First VarSITI General Symposium June 6-10, 2016, Albena, Bulgaria

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Advertisements

Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Non-Equilibrium Ionization Modeling of the Current Sheet in a Simulated Solar Eruption Chengcai Shen Co-authors: K. K. Reeves, J. C. Raymond, N. A. Murphy,
1 Diagnostics of Solar Wind Processes Using the Total Perpendicular Pressure Lan Jian, C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling How does the magnetic structure.
Characterization of Coronal Mass Ejection Deflection using Coronagraph Image Sequences Jenna L. Zink, GMU Undergraduate Research Scholars Program, Rebekah.
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Thermal, Nonthermal, and Total Flare Energies Brian R. Dennis RHESSI Workshop Locarno, Switzerland 8 – 11 June, 2005.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Spectroscopy Department Lebedev Physical Institute Moscow Solar Extreme Events: Fundamental Science and Applied Aspects (SEE-2005) International Symposium.
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
Relation between Type II Bursts and CMEs Inferred from STEREO Observations N. Gopalswamy, W. Thompson, J. Davila, M. Kaiser NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Case Studies of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections – Different Phases of the Cycle Of particular interest to the.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Solar Cycle Trends and Case Studies of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections During Different Phases of the Cycle.
The Sun.
Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.
Lessons Learnt from SOHO: CME Onsets CME Properties: to kg km/s Average span 45 o Significance: - Coronal evolution - Space weather.
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
SOHO-20 “Transient events on the Sun and In the Heliosphere” – August 28, 2008, Ghent SOHO-20 “Transient events on the Sun and In the Heliosphere” – August.
POST CME EVENTS: COOL JETS AND CURRENT SHEET EVOLUTION A. Bemporad, G. Poletto, S. T. Suess IAU Symposium 226 Coronal and Stellar Mass Ejections September.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
KASI Low atmospheric reconnections associated with an eruptive flare Yong-Jae Moon(1), Jongchul Chae(2), Young-Deuk Park(1) 1: Korea Astronomy and.
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
Long Term Measurements of Solar Wind Fe Charge States Mark Popecki, A. Galvin, L. M. Kistler,H. Kucharek, E. Moebius, K. Simunac, P. Bochsler, L. M. Blush,
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Origins of Solar Minimum CMEs with ICMEs Yan Li 1 B. J. Lynch 1, J. G. Luhmann 1, A. Thernisien 2, A. Vourlidas 2, E. Kilpua 3, L. Jian 4, A. B. Gavin.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
Xie – STEREO SWG – Dublin – March 2010 Low Mass Coronal Mass Ejections Missed by STEREO A/B or LASCO and Associated ICMEs H. Xie 1,2, O. C. St. Cyr 2,
Variability of the Heliospheric Magnetic Flux: ICME effects S. T. Lepri, T. H. Zurbuchen The University of Michigan Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic,
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
Manuela Temmer Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Austria Tutorial: Coronal holes and space weather consequences.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
CME rate: 1/3 (4) day -1 at solar min (max) [LASCO CME catalogue. Yahsiro et al., 2005] |B| at 1 AU: 5 (8) nT at solar min (max) [OMNI data] D (fraction.
Our Star, the Sun Chapter Eighteen. Guiding Questions 1.What is the source of the Sun’s energy? 2.What is the internal structure of the Sun? 3.How can.
Poster X4.137 Solar Wind Trends in the Current Solar Cycle (STEREO Observations) A.B. Galvin* 1, K.D.C. Simunac 2, C. Farrugia 1 1.Space Science Center,
SPIRIT observations of the Sun in 175 Å and scientific tasks for SWAP&LYRA V. Slemzin P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow.
A joint study of the University of Göttingen (1) and Astrium (2)
Sun: General Properties
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
SLIDE SHOW 6. SOLAR WIND (Mariner 2, 1962)
Evolution of solar wind structures between Venus and Mars orbits
Investigations of CME in muon flux detected in hodoscopic mode
N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, P. Mäkelä, S. Yashiro, I. Usoskin
Consequences of the Anomalous Expansion of CMEs in Solar Cycle 24
Solar Flare Energy Partition into Energetic Particle Acceleration
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Forecasting the arrival time of the CME’s shock at the Earth
How does the solar atmosphere connect to the inner heliosphere?
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
Alexei Struminsky1,2  1 Space Research Institute
Relative abundances of quiet-time suprathermal ions at 1 AU
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
Forbush and GCRDs First rigorous experimental observation of Cosmic Ray Flux Decrease was obtained by S. E. Forbush in , after deep statisitcal.
The properties of CMEs embedded in extreme solar wind
Correlation between halo coronal mass ejections
-Short Talk- The soft X-ray characteristics of solar flares, both with and without associated CMEs Kay H.R.M., Harra L.K., Matthews S.A., Culhane J.L.,
Astronomy notes for Phys/Geog 182
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
A STUDY OF THE KINEMATIC EVOLUTION OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS J
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Presentation transcript:

