Schema and Schema Theory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic: Theoretical Bases for Cognitive Method Objectives Trainees will be able to give reasons for the design and procedures of the Cognitive Method.
Advertisements

Contemporary Perspectives. What is a “perspective”? What do you think???
How Psychologists Ask and Answer Questions
Contemporary Theories of Psychology What does contemporary mean?
Cognitive level of Analysis
A mental representation of knowledge stored in the brain 3.2 Evaluate Schema Theory.
Cognitive Level of Analysis. What is Cognition? Cognitive LoA is new to psychology (40-50 years) Important way to look at your life – important to be.
Introducing Piaget Read the information on Piaget and answer the following questions (on a word document or in your green books): Outline Piaget’s main.
Evaluate schema theory with reference to research studies
The Field of Psychology Gaining Insight into Behavior Behavior results from physiological (physical) processes and cognitive (intellectual) processes.
Myers’ EXPLORING PSYCHOLOGY (6th Ed) Chapter 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science.
COGNITIVE LEVEL OF ANALYSIS An Introduction. WHAT IS “COGNITION”?  The mental act or process by which knowledge is acquired  WHAT DO COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGISTS.
Do Now Sit according to your learning style.. Bellringer Reflect on your individual learning style. How will you better participate / advocate for yourself.
Cognitive Level of Analysis. Principles of Cognitive Level of Analysis 1.Mental processes guide behavior. 2.There is a biological basis for cognitive.
Fig8_2. InRev8a InRev7cInRev7bInRev7a InRev6bInRev6aInRev5bInRev5aInRev4bInRev2a INGREDIENTS OF THOUGHT Mental representations of familiar locations Visual.
Schema Theory. War of the ghosts One night two young men from Egulac went down to the river to hunt seals and while they were there it became foggy and.
 How would you rate your memory? Does this number vary from day to day? Morning to evening?
Cognitive Level of Analysis Unit 3. Cognition The mental act or process by which knowledge is acquired.
Schema Theory (3.4) Evaluate schema theory with reference to research studies Describe schema theory as it applies to human behavior (SAQ)
CHAPTER 1 THE FIELD OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. CHAPTER OBJECTIVES After reading this chapter, you should be able to: Offer a definition of social psychology.
3.1 Cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology Includes: perception, thinking, problem solving, memory, language, and attention. Cognition refers to such.
The Study of Psychology. What to expect? Social sciences –Explore influences of society on individual behavior and group relationships Natural sciences.
Cognitive Perspective Methodology & Foundation. Methods Experiments Interviews Observations Psychometric testing Computer simulation.
COGNITIVE LEVEL OF ANALYSIS An Introduction. Cognitive Psychology studies: how the human mind comes to know things about the world AND how the mind uses.
Theoretical Framework Do you have a theoretical framework to guide your research?
Reductionism, Free Will, Determinism and the Biological LOA This is key evaluation which can be brought into any questions from this section.
HW 425 Unit 6 Seminar Theory in Health Promotion & Education.
AICE psychology as level Big ideas
Schema Theory.
The Cognitive Approach
Cognitive Level of Analysis
IS PSYCHOLOGY A SCIENCE?
Attitudes and Intentions
Module 2 Research Strategies
Psychology Notes 1.1.
Vygotsky’s Theories of Learning
Interpretation and Perception
Evaluation of Ethiology
Evaluating a Theory.
THE FIELD OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Your homework question Due next Thursday
THE FIELD OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
3.1 LO: Evaluate schema theory with reference to research studies
THEORY IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Cognitive Approach in Psychology In psychology.
Theories of Literacy Development
Assumptions of the Cognitive approach
Schema Theory 3.1.
Topic 1 Development Assessment Revision
Social Psychology.
Cognitive level of analysis
Recap of the Biological Approach
The Cognitive Approach
Introduction to Psychology Chapter 1
The Cognitive Level of Analysis
Cognitive Analysis: Schemas
Ch 1.1.
Schema Theory.
The reconstructed theory of memory
“Each time one prematurely teaches a child something he could have discovered himself, that child is kept from inventing it and consequently from understanding.
Approach 4: The Cognitive Approach
Get started on this straight away!
Cognitive Level of Analysis: Cognitive Processes
The Cognitive Level of Analysis
Theory of Knowledge Human sciences.
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Myers’ EXPLORING PSYCHOLOGY (6th Ed)
Cognitive level of analysis
 Piliavin et al. developed a model to explain their results called the Arousal: Cost vs. Reward model. They argue that firstly, observation of an emergency.
The Cognitive Approach
Presentation transcript:

Schema and Schema Theory

What is a schema? Cognitive structures that represents a person’s knowledge First used by Piaget in 1926 “pre-existing assumption about the way the world is organized” Used to organize, recall, guide behavior make predictions Helps us make sense of new situations Automatic Culturally specific

Key Vocab: Schema-mental representation of knowledge stored in the brain Script-a specific type of schema (events or situations) Assimilation-adding new information to existing schema Accommodation-building new schema for new information or existing schema is replaced Social norms-expected or usual ways to behave Reconstructive memory-if incoming information is unclear, “filling in the gaps” using existing schema

Characteristics of Schema: Intangible Organized meaningfully Can be added at any time Can be re-organized by moment as new data is received May be innately programmed to organize information into schemas

Refresher: What is a theory? Gives insight into psychological phenomena which cannot be observed Describe or explain psychological phenomena in the social world TEACUP! To Evaluate a theory.

Schema Theory Seeks to explain how we interpret or perceive the world Predicts that we interpret experiences by using relevant social and textual schemas Tries to explain memory distortions and reconstructive memories

An example:

TEACUP-Schema Theory Evaluation: Schema Theory Testable: Schema theory is testable. By priming one's schema, we are able to determine whether the schema helps or interferes with learning - as seen in the study by Anderson & Pitchert. Empirical evidence: There is a lot of research that has supported schema theory. Above you can see the studies by Anderson & Pitchert and Brewer & Treyens. There is also biological research to support the way in which the brain categorizes input. For example, Caramazza (2009) found that from the visual cortex, information about living and non-living objects is shuttled to different parts of the brain so as to trigger appropriate reactions - even in blind participants. These new findings suggest that the wiring that connects different areas of the visual cortex with appropriate regions in the rest of the brain is innate - it does have to form gradually based on visual inputs. This means that our brain automatically sorts information and classifies it, in the same manner which schema theory predicts. Applications: Schema theory has been applied to help us understand how memory works. It also is helps us to understand memory distortion. Schema theory has also been applied in abnormal psychology (Beck's research on depression), relationships (research on violence and bullying) and in health psychology (health campaigns). It is a robust theory that has many applications across many fields of psychology. Construct validity: Cohen (1993) argued that the concept of schema is too vague and hypothetical to be useful. Schema cannot be observed. Even the use of fMRI simply show brain activity, they do not clarify what exactly the individual is processing at the time. Unbiased: Schema theory is applied across cultures. There is no apparent bias in the research, although most of the early research was done in the West. Predictive validity: The theory helps to predict behaviour. We can predict, for example, what types of information will be best recalled when given a list of words. Trends, such as leveling and sharpening, are commonly seen in individuals recalling a news story. However, we cannot predict exactly what an individual will recall. Finally, another criticism of the theory is that it is not entirely clear how schemas are acquired in the first place and how they influence cognitive processes. It is not possible to actually observe schema processing taking place within the brain.