The Caltech Core-Collapse Program (CCCP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rencontre de Monriond 2006 SNLS 1st year cosmological results SNLS : Cosmological results from the first year dataset Dominique Fouchez, CPPM Marseille.
Advertisements

Pair-Instability Explosions: observational evidence Avishay Gal-Yam, Weizmann Institute Nikko 2012.
Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University.
The Physics of Supernovae
Chelsea Braun Credit: Artist illustration ESO, content/uploads/2006/12/ supernova.jpg.
Supernovae Josefine Selj, Dmitry Sharapov, Auni Somero, Linda Östman supervisor: Jesper Sollerman NORDFORSK Summer School on Observational Astrophysics.
The Flavours of SN II Light Curves Iair (“ya-eer”) Arcavi Advisor: Avishay Gal-Yam.
From Progenitor to Afterlife Roger Chevalier SN 1987AHST/SINS.
Supernovae from Massive Stars: light curves and spectral evolution Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
CLASH: Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble ACS Parallels WFC3 Parallels 6 arcmin. = 2.2 z=0.5 Footprints of HST Cameras: ACS FOV in.
The Lick Observatory Supernova Search (LOSS) and Follow-up Program Alex Filippenko Department of Astronomy University of California, Berkeley (with W.
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Optical I: Big Apertures Geoff Bower.
Supernovae Historically: “new stars” in sky Seen in 1006, 1054, 1181, 1572, 1604, 1680 SN 1054 visible in daytime sky for many months (Chinese records)
GRBs as a Probe of the Elemental Abundance History of the Universe D. Q. Lamb (U. Chicago) Workshop on Chemical Enrichment of the Early Universe Santa.
1 SDSS-II Supernova Survey Josh Frieman Leopoldina Dark Energy Conference October 8, 2008 See also: poster by Hubert Lampeitl, talk by Bob Nichol.
Observed properties of SN From Woosley Lecture 16 See also Filippenko (1997; ARAA 35, 309) See also
A Broader Perspective on the GRB-SN Connection Alicia M. Soderberg Caltech Schramm Symposium, Dec
Radio studies of mysterious Type IIn supernovae Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Collaborators:
Natalie RoeSNAP/SCP Journal Club “Identification of Type Ia Supernovae at Redshift 1.3 and Beyond with the Advanced Camera for Surveys on HST” Riess, Strolger,
Weidong Li Jesse Leaman Alex Filippenko Department of Astronomy University of California, Berkeley Nearby Supernova Rates from the Lick Observatory Supernova.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
Science Update: SN2011fe in M101 (Pinwheel Galaxy) Peter Nugent (LBNL/UCB)
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Recent results on supernova cosmology Bruno Leibundgut.
IAS, June 2008 Caty Pilachowski. Visible in the Southern Sky Listed in Ptolemy's catalog Discovered by Edmond Halley in 1677 –non-stellar –"luminous spot.
Supernova cosmology: legacy and future Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
ASIAANTUPHYS CosPA Seminar May 28, Supernovae and Acceleration of the Universe A journal club K. Y. Lo.
SNLS-03D3bb Andy Howell University of Toronto and the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS)
Precise Cosmology from SNe Ia Wang Xiao-feng Physics Department and Tsinghua Center for Astrophysics, Tsinghua University 2005, 9, 22, Sino-French Dark.
Supernova study with BATC Sky Survey Wang Xiao-feng Physics Department and Tsinghua Center for Astrophysics, Tsinghua University 2005, 8, 12, Weihai.
SN Ia rates and progenitors Mark Sullivan University of Southampton.
Hunting youngest Type Ia SNe in the intermediate Palomar Transient Factory Yi Cao (Caltech) On behalf of the intermediate Palomar Transient Factory collaboration.
Spectroscopic signatures of SN Ia progenitors A talk not about the Palomar Transient Factory Avishay Gal-Yam, Weizmann Institute of Science Leiden workshop.
The Transient Sky Eran Ofek CALTECH Shri Kulkarni Arne Rau Mansi Kasliwal Brian Cameron Avishay Gal-Yam Dale Frail Collaborators:
Ay 123 Lecture 11 - Supernovae & Neutron Stars Timescales for HS Burning faster and faster..
Radio and X-ray observations of SN 2009ip Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics January 4, 2013 Collaborators: Raffaella Margutti (Harvard),
Are Stellar Eruptions a Common Trait of SNe IIn? Baltimore, MD 06/29/11 Ori Fox NPP Fellow NASA Goddard Based on arXiv:
The SN Ia Rate In 0.5
Searching High-z Supernovae with HSC and WFMOS
Smartt, S. J. (2009). Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae. doi: /annurev-astro
Dynamic Andromeda: Novae and Variable Stars in M31 Yi Cao 2 nd year graduate at Caltech On Behalf of the Palomar Transient Factory collaboration.
The Exceptional GRB/XRF and its Associated SN 2006aj Jinsong Deng National Astronomical Observatories of China.
Study of the type IIP supernova 2008gz Roy et al. 2011, MNRAS accepted.
1 The progenitor stars of core-collapse supernovae Stephen J. Smartt Astrophysics Research Centre Queen’s University Belfast Queen’s SNe & Massive star.
IFU studies of GRBs and SNe regions Lise Christensen (Excellence Cluster Universe, Technical University Munich) + Maryam Modjaz (NY), + Christina Thoene.
1 Observations of Cosmic Explosions Review, and results from the Palomar Transient Factory Avishay Gal-Yam | Weizmann Institute of Science Avishay Gal-Yam.
SUSHIES Giorgos Leloudas Weizmann Institute of Science & Dark Cosmology Centre.
Modest Obscured Star-Formation Rates Inferred from EVLA Observations of Dark GRB Host Galaxies Daniel A. Perley (Caltech), Richard A. Perley (NRAO) We.
Sesto Workshop Daniel Perley Keck Observations of GRB Host Galaxies Keck Observations of 150 GRB Host Galaxies Daniel Perley +Joshua Bloom,
Single versus Binary Star Progenitors of Type IIb Supernovae
The monitoring of supernovae with the 6-meter telescope of SAO RAS
A Survey of Starburst Galaxies An effort to help understand the starburst phenomenon and its importance to galaxy evolution Megan Sosey & Duilia deMello.
A photometric method to classify high-z supernovae found with HSC
Keck Observations of Two Supernovae Hours After Explosion Shock-Breakout Flash Spectroscopy as a New Window into the Evolution and Death of Massive Stars.
“Dark” GRB in a Dusty Massive Galaxy at z ~ 2
The most powerful explosions in the Universe
Mid-infrared Observations of Aged Dusty Supernovae
DVU, Playa de Carmen, Mexico Dec. 12, 2017
Ay 123: Supernovae contd...
Just What is a Supernova?
RADIO EMISSION FROM SNe & GRBs, AND THE NEED FOR SKA
GRB-Supernova observations: State of the art
Supersoft X-ray sources in M31
Peculiar Extinction Laws observed for Type Ia Supernovae
Just What is a Supernova?
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
The supernova zoo HUJI winter school #35
Single Vs binary star progenitors of Type Iib Sne
Midwest Workshop on SUPernovae and TRansients Niharika Sravan
Presentation transcript:

