UWBI Coordinators and Executive Sponsors August 11, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Advertisements

The Value of a Project Management Office Copyright: Kathy J. Lang, 2004.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Self-Service Business Intelligence for the Product Management Department (Concurrency Corporation)
AACC – BI Tools Upgrade Presentation AACC Presentation BI Tools Upgrade Project May 1, 2008.
Technology Steering Group January 31, 2007 Academic Affairs Technology Steering Group February 13, 2008.
Business Intelligence Dr. Mahdi Esmaeili 1. Technical Infrastructure Evaluation Hardware Network Middleware Database Management Systems Tools and Standards.
EFS Reporting Strategy Financial Data Warehouse Initiative GMUN – May 2010.
National Finance Center’s 2008 Customer Forum EmpowHR 9.0 Billy Dantagnan Teracore.
AGILECO - Project Looking Glass Team 3 – Final Presentation Presenters: - Chris Dornin - Meghan Porter-Mahoney - Laura Zachary - Aaron Marsh.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
Project Risk Management. The Importance of Project Risk Management Project risk management is the art and science of identifying, analyzing, and responding.
Problem Identification
Kuali Research Administration (KRA) Kuali Financial System (KFS) Kuali Student (KS) Project Management Andy Slusar KRA Project Manager Cornell University.
University of Wisconsin System HRS Project Update to ITC November 19, 2010.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eGovernment Working Group Meeting February 11, 2004.
12/4/ OBIEE Technical Conference Getting Started with a Dashboard Development Project Theresa May.
1 Program Release 2008 Update to the Administrative Council August 9, 2007.
Welcome! BI Executive Sponsors August 4, 2016
BI Coordinators and Executive Sponsors March 3, 2017
Once Upon a Time: The Story of a Successful BI Implementation
Digital Campus: Foundation Projects
Quantum Leap Project Management
University of Wisconsin Business Intelligence
Account Management Overview
UWBI Coordinators and Executive Sponsors June 23, 2017
BI Executive Sponsors December 1, 2016
BI Executive Sponsors November 3, 2016
Welcome! BI Executive Sponsors April 7, 2016
Welcome! BI Executive Sponsors May 5, 2016
Application Outsourcing: Achieving Success & Avoiding Risk
Updating the Value Proposition:
Welcome! BI Executive Sponsors January 22, 2016
Ian Bird GDB Meeting CERN 9 September 2003
Data & Technology Updates April, 2016
Welcome! BI Executive Sponsors October 13, 2015
Project Management Lifecycle Phases
Project Steering Committee Meeting 27 May 2015 :14h00 – 16h00
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
Project & Program Governance
Defining an IT Workflow, from Request to Support
ESMF Governance Cecelia DeLuca NOAA CIRES / NESII April 7, 2017
Welcome! BI Executive Sponsors November 17, 2015
Description of Revision
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Phase 3 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Arizona Health-e Connection Leadership from Governor Napolitano
Project Charter General Information Project Title Date
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Welcome! BI Executive Sponsors December 18, 2015
UWBI Coordinators and Executive Sponsors April 28, 2017
UNLV Data Governance Executive Sponsors Meeting
Project Management Process Groups
Welcome! BI Executive Sponsors June 16, 2016
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
1915(i)& (k) Implementation Update
Enterprise Program Management Office
Production URLs Pod Institutions URL PLNUWNE Green Bay, Stevens Point,
Presentation to Project Certification Committee, DoIT August 24, 2008
Welcome! BI Executive Sponsors June 2, 2016
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Ctclink executive leadership committee May 31, 2018
Project Overview.
Project Kick-off <Customer Name> <Project Name>
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
IT Next – Transformation Program
SHARE Special Project SHARE Benefits Optimization
Presentation transcript:

UWBI Coordinators and Executive Sponsors August 11, 2017 University of Wisconsin Business Intelligence UWBI Coordinators and Executive Sponsors August 11, 2017

