Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics
Advertisements

Calorimeters Purpose of calorimeters EM Calorimeters
STFC RAL Graduate lectures 2007/8 R M Brown - RAL 1 An introduction to calorimeters for particle physics Bob Brown STFC/PPD.
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
DREAM Collaboration: Recent Results on Dual Readout Calorimetry. F.Lacava for the DREAM Collaboration Cagliari – Cosenza – Iowa State – Pavia – Pisa –
Particle interactions and detectors
Calorimetry and Showers Learning Objectives Understand the basic operation of a calorimeter (Measure the energy of a particle, and in the process, destroy.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
CERN Summer Student Lectures 2003 Particle Detectors Christian Joram IV/1   Basic principles Interaction of charged particles and photons Electromagnetic.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Particle Interactions
Calorimetry: Energy Measurements
Detectors of charged particles and ions 1) Gas filled detectors a) Ionization chambers b) Proportional counters c) Multiwire chambers d) Time projection.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 Energy Measurement (Calorimetry) Why measure energy ? I) Not always practical to measure momentum. An important contribution.
Calorimeters A User’s Guide Elizabeth Dusinberre, Matthew Norman, Sean Simon October 28, 2006.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
1 Calorimetry - 2 Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007.
Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007
Status of Atlas Tile Calorimeter and Study of Muon Interactions L. Price for TileCal community Short Overview of the TileCal Project mechanics instrumentation.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Status of Projectile Spectator Detector A.Kurepin (Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow) I. Introduction to PSD. II. Conception and design. III. Development.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
LHC Detectors 101 Vivek Sharma (with slides stolen from talks of several people ) 1 Good review article: ARNPS 2006, “General purpose detectors for large.
How do we detect photons? Kensuke Okada RIKEN BNL Research Center April 20,
Particle Detectors for Colliders Calorimeters Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
Calorimeters Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Electromagnetic Showers.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Monday, Oct. 16, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Monday, Oct. 16, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Total Electron.
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Study of Electromagnetic Interactions of Light Ions in the Framework of the IHEP Ion Program at U70 Serguei Sadovsky, IHEP, Protvino EMIN-2009, Moscow,
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Ultra-peripheral Collisions at RHIC Spencer Klein, LBNL for the STAR collaboration Ultra-peripheral Collisions: What and Why Interference in Vector Meson.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers
R.S. Orr 2009 TRIUMF Summer Institute
Rare decay Opportunities at U-70 Accelerator (IHEP, Protvino) Experiment KLOD Joint Project : IHEP,Protvino JINR,Dubna INR, Moscow, RAS.
INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER. twCshttp:// twCs
Learning Objectives Calorimetry and Showers
Adam Para, Fermilab, February 16, Who Cares? What is the Problem? 2 Dual Readout Total Absorption calorimeter has very good energy resolution.
Simulation studies of total absorption calorimeter Development of heavy crystals for scintillation and cherenkov readout Dual readout in the 4 th concept.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE
Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Photon energy.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Lecture 8 – Detectors - II
The PSD at Pb-Pb run PSD drawbacks at Ar beam
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
Scintillation Detectors in High Energy Physics
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Calorimeters in HEP Add hermiticity CC event - calibration
Spectrometry of high energy gamma ray
Experimental Particle Physics
Reports for highly granular hadron calorimeter using software compensation techniques Bing Liu SJTU February 25, 2019.
Chapter 5 - Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
ACCELERATORS AND DETECTORS
Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #17 Particle Detection Particle Accelerators
Particles going through matter
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday ,April 9, 2012 Dr. Brandt Calorimeter
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Presentation transcript:

Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow

CBM setup: CBM includes two calorimeters: PSD – Projectile Spectator Detector (Very Forward Hadron Calorimeter) ECAL – Electromagnetic Calorimeter

Features of CBM calorimeters. ECAL: Two-arm “shashlik” type EM-calorimeter. PSD: Lead/Scintillator-tile sandwich hadron compensating calorimeter. Common features of calorimeters: Sampling calorimeters; Consist of Lead/ Plastic Scintillator sandwiches; The light readout from scintillators is provided by WLS-fibers; Transverse segmentation; Total weight is similar. Different features of calorimeters: Sampling is very different; PSD modules are a factor 20 heavier. The light readout from scintillators is quite different; Transverse segmentation is different; The photodetectors are different. 44 modules. ~22 tons. ~1000 modules. ~28 tons.

Common features of ECAL and PSD: because of general principles of calorimetry and particle detection.

Different features of ECAL and PSD: because of different types and tasks of calorimeters. Let’s start from PSD : Definition of detector: PSD is fully compensated (e/h=1) sampling Lead/Scintillator hadron calorimeter. Tasks of PSD: Characterization of the events (determination of the collision geometry): Impact parameter (centrality ); Reaction plane (event plane). Experimental task: Detection of projectile spectators (non-interacting fragments, protons and neutrons of beam ions).

a) Measurement of centrality Impact parameter b – two dimensional vector connecting the centers of ions. b can not be measured directly. Small b – central events; Large b – peripheral events. Experimental situation: centrality fraction for b by measuring the track multiplicity or energy of spectators in forward calorimeter. Track multiplicity PSD Energy

b) Reaction plane (direction of b) Ideal situation: Reaction plane crosses Z and b and points out the direction of b. Experimental situation: measurement of event plane: spectators (energy in PSD)

ECAL overview. Definition: ECAL is sampling “shashlik” type electromagnetic calorimeter. ECAL is intended for the detection of electrons and photons from the decays of neutral mesons. How electrons and photons are detected in calorimeter?