The Caltech Core-Collapse Program (CCCP) Avishay Gal-Yam The Benoziyo Center for Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute off Science, Israel

CCCP executive committee CCCP Team CCCP executive committee Avishay Gal-Yam (PI) Brad Cenko Dave Sand Derek Fox Dae-Sik Moon Doug Leonard Alicia Soderberg

Outline The CCCP Project Motivations Type II SNe Limitations Future prospects and PTF

The CCCP: A large observational program designed to: Observe a well-defined complete sample of core-collapse SNe: every young (<30 days after last non-detection at discovery) core-collapse (via spectroscopy or phototyping) SN, above 18.5 mag, visible from Palomar Collect homogeneous optical photometry (P60), multi-epoch spectroscopy (P200, Keck), IR SEDs (P200) Characterize the CC SN population Test viability of SNe II-P for cosmology Provide well studied sample of Ib/c SNe as comparison for high-z GRB studies Support other SN studies at Caltech and in general

CCCP – First Results 50 SNe observed SN 2004dh II-P SN 2004fc II SN 2005Y SN 2005bf Ib/c SN 2004dk Ib SN 2004fe Ic SN 2005Z SN 2005bp SN 2004dn SN 2004ff SN 2005aa SN 2005bw SN 2004dr SN 2004fx SN 2005ab SN 2005bx IIn SN 2004du SN 2004ge SN 2005ad SN 2005by SN 2004eb IIb SN 2004gq SN 2005an SN 2005ci SN 2004ek SN 2004gt SN 2005ap SN 2005cl SN 2004em SN 2004gv SN 2005ar SN 2005cp SN 2004er SN 2005E SN 2005au SN 2005cs SN 2004et SN 2005H SN 2005ay SNF0630 Quest_SN1 SN 2005O SN 2005az SN 2005db SN 2004ex SN 2005U SN 2005ba SN 2005dp Total 49 36 13 SN 2005ds Additional CCCP would-be’s: SN 2004gk SN 2004gy 50 SNe observed >5000 photometric points, >200 spectra, ~150 IR points Main observing phase complete. Reference and calibrations in progress

Motivations (1): Constraining SN models Red Supergiant Blue Late W-R (C, O) Early W-R (He, N) Massive Binaries Luminous Variables SN 1987A (faint, slow) Type II-P Type IIL/IIb (little H) Type Ic (He) GRB/XRF Type Ib (H, He) Type IIn (dense CSM) Initial conditions: stars Theory Observations End product: supernova Observations Model

From Observations to Explosion Physics: the Progenitor – SN Map Red Supergiant Type II-P 0.5’’ a b c 1997 2005 2007 Gal-Yam & Leonard 2008 Blue Supergiant SN 1987A (faint, slow) Type IIn (dense CSM) LBV ( Car) SN 2005gl Gal-Yam et al. 2007, 2008 Late W-R (WN) Type IIL/IIb (little H) Early W-R (WC/WO) Type Ib (H, He) Massive Binaries Type Ic (He) Data from Van Dyk, Li, Filippenko et al.; Smartt, Hendry, Maund et al.; Gal-Yam & CCCP et al.

