Sterile Neutrinos at the Crossroads, Blacksburg, VA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6/6/2003Jonathan Link, Columbia U. NuFact03 Future Measurement of sin 2 2  13 at Nuclear Reactors Jonathan Link Columbia University June 6, 2003 ′03.
Advertisements

Summary of Nufact-03 Alain Blondel NuFact 03 5th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories & Superbeams Columbia University, New York 5-11 June 2003.
Prototype of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detector Wang Zhimin IHEP, Daya Bay.
Past Experience of reactor neutrino experiments Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Nov. 28, 2003.
ANGRA Neutrino Detector: Preliminary Design Main Concepts and Ideas (and some alternatives) Ernesto Kemp State University at Campinas – UNICAMP Gleb Wataghin.
Soo-Bong Kim Seoul National Univ. Current Status of RENO (Symposium on “Physics of Massive Neutrinos” May 20-22, 2008, Milos, Greece)
Observation of Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance at RENO Soo-Bong Kim for the RENO Collaboration KNRC, Seoul National University (presented at KEK on.
1 The Daya Bay Reactor Electron Anti-neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jianglai Liu (for the Daya Bay Collaboration) California Institute of Technology APS.
Jun Cao Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics, Oct. 3-8, 2005 National.
KamLAND Experiment Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector - Largest low-energy anti-neutrino detector built so far - Located at the site of.
Simulation study of RENO-50 Jungsic Park Seoul National University RENO-50 International Workshop June 13-14, 2013 Hoam Faculty House, Korea.
Eun-Ju Jeon Sejong Univ. Sept. 09, 2010 Status of RENO Experiment Neutrino Oscillation Workshop (NOW 2010) September 4-11, 2010, Otranto, Lecce, Italy.
Soo-Bong Kim Seoul National Univ. RENO for Neutrino Mixing Angle  13 5 th International Workshop on Low Energy Neutrino Physcis (Neutrino Champagne LowNu.
Current Status of RENO Jaison Lee (Seoul National Univ.) for RENO Collaboration 2009/12/17, KISTI.
Status of RENO Experiment Reactor Neutrino Oscillation in Korea
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
A detector design for the Daya Bay reactor neutrino experiment Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Jan. 18, 2004.
Using Reactor Anti-Neutrinos to Measure sin 2 2θ 13 Jonathan Link Columbia University Fermilab Long Range Planning Committee, Neutrino Session November.
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
RENO and the Last Result
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of WisconsinDNP2006, Nashville, October 28, 2006 A High-Precision Measurement of sin 2 2  13 with the Daya Bay Reactor Antineutrino.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
RENO for Neutrino Mixing Angle q13
Kr2Det: TWO - DETECTOR REACTOR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENT AT KRASNOYARSK UNDERGROUND SITE L. Mikaelyan for KURCHATOV INSTITUTE NEUTRINO GROUP.
Park Kang Soon Seokyeong Univ. Status of the RENO San Clemente, Pelugia Sep , 2009.
Results for the Neutrino Mixing Angle  13 from RENO International School of Nuclear Physics, 35 th Course Neutrino Physics: Present and Future, Erice/Sicily,
Status Report for KEK-PS E391a KEK IPNS G.Y.Lim 14 April 2003.
,,,,, The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment Liangjian Wen On behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Daya Bay Detectors.
RENO & RENO-50 Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “NOW 2014, Conca Specchiulla, Otranto, Lecce, Italy, September 7-14, 2014”
Results from RENO Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “17 th Lomosonov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics” Moscow. Russia, Aug ,
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
Performance Comparisons of Safeguard Detector Designs D. Reyna (Argonne National Laboratory) with help from R.W. McKeown (Drexel University)
Karsten Heeger Beijing, January 18, 2003 Design Considerations for a  13 Reactor Neutrino Experiment with Multiple Detectors Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence.
Muon flux at Y2L and reconstruction of muon tracks
Double Chooz Near Detector Guillaume MENTION CEA Saclay, DAPNIA/SPP Workshop AAP 2007 Friday, December 14 th, 2007
Jun Cao Jan. 18, 2004 Daya Bay neutrino experiment workshop (Beijing) Detector Module Simulation and Baseline Optimization ● Determine module geometric.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin Yale University, March 1, 2010  13 from Global Fits current best limit sin 2 2θ 13 < CL Fogli, et al., arXiv:0905:3549.
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
J.S. Jang Chonnam National University for RENO collaboration Oct. 24, 2010.
SHORT BASELINE NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENT IN KOREA Yangyang Yeongduk Kim Sejong University For HANARO-SBL collaboration.
Results on  13 Neutrino Oscillations from Reactor Experiments Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “INPC 2013, Firenze, June 2-7, 2013”
Status and Prospects of Reactor Neutrino Experiments Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “NuPhys 2014: Prospects in Neutrino Physics, London,
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
Report (2) on JPARC/MLF-12B025 Gd(n,  ) experiment TIT, Jan.13, 2014 For MLF-12B025 Collaboration (Okayama and JAEA): Outline 1.Motivation.
Status of RENO Yeongduk Kim Sejong University International Workshop on Nuclear, Particle and Astrophysics Yongpyong, Feb. 24, 2010.
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
The Double Chooz reactor neutrino experiment
NuFact 2012, Williamsburg, VA
Fast neutron flux measurement in CJPL
“RENO/RENO-50” K.K. Joo Chonnam National University
Observation of Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance at RENO
NEUTRINO OSCILLATION MEASUREMENTS WITH REACTORS
SoLid: Recent Results and Future Prospects
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment
Observation of Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance at RENO
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Searches for Sterile neutrinos
Summary of fiducial volume test at KEK
D. Lhuillier, CEA - Saclay
(on behalf of the RENO collaboration)
Current Status of RENO Soo-Bong Kim Seoul National Univ.
Current Results from Reactor Neutrino Experiments
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
Anti-Neutrino Simulations
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Neutrinos Oscillation Experiments at Reactors
Presentation transcript:

Sterile Neutrinos at the Crossroads, Blacksburg, VA Status of RENO Yeongduk Kim, Sejong University On behalf of RENO collaboration Sterile Neutrinos at the Crossroads, Blacksburg, VA 2011. 9. 25-28

Contents Q13 measurement with reactor neutrinos RENO overview Final Construction of RENO Calibration Data of RENO Summary

Reactor Neutrino Experiment at a Glance ν e + n Gd γ ~30μs Delayed signal E å ~ 8 MeV g prompt signal Inverse Beta Decay q13 Dominant sin2(213)=0.04 sin2(213)=0.1 sin2(213)=0.2 E (MeV) “near” “far” q12 Dominant

Reactor Sites Around the World Two Reactor Sites Multi-Reactor Sites Under Consideration Former Host Site Jonathan Link, Columbia U. Seminar 2003

RENO Sites Yonggwang Nuclear Power Plant near detector site 46.1 m 95 m reactor detector 1383.1 m 294.3 m ~256 m far detector site 168.1 m 272 m Yonggwang Nuclear Power Plant Six ~ 1 GWe class PWRs Total average thermal power of 16.4 GW (max 17.3 GW) Operational factor > 90%

RENO Detector 354 10” ID PMTs : 14% surface coverage 67 10” OD PMTs Both PMTs : HAMAMATSU, R7081 Mu-metal shielding for each PMT. (-5cm) No special reflector for ID Tyvek reflector at OD LAYER D (cm) H vessel Filled with Mass (tons) Target 280 320 Acrylic Gd(0.1%) +LS 16.5 Gamma catcher 400 440 LS 30.0 Buffer 540 580 SUS Mineral oil 64.4 Veto 840 880 Concrete water 352.6

Milestones in 2011 Detector closing (Jan.) Installation of electronics hut & control room (Feb.) DAQ electronics & HV supplying system, & cabling (Feb.) Installation of slow control & monitoring system (Jan. ~Jun.) Liquid scintillator production & filling (May ~ Jul.) Installation of 1D&3D calibration system (Jun..~ Aug.) Installation of water circulation system (Jul. ~ Aug.) Began regular data-taking & calibration (Aug. 1 ~)

Detector Construction & Closing (Jan. 2011) Near : Jan. 21, 2011 Far : Jan. 24, 2011

Completed RENO Detector (Feb. 2011) Liquid Scintillator Production System DAQ Electronics Calibration System Control Room

Dry Run Before filling liquids, we tested PMTs with a bottle of liquid scintillator & source at center. QBEE threshold is set to 1 mV for data taking. Charge(counts) discri. thr. -0.4mV -0.5mV -0.6mV -0.7mV -1.0mV 137Cs source Liquid Scintillator 1 Photoelectron peak

Gd-LS & LS Goal Gd-LS : 0.1% Gd , PPO 3g/L, bis-MSB 30mg/L  TARGET LS : PPO 3g/L, bis-MSB 30mg/L  GAMMACATCHER Concentrated Liquids Gd-LAB : 0.5% Gd ( X5 concentration) LS-Master : PPO 30 g/L, bis-MSB 300mg/L ( X10 concentration) LS batch (2000L) LAB (1800 L) + LS-Master (200L) Near/Far separate production & filling Gd-LS batch (2000L) LAB (1400 L) + LS-Master (200L) + Gd-LAB (400L) Produced in Far detector area and divided two

FAR NEAR LAB 10ton LAB 10ton GdLS LS (0.1 %) 2000L LS 2000L Water out LS master (x10) 200L Gd-LAB (0.5%) 400L Gd-sol TMHA LS LAB 10ton Water out Divide into two G.C. FAR LS master (x10) 200L LS 2000L LAB 10ton Water out G.C. NEAR

