Beam diagnostics for medical accelerators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Particle rate in M1 and M2 Muon Meeting
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
Energy deposition and neutron background studies for a low energy proton therapy facility Roxana Rata*, Roger Barlow* * International Institute for Accelerator.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
Particle Interactions
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
1 The LHCb Vertex detector 15/9/2003 Physics –Goals –Properties and consequences LHCb –Overview of the detector Vertex –Specifications –Silicon stations.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
1 A.I.Ryazanov, E.V.Semenov and A.Ferrari DPA calculations in irradiated graphite collimator materials under 7 TeV and 450 GeV proton beams ,
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Design of the Photon Collimators for the ILC Positron Helical Undulator Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Positron Source Meeting, July 2008.
The ZEUS Hadron-Electron-Separator Performance and Experience Peter Göttlicher (DESY) for the ZEUS-HES-group Contributions to HES Germany, Israel, Japan,
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
RF source, volume and caesiated extraction simulations (e-dump)
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
The LHCb Vertex Locator Lars Eklund LHCb VELO Group of the LHCb Collaboration CERN (Geneva), EPFL (Lausanne), NIKHEF (Amsterdam), University of Glasgow,
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Study of the Radiation Damage of Hamamatsu Silicon Photo Multipliers Wander Baldini Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare and Universita’ degli Studi di.
0 Characterization studies of the detector modules for the CBM Silicon Tracking System J.Heuser 1, V.Kyva 2, H.Malygina 2,3, I.Panasenko 2 V.Pugatch 2,
Aras Papadelis. NIKHEF 1 Aras Papadelis B-physics meeting 15/ Results from the Nov2004 VELO test beam (and what followed…)
Use of Silicon Detectors for Proton Diagnostics Tomasz Cybulski
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
Heating and radiological
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
ADvanced MOnolithic Sensors for
Cross section of the process
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Simulated vertex precision
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
Monte Carlo studies of the configuration of the charge identifier
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
The LHC collider in Geneva
Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
MINOS: a new vertex tracker for in-flight γ-ray spectroscopy
1. Introduction Secondary Heavy charged particle (fragment) production
Vertex Detector Overview Prototypes R&D Plans Summary.
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
The LHCb vertex detector
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

Beam diagnostics for medical accelerators Tomasz Cybulski University of Liverpool , UK The Cockcroft Institute, UK t.cybulski@liv.ac.uk

Outline Intoroduction to radiotherapy Scanditronix MC-60 PF Cyclotron A Quality Control Teaser Faraday Cup Optimisation LHCb VELO Detector Summary IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Introduction to Radiotherapy Fig. 2. Single strand DNA brake. [2] IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum - X – ray photon Fig. 1. Principles of conformal radiotherapy. [1] Fig. 3. Double strand DNA brake. [2] DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Introduction to Radiotherapy SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 4. Energy deposition by proton beam as a function of depth - Bragg peak. [4] Fig. 6. Sagittal colour-wash dose display for the treatment on meduloblastoma. [4] DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Introduction to radiotherapy SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum E1  E2  E3 Parameters determining the quality and effectiveness of radiotherapy treatment: DOSE – determines energy deposited in a target (tumour) volume – number of ionisation events Parameter of importance: Beam current 2. Tumour coverage – irradiation of tumour volume and protection of healthy tissue Penetration depth - determines distal tumour coverage Parameter of importance: Energy Lateral spread – determines accuracy of lateral irradiation accuracy DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Scanditronix MC-60 PF Cyclotron IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 6. Scanditronix MC-60 cyclotron is an isochronous machine. Magnetic field corrects the relativistic mass effect: 𝑚 =𝛾∙ 𝑚 0 , to hold the synchronism Fig. 7. The RF acceleration takes place in RF cavities of the width of 90 RF degrees. The RF pull push method is used. DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Scanditronix MC-60 PF Cyclotron IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Scanditronix MC – 60 Cyclotron characteristics Ions p Energy [MeV] 62 PIG source max current [mA] 1 Acceleration method RF Harmonic modes RF frequency [MHz] 25,7 𝑁 𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 = 𝐼 𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑐𝑒 ∙ 𝑁 𝐼 ∙ 𝑅𝐹 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑒 360 ∙ 1 𝑓 𝑅𝐹 =8.44 𝑒+6 Therapeutical beam characteristics RF period [ns] 37.45 Bunch length [ns] 1.35 Beam current [nA] 5.0 Number of ions per sec. 3.12 e+10 Number of ions per bunch 1.17 e+3 Beam power [W] 3.0 e-1 𝑃 = 𝐴 𝜁 ∙ 𝑖 𝑒 ∙𝑊 where: 𝑃 – beam power [W] 𝐴 – mass number of the ion 𝜁 – charge of the ion 𝑒 – 1,602 [As] – ‘the charge in 1 A’ 𝑊 – kinetic energy of the ions [eV/u] DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Fig. 8.b. Treatment beam line technical drawing. Scanditronix MC-60 PF Cyclotron The treatment line passive scattering device based on double – W foil scattering . IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 8.a. Double - W scattering foils. The thickness is of 20µm is a compromise between the beam lateral spread and energy loss. Fig. 8.b. Treatment beam line technical drawing. DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