Photons in matter g e- e-* Ze e- g e-* Ze Rayleigh scattering Coherent, elastic scattering of the entire atom + atom  g + atom Compton scattering Incoherent scattering of electron from atom + e-bound  g + e-free Photoelectric effect absorption of photon and ejection of single atomic electron + atom  g + e-free + ion Pair production absorption of g in atom and emission of e+e- pair Needs Eg>2mec2 Ze e-* e- g Photons in matter Ze e- e-* g Bremsstrahlung Electrons create photons through:

Electromagnetic cascade (shower) in calorimeter. E(x) = E0 exp(-x/X0) Longitudinal profile of E-M shower. The development of em-showers, whether started by primary e or  is measured in X0. Radiation Length X0 of a medium is defined as: distance over which electron energy reduced to e times. Characterizes the shower depth. Critical Energy, when energy loss due to Brem and energy loss due to ionization are equal. Transverse shower dimension: multiple scattering of low energy e-: Moliere Radius: 90% of energy is inside of cylinder with radius of RM. 99% of energy is inside of cylinder with radius of 3RM.

Hadronic cascade (shower) in calorimeter. Hadronic shower consists of two parts, EM (e) and pure hadronic (h) π0   - EM shower, e-part Pure hadronic component, h-part: Charged hadrons; Nuclear excitation, spallation, fission; Heavy nuclear fragments; n can produce signals by elastic scattering in scintillator. Basically e-part is higher of h: e/h>1 ! Nuclear break-up (invisible) 42% Charged particle ionisation 43% Neutrons with TN ~ 1 MeV 12% Photons with E ~ 1 MeV 3%

Characterization of Hadron cascade Shower development is determined by the mean free path between inelastic collisions, the nuclear interaction length: λI = (NAσI / A)-1  A1/3 E(x) = E0 exp(-x/ λI) Comparison of X0 and λI. X0 is one order smaller! Nuclear interaction length λI characterizes both, longitudinal and transverse profile of hadronic shower. The lateral spread of a hadronic showers arises from the transverse energy of the secondary particles which is typically <pT>~ 350 MeV/c.

Properties of Hadronic Showers Hadronic Showers are: Much broader; Extend deeper in the calorimeter; Have significant event-by-event fluctuations. Individual Hadronic Showers in calorimeter.

Compensation ● As already stated, hadronic showers have electromagnetic component (e) strong interaction component (h) e/h ≠1 ● EM fraction increases with energy Non-linearities ● Event by Event fluctuations tend to be non-gaussian Affect the resolution ● What can be done ? Compensating calorimeters to achieve e/h=1: Reduce EM-Component or Boost hadronic response. Nuclear break-up (invisible) 42% Charged particle ionisation 43% Neutrons with TN ~ 1 MeV 12% Photons with Eg ~ 1 MeV 3% Normally, the compensation is provided by selecting an appropriate thickness of absorber and scintillator.

Calorimeter types Homogeneous Calorimeters have the best energy resolution, but the most expensive.

Sampling Calorimeters The smaller sampling fraction, the worse energy resolution because of smaller visible energy.

Energy Resolution (inaccuracy of energy measurement) Sampling fluctuations for sandwich calorimeters (!!). Statistical fluctuations eg number of photo-electrons or number of e-ion pairs. b) Electronic noise. Pile-up effects. Others Non-uniform response. Calibration precision. Dead material (cracks). Material upstream of the calorimeter. Lateral and longitudinal shower leakage. Parameterise resolution as a Statistical b noise c constant (where  denotes a quadratic sum) Resolution of E.-M. calorimeters: Resolution of hadron calorimeters:

Structure of ECAL (shashlik) module 4 cells 60x60 mm2. 124 lead/scintillator layers Lead – 1.0 mm Scintillator – 1.0 mm tiles. Length 22.1 X0. Light collection - 36 WLS fibers inside each cell. Expected resolution:

Technical drawing of ECAL module

Structure of PSD (Forward Hadron Calorimeter) Modular Lead/Scintillator sandwich compensating calorimeter. 44 modules, Each module 20x20cm2 , Length 5.6 λint Sampling ratio Pb:Scint=4:1, Weight – 22 Tons, Longitudinal segmentation, Central beam hole.

Structure of PSD module 23.06.2018 Structure of PSD module SiPMs and amplifiers. SiPM – silicon photomultiplier (avalanche photodiod) ~60 lead/scintillator sandwiches lead – 16 mm scintillator – 4 mm Light readout – WLS -fibers Expected resolution: A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Сonstruction of PSD module 60 lead/scintillator sandwiches 10 longitudinal sections 6 WLS-fiber/SiPMs per section 10 SiPMs/module Module size 20x20x160 cm3 Weight ~500 kg.

Calibration of the module by muons Spectra of energy depositions in each longitudinal section pedestals Muons after beam stopper have wide energy spectrum.

Energy deposition in 1, 1+2, 1+2+3,… 1+…+10 sections for protons at 2 GeV/c in 1 section in 2 sections in 3 sections in 4 sections in 5 sections in 6 sections in 7 sections in 8 sections At Ep=1.27 GeV practically there is no hadron shower but only proton ionization losses. In green: Hadron shower profile in 9 sections in module

Energy deposition in 1, 1+2, 1+2+3,… 1+…+10 sections for protons at 6 GeV/c in 1 section in 2 sections in 3 sections in 4 sections in 5 sections in 6 sections in 7 sections in 8 sections The contributions from proton ionization losses are visible in first 8 sections. Longitudinal profile. in 9 sections in module In green: Hadron shower profile

Energy resolution of calorimeter (test data at NA61/CERN) Protons 4-158 GeV/c Large size hadron calorimeter The constant term is still non-zero because of imperfect calibration and problem with readout electronics.

Forward lead calorimeter leads CBM forward! Thank You!