Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):6. doi: /17.6.6 Figure Legend:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(9):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Advertisements

From: A unified Bayesian observer analysis for set size and cueing effects on perceptual decisions and saccades Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):27. doi: /
From: Complex interactions between spatial, orientation, and motion cues for biological motion perception across visual space Journal of Vision. 2013;13(2):8.
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(3):24. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(7):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Salience of unique hues and implications for color theory
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(6):10. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(13):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
From: Occlusion-related lateral connections stabilize kinetic depth stimuli through perceptual coupling Journal of Vision. 2009;9(10):20. doi: /
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
From: Subjectively homogeneous noise over written text as a tool to investigate the perceptual mechanisms involved in reading Journal of Vision. 2013;13(11):14.
From: ERP P1-N1 changes associated with Vernier perceptual learning and its location specificity and transfer Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):19. doi: /
From: Breaking object correspondence across saccades impairs object recognition: The role of color and luminance Journal of Vision. 2016;16(11):1. doi: /
From: Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):1. doi: /
From: Spatial attention alleviates temporal crowding, but neither temporal nor spatial uncertainty are necessary for the emergence of temporal crowding.
From: Temporal eye movement strategies during naturalistic viewing
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Illumination assumptions account for individual differences in the perceptual interpretation of a profoundly ambiguous stimulus in the color domain:
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: An escape from crowding
From: Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contextual effects on real bicolored glossy surfaces
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Does spatial invariance result from insensitivity to change?
Figure Legend: From: Comparing integration rules in visual search
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):22. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Low-level awareness accompanies “unconscious” high-level processing during continuous flash suppression Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):3. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?
Figure Legend: From: Gating of remote effects on lightness
From: Maximum likelihood difference scales represent perceptual magnitudes and predict appearance matches Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):1. doi: /
From: Multisensory simultaneity judgment and proximity to the body
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):27. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceptual entrainment of individually unambiguous motions
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(6):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(2):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Cross-modal attention influences auditory contrast sensitivity: Decreasing visual load improves auditory thresholds for amplitude- and frequency-modulated.
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(5):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Latitude and longitude vertical disparities
From: The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Expertise with multisensory events eliminates the effect of biological motion rotation on audiovisual synchrony perception Journal of Vision. 2010;10(5):2.
From: Size-induced distortions in perceptual maps of visual space
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(10):5. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What's color got to do with it
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
From: What predicts the strength of simultaneous color contrast?
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Figure Legend: From: Eidolons: Novel stimuli for vision research
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech ;6(4):5. doi: /tvst Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Motion-induced blindness and microsaccades: Cause and effect
Figure Legend: From: The color constancy of three-dimensional objects
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(9):20. doi: / Figure Legend:
Presentation transcript:

From: Perceptual learning is specific beyond vision and decision making Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):6. doi:10.1167/17.6.6 Figure Legend: During training, participants adjusted the central line of the vertical bisection stimulus to the smallest offset visible either by using the computer mouse (Experiment 5, N = 10) or by using the keyboard buttons (Experiment 6, N = 10). Training in both experiments yield strong improvements of performance (p = 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Before and after training (pre- and posttraining tests), participants performed adjustments with both the mouse and the buttons. In Experiment 5, learning did not transfer to the button adjustment condition (p = 0.059). However, observers showed a high initial performance in the pretraining test that was significantly better for the buttons adjustment condition (blue pre vs. red pre, p = 0.003). In Experiment 6, training transferred significantly to the mouse adjustment condition (p = 0.0014); however, the posttraining performance remained significantly lower for the mouse than for key adjustment condition (post red vs. post blue, p = 0.0086), suggesting that the transfer was partial. Error bars represent ±SEM. Date of download: 10/28/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.