The Athena SWAN Charter – what you need to know

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Womens Advancement Initiative Sarah Hawkes Scheme Coordinator, WAI PhD Student, Department of Psychological Medicine.
Advertisements

University of Oxford People Strategy – April 2014.
Athena SWAN Charter: what it is and how it helps promote gender equality.
What is Athena SWAN? Dr Sarah Bailey (Chair of Athena SWAN Implementation Committee (ASIC))
Student Focus Claire Worland, NDM Athena SWAN Coordinator
Sue Couling The Department of Chemistry. The University awards Departmental key targets Implementation and Benefits The Department of Chemistry.
Imperial College Londonsdfgafgafga 1 NHLI Athena SWAN - Update 9 October 2012 Professor Clare Lloyd.
Heriot Watt University Athena SWAN Open Session 28 March 2013.
The Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science and the Equality Duty Sarah Dickinson 28 March 2012.
Athena SWAN QUB School of Pharmacy ½ Day Meeting 26 th Sept 2013.
1 Leadership Development Opportunities for Tenured Faculty Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Center for Faculty.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
Centre for Women in Science and Engineering Research (WiSER) Trinity College Dublin.
Athena SWAN Charter James Lush Athena SWAN Adviser Equality Challenge Unit.
Graham Findlay Positive Action for Disability Manager, Chartered Institute of Housing.
Athena SWAN 10th Anniversary workshop July Athena SWAN: pre-May 2015 =Recognition scheme of excellence in women’s employment in STEMM =2005:10 founder.
ECU Gender Equality Charter Mark (GEM) Sandra Beaufoy.
Athena SWAN University College Cork, April 2015 Dr Ruth Gilligan – Athena SWAN Adviser.
Enhancing Research Staff Careers Research Staff Development at the University of Bristol 22 September Dr Alison Leggett, Head of Academic Staff.
Research Staff Support Dr Laura Hodsdon Researcher Development Officer 30/10/2015.
Defining an excellent research culture: Gender, diversity, equality and the Athena SWAN Charter Dr Ruth E Gilligan, Athena SWAN Manager RENU workshop,
What is Athena SWAN? Dr Sarah Bailey (Chair of Athena SWAN Implementation Committee (ASIC)
Staff Survey Results Research Excellence Framework All Staff Open Meeting Monday 23 February 2015.
Athena SWAN and Good Practice Sarah Dickinson Athena SWAN Manager, ECU.
Inside out: Dr Kate Carruthers Thomas Research Fellow/Project Manager Using research to inform higher education policy and practice SRHE/OFFA Seminar Series.
Demonstrating Good People Management Practices in Research Presenters: Helen Wells Maria Pervaiz Dr. Jane Cahill Rob Butler Research and Innovation Support.
Business School Action for the career development of academic women Simonetta Manfredi, Centre for Diversity Policy Research Oxford Brookes University.
Professor Fiona Beveridge Following the Money Executive Pro-Vice-Chancellor – Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences.
Leadership selection and succession Leadership Selection and Succession “More transparency, less politics, clear reward…” Prepared by: Chris Chappell and.
‘The under-representation of women threatens the goals of science in achieving excellence, as well as being wasteful and unjust’ - European Commission,
Human Resources division
Introduction The CIPD Advancing the HR and L &D profession in Ireland
Researching Gender Equality
Part #3 Beyond Bias and Barriers
Science in Australia Gender Equity (SAGE) Pilot of the Athena SWAN Charter - Update A./Prof. Kay Latham, RMIT University Lead Contact 22nd August 2016.
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
UCL HUMAN RESOURCES DISABILITY STANDARD
MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES
DIT Athena SWAN Process
Building momentum towards inclusive teaching and learning:
Equality and Diversity in Research
Athena Swan at Liverpool Hope
Warwick’s Athena Journey
School of Science and Sport Athena Swan Bronze Award Application
Equality and Diversity Plan - Progress and next steps
Health Education England Workforce Strategy - Key Points
SHIFT GEAR MAINSTREAMING GENDER INTO ACADEMIC & RESEARCH ORGANISATIONS
WRES The Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) was introduced in 2015 to support a consistent approach across the NHS in tackling workforce race inequality.
Athena SWAN departmental applications November 2017
Practical Ways to Change Workplace Culture
Workforce Race Equality in the NHS
REF 2021 Briefing 25 January 2018.
SAGE Athena SWAN Pilot Communication Pack 1
Athena SWAN Getting Started and the Departmental Application Process
Athena SWAN Getting Started and the Departmental Application Process
How can ECU’s Race Equality Charter tackle degree awarding rates
Health Education England Workforce Strategy - Key Points
What do we do? FMS Equality, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Team
SAGE Athena SWAN Pilot Communication Pack 2
Institutional Athena SWAN Renewal
Webinar on Equality Impact Assessments in REF 2021
What do we do? FMS Equality, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Team
Engaging Faculty in Enhancing and Supporting
REF and research funding update
The Athena SWAN Charter and Recent Developments
Understanding Impact Stephanie Seavers, Impact Manager.
The role of the UK HEI Impact “officer” pre- and post REF….
GENDER PAY GAP REPORT 2018.
Building momentum towards inclusive teaching and learning:
Presentation transcript:

The Athena SWAN Charter – what you need to know Dr Sam Riches, Lancaster University Athena SWAN Lead. sam.riches@lancaster.ac.uk Presented to Lancaster University Athena SWAN Forum, 11 July 2017