First VarSITI General Symposium June 6-10, 2016, Albena, Bulgaria Identification of coronal origins of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections using plasma ion composition data V.Slemzin 1, D.Rodkin 1, F. Goryaev1, Yu.Shugay 2, I.Veselovsky 2, 3 1 P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia 2 Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 3 Space Research Institute (IKI) RAS, Moscow, Russia

Goals of the study Statistical analysis parameters of ICMEs and spontaneous solar activity in Cycle 24. Comparison with that of Cycle 23. Formation of the event list for Cycle 24 containing parameters of ICMEs including ion composition data and parameters of associated CMEs and flares. Development of a model to predict the ICME ion charge states based on parameters of their coronal sources. 2

Data catalogs for Cycle 24 used in the study ICME: Richardson&Cane list http://www.srl.caltech.edu/ACE/ASC/DATA/level3/icmetable2.htm 1996 – 2016 (ref R&C) Hess&Zhang GMU list http://solar.gmu.edu/heliophysics/index.php/GMU_CME/ICME_List 2007 – 2015 (ref GMU) CME: CACTUS (COR 2 STEREO-A, B, LASCO) http://sidc.oma.be/cactus/ 2007 - 2016 CDAW LASCO http://cdaw.gsfc.nasa.gov/CME_list/index.html 1996 - 2016 Flares: Solar Demon http://solardemon.oma.be/ May 2010 – c.t. SPHINX flare catalog http://156.17.94.1/sphinx_l1_catalogue/SphinX_cat_main.html Feb – Nov 2009 GOES X-ray flares ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/STP/space-weather/solar-data/solar-features/solar-flares/x-rays/goes/xrs/ ACE/SWICS ion charge state data for Cycle 24 The analyzed period No data 09.11 – 06.12 3

Statistics of ICMEs and solar activity in Cycle 24 Сorrelations between year numbers of events Cycle 24 ICME-CME 0.49 ICME-Flares 0.56 Cycle 23 ICME-CME 0.68 ICME-Flares 0.74 R&C: 169 ICMEs, 133 MC(78%); GMU: 65 ICMEs, 47 MC R&C: 307 ICMEs, 196 MC (63%) 15422 CME, 13085 flares 11904 CME, 22691 flares 4

ICME types and geoefficiency in Cycle 24 (GMU list) MC – 70% (negative) Total 65 ICMEs MC – 47 events 5

Ion charge state distributions in ICMEs at 2010-2012 C6/C5 O7/O6 QFe 1 – MC 2 – MC+SH 3 - +CIR 4 – SH 5 - +flank CME 6 – ICME like 7 – range for 23d cycle (Gopalswamy et al. 2013; von Steiger Springer book, 2008) parameter Min-max (non-MC) Min-max (MC) Cyc 23 range Vp 310-660 270-680 360-490 QFe 9.37- 15.1 8.27– 15.69 >12 C6/C5 0.21 – 3.14 0.13 – 12.38 3 - 12 O7/O6 0.16 – 1.43 0.06 – 1.84 0.6 – 1.2 Fe/O 0.15 – 0.44 0.12 - 0.90 >0.24 The temperature-dependent parameters QFe, C6/C5 and O7/O8 in Cycle 24 vary in larger limits than in Cycle 23 due to values in minimum of Cycle 24 were lower. Max values were well correspond to that of Cycle 23. 6

Identification of ICME’s coronal sources Dst Ballistic approximation Transit time LSE / <VCME> ± 12h MacNeice et al. Space Weather, 2011 Calculated time slots for CMEs and flares: 3 flares and CMEs from AR 11261 Partial halo Halo Halo 7

