Integrative Research Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q: What is important for good policy (local and global)? A: Good information and viable options Hayden Montgomery Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
Advertisements

On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
Enhancing cooperation in agricultural greenhouse gas research Structure, Vision and Work plans for Research Groups and Cross-cutting Groups.
The Verified Carbon Standard: Scaling up MRV Naomi Swickard, AFOLU Manager 19 May 2011 REDD-plus after Cancun: Moving from Negotiation to Implementation.
Management impacts on the C balance in agricultural ecosystems Jean-François Soussana 1 Martin Wattenbach 2, Pete Smith 2 1. INRA, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Global Research Alliance Fellowships U.S. Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Inventorying Agricultural Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Methods Used by Annex 1 Countries Erandi Lokupitiya and Keith Paustian Colorado State University.
On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
SESSION 3: Climate Change Financing Opportunities.
MAGHG: Monitoring and Assessment of GHG Emissions and Mitigation Potentials in Agriculture: Focus on GHG Emissions from organic soils Riccardo Biancalani.
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
Sustainability Overview Laura McCann, on behalf of Alison Goss Eng U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biomass Program February 23, 2010.
Joint Committee on Agriculture, Food and the Marine Dr Eimear Cotter Senior Manager Environmental Protection Agency 8 April 2014.
Case Study 1 Canadian Prairies: Soil C management Biophysical information M. Boehm, B. McConkey & H. Janzen Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada How can we.
Assessment of Different Quantification Approaches and Application of Multiple Practices for a Single Farm Unit Dennis Haak, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada.
17 June 2010 M-Agg Washington, DC VCS Agricultural Land Management.
The development of a full understanding of the diversity of livestock systems and indentifying priority areas for improving the quantification and mitigation.
Name, Surname, Position Logo(s) LIFE12 ENV/ES/ REGADIOX Fixation of atmospheric CO 2 and reduction of greenhouse emissions through a sustainable.
December 6, 2013 USDA Climate Change Program Office.
Modeling the Greenhouse gases of cropland/grassland At European scale N. Viovy, S. Gervois, N. Vuichard, N. de Noblet-Ducoudré, B. Seguin, N. Brisson,
Innovative Sources of Funding for SLM:
GHG EMISSIONS FROM AGRICULTURE Climate Change Workshop December 12, 2000.
USDA Role in Supporting Decisions on Climate Change William Hohenstein Global Change Program Office January 10, 2005.
Mohamed Bakarr Senior Environmental Specialist GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 GEF Strategies, Activities and Accomplishment:
Leading Partners in Science The initial stock-take of GHG inventory &mitigation research activities in Alliance member countries: Insights, lessons and.
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
2/1/20161 Soil Carbon Sequestration Methods and Tools for Measurement, Monitoring and Verification Charles W. Rice University Distinguished Professor Department.
Potential of regulatory and voluntary carbon markets to support carbon credits for blue carbon restoration and conservation projects Steve Emmett-Mattox,
King County-Cities Climate Collaboration July 2015 Update to the GMPC
Reporting obligations for the UNFCCC, the Kyoto protocol, and the EU Decision 529 Simone Rossi, Marco Bertaglia, Wim Devos, Roland Hiederer Joint Research.
Reducing Emissions from Livestock Research Program Research Program structure and objectives Progress on contracts etc Understand Expectations – DAFF and.
JOHN MULDOWNEY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND THE MARINE JULY 2016 Climate Action – Implications for the Beef Sector.
Presented by: Alice Willett, UK Presented to: FAO; 18 October 2016, Rome, Italy Animal Health and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity Network.
Natural Resource Management
Integrative Research Group
10 November 2016 SECRETARIAT UPDATE.
Flagship: Inventories – Making it Count
The C sequestration efficiency of soils
13 July 2016 SECRETARIAT UPDATE.
Presenting carbonn Cities Climate Registry
Review of CRG 2016 meeting, Phoenix AZ
GRA Flagships Hayden Montgomery GRA Special Representative
Conservation Agriculture Network
2 September 2017 SECRETARIAT UPDATE.
Chair, FACCE-JPI Governing Board
GRA Flagships.
13 / 07/ 2016 SAI Platform Rice Project Group and GRA Priorities.
Livestock – compelling figures
2 September 2017 SECRETARIAT UPDATE.
Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency
For the Wimmera/Mallee in Vic:
Integrative Research Group
Determining Agricultural Soil Carbon Stock Changes in Canada
Jean-Mari Peltier Counselor to the Administrator on Agriculture Policy
Croplands Research Group Meeting
Science-Policy Interface
Value Chain Emissions Accounting Framework
Component 2- Peatland This component is currently led by
UN REDD FAO-UNDP-UNEP July 2008
Developing an Integrated
Flagship Project on Reducing GHG Intensity of Rice Systems
Climate change, energy and local governments
Research Group Co-chairs’ Report
Climate Action Regional Offices (CARO)
Francisco de la Chesnaye, USEPA Carol Jones, USDA/ERS
Kansas Corporation Commission
Climate Change Statistics for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Presentation transcript:

Integrative Research Group Brian McConkey, Jean-François Soussana, Lee Nelson

IRG: a new group approved by Council end 2015

IRG vision and scope Vision Collaborative work to develop the knowledge and capabilities for estimation, monitoring, and projection of GHG emissions and soil carbon within and across agricultural systems Scope: Address identified Research, Development, and Knowledge Transfer (R-D-KT) opportunities Integration of scales (local, subnational, national, and supranational scales) Applying, reporting, monitoring, and/or verifying greenhouse gas emission estimates across farming systems Communicate and coordinate Foster the building of capability of member countries.

IRG meetings Joined session with the Livestock Research Group (Melbourne, February 2016) Briefing during Paddy Rice Research Group America’s meeting (Arkansas, July 2016) Briefing session during Council Meeting (Mexico City, October 2016) Joined Session with the Cropland Research Group (Phoenix, November 2016) Network meeting Field Scale Integration (Rome, March 2016) IRG group meeting, side by side with FAO/IPCC meeting on soil carbon (January 2017, Rome)

Integrative Research Group achievements 10 member countries have joined so far The group has been set-up with five research networks Terms of reference have been established for the group and for the networks Each network has expressed 3-5 priority actions, accounting for feedbacks during meetings Monthly teleconferences with network leaders and webinars

Integration across scales Grasslands Soil carbon Field Farm, region Inventories Developing strategies for pastures Quantifying soil carbon potential Understanding M&A options at field scale Improving tests of options at farm and region scale Improving national inventories

Adopt a network Country, or associated partners, could adopt a network Fund initial meetings and development of activities Grasslands: F. Lattanzi (Uruguay), K. Richards (Ireland), Soil carbon sequestration: C. Chenu (France), D. Angers (Canada), Field scale : JF Soussana (France), P. Smith (UK), Farm and regional scale : R. Eckard (Australia), P. Havlik (IIASA), GHG inventories: J. Verhagen (Netherlands), B. Mc Conkey (Canada).

Priorities in each network (1/3) Grasslands Guidelines for SOC measurement/monitoring in grasslands, Data base on grazing practices vs. soil C and GHG emissions Mixed systems (temporary grasslands, integrated systems) Highlight: National project in Uruguay supported by GEF Soil carbon sequestration Co-benefits of soil carbon for yields and adaptation, Monitoring, reporting and verification of soil carbon Soil organic carbon dynamics modeling Highlight: Permanence of soil carbon vs. duration of practices

Priorities in each network (2/3) Field scale Mitigation and adaptation options assessed from multi-model ensemble Climate sensitivity of GHG emissions and soil carbon Statistical emulators for N2O emissions and soil C Highlight: accurate multi-model simulations of N2O emissions Farm and regional scale integration Demonstration farm network Farm calculators and soil carbon Pilot region assessment studies Regional maps of mitigation and adaptation potentials Highlight: Corn yield loss and land degradation under climate change

Priorities in each network (3/3) GHG inventories Guidance on how to improve inventories, including data on activities, Moving to Tier 2, sharing examples from countries, Country specific emission factors Highlight: sharing sensor technologies

Highlights A national project by URUGUAY supported by GEF/ FAO (World Bank) to increase beef production and store carbon in soils Permanence of improved practices is key to achieving soil C sequestration potential Without site specific information a multi-model ensemble predicts accurately N2O emissions from crop and pasture across 4 continents Land degradation lowers corn yields by end of century, due to losses in soil fertility in countries with low or negative nutrient surplus Capability building led by NZ and LRG, sharing and collaborating on methodologies, planning inventory meeting in 2017 (UK)