The fundamentals… what is University policy on AS? The university’s new EDI Strategic Vision 2020 includes, as a strategic objective, that FASS departments should gain Athena SWAN Bronze awards in 2017-18. Objectives were set via consultation with faculty deans and other senior figures. ob

Why do we need Athena SWAN? To promote and support gender equality in HE To tackle existing inequalities, such as underrepresentation of women at senior levels For practical reasons, for example to secure future research funding

Gender bias in academia and elsewhere Research has shown that: Job references describe men in terms of their ability but women in terms of their work ethic (goo.gl/ZXg5Tj) References for women emphasise the ‘wrong’ skills, such as ability to balance family life and research. References for men rarely mention these issues (goo.gl/egFS5a) Women are described as ‘helpful’ or ‘kind’, while men are described as ‘ambitious’ and ‘independent’ (goo.gl/QuTv0s)

Gender bias (2) In teaching assessments by students of all gender identities, men are described in terms such as ‘charismatic’ or ‘brilliant’, while women are described as ‘bossy’ or ‘helpful’. The term ‘shrill’ is only ever used of women, and only ever used negatively (goo.gl/d5u3Li) Women are seen as competent or likeable but not both (goo.gl/VElYf4) Work assumed to be by men is consistently judged to be superior to that assumed to be by women, by both men and women (goo.gl/ok1Dn1)

The Athena SWAN principles 1. We acknowledge that academia cannot reach its full potential unless it can benefit from the talents of all. 2. We commit to advancing gender equality in academia, in particular, addressing the loss of women across the career pipeline and the absence of women from senior academic, professional and support roles. 3. We commit to addressing unequal gender representation across academic disciplines and professional and support functions. In this we recognise disciplinary differences including: - the relative underrepresentation of women in senior roles in arts, humanities, social sciences, business and law (AHSSBL) - the particularly high loss rate of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine (STEMM)

The Athena SWAN principles (2) 4. We commit to tackling the gender pay gap. 5. We commit to removing the obstacles faced by women, in particular, at major points of career development and progression including the transition from PhD into a sustainable academic career. 6. We commit to addressing the negative consequences of using short-term contracts for the retention and progression of staff in academia, particularly women. 7. We commit to tackling the discriminatory treatment often experienced by trans people. Rob

The Athena SWAN principles (3) 8. We acknowledge that advancing gender equality demands commitment and action from all levels of the organisation and in particular active leadership from those in senior roles. 9. We commit to making and mainstreaming sustainable structural and cultural changes to advance gender equality, recognising that initiatives and actions that support individuals alone will not sufficiently advance equality. 10. All individuals have identities shaped by several different factors. We commit to considering the intersection of gender and other factors wherever possible.

Gender distribution across career stages – a snapshot

Future funding could be affected The National Institute for Health Research, which funds all research for NHS England, has made access to some funding streams contingent on the academic partner having an Athena SWAN Silver award. This is operational NOW – medical schools and related departments must already hold a Silver award to access these research grants. Could other Research Councils follow suit?

Future funding (2) RCUK has stated it wants to be “recognised as a leader in equality and diversity in the research community”. It has explicitly stated: “At this time, RCUK does not require formal accreditation, such as Athena SWAN, for grant funding; however, we will be reviewing and may consider such measures if there is no evidence of improvement.”

Potential to affect REF The Research Environment element of REF 2014 included an assessment of how well departments promote equality and diversity. REF has since stated: “Work is still needed to improve the representation of minority groups and to improve gender equality within academia. We were impressed with HEIs which recognised these imperfections and made efforts to address them. It is important that institutions proactively address inequalities in staff selection rather than simply accept them as a general ‘sector issue’.”

Timeline for departmental submission 3. Formation of departmental self-assessment team (SAT) 5. Analyse staff and student data and conduct staff survey 1. Initial commitment from HoD 6. Identify key gender equality challenges 8. Complete and submit Athena SWAN application 2. Appointment of departmental Athena SWAN lead 4. SAT meets monthly at first 4. (contd) SAT continues to meet at least termly, preferably more often 7. Adopt a series of actions to address these issues Overall timeframe: 1-2 years

Self-assessment team (1) “Having an effective self-assessment team will be key to the success of an application.” “The submission will require significant reflective analysis, which should be driven as far as possible by the full team (rather than it being reliant on a few or single individuals).” Quotes are extracts from the Athena SWAN handbook

Self-assessment team (2) “The team should comprise a mixture of grades and roles representing different stages of the career... the self-assessment team should be representative of the staff in the department, and should usually include student representation.”

Self-assessment team (3) “The self-assessment team must meet at least three times a year.” Informally, we have been told that roughly speaking, Athena SWAN would like to see teams meeting around once a month at the beginning. In addition, the SAT would preferably have been constituted around a year before submission.

Data analysis Athena SWAN action should be driven by analysing data to see where major gender equality challenges lie

Action plan Actions must be tailored to tackle the issues raised by the data Actions must be on a departmental level – it’s not enough just to say what the University as a whole does Many actions are standard and can be found in our Quick Actions Checklist

Resources The Athena SWAN handbook gives detailed information on how to fill in the application form. It is available at goo.gl/T151je Athena SWAN provides other resources including benchmarking data and an action plan template. Google ‘Athena SWAN resources’.

Resources (2) HR provides a number of resources, including Athena SWAN – Getting Started A basic overview of the Athena SWAN process Guide for Departments A very detailed guide to Athena SWAN applications Quick actions checklist Some first steps you can take to tackle common issues Staff survey template (via Bristol Online Surveys) See: http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/edi/diversity-groups/gender-equality/athena-swan-resources/