GPT Simulations of the Ion Source Beam

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First Steps XFEL S2E with CSRtrack Convert elegant particlefile upstream of BC-3 into CSRtrack input CSRtrack results.
Advertisements

Imperial College 1 Progress at the RAL Front End Test Stand J. Pozimski Talk outline : Overview Ion source development LEBT RFQ Beam Chopper MEBT.
MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
R. Miyamoto, Beam Physics Design of MEBT, ESS AD Retreat 1 Beam Physics Design of MEBT Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) November 29th, 2012 ESS AD Retreat On behalf.
Pepperpot Emittance Measurements of the FETS Ion Source
FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.
RFQ CAD Model Tolerance Studies Simon Jolly 14 th December 2011.
Emittance Measurement Simulations in the ATF Extraction Line Anthony Scarfe The Cockcroft Institute.
MERLIN 3.0 only considers first order (dipole) modes. Kick is linearly proportional to offset. For offsets close to the axis this is a reasonable approximation.
Diffuser in G4MICE Victoria Blackmore 09/03/10 Analysis Meeting 1/8.
Carbon Injector for FFAG
Status Report on Mk.II Pepperpot Simon Jolly Imperial College 13 th June 2007.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
RFQ CAD Model Beam Dynamics Studies Simon Jolly 3 rd August 2011.
Imperial College 1 Plans and Costs Front End Test Stand Aim is to demonstrate a 60 mA, 2 ms, 50 pps chopped beam at 3 MeV RAL/ISIS (ION SOURCE, CHOPPER,
MICE input beam weighting Dr Chris Rogers Analysis PC 05/09/2007.
Status of the Front End Test Stand April Infrastructure R8 refurbished Laser lab under construction Vacuum system for first section delivered Stands.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
H - injection simulations 13th October 2014 Jose L. Abelleira, Chiara Bracco.
Simulations and Diagnostics for the Front End Test Stand Simon Jolly Imperial College 18 th April 2007.
Marco apollonio/J.CobbMICE coll. meeting 16- RAL - (10/10/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model Main topic : Tracking code development : 3-D simulation of the field in an isochronous FFAG optics.
1 Motivation We wish to test different trajectories on the Stanford Test Track in order to gain insight into the effects of different trajectory parameters.
FETS RFQ Beam Dynamics Simulations for RFQSIM, CST and Comsol Field Maps Simon Jolly 2 nd June 2010.
RFQ 3Dtree Space Charge Studies Simon Jolly 6 th June 2012.
J. Brossard, C. Rimbault a P. Bambade LAL / / 8-9 nov LAL 1 Exercising emittance measurements in the ATF EXT line Upgrade.
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
Simulations of ILC electron gun and bunching system Diagram of bunching system (from TESLA paper by Curtoni and Jablonka) -Electron gun generates electrons.
Developments of the FETS Ion Source Scott Lawrie.
UPDATE IN PTC-ORBIT PSB STUDIES Space charge meeting ( ) * Vincenzo Forte * Follows LIS meeting presentation 16/04/2012.
If information seems to be missing, make any reasonable assumptions. 1.A target has an areal density of 2.3 g/cm 2 and a thickness of 0.8 inch. What is.
RMS Dynamic Simulation for Electron Cooling Using BETACOOL He Zhang Journal Club Talk, 04/01/2013.
RFQ GPT Input Beam Distributions Simon Jolly 22 nd August 2012.
RFQ Exit Bunch Modelling Simon Jolly 25 th July 2012.
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Warm linac simulations (DTL) and errors analysis M. Comunian F. Grespan.
R. Miyamoto, MEBT Lattice Optimization, ESS AD Beam Physics Internal Review 1 MEBT Lattice Optimization Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) For Beam Physics Group,
The 12th Symposium on Accelerator Physics, Yuzhong, Gansu, China1 Study of Beam Properties at SECRAL and The Solenoid Pre-focusing LEBT Youjin.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
FETS Ion Source Diagnostics: The Pepperpot
RFQ CAD Model Tolerance Studies Simon Jolly 2 nd May 2012.
Understanding Extraction And Beam Transport In The ISIS H - Ion Source D. C. Faircloth, A.P Letchford, C. Gabor, S. Lawrie M. O. Whitehead and T. Wood.
3 MeV Measurements at Lianc4 1 Veliko Dimov (for the source and linac team) (J-B Lallement, J. Lettry, A. Lombardi, D. Fink)
Preservation of Magnetized Beam Quality in a Non-Isochronous Bend
Study of Beam Properties at SECRAL and The Solenoid Pre-focusing LEBT
Zgoubi tracking study of the decay ring
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Pepperpot Emittance Measurements of the FETS Ion Source
Time-Reversed Particle Simulations In GPT (or “There And Back Again”)
Status of the Front End Test Stand April 2007.
Update on multi-turn particle debris tracking
Optimisation of the FETS RFQ
H- Ion Source Development
200 kV gun GPT simulations Tee, shroom and sphere catohdes
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
IMPACT Simulation of the Montague Resonance at PS
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model
Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB
SksMinus status 08 HB meeting 2008/7/10 白鳥昂太郎.
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
Current State of the Lattice Studies for the XFEL Injector
Simon Jolly UKNFIC Meeting 25th April 2008
Presentation transcript:

GPT Simulations of the Ion Source Beam Simon Jolly Imperial College FETS Meeting, 31/8/05

LEBT Optimisation To effectively optimise LEBT, must have accurate model of beam at start of LEBT ie. at source extraction. Various data on source beam: Measurements of beam emittance 600mm downstream (DF) - use measured and simulated beam profiles. Optimised emittance and beta functions from ISIS RFQ (APL). MAFIA simulations of source output (DF). Create optimised model based on this data…

Ion Source Measurements (1) Measurements made 600mm downstream from Ion Source (DF): Hrms = 0.92, Vrms = 1.01  mm mrad. xtot = 90mm, x’tot = 110 mrad. ytot = 110mm, y’tot = 155 mrad. For GPT, use uniform x/x’ dist., quadratic y/y’ dist. (see next slides). Run GPT simulation backwards to measure beam at ion source extraction.

Ion Source Measurements (2) Horizontal and Vertical emittance measurements

Ion Source Measurements (3) Horizontal emittance profiles X X’

Ion Source Measurements (4) Horizontal emittance profiles X X’

Ion Source Measurements (5) Vertical emittance profiles Y Y’

Ion Source Measurements (6) Vertical emittance profiles Y Y’

Ion Source Reverse Sim. (1) “Final” emittance profiles Y X

Ion Source Reverse Sim. (2) “Initial” emittance profiles - no space charge Y X

Ion Source Reverse Sim. (3) “Initial” emittance profiles - 10% space charge Y X

Ion Source Reverse Sim. (4) “Initial” emittance profiles - 20% space charge Y X

Ion Source Reverse Sim. (5) “Initial” emittance profiles - 30% space charge Y X

Ion Source Reverse Sim. (6) “Initial” emittance profiles - 50% space charge Y X

Optimised ISIS Values (APL) Fitted / functions and normalised RMS emittance: Hrms = 0.76, Vrms = 1.23  mm mrad. x = 1.53, y = 1.04. x = -8.93, y = -6.6. Gives the following beam parameters at ground plane: xrms = 10.4 mm, x’rms = 8.5 mrad. yrms = 10.9 mm, y’rms = 13.1 mrad. Run GPT using various particle distributions and space charge.

GPT Simulation - APL (1) Initial horizontal emittance: quadratic, uniform and gaussian distributions

GPT Simulation - APL (2) Final horizontal emittance: quadratic, uniform and gaussian distributions; 90% space charge

GPT Simulation - APL (3) Final horizontal emittance: quadratic distributions; 0, 50 and 90% space charge

GPT Simulation - APL (4) Vertical beam trajectories, 0, 50 and 90% space charge; quadratic distribution

Results: Target Values Ion Source measurements - 600mm (DF): Hrms = 0.92, Vrms = 1.01  mm mrad. xrms = 26.0 mm, x’rms = 32.0 mrad. yrms = 24.6 mm, y’rms = 35.0 mrad. Optimised ISIS Values - 0mm (APL): Hrms = 0.76, Vrms = 1.23  mm mrad. xrms = 10.4 mm, x’rms = 8.5 mrad. yrms = 10.9 mm, y’rms = 13.1 mrad.

