Debris Disk Studies with CCAT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Debris disks with CCAT Jane Greaves: ~2012??
Advertisements

Spitzer IRS Spectroscopy of IRAS-Discovered Debris Disks Christine H. Chen (NOAO) IRS Disks Team astro-ph/
Subaru/Gemini MIR Observations of Warm Debris Disks Hideaki Fujiwara (Subaru Telescope) 1 Collaborators: T. Onaka (U. Tokyo), D. Ishihara (Nagoya U.),
CO imaging surveys of nearby galaxies Nario Kuno Nobeyama Radio Observatory.
Signatures of Planets in Debris Disks A. Moro-Martin 1,2,3, S. Wolf 2, R. Malhotra 4 & G. Rieke 1 1. Steward Observatory (University of Arizona); 2. MPIA.
High-resolution Imaging of Debris Disks Jane Greaves St Andrews University, Scotland.
Detecting the signature of planets at millimeter wavelengths F. Ramos-Stierle, D.H. Hughes, E. L. Chapin (INAOE, Mexico ), G.A. Blake ???
1 Debris Disk Studies with CCAT D. Dowell, J. Carpenter, H. Yorke 2005 October 11.
SMA Observations of the Herbig Ae star AB Aur Nagayoshi Ohashi (ASIAA) Main Collaborators: S.-Y. Lin 1, J. Lim 2, P. Ho 3, M. Momose 4, M. Fukagawa 5 (1.
Stars science questions Origin of the Elements Mass Loss, Enrichment High Mass Stars Binary Stars.
Spitzer Space Telescope Observations of the Fomalhaut Debris Disk Michael Werner, Karl Stapelfeldt, Chas Beichman (JPL); Kate Su, George Rieke, John Stansberry,
STAR FORMATION STUDIES with the CORNELL-CALTECH ATACAMA TELESCOPE Star Formation/ISM Working Group Paul F. Goldsmith (Cornell) & Neal. J. Evans II (Univ.
Comparison of Photometric And Spectroscopic Redshifts.
Circumstellar disk imaging with WFIRST: not just for wide field surveys any more... Tom Greene (NASA ARC) & WFIRST Coronagraph Team AAS / WFIRST Session.
Dusty star formation at high redshift Chris Willott, HIA/NRC 1. Introductory cosmology 2. Obscured galaxy formation: the view with current facilities,
Line Detection Rates for Next Generation IR/Submm Spectroscopic Surveys Eric J. Murphy BLISS/X-Spec Science teams.
Zodiacal Cloud: The Local Circumstellar Disk Sumita Jayaraman.
Exo-planets: ground-based How common are giant planets? What is the distribution of their orbits? –3.6m HARPS: long-term radial velocity monitoring of.
Star Formation Research Now & With ALMA Debra Shepherd National Radio Astronomy Observatory ALMA Specifications: Today’s (sub)millimeter interferometers.
Marginally Resolved Disks with Spitzer Bryden, Stapelfeldt, Tanner, Werner (JPL) Beichman (MSC) Rieke, Trilling, Stansberry, Su, & the MIPS instrument.
A new class of warm debris disks? Rachel Smith, Institute for Astronomy; Mark Wyatt, Abstract.
Multiwavelength Continuum Survey of Protostellar Disks in Ophiuchus Left: Submillimeter Array (SMA) aperture synthesis images of 870 μm (350 GHz) continuum.
Decoding Dusty Debris Disks AAAS, Februrary 2014 David J Wilner Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Doug Johnstone: Former Associate Director JCMT, NRC Herzberg, Univ. Victoria JCMT: Debris Discs and Miscellaneous Sciences.
Extrasolar planets. Detection methods 1.Pulsar timing 2.Astrometric wobble 3.Radial velocities 4.Gravitational lensing 5.Transits 6.Dust disks 7.Direct.
A Systematic Search and Characterization of Dusty Debris Disks M. McElwain, B. Zuckerman (UCLA) Joseph H. Rhee, & I. Song (Gemini Obs.) Photo Credit: T.
Debris Belts Around Vega 0 Topic: Exoplanets Concepts: Infrared observations, debris disks, exoplanet detection, planetary systems Missions: Spitzer, Herschel.
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
Ralf Siebenmorgen MIR on ELT’s The Mid-infrared on ELT’s MIR recommended to be essential (3 – 25µm)
Coronagraphy and Debris Disk Imaging Karl Stapelfeldt JPL/Caltech and KITP.
The JCMT Debris Disk Legacy Survey: the (long) Calm before the Storm Brenda Matthews Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics.
Searching for Brown Dwarf Companions to Nearby Stars Michael W. McElwain, James E. Larkin & Adam J. Burgasser (UC Los Angeles) Background on Brown Dwarfs.
Basic Concepts An interferometer measures coherence in the electric field between pairs of points (baselines). Direction to source Because of the geometric.
Slide 1 (of 18) Circumstellar Disk Studies with the EVLA Carl Melis UCLA/LLNL In collaboration with: Gaspard Duchêne, Holly Maness, Patrick Palmer, and.
Imaging Molecular Gas in a Nearby Starburst Galaxy NGC 3256, a nearby luminous infrared galaxy, as imaged by the SMA. (Left) Integrated CO(2-1) intensity.
Studying Young Stellar Objects with the EVLA
The ε Eridani debris disk Jane Greaves St Andrews, Scotland with Wayne Holland, Mark Wyatt & Bill Dent and cast of thousands...
Forming High Mass Stars Probing the Formation Epoch.
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
Millimeter Observations of the  Pic and AU Mic Debris Disks David J. Wilner Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics NASA/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle S.Andrews,
Ge/Ay133 Can we study extrasolar Kuiper Belts?  Pic, A5V star AU Mic, M1Ve star.
Competitive Science with the WHT for Nearby Unresolved Galaxies Reynier Peletier Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Groningen.
Submillimeter Observations of Debris Disks Wayne Holland UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Royal Observatory Edinburgh With Jane Greaves, Mark Wyatt, Bill.
Cosmic Dust Enrichment and Dust Properties Investigated by ALMA Hiroyuki Hirashita ( 平下 博之 ) (ASIAA, Taiwan)
High Dynamic Range Imaging and Spectroscopy of Circumstellar Disks Alycia Weinberger (Carnegie Institution of Washington) With lots of input from: Aki.
NIR, MIR, & FIR.  Near-infrared observations have been made from ground based observatories since the 1960's  Mid and far-infrared observations can.
Debris Disks - LBTI Phil Hinz University of Arizona.
Protoplanetary and Debris Disks A. Meredith Hughes Wesleyan University.
Circumstellar Disks at 5-20 Myr: Observations of the Sco-Cen OB Association Marty Bitner.
Terrestrial Planet Bombardment & Habitability Jane Greaves St Andrews, Scotland.
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
Studying Nearby Starbursts with HST
Extended debris discs around nearby, Sun-like stars as a probe of disc-planet interactions Astronomical Society of Australia ASM 5th July 2016 Dr. Jonty.
ALMA User Perspective: Galactic Studies
Evidence for a Population of high redshift Submm Galaxies
Young planetary systems
Galaxy Formation and Evolution: Where we are and where we are going.
Gas! Very few debris disks have detected gas, and it is generally only found around the youngest systems. So why should we consider gas here?
CCAT Science and Facility Requirements
The Universe in the Infrared
Spatially Resolved Millimeter Observations of Pre-Main Sequence Binaries Jenny Patience Thanks Merci.
ALMA does Circumstellar Disks
9-10 Aprile Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte
Ge/Ay133 Can we study extrasolar Kuiper Belts?
Welcome to the 4th NAIC-NRAO School on Single Dish Radio Astronomy
Our Milky Way Galaxy.
Mapping Young Stellar Objects in the Galactic Mid-Plane
Polarizing Coronagraph for Circumstellar Dust Observations
Multiplicity among embedded protostars
Cornell-Caltech Atacama Telescope (CCAT)
Presentation transcript:

Debris Disk Studies with CCAT D. Dowell, J. Carpenter, H. Yorke Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech 2006 October 27

Debris Disks with the CCAT Debris disks, a.k.a. “Vega phenomenon”, a.k.a. “extra-zodiacal dust”: solid particles surrounding main sequence stars, especially youngish ones (10-100 Myr), after the gas has been absorbed into giant planets or expelled product of collisional grinding of planetesimals in Kuiper belts probably episodic in nature tracer of orbital dynamics (analogous to Saturn’s rings) CCAT niches high-quality images of statistical sample of nearby disk systems surveys for undiscovered cold disks (T < 40 K) around nearby stars important data points on spectral energy distribution characteristics of particles  evolutionary clues? much better measurement of mass than is possible with scattered light images unbiased surveys for disks in stellar clusters b Pictoris: debris disk discovery image Smith & Terrile (1984) Saturn’s rings: result of the interaction of moons and dust

CCAT fills an important role at 2-100″ scales for nearby disks. Fomalhaut (d = 8 pc) with 10 m telescope at left Debris in an eccentric orbit maintained by a planet (Marsh et al. 2005) Can use super-resolution techniques to “beat” diffraction by a factor of ~2 at l = 350 mm where signal-to-noise is high  2’’ resolution for CCAT at l = 200 and 350 mm ~20 resolution elements (15 AU) across sources such as this Marsh et al. (2005)

Debris disks trace the underlying distribution of planets. The distribution of dust indicates where planets are and what their mass is. Theoretical simulations: We are currently in a situation where better images are needed to identify disk structures in more than a handful of sources. The nearby debris disk systems to be imaged with CCAT are the ones which have the best chance for direct detection of both the dust and the planets (the latter with other facilities). Ozernoy et al. (2000) Wilner et al. (2002)

CCAT can image a statistical sample While only 8 debris disks have resolved structure with existing ~10 m telescopes (most at d < 10 pc), we would expect to resolve 50 with a 25 m telescope. In fact, we can already catalog nearly this many known debris disks to d = 30 pc: UPDATE THIS TALLY?