LS handling system Gd Loaded Liquid Scintillator

Liquids Production & Filling Gd-LS filling for Target Both near and far detectors are filled with Gd-LS, LS & mineral oil as of July 5, 2011. Gd-LS(18805L, <0.2% difference) Veto water filling is completed at the end of July, 2011. DAQ Electronics Gd Loaded Liquid Scintillator LS filling for Gamma Catcher Water filling for Veto

Water circulation system veto Circulation system Drain Local Water supply Ultra-pure water system is important for VETO efficiency. Solenoid valve : Auto on/off Feedback from the ultrasonic level sensor of Water level

Gain matching of PMTs 137Cs source in the center. PMT gains are set to 1.0x107 for all PMTs. gain variation between PMTs are within 3% for both detectors. Gain (107) # of PMTs

Electronics & Trigger Software trigger QBEE : each channel digitized if over threshold. All the hits are sorted in time and grouped into an event if number of hits exceeds preset trigger condition. (ID:90, OD:10) Pedestal hits are collected realtime Intrinsic charge Injector into each channel for electronics calibration. Types of Trigger : ID OD LASER PEDESTAL Charge Injector Data block(20ms) Software trigger 200ns “Software” event Merge the data From front-end PCs Number of hits exceeds the threshold, Send downstream

Laser calibration system Blue(420nm) Laser  Fiber optics (1 @ Top, 1 @Bottom, 3 @ Barrel) Optical Fiber+ Cosine Corrector Barrel Top Bottom Laser Q (degree)

1-D source driving systems Two identical source driving systems at the center of TARGET and one side of GAMMACATCHER.

Calibration w/ Gammas 68Ge 137Cs 60Co Preliminary Far Near 1.022 MeV 0.662 MeV Far Near 60Co 2.506 MeV Sources @ center. ~ 230 PE/MeV Near/Far show similar spectra.

252Cf - neutron Preliminary Far Near We are observing both Gd capture and hydrogen capture as expected by simulation. Capture time distribution and vertex reconstruction is in progress. Preliminary Gd(n,g) neutron capture signal p(n,g) neutron capture signal Far Near

Backgrounds – single rates. Trigger Conditions : BUFFER No VETO VETO NEAR ~280 70 ~533 FAR ~110 86 ~66 Background trigger rates over ~0.5MeV is comparable to the simulated rates over 1MeV.

Backgrounds – single rates Simulation(TDR) Background events with All triggers. Events/ (sec 65keV) NEAR FAR 3MeV

RENO Sensitivity on sin2(2q13) Statistical errors (3 years of data taking with 70% efficiency) Near : 9.83x105 ≈ 106 (0.1% error) Far : 8.74x104 ≈ 105 (0.3% error) T2K Systematic error : <0.5% * Sensitivity : sin2(2q13) > 0.02 at 90% C.L. 90% CL Limits

Summary Construction of both near and far detectors at RENO are completed in Feb. 2011. All the liquids are produced and filled by end of July 2011. Regular data-taking with NEAR & FAR detectors began from August 1, 2011. Data reduction, source calibration, and Monte-Carlo reconstruction efforts are on progress. RENO group hope to tell the value of sin2(2q13) at the anticipated time.

Backup Slides

Comparison of Reactor Neutrino Experiments Location Power (GW) Distances Near/Far(m) Depth Near/Far (mwe) Target Mass (tons) Double-CHOOZ France 8.7 400/1050 60/300 10/10 RENO Korea 17.3 290/1380 120/450 16/16 Daya Bay China 17.4 360(500)/1985(1613) 260/910 402/80 Detail numbers should refer to individual experiment.

Calibration Sources type source E(keV) Activity (m Ci) calibration gamma 137Cs 662 1 threshold e+ 68Ge 1022 0.014 Position, E threshold 60Co 2506(1173+1333) Multiple gamma neutron 252Cf Neutron+gammas ~8000 0.06 Neutron efficiency Gd concentration

Sterile neutrinos at RENO Both RENO detectors will see the deficit of neutrinos if sterile neutrinos exist. No L/E sensitivity except 0.1 eV2

Slow Monitoring System PMT HV Adjustment & Monitor (LABVIEW) A1932 primary current & individual HV return value. Detector Temperature (BUFFER, VETO) PT-100 thermocouple. Water Level Using ultrasonic sensor. Rn Monitoring Sun Nuclear 1027 model. Gas Concentration – CO2 & O2 KCD-HP500 : CO2 concentration measurement using IR absorption Honeywell XCD : O2 concentration Humidity & Temperature HTM420R IP Camera System

1D system configuration passive pulley active(motor) pulley glove box source case (acrylic) weight (teflon) Mechanical system wire pulley (circumference ~ 1 m) Control system