Network analysis for AML data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Periodic clusters. Non periodic clusters That was only the beginning…
Advertisements

1 Harvard Medical School Mapping Transcription Mechanisms from Multimodal Genomic Data Hsun-Hsien Chang, Michael McGeachie, and Marco F. Ramoni Children.
Computational discovery of gene modules and regulatory networks Ziv Bar-Joseph et al (2003) Presented By: Dan Baluta.
Gene Set Analysis 09/24/07. From individual gene to gene sets Finding a list of differentially expressed genes is only the starting point. Suppose we.
Gene Regulatory Networks - the Boolean Approach Andrey Zhdanov Based on the papers by Tatsuya Akutsu et al and others.
Goal: Reconstruct Cellular Networks Biocarta. Conditions Genes.
Alizadeh et. al. (2000) Stephen Ayers 12/2/01. Clustering “Clustering is finding a natural grouping in a set of data, so that samples within a cluster.
Whole Genome Expression Analysis
Tennessee Technological University1 The Scientific Importance of Big Data Xia Li Tennessee Technological University.
Radiogenomics in glioblastoma multiforme
Using Bayesian Networks to Analyze Expression Data N. Friedman, M. Linial, I. Nachman, D. Hebrew University.
The importance of enzymes and their occurrences: from the perspective of a network W.C. Liu 1, W.H. Lin 1, S.T. Yang 1, F. Jordan 2 and A.J. Davis 3, M.J.
ArrayCluster: an analytic tool for clustering, data visualization and module finder on gene expression profiles 組員:李祥豪 謝紹陽 江建霖.
BIF Group Project Group (A)rabidopsis: David Nieuwenhuijse Matthew Price Qianqian Zhang Thijs Slijkhuis Species: C. Elegans Project: Advanced.
Clustering of protein networks: Graph theory and terminology Scale-free architecture Modularity Robustness Reading: Barabasi and Oltvai 2004, Milo et al.
Reconstructing gene networks Analysing the properties of gene networks Gene Networks Using gene expression data to reconstruct gene networks.
Class Prediction and Discovery Using Gene Expression Data Donna K. Slonim, Pablo Tamayo, Jill P. Mesirov, Todd R. Golub, Eric S. Lander 발표자 : 이인희.
A quick introduction to Oncinfo Lab Dr. Habil Zare, PhD PI of Oncinfo Lab Department of Computer Science Texas State University 18 September 2015.
Module networks Sushmita Roy BMI/CS 576 Nov 18 th & 20th, 2014.
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of fungi Group Nicotiana Daan van Vliet, Dou Hu, Joost de Jong, Krista Kokki.
Case Study: Characterizing Diseased States from Expression/Regulation Data Tuck et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 2006.
Eigengenes as biological signatures Dr. Habil Zare, PhD PI of Oncinfo Lab Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Texas State University 5.
A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraints using 29 mammals Kerstin Lindblad-Toh et al Presentation by Robert Lewis and Kaylee Wells.
Algorithms and Computational Biology Lab, Department of Computer Science and & Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan Network Biology.
Eigengenes as biological signatures Dr. Habil Zare, PhD PI of Oncinfo Lab Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Texas State University 3.
Inferring Regulatory Networks from Gene Expression Data BMI/CS 776 Mark Craven April 2002.
K. Brennan, J.L. Koenig, A.J. Gentles, J.B. Sunwoo, O. Gevaert
Comparison between Pathologic Characteristics of Her2 Negative and Positive Breast Cancer in a Single Cancer Center in Jordan DR Majdi A. Al Soudi, MD,
1. SELECTION OF THE KEY GENE SET 2. BIOLOGICAL NETWORK SELECTION
Biases and their Effect on Biological Interpretation
Monica Britton, Ph.D. Sr. Bioinformatics Analyst June 2016 Workshop
Dr. Habil Zare, PhD Oncinfo Lab Texas State University 4 Dec 2014
Biological networks CS 5263 Bioinformatics.
Time-Course Network Enrichment
Eigengenes as biological signatures
Global Transcriptional Dysregulation in Breast Cancer
INFERENCE OF PERSONALIZED DRUG TARGETS VIA NETWORK PROPAGATION
M. Fu, G. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, B. Yu, F. Meng 
Artefacts and Biases in Gene Set Analysis
Building and Analyzing Genome-Wide Gene Disruption Networks
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Highly correlating interaction profiles can predict functional similarity Highly correlating interaction profiles can predict functional similarity AROC.
Kanguk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University
Fig. 6. Pathway analysis of CMLD
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Transcriptional Consequences of 16p11
A Call for Systematic Research on Solute Carriers
ADAGE model example. ADAGE model example. For one sample in the expression compendium (one column in the figure with red or green colors, representing.
Stop that Noise and Turn Up the Antisense Transcription
Meta-analysis of the Listeriomics transcriptomic data sets.
Centrality of targeted and neighboring proteins.
Characteristics of tissue‐specific co‐expression networks (CNs)‏
R.H. Brophy, B. Zhang, L. Cai, R.W. Wright, L.J. Sandell, M.F. Rai 
Analysis of the nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions dN/dS (ω) for the 5,493 1:1 ortholog transcripts. Analysis of the nonsynonymous to synonymous.
Identification of aging-related genes and affected biological processes. Identification of aging-related genes and affected biological processes. (A) Experimental.
Pie charts showing the percentage of genes for selected enriched biological functions and pathways at different time points after hyperthermic seizures.
Reanalysis of an existing experiment using ADAGE
Stage-specific expression modules of preimplantation development.
Extended analysis of differential expression datasets.
Fig. 5 Transcriptional changes in dKO mice after HFD regimen.
Derivation of ImSig. Derivation of ImSig. A, An example of a correlation network generated from a tissue data set where nodes represent unique genes and.
Inferred promoter–metabolite regulation network (Table EV7)
HIF-1α is not required for the classic transcriptional response to hypoxia. HIF-1α is not required for the classic transcriptional response to hypoxia.
A, unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the expression of probe sets differentially expressed in the oral mucosa of smokers versus never smokers. A,
Fig. 3 Transcriptional changes in dKO mice.
Gene expression profiles of T cells.
HOXA9 and STAT5 co-occupy similar genomic regions and increase JAK/STAT signaling. HOXA9 and STAT5 co-occupy similar genomic regions and increase JAK/STAT.
Identification of putative TET1 targets in TNBC
Distinct subtypes of CAFs are detected in human PDAC
Differences in tumour cell metabolism and cytokine/chemokine expression among the three HCC subtypes. Differences in tumour cell metabolism and cytokine/chemokine.
Presentation transcript:

