Visitation Protocol Project - Providing Meaningful Visitation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safety Planning. Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5:
Advertisements

Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence CFWS In-Service.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
A court dedicated to protecting children and promoting families
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
1 EDUCATION: Court Reports: What to include related to the Child’s Education.
Fixed Term Exclusions Period of time could run from ½ day or up to 45 days and could include lunchtime exclusions Parents must receive written details.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
CARE PROCEEDINGS REFORMS: An Overview Statutory Guidance and Public Law Outline Training.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
REDUCING ADVERSITY: Managing the Family Law Case and Promoting Cooperation William C. Fee Steuben Superior Court.
Kenny A vs State Principles Georgia’s Child Welfare System must actively promote the opportunity for children to grow up with in a family. Family contacts.
1 Child in Need of Protection or Services Proceedings Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl.
Implementing Fully Every Tool in the Child Welfare Toolbox Chuck Johnson President and CEO National Council For Adoption.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Parent-Child Visitation: Could Practice Make a Difference? Washington State CASA Conference October 2015Washington State CASA Conference October 2015.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Roles and Responsibilities of the IRO. Role and Responsibilities of IRO When consulted about the guidance, children and young people were clear what they.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discipline.
The council’s future role in education June 2016 [Final] Standards First.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Introduction to the Domains
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
The Role of the Education Rights Holder (ERH)
A court dedicated to protecting children and promoting families
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Educational Advocacy And The CASA Volunteer.
Finding the “Rights” Balance
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
SEFTON MASH The Decision Making Process of MASH and how the current restructure will affect MASH.
Information Session Maggie Davies.
The Role of Education/Special Education Decision Makers
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Presented by Hill Country CASA
Module 9 Safety Planning
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Foster Care Updates and Issues
 Introduction Permanency Planning Meetings (PPMs) are held in addition to the Child’s Looked After Review to establish a child’s permanency pathway and.
A Managers Guide to Parental Leave
Removal and Placement FSFN
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Removal and Placement FSFN
Open Adoption Agreements
Ongoing Assessment of Change and Permanency
Maintaining Child and Family Connections
Module 17 Achieving Permanency
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
House Human Services Committee
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Completing the Child’s Plan (Education – Single Agency Assessment)
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Attendance and Truancy
Forms – Domestic Violence
Presentation transcript:

Visitation Protocol Project - Providing Meaningful Visitation Georgia State University and Committee on Justice for Children Visitation Seminar Atlanta, Georgia January 31, 2007 Judge R. Michael Key, Troup County Juvenile Court Melissa Carter, Committee on Justice for Children Susan Webb, Troup County DFCS

What is the Visitation Protocol Project? Project of the Georgia Court Improvement Initiative and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Joint Project of the Permanency Planning Department and the Domestic Violence Department of the National Council Multi-Disciplinary Workgroup Work in Progress

What is “Family Time”? “Visitation” does not adequately describe the time families need together, either quantitatively or qualitatively. “Family Time” should be frequent, consistent, and as “family-like” as possible given the state of disruption within the family.

Goals of the Project Reach consensus for minimum family time; Identify innovative practices; Identify the roles of various persons and agencies with reference to visitation; and Develop a decision model to ensure that all relevant factors are considered and properly weighed in setting family time.

Core Principles Whenever children are removed from their homes by state action, the state has a legal responsibility to provide meaningful and safe visitation. There is value in having a beginning point in the decision making process that is research-based. Family time plans should be based on the unique facts of each case, allowing for variation from the default provisions where certain factors, or “special circumstances”, are present.

Core Principles, Continued Although it is generally true that whatever is good for the parent is good for the child, when there is a conflict between what is in the best interest of the child and what is in the best interest of the parents, the best interest and well-being of the child shall always take precedence. An initial opportunity for family time should be made available within the first five (5) working days following physical removal of the child from the home.

Core Principles, Continued Within thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days following removal of the child from the home, if the child remains in care, the agency should develop a more case-specific family time plan, taking into account the facts as they have developed in the case, and seeking input from the parents, the child, and the CASA or other child advocate. Whenever possible, involvement of the parents and the foster parents together in the development of the family time plan is important.

Core Principles, Continued Throughout the life of the case, circumstances change and facts become known that previously had not been considered in developing the family time plan. Family time plans must never be used as a threat or form of discipline to the child or to control or punish the parent. Family time decisions are not made in a vacuum, so decisions regarding family time need to be made with consideration given to where the child is placed.

Core Principles, Continued The failure to provide for meaningful family time for children removed by state action, early and throughout the life of the case, may constitute a failure to make reasonable efforts to reunify families or to effect and finalize an alternate permanency plan.

Default Provisions- Working Assumptions Focus on duration and frequency. Contemplate only supervised visitation at this point in the project. Driven by the needs of the children and families, not controlled by readily available resources, but influenced by an overlay of reasonableness. Reunification is the permanency goal.

Troup County’s Protocol

Troup County’s Protocol The children shall be provided meaningful and safe Family Time from the time they enter care until the reunification is accomplished or until further order of the Court. The Agency shall provide as much Family Time as possible consistent with the best interests of the child, both in terms of frequency and duration, and to provide that opportunity in such a place and manner so as to make it as natural as possible. The Family Time Default Provisions contained herein are merely as the minimum Family Time and, when possible and appropriate, provision of more Family Time shall be made.