Agenda AGENDA MEETING OBJECTIVES Welcome, Objectives, Agenda UWBI Coordinators… Review deployment timeline Learn of plans for developing training Have a chance to share their progress. Executive Sponsors… Review UWBI Progress Dashboard Understand project issues and risks Have an opportunity to ask questions and discuss transition of UW to OBIEE. AGENDA Welcome, Objectives, Agenda UWBI Progress Dashboard UWBI Project Risks UW-System OBIEE Deployment Timeline UWBI/Shared Queries Look/Feel Training Next Steps Summer Meeting – Common Interests Project Transitions Questions

PROGRESS DASHBOARD UW Business Intelligence Effort Approved Scope TODAY OBIEE IMPLEMENTATION Budgeted v Spent/Committed FY16/FY17 Completed On track Minor delay Serious Future activity Campus Progress For details behind this campus information, see the wiki. If you have questions, contact Kathy Luker and Mark Treiber. T Eau Claire Green Bay Milwaukee Platteville Stout Whitewater Madison Superior River Falls Stevens Point Oshkosh Parkside La Crosse Colleges/Extension Key Highlights Current critical issues Potential issues (i.e. risks) Shared Queries – Release A nearing completion and being readied for Preview Testing. Merge Management Processes complete and being tested Platteville, Eau Claire and Madison moving into Central Environments Security – Security functioning. Middleware working on security table ETL. Infrastructure – Central Test ready for use Issue Mitigations Owner Central Merge Manager hire fell through. Resource constraints on shared query team Kathy’s replacement Interviews progressing, offers pending. See Risk Matrix In discussions for short term and longer term solution Andy C.. Andy C. David S. Risk Mitigations Owner Shared Query conversion just beginning, campus custom reports at risk May not have all SFS/HRS elements used by campuses in RPD by deadline Merge manager position difficult to fill Pilot approach to deliver content as quickly as possible to campuses Topic of discussion with Rob Cramer Executive Sponsors Offer pending Andy C. Nikki B

Technical Support and Setup UWBI Risk Matrix To facilitate discussion and tracking, the risks have been categorized into three areas. Adoption Risks in this category are related to the adoption and effective use of the OBIEE suite and the ability of the solution to fulfill the requirements identified as part of the initial selection of the software Schedule Risks in this category involve items that will prevent IR from being retired in April, 2018 Technical Support and Setup Risks in this category involve items that could jeopardize the setup and stability of the OBIEE environment or the ability to meet the technical requirements of the system

Risk Matrix - Adoption As of 5/23 as of 8/9 # Category   As of 5/23 as of 8/9 # Category Risk Description P I Risk Response Current Response Tasks 1 Adoption Funding has not yet been approved to build a central Finance RPD for the campuses to build reports from. Campuses heavily rely on Finance data for day to day operations. If funding is not approved soon, there is a high probability campuses won't have time to rebuild their reports before April, 2018 deadline and will go in another direction. (Also a schedule risk) High Avoid 1. Discussion held with Rob Cramer on 8/8, discussing options. 2 End users will need appropriate training to enable them to use OBIEE effectively. UW-System does not currently have an effective structure to provide UW-System wide training. Medium 1. UW-System hiring a full time training resource. Committee being formed. 2. Huron proposing short term options. 3. Leverage UW-Platteville materials 3 The solution for the shared queries does not address the underlying data quality and consistency issues with the EPM warehouse. Risk that existing data quality issues will limit usage of OBIEE reports. Low Accept EPM Data quality is a larger issue, not part of this effort. 4 Ad Hoc query capability is a top priority for many of the campuses. Decision is needed on tool to be used. Note that Oracle indicated Visual Analyzer can be used for mashups. 1. Visual Analyzer training conducted in July, need to evaluate usage. 2. Mashup limitation being researched by Oracle and Robert Flum. 5 Complexity of the UW BI support model will make it difficult to establish production support. 1. Governance Committee has responsibility and is working to establish. Approach is to keep it simple and leverage similar model to IR support.