A Quality Control Teaser IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 10. Beam halo hit map on the LHCb VELO at the distance d = 110 mm from the collimator. [5] Fig. 9. LHCb VELO module at the Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology. [5] Fig. 11. Divergence of the beam halo as a function of distance from the collimator. [5] DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Quality Control for Medical Accelerator IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 12. Treatment room set up at Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology. [3] DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Faraday CUP Optimisation FLUKA – a multi particle transport code – has been used to simulate the optimum geometry for the Faraday CUP design. IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum FC design requirements: Thickness: enough to stop both primary and secondary particles Depth: enough to make the escaping secondary electrons opening angle as small as possible Material: good electrical conductivity, nuclear reactions have to be considered. Vacuum good enough to avoid ionisation of the residual gas – up to 10-5 hPa. Fig. 13. FLUKA simulation of the 60MeV proton beam impinging on a cubical Cu target. Charged Hadron fluence is estimated for 3.12e10 primary protons. DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Faraday CUP Optimisation IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Tab. 3. Faraday CUP design dimensions. The beam diameter is 2cm. Aperture Diameter [cm] 4.0 Outer diameter [cm] 8.0 Well length [cm] Aperture polar angle [deg] 30 Target thickness [cm] Target materials Copper Aluminum Graphite Fig. 14. Geometrical design concept of Faraday Cup. DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Faraday CUP Optimisation FLUKA input file configuration: Multiple Coulomb Scattering option enabled Electromagnetic FLUKA: production cut for electrons and positrons – 1keV, production cut for photons 0.1keV Electromagnetic interactions thresholds: as for the electromagnetic Secondary proton production threshold: 10-6 GeV. IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Self-shielding option for neutrons enabled (bulky materials may act as „neutron sink” due to neutron resonances) Fig. 14. FAIR interface for the FLUKA simulations. DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Faraday CUP Optimisation Secondary emission particles spectra simulated for the optimisation of the Faraday CUP: Protons Electrons Positrons Charged particles Auxiliary simulations: Bremsstrahlung and photons Neutrons flux Pions and mions < proton energy lower than production threshold energy (290MeV) IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 15. Neutron fluence for Graphite target – 60MeV proton beam for 3.12e10 particles DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Faraday CUP Optimisation IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 16. Regions setup for particles fluence estimation. Fig. 19. Electron fluence estimated with the USRDBX estimator (Graphite target). Upper plot – target to Vacuum 1; lower: Vacuum 3 to Vacuum 4. DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Faraday CUP Optimisation Statistics problem: IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 18. Simulation results for Graphite target: 150 energy bins, 1e6 protons. Fig. 17. Simulation results for Graphite target: 75 energy bins, 1e8 protons. (Simulation time for Cu target – 30 days) DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Faraday CUP Optimisation Faraday Cup summary: Measurement of 5 nA beam current, the beam stability 5% (0.25nA). The expected measurement sensitivity: maximum 0.01nA Detailed material and geometry investigation will be introduced on completing the simulations Operation time constraints due to thermal effects will be investigated IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

LHCb VELO Detector IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 19. Cluster shapes for a underdepleted and fully depleted silicon strip detector. [6] Fig. 20. TDR LHCb VELO detector sensor structure. [6] DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Fig. 21. rφ geometry of the LHCb VELO sensors LHCb VELO Detector Tab. 4. LHCb VELO sensors parameters IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 21. rφ geometry of the LHCb VELO sensors (n-on-n). φ – sensor strip pitch R – sensor strip pitch 37.7+ 79.5−37.7 𝑟−8170 17250−8170 40+ 101.6−40 𝑟 −8190 41949 −8190 37.7+ 79.5−37.7 𝑟 −17250 42000 −17250 DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

LHCb VELO Detector Beetle chip IntRo CMOS technology, 0.12 µm, radiation hard ASIC, analogue IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Noise Equivalent Charge ENC = 790e +17.5e /pF Fig. 22. Beetle chip architecture and pulse shape. The Spill over has to be lower than 0.3 of the peak value after 25ns.[8] The Response of the Beetle to the test-pulse: the measured rise time is 14.7 +/- 0.5 ns and the spill-over (26 +/- 0.6%). DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

LHCb VELO Detector LHCb VErtex LOcator (VELO) – reconstruction of vertices tracks of decays of beauty- and charm- hadrons in LHCb experiment. IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Detector design and construction requirements: Performance Geometrical Environmental Machine integration Fig. 23. LHCb VELO modules in cross section in LHCb experiment. [7] DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

LHCb VELO Architecture IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Experiment will replace this section of pipe. Proton beam Fig. 24. LHCb VELO stand at the Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology. DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Fig. 25. LHCb VELO readout electronics. [7] LHCb VELO electronics IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 25. LHCb VELO readout electronics. [7] DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

LHCb VELO electronics TELL 1 cards for VELO Functions: Digitization of the data – 10 bit digitizers sample at the frequency of 40 MHz: 4 A-Rx cards, 16 channels each card Pedestal subtraction IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 26. Pedestal subtraction from the signal determined for two chips. The ADC count corresponds to the charge of approx. 450 electrons, thus the signal is of about 50 ADC counts. The noise is of about 2 – 3 ADC counts. [9] DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

LHCb VELO Detector Cross – talk removal Channel re-ordering Common mode suppression Clustering – up to four strips: seeding treshold, inclusion treshold cut. IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum Fig. 27. ADC noise before and after channel reordering in Phi – sensor. [9] Fig. 28. Common noise suppression for signal from each Beetle Chip. DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Beam Diagnostics - Summary Proof of principle measurements indicate that the LHCb VELO is capable to measure proton beams It seems possible to qualitatively estimate the proton beam halo divergence by use of the VELO detector Further studies will investigate into potential correlations between beam current (Faraday CUP) and halo signal (LHCb VELO) The possible use of the VELO detector as a non-invasive method for beam QC will be assessed A concept of the Multilayer Faraday Cup for beam energy and energy spread will be considered based on classical FC simulations followed by MLFC dedicated studies IntRo SC60 QCT FCO LHCb Sum DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011

Thank you Any questions? DITANET International Conference - Seville 9-11.11.2011