Network analysis for AML data Dr. Habil Zare, PhD Oncinfo Lab Texas State University 14 Jan 2015

Bayesian networks are useful in modeling genes interactions

CCLE provides expression data useful for learning the network

First application Biological interpretation Gene hubs, causal relationships, interaction between pathways, ….

Data cleaning FKPM values less than 1 Are considered noise and technical artifact.

Differential expression We used limma and ranked the transcripts based on their differential expression in AML vs. MDS. We used the top third for further analysis that included 913 non-coding RNAs. Length of non-coding RNAs

Gene modules Size of module identified by WGCNA. 44 AML cases 24 MDS cases The difference is the number of size of modules is most likely due to different sample size in each group

Gene modules 30 random AML cases 30 random MDS cases MDS is expected to have more modules because of higher heterogeneity.

Gene hubs in modules Hubs are the transcripts that have the highest correlation (interaction) with other transcripts in a module.

Gene hubs in modules We looked at the hubs in the modules and found that: A) PBX3, HOXA9, HOXA10, and MEIS1 are among the top 10 hubs in AML-36 module. They are know to be associated with AML. PBX3 is a cofactor for HOXA9 and both of them are targets for AML therapy. The cluster of HOXA genes are known to be very well associated with leukemia; "Artificial overexpression of HOXA7, HOXA9, or HOXA10 in combination with MEIS1 caused leukemia in animal models.” (Bach et al. 2010)

Gene hubs in modules We looked at the hubs in the modules and found that: B) 9 isotopes of HLA-DPA1 are hubs of AML-20 reported to be associated with AML in 10 studies according to Miler 2010. HLA-DPA1 is also a hub in MDS-35 module.

Gene hubs in modules C) The other hub of AML-20 module is HLA-DMA. Can HLA-DMA be interesting for us too? They both have a high correlation of 0.94 over all AML and MDS cases.

Gene hubs in modules HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DMA are under-expressed in AML. HLA-DMA was reported in 5 studies in the review paper but is its role in AML understood as much as the other gene in this module?

Genes in module 36 correlate differently in AML vs. MDS

AML-related genes in the modules Distribution of 4000 known, AML-related genes in the modules Other than module 36, module 46 that is also enriched in interesting genes.

Genes in module 46 correlate differently in AML vs. MDS too

One striking difference 2 HOXB cluster antisense RNA, NR_033202 and NR_033201, have almost no correlation in MDS. AML MDS

NR_033202 and NR_033201 ~0.5 Kbs long. Both are expressed in more than 1/3 of AML cases and rarely in MDS case. Are they associated with an AML subtype?

NR_033202 and NR_033201 They are associated with therapy-related AML or MDS. NR_033201: 40% of tAML cases have expression > 1 (above noise level) while subtypes AML-MEGA, AML-MPN, AML-NK, MDS have 0 expression. Expressed in AML-M6:1 AML-MDS :1 tAML:12 tMDS : 2 NR_033202: AML-M6:1 AML-MDS:3 tAML:11 tMDS:3

Next steps Controlling for confounding variables such as age and sex Study other gene hubs Learning a Bayesian Network for each module and studying the most influential genes (recognized as N-hob-down-stream nodes) Introducing a new binary variable to the network that indicates whether the sample is AML and MDS. The genes connected to this new random variable are useful in explaining the biological difference between AML and MDS.