Flux Calibration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Noise in Radiographic Imaging
Advertisements

GEM Chambers at BNL The detector from CERN, can be configured with up to 4 GEMs The detector for pad readout and drift studies, 2 GEM maximum.
Observational Astrophysics II: May-June, Observational Astrophysics II (L2) Getting our NIRF What do want to do? 1.Image a selected.
CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine.
2002 January 28 AURA Software Workshop The MATPHOT Algorithm for Digital Point Spread Function CCD Stellar Photometry Kenneth J. Mighell National.
Face Recognition Using Neural Networks Presented By: Hadis Mohseni Leila Taghavi Atefeh Mirsafian.
THALES RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY FRANCE This document and any data included are the property of THALES. They cannot be reproduced, disclosed or used without.
…….CT Physics - Continued V.G.WimalasenaPrincipal School of radiography.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrometer simulation Note in ● Why we need it now ● What should.
Naoyuki Tamura (University of Durham) Expected Performance of FMOS ~ Estimation with Spectrum Simulator ~ Introduction of simulators  Examples of calculations.
D EDICATED S PECTROPHOTOMETER F OR L OCALIZED T RANSMITTANCE A ND R EFLECTANCE M EASUREMENTS Laetitia ABEL-TIBERINI, Frédéric LEMARQUIS, Michel LEQUIME.
Photon Transfer Method 1. Using two identical flat field exposures it is possible to measure the read noise of a CCD with the Photon Transfer method. Two.
Image Formation. Input - Digital Images Intensity Images – encoding of light intensity Range Images – encoding of shape and distance They are both a 2-D.
Detector Monitoring as part of VLT Science and Data Flow Operations Wolfgang Hummel DMO/DFO/QC group Lander de Bilbao, SDD/pipeline group Andrea Modigliani,
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
First results of the tests campaign in VISIBLE in VISIBLE for the demonstrator 12 October 2007 SNAP Collaboration Meeting Paris Marie-Hélène Aumeunier.
Integral Field Spectrograph Eric PRIETO CNRS,INSU,France,Project Manager 11 November 2003.
PACS FM-ILT SPECTROMETER SPATIAL CALIBRATION A. Contursi (H. Feuchtgruber) PACS Science Verification Review – 8/9 November 2007 MPE-Garching.
OMEGA GROUND CALIBRATION B. Gondet,Saint Louis, 21/05/2008.
2004 January 27Mathematical Challenges of Using Point Spread Function Analysis Algorithms in Astronomical ImagingMighell 1 Mathematical Challenges of Using.
 PLATO PLAnetary Transits & Oscillations of stars Data onboard treatment PPLC study February 2009 on behalf of Reza Samadi for the PLATO data treatment.
Integral Field Spectrograph Anne EALET CNRS (IN2P3) FRANCE, Instrument Scientist Eric PRIETO CNRS,INSU,France,Project Manager 11 November 2003.
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
WFIRST IFU -- Preliminary “existence proof” Qian Gong & Dave Content GSFC optics branch, Code 551.
BioE153:Imaging As An Inverse Problem Grant T. Gullberg
DynAMITe: a Wafer Scale Sensor for Biomedical Applications M. Esposito 1, T. Anaxagoras 2, A. Fant 2, K. Wells 1, A. Kostantinidis 3, J. Osmond 4, P. Evans.
1-D Flat Fields for COS G130M and G160M Tom Ake TIPS 17 June 2010.
SNAP Collaboration meeting / Paris 10/20071 SPECTROMETER DETECTORS From science requirements to data storage.
Results Fig. 4a shows the raw, noise-free, simulation data for a sample with T 1 = 1 s and T 2 = 100 ms. A clear difference is seen between the cases where.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
CorotWeek 3, Liège 4-7/12/20021 (working on Saturday!!!) The CCD flight models Miss Pernelle Bernardi Mr Vincent Lapeyrere Mr Tristan Buey and the CCD.
Practical applications: CCD spectroscopy Tracing path of 2-d spectrum across detector –Measuring position of spectrum on detector –Fitting a polynomial.
Part 2: Phase structure function, spatial coherence and r 0.
Basic Detector Measurements: Photon Transfer Curve, Read Noise, Dark Current, Intrapixel Capacitance, Nonlinearity, Reference Pixels MR – May 19, 2014.
RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics,
August 23, 2007JPL WL from space meeting1 Shear measurements in simulated SNAP images with realistic PSFs Håkon Dahle, Stephanie Jouvel, Jean-Paul Kneib,
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
# x pixels Geometry # Detector elements Detector Element Sizes Array Size Detector Element Sizes # Detector elements Pictorial diagram showing detector.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
Semiconductor Detectors and Applications on X-ray imaging Natalie Diekmann Particle Physics 1 NIKHEF.
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1)
UVIS Calibration Update
Single Object Slitless Spectroscopy Simulations
Miss Pernelle Bernardi
NAC flat fielding and intensity calibration
General Features of Fitting Methods
NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
COS FUV Flat Fields and Signal-to-Noise Characteristics
Spectrophotometric calibration of the IFU spectrograph
NIRSpec simulation data-package
OMEGA GROUND CALIBRATION
SNAP spectrograph demonstrator : Test Plan
An IFU slicer spectrometer for SNAP
A special case of calibration
Fabio de Oliveira Fialho Michel Auvergne
BASIC HYPER SPECTRAL IMAGING
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
Basics of Photometry.
Do Now 1) t + 3 = – 2 2) 18 – 4v = 42.
UVIS Calibration Update
Solving an estimation problem
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
UVIS Calibration Update
} 2x + 2(x + 2) = 36 2x + 2x + 4 = 36 4x + 4 = x =
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
Lunar calibration of COMS visible channel using GIRO
Calibration and homographies
Distributed Ray Tracing
Presentation transcript:

