Relational Maximization and Commitment in Romantic Relationships

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Music Preference and Relationship Satisfaction
Advertisements

Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Inference and Inferential Statistics Methods of Educational Research EDU 660.
RESULTS In both studies, greater anticipated mobility significantly predicted reduced relationship prioritization, even after controlling for demographics.
Correlation Coefficients of Religious Orientation & Psychological Well-Being Participants 118 male and 381 female undergraduate students at Eastern Kentucky.
CHAPTER 3: ATTITUDES AND JOB SATISFACTION. Learning Objectives After studying this chapter, you should be able to:  Contrast the three components of.
Optimizing Undergraduate Student Study Time based on Future Income Perry Baptista Senior Honors Project April 26, 2014.
Analyse why relationships may change or end By: Poom + Chris (Loners group)
Designing Research 1 문헌정보학연구방법론 -1. Introduction  An Introduction  The paper that provides readers with the background information for the research.
Chapter 4 Lecture Chapter 4: Building Healthy Relationships and Communicating Effectively © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
Sex and Money: exploring how sexual and financial stressors, perceptions and resources influence marital stability for men and women David B. Allsop,
Chapter 2: The Research Enterprise in Psychology
Jaclyn Theisen & Brian Ogolsky
[ 10.3 ] Voting Trends.
The Relationship Between Instagram Photo Editing and Undergraduate College Women’s Body Dissatisfaction Madeline Wick, Cindy Miller-Perrin, & Jennifer.
socI 100: INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY
Relationships Lesson 8.
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Teacher Instructions Print the lesson,
Robert Nutt, Michael J. Bernstein, & Jacob A. Benfield
Lecture on Attitudes and Job Satisfaction
National Secretary and Host Organisation Championship Survey
Items in red require your input
Research Methods Correlation.
Predictors of Parenting Self-Efficacy in Parents Attending College
Incarcerated Men and Their Partners: A Relationship Intervention Study
The sample under analysis at the end of the scoring was made up of 99 participants as follows:
The Investment Model Relationships
Maternal Demographics
Christian Hahn, M.Sc. & Lorne Campbell, PhD
The ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots’
Multiculturalism and Its Links to Hostility
Making Responsible Decisions
Chapter 2 Entrepreneurial Intentions and Corporate Entrepreneurship.
Created By: T. Alaa Al Amoudi
Religiosity and Romantic Beliefs
Building block of accountability: Transparency Information must be timely and accessible We need to consider what information we are providing, when.
By: Anthony Bryant Jessica Stewart Nicole Williams
C. K. Smith, G. Gaither, P. Lin & A. M. Spurling
The Narrative of the Blended Family
My, But We are Impressive
Sociosexuality and Perceptions of Partner Over Time
Perceived versus Actual Knowledge of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Attitudes, and Job Satisfaction
Social Exchange Theory
Male Organ Health and Your Undergarments: The Debate on Boxers Vs. Briefs
Hypothesis Tests for a Population Mean,
PHLS 8334 Class 2 (Spring 2017).
Items in red require your input
Teacher Instructions Print the lesson,
Items in red require your input
Minimizing misery vs maximizing happiness
Attitudes, and Job Satisfaction
Making Healthy Decisions
Homeschooling Kelli Hoffman.
Lacking occupational network contacts:
Decision Making.
The Effects of Childhood Emotional Abuse on Later Romantic Relationship Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Self-Worth, Alcohol, and Jealousy Madeline M.
Introduction Results Discussion Hypotheses Method
Bell Ringer People make decisions that affect their health everyday. Write down a decision that you recently made that concerns your physical, mental/emotional,
The Geography of Crime! It might not be immediately obvious to you what the link is between geography and crime. However there are many different types.
Personality Dispositions Over Time: Stability, Change, and Coherence
Aashna A. Dhayagude & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
EPUNET Conference in Barcelona at 9th of May 2006 Katja Forssén &
Attitudes and Job Satisfaction
Chapter 7: Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors of Investors
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 10
Levine et al continued.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 10
Purpose and Hypothesis
Presentation transcript:

Relational Maximization and Commitment in Romantic Relationships Madison Garner, Communication Studies Whitworth University Abstract methods Discussion Cont. Discussion Commitment in romantic relationships tends to increase as satisfaction increases, but can a personality trait affect commitment levels of individuals in satisfying relationships? This study examined whether the trait of relational maximization impacts commitment. Results from 343 participants revealed relational maximization does weaken the relationship between satisfaction and commitment in romantic relationship. Participants: 343 college students (127 men, 209 women, 7 individuals who did not identify) with an average age of 21 years old. A pen and paper survey was used, with questions measuring relational satisfaction, investments, commitment, and relational maximization. This study showed that the trait of relational maximization does moderate the relationship between satisfaction and commitment. If you take two individuals who are high in satisfaction and one is also high in maximization, that individual will be less committed to the romantic relationship than the person low in maximization. One key takeaway from the research is that maximization does not only impact how individuals chose a romantic partner, but impacts the commitment individuals have to a chosen romantic partner. As the research showed, simply holding high standards isn’t the problem for maximizer’s in their relationships. Decision difficulty and alternative search is what negatively impacts commitment, and in turn negatively impacts the relationship. results background Relational Maximization Maximization is a personality trait found in individuals who want to make the best choice possible in romantic relationships. Relational maximization is made up of three components: High standards: holding high expectations about a potential romantic partner Decision difficulty: struggling with deciding whether or not to pursue a romantic relationship with an individual Alternative search: seeking better options and considering other relationships Satisfaction Satisfaction is people’s perceptions of the quality of their relationship based on their expectations. Satisfying relationships exceed expectations and dissatisfying relationships fall below expectations. Commitment Commitment is people’s evaluations of whether they wish to remain in the relationship. Mean Scores of Commitment Limitations The method used only allows for correlation, not causation. The research examined an undergraduate student population, which may not reflect the general population’s experience of maximization Future directions Correlation of Satisfaction to Commitment Low Maximization High Maximization .68 .56 What’s the difference between why a maximizer would be high in high standards versus a maximizer high in alternative seeking? Are relationship termination rates higher among individuals high in maximization versus low in maximization? Is there a point in the relationship where maximizers stop maximizing, such as a turning point in the relationship like marriage? Hypothesis H1: Maximization will moderate the relationship between satisfaction and commitment. Specifically, maximization will weaken the relationship (a high satisfaction maximizer will be less committed than an individual who is low in maximization). Correlations for Relational Maximization and Commitment Alternative Search Decision Difficulty High Standards Commitment -.37 -.09 ns Correlation is significant at the .01 level, ns stands for not significant