State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Rubric

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements

Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Office of Student and School Success Action Plan Reviews Essential Question: What defines a distinguished Student and School Success Action Plan? Learning.
NC SSIP: 5 Things We’ve Learned Directors’ Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
NC SSIP: Top 5 Things We’ve Learned Mid-South Meeting January 7-8, 2015.
© 2013 Edvance Research, Inc.. Learn how to use the S Online SRAS System Improvement Tool Assessment Process Planning Process Implementation Monitoring.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
SSIP Implementation Support Visit Idaho State Department of Education September 23-24, 2014.
Overview – Indistar® SSOS Online Web Tool in comparison to the publication “ Evaluating the Statewide System of Support” Assessment Process Planning Process.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Managing Performance in the System of Support A Guide for Providing Technical Assistance to SEAs for Assessing and Improving their System of Recognition,
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs United States Department of Education Aligning the State Performance Plan, Improvement Strategies, and Professional.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna
SSIP Implementation: Alignment & Evaluation Across the State System
The New Educator Evaluation System
Phase I Strategies to Improve Social-Emotional Outcomes
Pat Mueller, EEC David Merves, EEC Vitaliy Shyyan, NCEO
SAMPLE Develop a Comprehensive Competency Framework
Using Formative Assessment
Strategic Performance Management
Generate, An Automated federal Reporting Tool
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
Introduction to National Evaluation System
Kristin Reedy, Co-Director June 24, 2016
Purpose for Curriculum Mapping
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
NCSI Cross-State Learning Collaboratives Part B Meeting
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Performance Improvement Poster Title Author(s) Name(s), Degree, License, Certification, Institution and/or Department Affiliations Focus Develop Evaluate.
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Structures for Implementation
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Continuous Improvement Planning with the eCIP Tool
Leveraging Evaluation Data: Leading Data-Informed Discussions to Guide SSIP Decisionmaking Welcome Mission of IDC- we provide technical assistance to build.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS)
Building Your Title I Schoolwide Plan
Data Framework A Positive Impact.
AESS Annual Assessment Process Workshop
Using Data for Program Improvement
2018 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Using Data for Program Improvement
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
TLAP Partnership Meeting 7th June 2017
Strategic Communication
Reform Support Network Sustainability Rubric
Assessment Day Strategy
Part B: Evaluating Implementation Progress and Impact of Professional Development Efforts on Evidence-Based Practices   NCSI Cross-State Learning Collaboratives.
Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities
2017 Community Health Assessment Fredericksburg City, Virginia
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Rubric Heather Zavadsky BSCP © 2013 Edvance Research, Inc.

Why Use the Rubric? Create a framework to better serve all students, particularly those with special needs Connect SEA departments Collect better and more nuanced data Focus on student results Comply with the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) SSIP requirements

How to Use the Tool Integrated SEA Team Special education Accountability School improvement Title programs Connect departmental roles to student outcome goals Develop plans aligned to existing reform efforts

Rubric Design Essential implementation indicators Four progressive implementation levels No development or implementation Partial development or implementation Mostly functional development or implementation Full development or implementation and evidence of impact “ OSEP terminology and timeline OSEP Part B & C outcome indicators

Essential Indicator Topics Part A: Needs Assessment (data collection and analysis) Part B: Improvement Plan to Address SEA Infrastructure, Practices, and TA Part C: Implement Improvement Plan Part D: Evaluation Part A: Needs Assessment (Data Collection and Analysis) ...............................................................5 1. Identifying data collection and storage processes......................................................................5 2. Identifying and collecting key SEA data on infrastructure and practices..................................7 Part B: Improvement Plan to Address SEA Infrastructure, Practices, and Technical Assistance ....12 3. Analyzing data, determining state-identified measurable results, strategies, and theory of action ................................................................................................12 Part C: Implement Improvement Plan ............................................................................................20 4. Managing and monitoring implementation..............................................................................20 Part D: Evaluation............................................................................................................................21 5. Planning and collecting data for evaluation ............................................................................21 6. Communicating evaluation results and revising the plan ........................................................23

Your Turn Pick a page on the rubric to complete collaboratively at your table. Answer the questions through lens of a particular SEA. Once your page is finished, flip through the rubric and discuss the following questions with your table mates (next slide)

Your Turn How could this rubric be used in one of your SEA’s? Which headings or sections seem the most relevant? Use entire rubric or separate parts? Facilitated or independently?   How can BSCP support you to use this tool? Report-Out by Table