Did people do what they said

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Performance of The Polls John Curtice
Advertisements

Client logo Telephone Polls: Opportunities and Pitfalls Martin Boon, ICM Research.
Measuring Turnout – Who Voted in 2010? British Election Study Harold Clarke, David Sanders, Marianne Stewart, Paul Whiteley, University of Essex.
Influences on Voting. Part One
How it came about, an analysis of the 2010 British General Election Professor Sir Robert Worcester Dr. Roger Mortimore Dr. Paul Baines Mark Gill 18 th.
2010: Did online polling come of age? Anthony Wells – Associate Director Joe Twyman - Director of Political Research, YouGov.
Election 2015: Prospects overall and the role of student electors Stephen D Fisher University of Oxford Presentation for the Higher Education Policy Institute.
Exit-poll analysis and prediction Stephen Fisher Following: Curtice, John and David Firth (2008) Exit polling in a cold climate: the BBC-ITV experience.
The impact of weightings and adjustments on the accuracy of the final polls in 2010.
Turbulent Times Politics, economics, resources and policy.
Tactical Voting. Lesson Objectives I will get the opportunity to analyse election results for evidence of potential tactical voting I will get the opportunity.
The Polls and The 2015 Election John Curtice 9 June 2015.
Voting Behaviour at the 2010 General Election Dr Justin Greaves University of Warwick.
For the British Polling Council / Market Research Society 19 June 2015 Voting Intention polling.
© 2010 GfK NOP Exit Polls – the Whys and Wherefores (and more importantly the Hows) Nick Moon, GfK NOP.
Understanding the polls: Ipsos MORI’s election BPC ENQUIRY 19 JUNE.
A part of Creston Unlimited Confidential: For research purposes only British Polling Council & Market Research Society Inquiry Evaluating the ICM pre-election.
Why Wales Said Yes The 2011 Referendum Roger Scully Aberystwyth, 24 th June 2011.
Polling the Leadership Debates The role of the instant polls Andrew Hawkins & Caroline Lawes 22 nd November 2010.
Why do people vote the way they do? DO NOW Make a list of factors that can influence voting behaviour. Start by making your own list, then compare it with.
First Past the Post How representative is it?. What is FPTP  It is a, simple, voting system used in the UK general elections  The voter puts an X next.
20 January 2010 Internet polling: a more hesitant approach Andrew Cooper, Founder, Populus.
Today we will… Identify the information handling questions which will be assessed in Higher Modern Studies.
Aim: How can American political participation be characterized? Why do you think the U.S. has a low rate of voter turnout? Why does the U.S. have a lower.
The Phone/Internet Divergence John Curtice Senior Research Fellow NatCen Social Research and ‘The UK in a Changing Europe’ initiative.
Measuring Public Opinion and Political Information How Polls Are Conducted –Sample: a small proportion of people who are chosen in a survey to be representative.
Britain Says NO: Voting in the 2011 AV Ballot Referendum Paul Whiteley Harold Clarke David Sanders Marianne Stewart.
Today we will… Identify the information handling questions which will be assessed in Higher Modern Studies.
Public Opinion and Political Action
The American People The American Melting Pot
Public Opinion and Political Action
? Examining alternative ways of predicting election results
Introduction.
A part of Creston Unlimited
Public Opinion and Political Action
Voter Trends EQ: How does data on voter trends affect the parties’ platforms?
Lesson 1 - Introduction to Voting Behaviour
Propensity Score Adjustments for Internet Survey of Voting Behavior:
Part III – Gathering Data
Long Term Factors Affecting Voting
Public Opinion and Political Action
Can we trust the opinion polls – a panel discussion
AP Government Public Opinion
Secondary PowerPoint 7: Opinion Polling in Elections
How Have The Polls Changed Since 2015?
Latino Participation and Partisanship
Lesson 2: The Media’s Influence on Voting Behaviour (1) - Newspapers
MINI-SPEC REFERENDUM April 2010 Report
Public Opinion and Political Action
Public Opinion and Political Action
What does Voting Behaviour mean?
Public Opinion and Political Action
SPEC Barometer Results
Public Opinion and Political Action
Public Opinion & Political Action
The Polls in 2010: Questions and Queries
Public Opinion Belief & Behaviors.
Public Opinion and Political Action
Public Opinion and Political Action
Public Opinion and Political Action
Ready to Compromise? Where Voters Stand on the Brexit Impasse
Meltdown: Can the LibDems avoid disaster in 2015?
The General Election of 1959
Public Opinion and Political Action
Voting and the voting process
Public Opinion and Political Action
Engaging young people in the democratic process
Political Participation and Voter Behavior
2019 Planning & Progress Study
Voting GOVT 2305, Module 11.
Presentation transcript:

Did people do what they said Did people do what they said? Martin Boon, ICM Research John Curtice, University of Strathclyde

Did people do what they said? Recap: The ICM method All ICM Vote Intention polls employ a telephone method. Representative samples of around 1,000 people each time, although the final prediction poll in 2010 interviewed just over 2,000 people. Various weighting and adjustment procedures are employed, including: Weighting by likelihood to turnout. Weighting by recall of past voting, with target weights being 20% to the actual result of the previous General Election, and 80% to the average recall generated across (up to) the previous 25 ICM vote intention polls. Adjustment procedure: reallocating 50% of the Dks and Partial Refusers back to the party they voted for in the previous General Election. Did people do what they said?

Recap: The ICM performance Con % Lab LD Other Average error ICM 36 28 26 10 1.25 Harris 35 29 27 1.5 Ipsos-MORI 8 1.75 Populus 37 11 ComRes 7 2.25 You Gov 9 Result 30 24 - Did people do what they said?

ICM Polls: campaign tracking: 1. ICM cannot escape ‘Lib Dem surge’ issues. 2. Penultimate poll would have been pretty poor (AE: 2.75%) 3. All adds up to a need to test the efficacy of our methods. Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? The Recall Poll ICM has conducted a Recall Poll after every election since 1997. It has been used to evaluate various conditions that affect past vote recall, including the tendency of LD voters to be somewhat more forgetful. Certainly, the behaviour of Liberal Democrat supporters is in the firing line of our efforts on this occasion. On this occasion we called back 4,662 people who had previously been interviewed on one of our campaign polls up to and including (original) poll fieldwork on April 14th 2010. 14-16th Apr 17-23rd 24th-30th 1st-3rd May 4th May Prediction Poll Total 814 1,018 1,104 594 1,132 4,662 Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? What we can examine How well did people forecast whether they would vote or not? What happened to the “Don’t Knows” and “Won’t Says”? Was there a late swing? Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? Potential Pitfalls Those who participated in the recall exercise may not be representative of all those who participated (sample is skewed towards older and middle class people) In particular they may have been particularly likely to have voted (84% did so) Some of the “Don’t Knows” and “Won’t Says” wouldn’t say afterwards either! (14% of voters didn’t declare their party id) Not all respondents were originally interviewed close to polling day. The swing amongst those whose reported vote did not match their vote intention may not have been ‘late’ (46% interviewed before the last week) Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? Some Decisions Data weighted to be demographically representative (but not past vote weighted) In analysis of reported vote, those who failed to say for whom they voted are excluded. Some analyses based only on those interviewed in the last week. Did people do what they said?

Anticipated and Actual Turnout Did people do what they said?

Estimating The Party Differential Vote Intention Estimated Turnout Actual Gap Conservative 95 92 +3 Labour 93 86 +7 Liberal Democrat 90 +2 Other 88 75 +13 Did people do what they said?

Alternative Estimates Voting Intention 7-10 Only Gap 3 point scale Conservative 95 +3 90 -2 Labour +4 88 +2 Liberal Democrat 87 -3 Other 84 +9 Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? Too big to ignore? 68% of those who did not declare a vote intention reported having voted. These constituted 29% of all those who reported having voted… Including 22% of those who voted who revealed for whom they voted. Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? A Distinctive Group Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? Their Recall of 2005 Did people do what they said?

How Recall 2005 Vote Anticipates Reported 2010 Vote Con Lab Lib Dem Other DNV 66 14 15 17 7 48 12 13 10 54 24 9 4 3 8 28 2 20 11 70 Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? Campaign and After Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? The Last Week and After Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? The Last Poll and After Did people do what they said?

The (Last Week) Crossbreak Con Lab Lib Dem Other 87 1 4 7 2 80 3 78 8 * 54 DNV 15 9 27 Did people do what they said?

Did people do what they said? Conclusion Some differential abstention that was only partly captured by turnout weighting. Labour profited – including relative to the Lib Dems - from the ‘shy Tory’ phenomenon – though this was (adequately?) allowed for in some polls. But no convincing evidence of a significant late swing away from the Lib Dems. So also need to look to possibility of sampling bias – or weighting error? Did people do what they said?