Effect of larger telescope aperture Going to 25 m aperture is like bringing source 2.5× closer. (Vega at 8 pc; Marsh et al. 2006) Ring structure can be studied in detail. Source at 29 pc with 10 m telescope Central clearing? Asymmetry?

CCAT has plenty of sensitivity to image nearby resolved debris disks With CSO and JCMT, it has been possible to image structures down to: 30 mJy/9” beam at 350 mm  5 mJy/CCAT beam, requiring only a few minutes to detect with CCAT 5 mJy/15” beam at 850 um  2 mJy/CCAT beam, requiring only a few minutes to detect with CCAT Due to telescope surface quality and transmissive atmosphere, CCAT will have a sensitivity advantage, too – not just an angular resolution advantage.

Interferometers like ALMA are likely to miss a lot of the dust Wilner et al. (2002) IRAM 1.3 mm J. Greaves, W. Holland JCMT/SCUBA 850 mm INTERFEROMETERS SHOULD EXCEL AT THE PATTERN ROTATION EXPERIMENTS Comparison of single dish image (left) and interferometer image (right) of the same source with existing ground-based technology. ALMA will make large steps in sensitivity and fidelity compared to present-day interferometers, but may still specialize in small angular scales. CCAT and ALMA maps will jointly identify all major dust structures in these sources.

Importance of Multiple Wavelengths l = 200 mm capability allows measurement of dust temperature in cooler systems Since debris disk grains are large, there are emissivity effects as well through the submillimeter. Interpreted as two orbital populations with different grain size (Marsh et al. 2006) Vega at 850 mm (Greaves & Holland) Vega at 350 mm (Marsh et al. 2006)

CCAT can discover colder disks too faint for Spitzer to have detected Explores outer Kuiper belts (>100 AU) around solar-like stars that are difficult to detect by other means Quantifies debris around lower-luminosity stars d = 50 pc 30 minute integrations, except Spitzer shorter/typical Herschel confusion noise dominated (15 mJy)

Removing Pollution of Submillimeter Galaxies Parts of the disks, or background galaxies? CCAT will be good at identifying background sources through their intensity profile, color, and presence/absence of redshifted emission lines. b Pic at 850 mm (Holland et al. 1998) e Eri at 850 mm (Greaves et al. 2005) h Crv at 850 mm (Wyatt et al. 2005)

Gas Emission Dust debris disks around main sequence stars – especially older ones – have been cleared of CO by photodissociation, so they are not easy targets for submillimeter spectroscopy. However, there are some detections (see Dent et al. 2005 for recent summary), and due to the importance of getting dynamical information, deeper searches should be made with CCAT, including new molecular species.

Unbiased Surveys of Open Clusters for Debris Disks Are Challenging M47: d = 450 pc, 100 Myr Gorlova et al. (2004) – attempt at this with Spitzer 7 dust-excess candidates at 24 mm (T > 50 K) NONE at 70 mm

With very large detector arrays, CCAT can survey stellar clusters efficiently. Can survey 1°×1° clusters to 4s = 0.2 mJy depth at 350 mm in 200 hr, assuming filled 20′×20′ field of view Confusion noise from background galaxies plays a role, and <25 m telescopes are insufficient at this wavelength. Can detect at 5s: e Eri-like debris disks to 130 pc (e.g., Pleiades, 100 Myr) 2× e Eri disks to 180 pc (M44 = Beehive, 700 Myr) Fomalhaut-like disks to 500 pc (e.g., NGC 752, 1100 Myr) Only a weak temperature bias in submillimeter (flux  T) CCAT can: derive debris disk lifetime from detection statistics provide target list for ALMA

Flow from Science to Technical Requirements First-light debris disk science with CCAT: Images of disks around nearby stars 25 m aperture plus operation at 200 mm and 350 mm (Provides 2″ angular resolution in part of spectrum complementary to Herschel at 60 mm, initial ALMA bands, and even larger mm telescopes.) >30% aperture efficiency (Disks are faint, and image fidelity is key.) Background-limited/high quantum efficiency detectors with at least 2′×2′ field of view. (Disks are faint and extended.) Nyquist sampled focal plane (No compromise in angular resolution; 3× reduction in time to map extended disks compared to 2l/D feedhorn arrays.) Longer-term debris disk science with CCAT: Efficient surveying for unknown debris disks in Galactic open clusters. Entire focal plane filled with detectors As large an aperture as possible to reduce confusion noise