University of California, Riverside

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seven Deadly Sins of Dyadic Data Analysis David A. Kenny February 14, 2013.
Advertisements

No. 1 secret to maintaining a healthy relationship is having good communication skills.
Chapter 2 The Research Enterprise in Psychology. Table of Contents The Scientific Approach: A Search for Laws Basic assumption: events are governed by.
Intimate Relationship
Good Morning Inver Grove Heights Year Two: Leading For Excellence.
The Broader Context of Relational Aggression in Adolescent Romantic Relationships Megan M. Schad, David E. Szwedo, Amanda Hare, Jill Antonishak, Joseph.
Implicit Vs. Explicit Peer Rejection Megan M. Schad, Amori Yee Mikami, Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia We would like to thank the National Institute.
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model or APIM. APIM A model that simultaneously estimates actor and partner effects on an outcome variable The actor and.
MAUS WRITING ASSIGNMENTS. For this assignment you will need to find a current event article which you feel connects to events of the Holocaust as depicted.
The Scientific Method. Scientifically Solving a Problem Observe Define a Problem Review the Literature Observe some More Develop a Theoretical Framework.
1) This study was the first to confirm a genetic influence on altruistic behaviour, with the highest contribution present in altruism toward friends. This.
Family School Relationships Peer Contexts H607: Ethnicity, Context & Family Dynamics.
Deep Dyadic Friendships vs. Broad Peer Preference During Adolescence as Predictors of Adolescent and Adult Internalizing Symptoms Rachel K. Narr & Joseph.
Statistics & Evidence-Based Practice
Chapter 8 Introducing Inferential Statistics.
Attachment style and condom use across and within dating relationships
Chapter 2: The Research Enterprise in Psychology
Correlation Prof. Andy Field.
Personality Assessment, Measurement, and Research Design
Effects of Self-Monitoring on Perceived Authenticity in Dyads
Argumentative Writing and Transition Words
Marriage and Parenting
Rational Influence Tactics Harsh Influence Tactics
Power Analysis and Meta-analysis
Roommate Closeness Development and Pathological Personality Traits
Christian Hahn, M.Sc. & Lorne Campbell, PhD
Father play in multiple contexts: Study Site Information
Support The toulmin model.
Shared Positive Affect Shared Negative Affect
DESCRIPTIVES AND CORRELATIONS
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Lehigh Valley Hospital & Health Network
Chapter 15 Strategic Thinking Part One
Unit 1. First Impressions
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/Techniques
Self-discrepancies in the Social Role of Mother: Associations between Self-discrepancies and Negative Affect Nicole J. Holmberg, Laura D. Pittman, Emily.
Findings of examined articles
Lesson ANOVA - D Two-Way ANOVA.
Chapter 1 – Sociology: A Unique Way to View the World
Study Says that ED and Depression are Linked
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/Techniques
Chapter 6 Making Sense of Statistical Significance: Decision Errors, Effect Size and Statistical Power Part 1: Sept. 18, 2014.
Activity 2: What Makes Couples Tick?
Attachment Behaviors:
Introduction Results Methods Conclusions
Gender and Gender Composition Differences in Initial Dyadic Interactions Chapter 3 of Strangers.
Bivariate Association: Introduction and Basic Concepts
Collecting and Interpreting Quantitative Data – Introduction (Part 1)
Introduction Results Conclusions Method
Introduction and Hypotheses
Introduction Results Conclusions Hypotheses Method
Basic Concepts in Social Science Research
What is Personality?.
THE SELF.
Day 47 – Cause and Effect.
LONELINESS What we know (so far) An overview of evidence reviews:
Preparing a PROFILOR® Feedback Report
The European Social Model and Quality of Life
General Findings and Observations
Personality Assessment, Measurement, and Research Design
Sociology: A Unique Way to View the World
EAST GRADE course 2019 Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Conversations change lives
Introduction Results Discussion Hypotheses Method
Understanding your Impact on Well-Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 Contributing to and Reporting on the 7 Wellbeing Goals, Local Wellbeing.
Chapter 10 Communicating in Close Relationships
Key Terms 4.02.
Meta-analysis, systematic reviews and research syntheses
Does a correlation exist between coping skills and economic realities?
Shared Positive Affect Shared Negative Affect
Presentation transcript:

University of California, Riverside A Meta-Analytic Approach to We-Talk and Positive Functioning in Romantic Couples Alexander Karan Robert Rosenthal Megan L. Robbins University of California, Riverside

Introduction Romantic relationships are interdependent First-person plural pronouns may reflect interdependence We-talk: “we,” “us,” “our” We-talk positively relates to many indicators of positive functioning Negative and null findings too Relationship depends on who uses we-talk Hallmark of rom rel is that they are interdependent or behaviors… Especially in romantic relationships, these influences may seep into how connected the partners are. They may feel similarly about events or share interests. They may have to rely on each other and desire to help each other to get through life stressors they are inevitably going to come across. Through this interdependence, their identities may begin to merge and one way this may expressed is through their use of words Relationship depends on who uses, self, partner, patient, spouse Coping contexts especially desirable to go through it together than individually. Because of conceptual differences, we conducted a meta-analysis to add clarity to this line of work

Method and Results 30 published and unpublished articles relating we-talk and positive functioning 30 articles, positive functioning broadly defined - relationship outcomes and behaviors, mental health, physical health and health behaviors Plot depicts actor effects… positive trend actor effects We-talk and rel outcomes most robust – 25 studies AND it would take 94 studies with an average effect size of 0 to bring this to p=.05 r = .08

Results Partner effects were similar r = .11 Strongest was partner and health beh r = .17 Particularly true in patient samples where the spouses we-talk most strongly related to patients’ positive functioning r = .11

Conclusions Consistent positive relationship between we-talk and positive functioning Partner > actor effect Spouse > patient we-talk for patient outcomes Causal direction? Consistent positive relationship. We think this really underscores the importance of interdependence in romantic relationships as it seems to be linked to positive functioning for both individuals in the relationship Pattern of partner > actor, relationship outcomes and health behaviors Similarly, spouses > patients for patients own outcomes However, these were all correlational. Causal direction between we, inter and positive functioning still needs to be addressed.

Significance and effect sizes