APL Results (600mm) S.C. xrms xrms’ yrms yrms’ xmax ymax xmax/xrms ymax/yrms 0% 11.8 8.5 13.7 13.1 63.3 75.5 5.3 5.5 10% 14.1 12.6 15.9 16.9 71.0 83.1 5.0 5.2 20% 16.3 18.2 18.0 21.9 78.7 90.5 4.8 30% 18.3 23.8 20.0 27.1 86.0 97.6 4.7 4.9 40% 20.3 29.2 32.2 93.1 104.5 4.6 50% 22.3 34.4 37.1 99.9 111.2 4.5 60% 24.1 39.3 25.6 41.8 106.6 117.7 4.4 70% 25.9 44.0 27.4 46.4 113.1 124.1 80% 27.7 48.6 29.1 50.7 119.5 130.4 4.3 90% 29.4 52.9 30.8 55.0 125.7 136.5 100% 31.1 57.1 32.5 59.1 131.9 142.5 4.2

Ion Source Results (0mm) S.C. xrms xrms’ yrms yrms’ xmax ymax xmax/xrms ymax/yrms 0% 7.3 32.0 4.7 26.2 4.4 5.5 10% 8.8 26.0 6.1 29.2 37.9 31.4 4.3 5.2 20% 10.2 20.6 7.4 24.0 43.6 36.4 4.9 30% 11.6 16.0 8.7 19.4 49.2 41.3 4.2 40% 13.0 12.0 10.0 15.5 54.7 46.0 4.6 50% 14.3 9.1 11.3 12.4 60.0 50.6 4.5 60% 7.9 12.6 10.4 65.2 55.1 70% 16.8 13.8 70.2 59.6 80% 18.0 11.0 15.0 11.1 75.1 63.9 90% 19.2 13.9 16.2 13.2 79.9 68.2 100% 20.3 17.0 17.3 15.8 84.7 72.3

Mafia Data Simulation Input position & velocity data of 10,000 particles to GPT, generated from Mafia simulation (DF). X Y

Mafia Data Results (10% SC) X Y

Mafia Data Results (100% SC) X Y

Mafia Input Results (600mm) S.C. xrms xrms’ yrms yrms’ xmax ymax xmax/xrms ymax/yrms Initial 3.6 2.3 6.1 12.7 14.6 4.1 10% 9.5 16.2 12.6 21.3 37.9 48.6 4.0 3.8 30% 17.9 36.5 21.0 41.7 71.7 79.9 50% 24.7 51.9 27.9 57.1 99.0 105.8 70% 30.7 64.9 33.9 70.1 123.0 128.7 100% 38.7 81.6 41.9 86.8 154.7 159.3

Matlab Interpolation (1) Need to produce input file for GPT from DF measured data. Start with raw data file (histogram data)…

Matlab Interpolation (2) Convert histogram data into individual particle data: use random distribution of points for each phase space cell (increases emittance)…

Matlab Interpolation (3) Reduce number of particles to 10,000 total to produce suitable number for GPT input…

Matlab Interpolation (4) Reproduce histogram for beam distribution compare to real data. Data can now be input to GPT.

Matlab Interpolation (5) Real data

Preliminary Results Closest match to measured data using ISIS / functions with a quadratic particle distribution, 50% space charge. Tracking measured data backwards gives reasonable match even though distributions are different - need to input real data, not approximate distributions. More difficult to find match with Mafia data - initial beam much smaller than others. New Matlab analysis functions match results from GPT.

Still to do… Re-run measured data simulations using actual data, not GPT particle distributions. Create custom particle distributions to read into GPT for a better match to measured data.