Selection of the associated CMEs and flares CME selection procedure: STA - CME at East limb STB – CME at West limb Simultaneous appearance within 1h Latitudinal contours should cross the equatorial plane Coronal sources of ICMEs of August 5 – 6, 2011 CME: Stereo-A 02.08 06:36UT STB 03.08 14:00UT LASCO 04.08 04:12UT 2016 2009 2010 2011 2012 Flares: 02.08 05:19-06:48 M14 03.08 13:17-14:10 M60 04.08 03:41-04:04 M93 211 A M1 M6 M9 Flare selection procedure: Peak <1h before the CME 8

ICME/source list for 2010-2012 Total ICME 79 ICME/CME 68 (86% identified) ICME/CME/Flare 30 for MC 25 Comparison with GMU ICME list of Phillip Hess & Jie Zhang for 2010 – 2012 From 33 ICME events 15 identifications coincide, 18 events are absent in R&C, 46 events absent in GMU list Content of the extended ICME/source list ICME CME Flares (GOES) MC id all parameters from R&C list dt STA, STB dt peak Min/max, average C6/C5, O7/O6, Qfe Vcme STA, STB flare class, max flux Min/max Fe/O Pa STA, STB pw STA, STB 9

Development of a model to predict the ICME ion charge states using coronal source parameters Flare 08/02 05:19 - 06:48UT GOES temperature of the flare Initial data for modeling: Ne, Te = f(R,t) V(R,t), dV/dt atomic constants (recombination, ionization) plasma condition – LTE Time Teff , MK ne , cm^(-3) 05:32 9.12 1.53E9 05:44 7.31 2.48E9 05:50 7.19 2.40E9 Diagnostics by EUV lines of AIA Kinematics Loops 4-5 10

Basic principles of the model 0 0.1 0.3 1 5 10 100 Earth Distance from the solar surface, Rsun Sun Ne ~5.108 cm -3 5.106 2.104 101 EUV observations conductive cooling radiative cooling expansion cooling (adiabatic) rec >> exp Te~ 3 MK 2 MK 1.5MK maxQFe=16 15 13 recomb < exp Collisionless plasma acceleration loop rize- up CME seen in coronagraph ICME 11 LTE Freeze-in region heating?

Simulation of the ICME of 5-6 August 2011 Ne(0.1R)= 3.109 cm-3 V CME =711 km/s In situ <Qfe> ≈ 13 12

Variation of the ICME ion charge state due to interaction of transient and high-speed flows in the corona ICME1 Recurrent HSS from CH ICME2 Vp |B| Np AR 1514 Disappearance of an ICME signatures due to interaction of transient flow with HSS from CH AR far from CH AR close to CH AR 1493 13

Decrease of ion charge state due to interaction between flows in the corona ICME1 ICME2 14

Conclusions Analysis of statistics of ICME and sporadic solar activity events in 2007-2016 has shown that the year frequency of ICMEs in Cycle 24 is in 40% lower than in Cycle 23. The total number of CMEs is higher, the number of X-ray flares is lower in Cycle 24 than in Cycle 23. Correlation of the ICMEs year frequencies with that of CMEs and flares in Cycle 24 decreased. In Cycle 24 the range between minimum and maximum numbers of peak values for the temperature-dependent ion charge ratios <C6/C5>, <O7/O6> and <QFe> in ICMEs are wider than in Cycle 23 due to extremely weak solar minimum between Cycles 23 and 24. From 79 ICMEs contained in the R&C ICME list for the period 2010-2012, 68 events have been associated with CMEs from which 55 events were associated with flares (25 MC and 30 non- MC). The ion charge state parameters for these cases have been analyzed. The R&C ICME list for 2010-2012 (68 events) has been supplemented with the ion charge state data and parameters of the identified coronal sources (CMEs and flares). 15

5. The theoretical model of forming the ICME ion charge state for minor ions (O,C, Fe) in the corona has been developed. For several tested events estimations by the model are well agreed with measurements. 6. The temperature-dependent ICME ion parameters O7+/O6+ and QFe occurred to be well correlated with the flare flux which confirms their dependence on the source conditions included into the model. The found dependences are similar to that found earlier in Cycle 23. 7. When the parent active region responsible for the CME is located nearby a CH, interaction of the transient flow with HSS flow from CH may influence on signatures of ICME. This effect can be produced by inclination of CME (Gopalswamy et al. 2009) or reconnection between magnetic fields of AR and CH followed by mixture of their plasma fluxes. 16

Thank you for your attention Solar transient in the Miracle book. XVI century