteit.
Yizhong Fan (Niels Bohr International Academy, Denmark Purple Mountain Observatory, China)
Gamma-Ray Bursts II : Physics and Phenomenology of the Afterglow Andrea Melandri INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Brera.
Magnetized Shocks & Prompt GRB Emission
CSI in SNRs You-Hua Chu Inst of Astron and Astroph
Convective instability of a decelerating relativistic shell: an origin of magnetic fields in the early afterglow phase? Amir Levinson, Tel Aviv University.
Vikram V Dwarkadas University of Chicago
Particle acceleration and the microphysics of gamma-ray burst shocks
RADIO EMISSION FROM SNe & GRBs, AND THE NEED FOR SKA
Modelling of non-thermal radiation from pulsar wind nebulae
Observations: Cosmic rays
Gamma-Ray Bursts Ehud Nakar Caltech APCTP 2007 Feb. 22.
Andrei M. Beloborodov Columbia University
GRBs with GLAST Tsvi Piran Racah Inst. of Jerusalem, Israel
Tight Liso-Ep-Γ0 Relation of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts
Stochastic Wake Field particle acceleration in GRB
Presentation transcript:

The signature of a wind reverse shock in GRB’s Afterglows Asaf Pe’er Ralph A.M.J. Wijers (Amsterdam) ApJ., 543, 1036 astro-ph/0511508 June 06

Outline Motivation: massive stars as GRB progenitors Complexities of the ambient density profile Interaction of relativistic blast wave and wind termination shock Plasma dynamics Resulting light curves

Motivation: wind from massive star Massive stars are progenitors of Long GRB’s (GRB-SN Ic connection, GRB’s in star forming regions..) Massive stars emit supersonic wind: ISM nISM~103 cm-3 Stellar wind Shocked stellar wind Massive star (reverse) shock wave (forward) shock wave Contact discontinuity

Graph #1: Density profile Pb>>Pa rb=4ra(r=R0) Castor et. al., 1975 Weaver et. al., 1977

Density profile numerical simulation by Chevalier, Li & Fransson (2004)

Blast wave propagation in region a: density profile Dr(ã)ob. ~ r/4G2 Blandford & McKee (1976) : n(r) r-2  G(r) r-1/2

GRB blast wave propagation in region a (relativistically-) shocked stellar wind (hot: Gmc2 per particle) Region a: Stellar wind (cold) Region b: Shocked stellar wind G(r) Compressed: Dr(ã)ob. ~ r/4G2 Relativistic blast wave Wind reverse shock

Interaction of shock waves Region ã Region a Region b Wind reverse shock G(r) (downstream) r<R0 G(r) Region b ~ Region c ~ Region ã: Region b G1G(r=R0) (upstream) GRS<G1 r>R0 New blast wave reverse shock New blast wave forward shock Contact discontinuity

Calculation of plasma properties during interaction Problem: reverse shock propagates into hot medium  not strong ! Region b: Region ã: Region b ~ Region c GRS<G1=? G1G(r=R0) G2=? We know: Boundary conditions: G1, nã, nb We find: Reverse shock jump conditions: - Conservation of particle number flux: [nGb] - Energy flux – [wG2b] - Momentum flux: [wG2b2 + P]

Schematic density profile during the existence of the reverse shock As long as the reverse shock exists – plasma in region ã is upstream  continues to move at G1  conditions in other regions are time independent !

Graph #2: Evolution of blast wave Lorentz factor G(r) r-1/2 G(r) r-3/2 R1 = 1.06R0 = radius where the reverse shock crossed region ã

Light curves calculations Synchrotron emission spectrum Calculation in 3 different regimes: (a) r < R0  Emission from region ã (b) R0<r<R1 Emission from regions ã , b, c (c) r>R1  Emission from region c ~ ~ (Sari, Piran & Narayan, 1998) ~

Graph #3: Resulting light curve Model predictions: (1) Jump in the light curve by a factor ~2 after ~day; (2) Change of spectral slopes at late times (3) Late times afterglow looks like explosion into constant density

Comparison with data: GRB030329 R-band afterglow of GRB030329 (corrected for the contribution of SN2003dh) (Taken from Lipkin et.al., 2004)

Summary Wind of massive star results in complex density structure GRB blast wave splits at R0, change its r- dependence Light curve is complex: shows jump by a factor of ~2 after ~ day, and change slope at late times