Motivations (2): Rates (esp. at high-z) Typical properties (peak mag, color curve) of CC SNe a major missing ingredient (starting with Dahlen et al. 1999, Sullivan et al. 2000, up to Weidong Li’s talk) Need to: classify SNe Convert counts to rates

What’s missing on the SN side? Self consistent classification Typical properties (and their dispersion) for each class Relative fractions

Why not a catalog sample? In a sample of SNe Ib/c from the literature: SN 1991D: “The exceptionally bright Type Ib supernova 1991D” (Benetti et al. 2002) SN 1992ar: “The Luminous Type Ic Supernova 1992ar at z=0.145” (Clocchiatti et al. 2002) SN 1997ef: “A hypernova model for the peculiar type Ic supernova 1997ef” (Nomoto et al. 1999) And similar others, including SN 1999as, among the brightest SN ever (6/13 obviously biased)

22 SNe II from CCCP (extended): Do SNe spectroscopically similar to SN 1999em (II-P prototype) always have a plateau Are supernovae not similar to 1999em always non-plateau? What do SNe IIn look like

Guessing game (1) SN 2005an:

Guessing game (2) SN 2005au:

Classical II-Ps:

Peculiar II-Ps

SN 2004ek: a peculiar SN II

SN 2004cs, SN 2004ex: type IIb

Type IIn

A Look at Type II SNe 22 events with good data 12(14)(15)(18) II-P Photo type Spec type Reference/comments SN 2004A P II-P Hendry et al. 2006 SN 2004cs L IIb Rajala et al. 2005 SN 2004dh Nugent et al. 2006 SN 2004dr II SN 2004du SN 2004ek pec SN 2004em P-pec SN 2004er SN 2004et Li et al. 2005 SN 2004ex Gal-Yam et al. 2007 SN 2004fc SN 2004fx Hamuy et al. 2006 SN2005an II (similar to 99em) (preliminary, 1 of 3 spectra) SN2005au IIb (weak) (preliminary, 1 of 4 spectra) SN2005ay Tsvetkov et al. 2006; Gal-Yam et al. 2008; Bufano et al. 2008 SN 2005ba (preliminary, 1 of 2 spectra) SN 2005bw SN 2005ci SN 2005cl “P” IIn SN 2005cp SN 2005cs Li et al. 2006; Pastorello et al. 2006; Tsvetkov et al. 2006 … SN 2005db A Look at Type II SNe 22 events with good data 12(14)(15)(18) II-P 2/3 IIb (and counting) 4 II-L (inc. 2 IIb) 3 IIn

Some conclusions: Both light curve and multi-epoch spectroscopy are essential SNe II-P appear to constitute a large fraction of SNe II and core-collapse events in total (~50%) BTW, f(8<M<15 / 8<M<150) = 57% (for Salpeter IMF) SNe II-L appear to exist (photo-L, spectroscopically non b/n) but are rare CCCP was too small! You really need x10 more of the same

The population of SNe Ib/c Gal-Yam et al. 2006 Soderberg et al. in prep.

Cosmology with SNe II-P Nugent et al. 2006; Leonard+ in prep

CCCP data also used in: Rajala et al. 2005 (phototyping) Gal-Yam et al. 2005 (the progenitor of SN 2004gt) Nugent et al. 2006 (II-P) Leonard et al. 2006 (spectropolarimetry of SN 2004dj, Nature) Hendry et al. 2006 (the progenitor of type II-P SN 2004A) Gal-Yam et al. 2007, 2008 (progenitor of SN 2005gl

What Next? Phase I: reference frames, calibration Phase II: taking advantage of this well-defined sample of SNe to study: Environment (high resolution imaging with Keck-LGS, HST) H imaging (where possible) to measure distances to HII regions Local metallicity from nearby HII regions (high resolution spectroscopy)

What is missing? CCCP is dominated by KAIT-discovered objects, and is therefore limited to the bright-galaxy population At high-z, low mass, high SFR galaxies will be important Core-collapse SNe in small galaxies ARE DIFFERENT Need a “blind” survey

Core Collapse Supernovae: something new? Most nearby SNe are found in targeted searches of luminous galaxies Blind surveys find new types of supernovae in faint hosts. New SNe? Pilot projects (SNF) give interesting clues … PTF will provide 75(10) CC SNe in hosts with <LMC(<SMC) metallicities

The PTF There is nothing like searching, if you want to find something. You usually find something, if you search, but it is not always quite the something you were after. Thorin Oakenshild

Thanks!

SN 2004dr: a type II-L SN