Flux Calibration

Spectrograph calibration: Flux calibration Requirements :Test the feasibility of flux calibration : Punctual Object Flat Field Specification: - measure relative flux between ≠ λ to 1 % - measure absolu flux to 10 % What means ? Correct flux losses  Calibrate flux losses to define the correction function Φ(λ) Image calibrated Source Flux Correction Optical losses: diffraction (mainly), aberrations Spectrograph Treated Image QE, noise, intra-pixel variations Detector calibration Detector Φmeasured(λ) Untreated Image Detector Image

Flux Variations Main causes of flux variations: - optical losses: diffraction, diffusion - detector: noise (thermal, readout), gain of pixel, intra-pixel variations Flux losses depend on: - position on the slicer plane: (x, y) - wavelength 2 methods to correct flux losses: create a library of reference images at different positions (x,y) and wavelength calibrate diffraction losses as a function of (x,y,λ). Which means to well-calibrate detector (dark,flat,intra/inter pixel variation).

Flux Correction from library of reference images: simulation Image at (x,y,λ), I1=kth×I0 Image at (x,y,λ) ∕ Compare the pixels distribution Method ? Image calibrated in flux Selected Reference Image Library of reference images at I0 How to calculate k ? k = ∫ image / ∫ image ref minimization chi2 How to find the best reference image ? Correlation Minimisation:chi2

PSF Library creation y x Conditions No noise Creation of library of 100 PSFs on detector at ≠ positions into one pixel (step 1/10 of pixel) : SNAP spectrograph simulation From old design of SNAP spectrograph y one pixel slice n+1 0.15 ’’ slice n x slice n-1 Conditions No noise step of position variations: 1/10 of a pixel= 0,15’’/10=0.015” Initial pixel (x0,y0)=(0”,0”)

Х2 Minimization Method For each image (p), find : (i,j) matrix index (0<i,j<N) signal and noise of the image to calibrate into pixel (i,j) Flux error signal and noise of reference image indexed p (0<p<100) associated with a single position (x,y) & λ into pixel (i,j) k : Ratio image to calibrate over reference image For each image (p), find : Deduce the index pmin of the reference image (the nearest one of the image to calibrate): Error on parameter k :

Method of Х2 Minimization : Summary Si,j =Image subtracted of the noise average Image k x Φ0 to calibrate Image (p) of library: Φ0 Determine the ONE reference image pmin the nearest Determine M reference images the nearest Interpolation :

