Professional Learning – October 12, 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Essential Questions: 1. How does an SLO factor into teacher evaluation? 2. How will the SLO process be organized at Lower.
SLO Process A process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Upper Perkiomen School District August 2013.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
PSSA & Keystone Exams Pa School Performance Profile
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Pennsylvania Department of Education Initiatives Updates May 24, 2012.
PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.
Curriculum Directors April 10, Key provisions under the Chapter 4 proposal as adopted by the State Board of Education.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Correlation Data.
Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE SY PIMS/Educator Effectiveness/PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting Mini PPT for LEA Admin.
SAU 16 Curriculum Update Joint Board Meeting April 30, 2012.
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
August 31,  Welcome ◦ Education Chair: Mrs. Sue Smith  Pledge of Allegiance  New 2015 PSSA Exams  Literacy Committee Update  C2BC – Cool to.
UMASD CURRICULUM/TECHNOLOGY/STUDENT SERVICES COMMITTEE December 17, 2012.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Teacher Evaluation: Professional Practice Compass Update April 2012.
Next Generation of Assessments June 25, >
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness:
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Act 82 Boot Camp Day 1 July 29 th, 2015 Angela Kirby-Wehr, Educator Effectiveness.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
2015 PSSA/Keystone Data and Information Monday, October 12, 2015 Presented by Dr. Tammy Stern.
Elementary [166] K-8 [36] Middle [37] Secondary [1] High School [52] K-12 [1] Manhattan [53] Brooklyn [40] Bronx [18] Queens [176] Staten Island [6] 293.
What does it mean? August 17, 2015 MAXIMIZING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUCCESS.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
In the spring of 2007, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce released an education report card for all states. Tennessee received an “F” in the category of Truth.
10/24/11 SPS Goals Somers Public Schools Building and Department Goals Academic Year.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Montgomery Township Board of Education
2016 State Assessment Highlights
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Pennsylvania Standards & Common Core
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
Comprehensive Planning
Shaler Area School District
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Pennsylvania’s ESSA Submitted Plan Review
Muncy School District November 9, 2015
Parent Informational Meeting
An Introduction to the Future Ready PA Index
WELCOME TO THE SCHOOL YEAR!!
Presented to the Octorara Area School Board on December 3, 2018
An Introduction to the Future Ready PA Index
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
New Prospect Elementary School
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
So what is PVAAS? PVAAS measures a group of students as they move from one grade level to the next. PVAAS is not concerned with “Achievement” PVAAS is.
Presentation transcript:

Professional Learning – October 12, 2015 BWSD Stands #withMalala Reflections Educator Effectiveness ESEA Waiver Differentiated Supervision Action Plans Student Learning Objectives PA-ETEP

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS Goal: 1 - Create a culture and environment built on trust and relationships that demand a concerted focus on the children to ensure that they realize their full potential. Goal 2: - Create a system within the school that fully ensures school-wide use of data that is focused on school improvement and the academic growth of all students. Goal 3: - Implement scientifically research-based interventions for English Language Arts, mathematics and science to address the diverse needs of ALL students. Goal 4: Ensure that there is a system within the school that fully supports consistent implementation of effective instructional practices that meet the needs of all students across all classrooms and aligns with the Pennsylvania Framework for Teaching

Strategic Vision Pillars Objective 1.1 – Increase academic rigor through continuous improvement of instruction Objective 1.2 – Create school level intervention teams to address diverse needs of all learners Objective 1.3 – Improve student achievement by 5% in all schools based on Keystones, PSSA, PVAAS, as well as other indicators Objective 3.5 – Improve school security and safety of students and staff Objective 4.2 – Improve internal and external communication about BWSD Objective 4.3 – Create a culture and environment in the district of high performance and focus of student achievement

Educator Effectiveness

ESEA Waiver Pennsylvania’s Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) waiver which allows for a one-year pause in the use of the state’s School Performance Profile (SPP). Governor Wolf and Education Secretary Pedro A. Rivera had requested the waiver in using the 2015 PSSA scores to calculate SPP and teacher effectiveness ratings due to sweeping changes to the assessment that took effect in the 2014-15 school year. The Keystone Exams will be the only test used to help establish the SPP scores.

