Payment Choice with Consumer Panel Data Cohen* Rysman** Wozniak***

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Objectives Explain what money is.
Advertisements

Discussion of The perverse effect of Investment Bank Ratings:Evidenc from M&A League Tables – Derrien & Dessaint Lammertjan Dam, University of Groningen.
Fixed-Mobile Substitution and the Promotion of Universal Service Glenn A. Woroch University of California at Berkeley.
The Influence of Monetary and Fiscal Policy on Aggregate Demand Chapter 32 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests for permission.
Learning objectives In this chapter, you will learn about how we define and measure: Gross Domestic Product (GDP) the Consumer Price Index (CPI) the Unemployment.
1 Consumer Homing on Payment Cards: From Theory to Measurement Christopher M. Snyder Dartmouth College Jonathan Zinman Dartmouth College.
Comments on Payment Industry Dynamics  Focus on how paper differs from literature  Discuss nature of asymmetries driving interchange fees  Some other.
Impact Evaluation of Health Insurance for Children: Evidence from Vietnam Proposal Presentation PEP-AusAid Policy Impact Evaluation Research Initiative.
Copyright © 2004 South-Western 20 The Influence of Monetary and Fiscal Policy on Aggregate Demand.
Review of the previous lecture In the long run, the aggregate supply curve is vertical. The short-run, the aggregate supply curve is upward sloping. The.
Alcohol Availability & Alcohol Consumption: New Evidence from Sunday Sales Restrictions Kitt Carpenter (UC Irvine) & Daniel Eisenberg (University of Michigan)
The Influence of Monetary and Fiscal Policy on Aggregate Demand Leader – AP Econ.
The Theory of Consumer Choice
Household Behavior and Consumer Choice Asst. Prof. Dr. Serdar AYAN.
Why Are (Some) Consumers (Finally) Writing Fewer Checks?: The Role of Payment Characteristics Scott Schuh and Joanna Stavins Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
September 9- BUDGET UNIT: SEPTEMBER 9. How do you budget your expenses? If you do not budget, explain why….. BELLWORK: 9/9.
PSD: Managing Own Money Challenge 3. Level 2 – Challenge 3 You are about to look at 4 different situations. For each you need to consider/discuss with.
Charge It Right. 2 You Will Know  The characteristics of a credit card  The costs of using a credit card  The potential problems with credit card use.
Chapter 3 Arbitrage and Financial Decision Making
1 Comments on Hancock, Peek, and Wilcox and Wilcox and Yasuda Sole Martínez Pería (World Bank) Presentation prepared for the World Bank, Rensselaer Polytechnic.
“Buying Less, but Shopping More: The Use of Non-Market Labor During a Crisis” By David McKenzie and Ernesto Schargrodsky Comments by Hugo Ñopo.
Review of the previous lecture 1. Keynesian Cross  basic model of income determination  takes fiscal policy & investment as exogenous  fiscal policy.
“Does Openness to Trade Make Countries More Vulnerable to Sudden Stops, or Less? Using Gravity to Establish Causality” Comments Alejandro Izquierdo Second.
3 | Demand and Supply - Week 2 This week we want to apply our tools of supply and demand to help us think logically about real world problems.
Economics Making decisions. Definition of Economics Economics is the study of how we make decisions in a world where resources are limited. – Do we make.
CHAPTER 2 Tools of economic analysis ©McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.
© 2007 Thomson South-Western. The Influence of Monetary and Fiscal Policy on Aggregate Demand Many factors influence aggregate demand besides monetary.
The Theory of Consumer Choice Chapter 21 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of.
Academic year 2015/16 Introduction to Economics Augusto Ninni.
CH6:Household Behavior and Consumer Choice CH6:Household Behavior and Consumer Choice Asst. Prof. Dr. Serdar AYAN.
13-1 Money  In this chapter we examine the role of money in the economy. Specifically  What is money?  How is money created?  What role do banks play.
The theory of consumer choice Chapter 21 Copyright © 2004 by South-Western,a division of Thomson Learning.
Copyright © 2004 South-Western 34 The Influence of Monetary and Fiscal Policy on Aggregate Demand.
You will learn the IS curve, and its relation to
Monetary and Fiscal Policy. Aggregate Demand Many factors influence aggregate demand besides monetary and fiscal policy. In particular, desired spending.
PSD: Managing Own Money
Elasticity of Demand and Supply
Instrumental Variables Regression
TO BE or Not to Be GDP That is the Question.
Discussion of “When is Hard to Make Ends Meet?”
The Theory of Consumer Choice
Payment Instruments, Financial Privacy and Online Purchases
How are Albert Einstein and the Rule of 72 related?
Elasticity of Demand and Supply
Household Behavior and Consumer Choice
ECN741: Urban Economics Notes Based on: “Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Why Do Real Estate Agents Withhold Available Houses from Black Customers?” Jan.
Perspectives of Property Tax Incidence in California Forty Years after Proposition 13 Robert W. Wassmer Professor, Department of Public Policy and Administration.
How are Albert Einstein and the Rule of 72 related?
CH6:Household Behavior and Consumer Choice Asst. Prof. Dr. Serdar AYAN
Understanding Credit Cards
How are Albert Einstein and the Rule of 72 related?
Household Behavior and Consumer Choice Asst. Prof. Dr. Serdar AYAN
The Influence of Monetary and Fiscal Policy on Aggregate Demand
How are Albert Einstein and the Rule of 72 related?
Discussion Critical participants in target2
Warmup John’s billing cycle started on Aug 4th. His beginning balance was $ He had the following transcations: Aug 10 spent $54.96 Aug.
A Formal Model of Consumption and Saving
Changes in Demand.
Comments on “Loan-to-value Caps, Bank Lending and Spill-over to General Purpose Loans” Ashley Dunstan Macro-financial Department, RBNZ December 2017.
Demand, Supply, and Equilibrium in the Money Market
Week One - Review.
Chapter 17 The Financial System.
Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance CharlesP.Himmelberga R.GlennHubbardab DariusPaliaac.
Money and Banking Lecture 38.
The Influence of Monetary and Fiscal Policy on Aggregate Demand
How are Albert Einstein and the Rule of 72 related?
ECN741: Urban Economics Notes Based on: “Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Why Do Real Estate Agents Withhold Available Houses from Black Customers?” Jan.
ECN741: Urban Economics Notes Based on: “Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Why Do Real Estate Agents Withhold Available Houses from Black Customers?” Based.
Presentation transcript:

Payment Choice with Consumer Panel Data Cohen* Rysman** Wozniak*** Discussion by Alistair Milne, Loughborough University 15th PSS seminar, Helsinki, Aug 2017

Summary Utilises an unusual data set of scanned consumer grocery (food) purchases, by household member and including data on total transaction size and payment method (card v. check v. cash). 1.34 mn transactions in 16 designated market areas, 2006-2008 Investigates payment instrument choice esp. impact of transaction size and extent and evolution of ‘single homing’

Main findings Summary stats Average spend cash transactions $35.3, falling with size v. $70.2 for cheque and $64.9 for card, both increasing with size. Cash and card usage varies as expected with income, but not check usage Most h/holds utilise two instruments a few one Preferred instrument changes little month to month

Econometric issues Multinomial probit model Computational problems and potential bias with many individual fixed effects Solution: bias-correcting Dhane Jochmans (2015) and expectations maximizatiion estimator EM proposed by Chen Reverse causality, payment choice affecting transaction size Solution instrument with day of week variable as proposed by Terza et. Al. (2008)

Econometric results Transaction size strong predictor of payment choice, not much effected by control variables Demographics, lagged choice, or fixed effects or instrumentation Changing household preferences explain little of shift of choice toward card payment Mostly explained by increasing transaction size, entry of ‘card preferring’ households Analysis of check withdrawal Leading to fairly equal substitution into cash and card

Comments and suggestions Motivation High quality but old data set (2006-2008) can you better persuade me of relevance today? e.g. mention overall shift in household instrument usage 2000-2016, politics of check withdrawal Well executed, good combination analytical tools Working paper 2013. Updated econometrics since for potential bias? Much difference? One main question remains unanswered for me Do changes in household preferences affect transaction size and hence choice of instrument? Perhaps some accompanying modelling of transaction size This has implications for check withdrawal Different prediction today because of changed preferences