Progress Report Implementing the Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan May 22, 2003 in Sacramento Brian Smith, Deputy Director, Planning and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Idaho/Canada Border Issues Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Coeur d’Alene, ID April 22-23, 2008.
Advertisements

Freight Advisory Committee Meeting #3 June 17, 2013 Ashley Probart Deputy Director Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board First and Last Mile Connectors.
Theodore Roosevelt Expressway Annual Meeting Watford City, November 26, 2013 Plenty to Do… Amid Growing Opportunities Joe Kiely Vice President of Operations.
New Directions Forward Scott Omer, PTP, Director Multimodal Planning Division Arizona Department of Transportation 2014 AzTA / ADOT Annual Conference April.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Dan O’Neal, Chairman Washington State Transportation Commission.
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Station Development Update Melissa DuMond, Director of Planning and Integration April 29, 2015.
2060 Florida Transportation Plan Transportation Disadvantaged Training and Technology Conference July 14, 2010.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
 Hartsfield–Jackson is ranked as the world's busiest airport, both in passengers and number of flights.  In 2011 it accommodated 92 million passengers.
Huntsville :: the big picture the convergence of aviation, transit and highway modes.
Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan (ITSP) Status Update Planning Horizons Bruce de Terra Office of System, Freight, and Rail Planning Division.
Transport Investing in Regions SEATS Meeting 17 February 2012.
4 August 2015 Toowoomba Transport and Logistics Symposium Michael Kilgariff, Managing Director, Australian Logistics Council.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Sue Mulvihill, Deputy Commissioner & Chief Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
Highway Program Structure Highway Recommendations Neil Pedersen Chair, ASC Highway Legislative Team Vice Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Administrator,
Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.
TxDOT UTP Category 3 Urban Area (Non-TMA) Corridor Projects Workshops.
1 High-Speed Rail Evaluation October 12, 2007 Planning Committee.
Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board December 6th, 2013 Ashley Probart Deputy Director Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board Primary Freight.
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
Interstate 69 Update Briefing  Loyd Neal, Nueces County Judge Alliance for I-69 Texas Board Chair  Jeff Austin III, Transportation Commission Member.
Northern California Goods Movement Challenges: The I-580 Altamont Corridor Steve Heminger Executive Director, MTC Presentation to Congressman Richard Pombo.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Think Globally, Act Locally August 19, Introduction Why freight is important to central Ohio Global implications and impacts Highway system challenges.
1 Planning Andrea Stevenson. 2 What’s the Big Deal About Ohio’s Transportation System? Ohio is within a single day’s drive (600 miles) of 60% of the United.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Calmentor August 25, 2015 Tony Boren, Executive Director Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare St. #201 Fresno, CA (559) Ext
Linking Northern, Central and Southern California to the world and the nation.
Linking Northern, Central and Southern California to the world and the nation.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
Linking Northern, Central and Southern California to the world and the nation.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
MAP 21 Freight Talking Freight December 14, 2011 Leo Penne AASHTO.
Transportation Infrastructure Perspective Ross Chittenden Deputy Executive Director, Contra Costa Transportation Authority.
1 SOLVING THE PROBLEM AVIATION FOR THE FUTURE. 2 SCRAA BOARD OF DIRECTORS County of Los Angeles - Supervisor Don Knabe County of Riverside - Supervisor.
Statewide Transportation Planning Oklahoma DOT Planning Process Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan Statewide Freight Transportation Plan Arkansas.
Linking Northern, Central and Southern
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Linking Northern, Central and Southern
Georgia’s Transportation systems & the Economy
Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study
A Position Statement 14th October 2016
I-80 California Goods Movement
Central Polk Parkway PD&E Study
Future Interstate 11 Kevin Verre
Southern California Transportation Outlook to the year 2040
Common Learning Blocks
THE EAST COAST GREENWAY
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
Grey County Transportation Master Plan
CANADA – PHYSICAL FEATURES
Category 2 Parameters Transportation Management Areas (TMA) – 200,000+ pop. 8 TMAs in Texas Austin Corpus Christi Dallas-Fort Worth El Paso Hidalgo County.
Intercity Bus Study 5311/Update
Connected Places: Freight, Regions and Megaregions Catherine L
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Georgia's transportation systems
The Air Traffic Organization: Building Today to Ensure Our Future
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
Georgia's transportation systems
Surface Transportation Reauthorization: Corridors and Borders
Presentation transcript:

Progress Report Implementing the Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan May 22, 2003 in Sacramento Brian Smith, Deputy Director, Planning and Modal Programs California Department of Transportation Chair and Members of the Commission. My name is Brian Smith. I am the Deputy Director of Planning and Modal Programs for the Department of Transportation. Today I will be presenting a brief Progress Report on implementing the six key objectives of the Department’s Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan. (CLICK)

Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Guiding Interregional Improvement Program Investment Improving Interregional Movement of People and Goods Vision, Strategies, Performance Measures, Principles, and Objectives The Plan is a framework to guide investment of Interregional Improvement Program dollars to achieve strategic transportation objectives for improving the interregional movement of people and goods. The Plan includes a vision for each eligible funding component, strategies for making most effective use of the dollars, performance measurement at a higher system level, principles for carrying out the program, and six key strategic objectives toward which the Plan and program are directed. (Click)

Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Objective 1 – Complete a Trunk System 10 Routes and Route Portions for Focused IIP Investments Meet Current and Future Population Needs Major Underdeveloped North – South and East – West Routes Focus Routes plus Interstate System Ensures Strong Transportation System While each of the six objectives is important, completion of the trunk system (Focus Routes) is pivotal for sustained statewide interregional mobility. It’s continued development is the basis for meeting three of the other Plan objectives. These routes are termed “focus” for focused investment of Interregional funds. They are a strategic investment for California’s current and future population and vital to goods movement for non-Interstate truck travel. These 10 routes are the major underdeveloped north-south and east-west non-Interstate routes in California that serve the larger interregional travel needs statewide from the Mexico Border to Oregon and from the Ocean to the Eastern Sierra. Completion of the Focus Routes, with the already completed Interstate System, will ensure a strong, constrained ground transportation system for CA.   (CLICK, Focus Map pop up)

Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Focus Routes and Goods Movement Benefits Major North – South Routes for Goods Distribution and Transfer STAA (Big Trucks) and Terminal Access Routes 5 Axle Truck VMT - Interstates 57% - Focus Routes 26% Principal East – West Access Over Coast Range and Connections from I-15/40 into Central Valley Peak Agricultural Season, Timber, Mining The focus routes (or trunk system) are key routes for current and future goods movement and connectivity for non-Interstate truck traffic. They are STAA (big truck) routes and terminal access routes. These routes combined carry the second largest daily vehicle miles of travel for 5 axle trucks-26% - next to the Interstates at 57%. Eighty three % of all large truck travel is handled by these two systems. The focus routes provide critical east –west access over the coastal mountains (such as Pacheco Pass on SR 152 for movement of produce from the Salinas Valley and for access into the Valley from the farther eastern areas via SR 58). They provide north-south access in the 3 primary corridors statewide (such as SR 99 with 5 axle truck volumes that are some of the highest in the state and with additions of over 2,700 big trucks per day during agricultural peak seasons. Agriculture is the primary economic engine of the valley with $10 billion generated in revenue annually.) The routes overall are a strong non-Interstate trunk for goods movement statewide, including in the north state for moving timber, lumber and mining products. (CLICK)

Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Objective 3 –Dependable Movement Into Major Gateways & Connectivity to Key Intermodal Transfer Facilities   Bay Area, Southern CA, Mexico, Grapevine and Central Valley International Airports, Air Cargo Terminals, Seaports, Freight Distribution Facilities Goods Movement - STAA Routes and Truck Terminal Access The 3rd objective is to ensure “dependable movement into major gateways and connectivity to intermodal transfer facilities”. The objective emphasizes primarily the Interstates and their vital importance to goods movement and access to key intermodal transfer centers and distribution facilities, such as International air and seaports. The Interstates, although complete from a system perspective, can be improved for interregional goods movement through truck climbing lanes and other projects. (CLICK)

Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Objective 5 – Link Rural and Smaller Centers to Trunk   California 3rd Largest State 156 Thousand Square Miles 86% State Population in Urbanized Areas on 4.2% of Land Many Rural and Small Towns Susanville, Williams, San Juan Bautista, Chowchilla, Bishop and Oasis The 5th objective to “Link rural and smaller centers to the Trunk” recognizes the vast land area of the state and that while 86% of the State’s population lives in urbanized areas on 4.2% of the land, there are many rural and small towns that are part of the complexity and diversity of CA. Susanville, Williams, San Juan Bautista,Chowchilla, Bishop and Oasis are among them to name only a few. (CLICK).