Х2 Minimization to find coefficient {ap}0<p<M Interpolation Normalized Reference Images Normalized Image to calibrate Х2 Minimization to find coefficient {ap}0<p<M Normalization cste Solve Solve the M linear equations Minimize

X2 minimization without interpolation Si,j =Image subtracted of the noise average X2 minimization without interpolation X2 minimization with interpolation For each reference image (p), minimize: Goal - Minimize: First step: find the “nearest” reference image A first method of X2 minimization determines the M reference images the nearest (M=2 by default) The interpolation consists in computing the coefficients ap from normalized images: the method used is the Х2 Minimization. This method leads us to solve a linear system of M equations (see next slide). After solving the system of equation, we determine the ratio k (δX2/δk=0) : The one nearest reference image combination of the nearest reference images

Х2 Minimization Method in practice To compute: We need to well-know the noise B per pixel impossible (random) Hypothesis; B = 0 (first application to check the method): no detector noise, no photonic noise Generate 32 images (without noise) at λ,x given  scan along the slice width by step of 0.003 ’’ (y0={0.02 ’’:0.113’’}) Source flux= k x source flux of reference images (k=0.6)  Find k(=0.6) from 2 library of reference images (with different sampling)

Method used: minimization chi2 Library used: 10 reference images x0=0’’ fixed, λ=1,4 µm fixed y0={0.001’’:0,135”} by step 1/10 of a pixel=0.015” Library used: 40 reference images x0=0’’ fixed, λ=1,4 µm fixed y0={0’’:0,146”} by step 1/40 of a pixel=0.00375”

Method used: minimization chi2 to determine k+ interpolation Library used: 10 reference images x0=0’’ fixed, λ=1,4 µm fixed y0={0.001’’:0,135”} by step 1/10 of a pixel=0.015” Library used: 40 reference images x0=0’’ fixed, λ=1,4 µm fixed y0={0’’:0,146”} by step 1/40 of a pixel=0.00375”

λ=0.5 µm λ=1 µm (visible arm) λ=1 µm (IR arm) Erreur augmente au bord de la slice + critique ds le visible: variation de la PSF + rapide λ=1 µm (IR arm) λ=1.5 µm

Flux variation per slice as a function of source position into the slicer λ=1.5 µm slice 3 5 slice side Direction to move 3 Comprendre l’évolution de la distribution spatiale et du flux sur le détecteur en fonction de la position de la source pour ameliorer l’interpolation et la minimisation slice 2 slice 4 slice 5 slice 1 slice 0

λ=0.5 µm λ=1 µm (vis arm) λ=1 µm (IR arm) λ=1.5 µm Pente + raide ds visible (cf resultat de la minimisation ds vis) λ=1 µm (IR arm) λ=1.5 µm

slice side slice 3 slice 2 slice 4 Integration on 1 pixel per slice around the maximum λ=0.5 µm slice side slice 3 slice 2 Integration of 49 pixels per slice around the maximum slice 4 slice side slice 3 slice 2 slice 4 Integration of 9 pixels per slice around the maximum Au bord de la slice, non seulement le flux varie bcp mais aussi la distribution spatiale: interpolation lineaire suffisante ? slice 0

Variation of spatial distribution into one slice as a function of source position y (around the side of slice) y=0,065” y=0,068” y=0,071” y=0,074” y=0,086” y=0,080” y=0,083” y=0,077”

Variation of flux into one slice as a function of source position y (around the side of slice)

A faire Minimiser non pas les images sur le détecteur mais le flux total de ROI prédefini (1 roi par slice ou 2 roi par slice) Images de référence Image a calibrer flux de la slice 0 On s’affranchit d’une variation de la distribution spatiale trop rapide A minimiser

Calibration with Photonic Noise generated Φ0=0.00005 S/Nmax=106 <S/N>=1.2 Library used: 10 reference images x0=0’’ fixed, λ=1,5 µm fixed y0={0.001’’:0,135”} by step 1/10 of a pixel=0.015” Library used: 40 reference images x0=0’’ fixed, λ=1,5 µm fixed y0={0’’:0,146”} by step 1/40 of a pixel=0.00375” λ=1.5 µm λ=1.5 µm

Spares