Risk Matrix - Schedule As of 5/23 as of 8/9 # Category   As of 5/23 as of 8/9 # Category Risk Description P I Risk Response Current Response Tasks 6 Schedule Current work on the conversion of the shared queries is just beginning. There is a risk that they will not be available in time for campuses to recreate their custom reports. Medium Low High Accept 1. Need a plan to address 7 Campuses are just getting started with development, Campuses indicate they are on track as reported by the campuses and in the dashboard but solid plans with milestones have not been shared. and there is a risk they will not make it by April, 2018 1. Campuses provided initial schedule for move. 2. Need to continue to monitor. 8 UW Decision Making process can take significant time; there is a risk that project timelines could slow while waiting on decisions. Avoid Same as above

Risk Matrix – Technical Setup and Support   As of 5/23 as of 8/9 # Category Risk Description P I Risk Response Current Response Tasks 9 Technical Setup and Support In house OBIEE Admin knowledge centrally and at the campuses is limited. Troubleshooting ability is limited and there is a high probability that future technical issues will be difficult to solve. High Medium Avoid 1. Technical issues have been limited in last month. 2. Assess risk after campuses start moving centrally and heavy report development begins 10 UW Federated security model is somewhat complex. There is a risk that there will be continuing technical difficulties getting it to work within OBIEE. Low 1. Discussions have indicated MFA requirement is not as complex as expected. 2. Further testing needed, but risk appears to be lower. 11 The merge manager position may be difficult to fill given the complexity of merge administration. Huron is currently playing this role and there is a risk this role may not be filled by the end of the Huron contract on 7/31. 1. Continues to be an issue with merge manager hire falling through. New interviews in progress, offer may be pending. Monitor closely effort after Platteville merges in. 12 There is a risk of turnover of the technical staff. 13 The security and merge management processes and procedures are complex, there is a risk that it will be difficult to manage these efforts for the campuses. 1. Process in place, pilot and then reassess risk. 14 There is no common UW security approach. Multiple logons, 2-factor authentication in some instances. There are multiple decision maker(s). It is not clear who should approve and the final solution may miss key requirements. 1. Recent conversations indicate this is resolving. 15 Oracle is historically very slow in responding to SR's. There is a schedule risk of an answer from Oracle is needed. 1. Escalate if need be. 16 Connecting so many different data sources may negatively impact the stability of the OBIEE environment. Accept 1. No action, address if it becomes an issue

Draft as of July 11, 2017 What changes have occurred?

UWBI/Shared Queries Demo

Training Next Steps Sept. 6-8 Reports and Dashboards class in Eau Claire Kathy needs names! Training Brainstorm discussion – Project Coordinators Meeting (7/11) Training Discussion and Demo (7/31) Trainer/Communication Position

Summer Meeting – Common Interests Common Development Approach Release by Subject Area Gradual transition into Central Environments Common Training Materials End User Guides (including videos) Use of Central Trainer Common Communication Materials Collaboration Face to Face Working Group Sessions Listserv to ask questions/ask for help Use of UW-Platteville RPD Centralized repository of who’s working on what; solutions to problems Security Roles Documented How to secure folders, subject areas, dashboards

Project Transitions New Data Council formed CSRG Data Management Workgroup reported out on July 27th New Data Management Council was named and will convene in August Todd Carothers Rob Cramer Jason Fishbain Jim Henderson Anne Milkovich Sean Nelson Lynsey Schwabrow Next steps include Define data domains Define roles and responsibilities (Data Management Council, Campus Councils, Data Stewards etc.) Finalize Common Charter Determine methodology for prioritizing data management requests Consider acquisition of UWS data dictionary platform Develop reference/training materials and communication plan to promote data management as a strategy Kathy Luker retiring on September 1, 2017 Short term: Rob Cramer is considering engaging Huron to aid in management Long term: Hire a BI Program Director reporting to David Stack and working closely with the new Data Management Council Give David Stack feedback on the roles and responsibilities of the BI Program Director position

Next Update: To be scheduled Good-bye! Next Update: To be scheduled Wisline Web