Pennsylvania’s ESEA Waiver PDE is required to demonstrate that Pennsylvania’s teacher and principal evaluation systems differentiate among teachers and principals who make significantly different contributions to growth in student learning and that 1) “the rating  systems consider prior student performance by classroom in setting targets; and (2) include safeguards to ensure that teachers are not disadvantaged based on students’ prior academic performance”

ESEA Waiver Using 2014-2015 data… SPP Score - Baldwin High School (only schools that have a grade 11) NO SPP Scores for Harrison, McAnnulty, Paynter, and Whitehall The 15% Building Level SPP score will be replaced with Observation and Practice - now 65% of Educator Effectiveness

ESEA Facts This past spring a new PSSA was administered in Pennsylvania’s classrooms, grades 3 through 8, in English Language Arts and Mathematics. This assessment was the first PSSA to be fully-aligned to the more rigorous PA Core Standards, which the State Board of Education adopted in fall 2013.

ESEA Facts On July 9, 2015, at a public meeting in Harrisburg, the State Board of Education approved “cut scores” for determining student performance levels on the 2015 PSSAs.

ESEA Facts The heightened difficulty of the PA Core and the limited time between final adoption and implementation of the new PSSA have resulted in fewer students scoring proficient or advanced. A thorough transition to the new standards requires time to develop new curriculum, train teachers, and provide resources to support the new curriculum.

ESEA Facts In regards to PVAAS, based on what has happened in other states during their transition to more rigorous standards, it is unlikely that there will be a substantial decrease in PVAAS growth measures statewide, even if there is a substantial decrease in the percentage of students testing in the Proficient range or higher

Keystone Data

Baldwin High School Keystone Data Algebra I 28.75% Proficient and Advanced 71.25% Basic and Below Basic Biology 40.94% Proficient and Advanced 59.06% Basic and Below Basic Literature 62.62% Proficient and Advanced 37.38% Basic and Below Basic

PSSA DATA

English Language Arts

ELA Cut Scores

Math Impacts

Math Cut Scores

Harrison Middle School

Paynter Elementary School

Whitehall Elementary School

Student Learning Objectives

SLO – Performance Measure PDE has modified the respective templates to emphasize the need for a growth SLO  PDE would encourage LEAs to reconsider these mastery goals and revise the SLO to demonstrate growth.

SLO – Growth Measure For example: 1) What data was used to inform the mastery based SLO? 2) Was the SLO calculated to take into account students' prior academic performance? If so, reflect the baseline data in your SLO. In the near future, PDE will conduct a statewide webinar regarding all of the ESEA waiver requirements. However, given the time sensitive nature of SLO development for the 2015-2016 school year, IUs have been asked to disseminate the revised templates to the field now.

SLO – Performance Measure MUST INCLUDE GROWTH

Differentiated Supervision Action Plans

Differentiated Supervision Action Plan - Documentation Each individual is responsible for his/her own paperwork and artifacts, which must be kept in a paper or electronic portfolio. The artifacts, paperwork, and narrative summaries, which include a mid-point and final reflection on professional growth and application aligned to the Danielson Framework, must be included in the portfolio. The project and accompanying portfolio will be reviewed twice. A mid-year and final review will be conducted between the professional employee and supervising administrator and will be used as evidence for supervision and evaluation.

Danielson Self Reflection PA-ETEP Mid-Year Progress Self-Assessment Rubric

Self-Assessment Be honest, but not self destructive. Rely on your evidence, no matter when you gathered it. Always add comments, and when you haven’t provided evidence, add more comments. (Download “Types of Evidence” PDF on PA-ETEP)

Resources bwschools.net Curriculum Writing Resources http://bwsdcurriculum.weebly.com/ Differentiated Supervision Action Plans, Educator Effectiveness, PA-ETEP, SLOs and so much more…