Troup County’s Protocol Family Time Plans should be based on the unique facts of each case, allowing for variation from the Default Provisions where certain factors, or “special circumstances”, are present. However, whenever there is a variance from the Default Provisions that result in less family time, the reason for the variance should be articulated to all relevant parties to the case, factually based, appropriately documented, and approved by the Court. Should there be a conflict between what is in the best interest of the child and what is in the best interest of the parents, the best interest and well-being of the child shall always take precedence in developing and implementing the Family Time Plan.

Troup County’s Protocol Wherever used herein, the term “Family Time Plan” shall mean and refer to the schedule developed and implemented for the time the child, parents, and, where applicable, siblings spend together. An initial period of Family Time, consistent with the duration provided for in the Default Provisions, should be made available within the first five (5) working days following physical removal of the child from the home.

Troup County’s Protocol At the shelter care hearing, the court shall put in place, or ensure that the agency has put in place, a meaningful Family Time Plan. This Family Time Plan shall remain in place until adjudication or until the plan is changed in accordance with the decision model provided for herein. Except to the extent special circumstances that justify a variance are established at the shelter care hearing, the pre-adjudication family time plan should, at a minimum, provide for family time substantially in accordance with the Default Provisions. In developing the Family Time Plan, there shall be a presumption that the Family Time shall not be supervised. The presumption may be rebutted based on evidence presented at the 72-hour hearing or any other subsequent hearing where Family Time is addressed.

Troup County’s Protocol Within thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days following removal of the child from the home, if the child remains in care, the Agency shall develop a more case-specific Family Time Plan, taking into account the facts as they have developed in the case, and seeking input from the parents, the child, and the CASA or other child advocate. Family time plan should be developed in a family conference with as many of the following participants present and/or consulted: (1) the parents; (2) the child; (3) the CASA and/;or attorney for the child; (4) family members with whom the child has a significant attachment; (5) foster parents; (5) service provider who is in a position to offer constructive comment in regard to Family Time; (6) any provider who has assessed the child; and (7) other persons demonstrating a significant attachment or commitment to the child.

Troup County’s Protocol Whenever possible, the parents and the foster parents should be involved in the development and implementation of the Family Time Plan. The Family Time Plan should not be rigid, but should allow sufficient flexibility for change as circumstances warrant to ensure the safety and well-being of the child. Provided, however, that when the family time plan is changed, there should be safeguards in place to protect the rights of all parties. Family time plans shall not be used as a threat or form of discipline to the child or to control or punish the parent

Troup County’s Protocol - Default Provisions Age Birth to 6 Months- 30 to 60 minutes 3 times per week. Age 6 to 18 Months- 1 hour 3 days per week. Age 18 months to 3 years- 1 ½ hours 2 times per week. Age 3 to 5 years- 2 or more hours 1 time per week. Age 5 to 12 years- 2 or more hours 1 time per week. Age 12 to 18 years- No specific recommendation.

Troup County’s Protocol – Special Circumstances The default provisions provided for in Paragraph 13 hereof shall apply in every case unless, based on the unique facts of each case, a variation from the Default Provisions is warranted. In considering whether to vary from the Default Provisions, consideration shall be given to any special circumstances which might exist including, but not limited to the following:

Troup County’s Protocol – Special Circumstances Safety, which shall always be of paramount concern; Any special purpose for the Family Time based on the facts of that particular case; The permanency plan for the child; Existence of a concurrent plan; Participation of siblings, including adults and children;

Troup County’s Protocol – Special Circumstances Presence of domestic violence; The schedules and activities of the children; The schedules and activities of the parents; The relationship between the child and the current caregiver; The relationship between the child and the parents before removal;

Troup County’s Protocol – Special Circumstances Transportation; The activities planned for Family Time; The reasons for removal of the child from the home; Other existing court orders; Placement of the child; Placement of the parent; and The history of the parent’s exercise of parenting time.

Troup County’s Protocol – Family Time for Siblings The particular relationship between the siblings in individual cases should always be considered because, generally speaking, sibling contact is at least as important as contact between children and their parents. If siblings cannot be placed together, the Family Time Plan should make specific provisions for contact between siblings. It is not necessary that all siblings be present for all family time. Considering the children’s ages and activities it may be perfectly appropriate to have some family time as a complete family unit, and some spent with various parts of the family unit. Provided however that, the duration, length, or quality of family time for one child or parent should not be sacrificed on account of another child or parent.

Troup County’s Protocol – In all matters relative to the establishment of a Family Time Plan the work of the Visitation Protocol Project, including the Domestic Violence Team Report from the Project, as it progresses shall be considered. In any case where reunification is still the permanency plan in the case and supervised visitation is still required six months following the removal of the child from the home, a hearing shall be held at the first available hearing date to show cause why there is still a need for supervised visitation.

Troup County’s Protocol – At the first Citizens’ Panel Review held following removal of the child from the home (usually hold four months following removal), if there is not a plan in place to move to unsupervised visitation no later than six months following removal from the home, the case shall be referred to the Court for a review of the case generally and of visitation specifically.

Two New Related Projects

Two New Enhancements Enhancing Quality of Visitation to Promote Permanency Milestones to Permanency

What is a Milestone? A stone or marker functioning as a milepost. A significant event or stage in the life, progress, development, or the life of a person, nation, etc. Milestones are those points where time and specific events intersect. They are the critical stages of the case plan where decisions are made, actions are rewarded, or sanctions are administered.

Invite written follow-up comments to: Open Discussion. Invite written follow-up comments to: carterm@gaaoc.us michael@kmglawfirm.com sewebb@dhr.state.ga.us