EASA CRD on NPA & MDM032 EAS Cologne 14th March 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
05 July 2007Cologne NPA WG66.009: Type and Group Ratings Juan Anton.
Advertisements

European Aviation Safety Agency 3 July 2008 Cologne: Part-M workshop (Opinion 02/2008) 1 NPA (Task ): "Licences for non-complex aircraft.
04 July 2007Cologne : Aircraft Maintenance Licence for Light Aircraft Juan Anton.
Flight Time Limitations for Business Aviation A Snapshot of EBAA Activity Andrea Němec Manager Safety and Rulemaking BBGA Annual Conference 12 March 2013.
Slide 2 OST 07-1 Use of Headsets JAR-OPS 3 OST WP HSST WP-06/15.3.
Dominique MEREUZE KRAKOW 14 – 15 April On your behalf today, I’d like to thank Darek and all his team for their welcome in this most beautiful town.
EASA MDM.032 Working Group Lisbon 11 – 12 March 2006.
Recording of Digital Communications AEA position and concerns with JAA FRSG WP Vincent De Vroey Manager Operations and ATM Association of European.
BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROL Willie Hannigan.
TRANSLINK Training Effective Management and Supervision of PhD Candidates University of Indonesia, 9-10 May 2006 Postgraduate Supervision Dr. Paul Timms.
UAS in civil applications – New challenges - General Aviation Safety Program Diana Dumitrache – President.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
American Government and Organization PS1301 Wednesday, 21 April.
IAOPA Europe Regional Meeting Reykjavik - 7. Maj 2014 GA SUB SSCC.
Regulatory matters è The newly created European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is harmonising most regulations in aviation across Europe: è Licensing è.
Proposal to the MDM.032 Working Group Y Morier Meeting
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
EATS 2009 Evolving European Regulatory Environment Prague November 2009 Jean-Marc Cluzeau EASA Rulemaking Directorate.
MADRID, 8/9 March ‘08 I 450 / 472,5 kg Welcome In Madrid I would like first to express my gratitude to Yago, on behalf of all of us, for the great job.
2008 © European Aviation Safety Agency European Aviation Safety Agency Preparing for new responsibilities Patrick Goudou Executive Director 2008 US/Europe.
Update on European Rulemaking for ETOPS-LROPS Global ETOPS/LROPS Implementation: Timetables and Approaches Yves Morier, St Petersburg, 4 June.
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
Proposed Gluten Regulations in Argentina Excipient Realities and Global Requirements.
IAOPA Regional Meeting Larnaca 22 September 2007 EASA OPS.001 Working Group.
8 June 2006Portland, Oregon, USAE. Sivel EASA Working Group on regulation of non-complex motor aircraft engaged in non-commercial operations E Sivel (EASA)
Dominique MEREUZE Malta 13 & 14 October First of all I wish to thank heartily, on behalf of the EMF members, Adrian and all those who have helped.
International Accident Investigation
UEAPME: Lobbying and Advocacy at EU level.
Technical & General Meeting Luxembourg, March 2015 Brief Update on Activities at the EU Political Level Timo Schubert 1.
Protection of Trade Secret in Future Japanese Patent Litigation
The European Federation of Light, Experimental and Vintage Aircraft
12/05/2018 Industry expectations about European Aviation Safety plan (EASp) and Certification activities G.Garrouste ASD AirWorthiness Committee chairman.
Non-contentious disposals
FRENCH POSITION on the 600 kg question
IASB Questions & Feedback
IAOPA, at its 27th World Assembly, resolves:
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS (OPINION ESSAYS)
ICAO SARPS State Obligations
C++ coding standard suggestion… Separate reasoning from action, in every block. Hi, this talk is to suggest a rule (or guideline) to simplify C++ code.
RIA: Communication – building credibility
Fagmøte 2. april Gardermoen
Lesson 2: The Media’s Influence on Voting Behaviour (1) - Newspapers
Criteria Of Credibility
Revision of the Basic Regulation
Peter Saundby President CIMP
Organisational Development
EMF Working meeting Madrid 8-9 March 2008
Errors in Reasoning.
IAOPA Regional Meeting
Review of Part C of the Code – Inducements & Applicability
Proposal for a mid vehicle concept
Language proficiency requirements workshop – St
Ombudsman Services Good for consumers – Good for business EHU Update 2nd November 2016 Sue Jackson – Relationship Manager Jay Ross- Energy Sector Expert.
Bernhard Berger, Marco Paviotti DG Environment, European Commission
Workshop for Licensing and Operations
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
Criteria Of Credibility
A PROPOSAL.
Annex II Amendment possible implications Jan Fridrich, EMF Vicepresident European Microlight Federation Working Meeting Oslo 24. – 25. March 2007.
EASA’s MDM.032 WG Regulation of aircraft other than complex motor powered aircraft when used in non-commercial activities UK CAA Presentation 18/19.
Elements of an Electronics NTBs Initiative
Lesson Overview 1.1 What Is Science?.
A REPORT.
Argumentative Writing
STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF CO-OPERATION
Implementation of Learning Systems
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Lesson Overview 1.1 What Is Science?.
EU Water Framework Directive
I think the... came first because...
Presentation transcript:

EASA CRD on NPA 2007-08 & MDM032 EAS Cologne 14th March 2008

Background EMF members have always expressed their clear and determined choice that aircraft below 450kg MOTW (472.5kg with recovery parachute) remain outside of EASA’s control, in Annex II The EMF is very satisfied with the current situation in this regard and has no wish whatsoever to see it change

EMF & MDM032 Nevertheless, during its General Conference in Prague in 2005, EMF members expressed their interest in supporting the creation of a new class of aircraft (which could be comparable with the US Light Sport Aircraft) to fulfil the need of some of their pilots who want to fly heavier aircraft without the burden of the heavy regulation they would face today. EMF experts have therefore participated in MDM032.

M017 & MDM032 During the EMF Conference in Madrid on 8th and 9th of March 2008, the members carefully reviewed the Comment Response Document relating to the Notice of Proposed Amendment 2007-08, issued on 6th March 2008 relating to Part M. As a result of their deliberations they unanimously agreed to express by letter their great concern for the future of Sports and Recreational Aviation and, in particular, the process associated with EASA’s Working Group MDM032.

Problems with EASA Process The process of preparing Part M illustrates some serious problems in the way EASA drafts its regulations By participating in this flawed process we allow EASA to claim that these regulations were made with our support The problems seen in the preparation of Part M cause us to fear similar problems following the work of MDM032 We can easily provide examples of the problems

Change for Change’s Sake This problem is summed up by the following phrase in the General Issues Section of the Comments Response Document (CRD) to NPA 2007-08: “Although there is no evidence pointing to the existence of a safety concern with the currents national systems, this does not mean that safety cannot be improved” So EASA justifies the development of unnecessary and, to many, burdensome new regulations on the grounds that they might be better, despite the lack of evidence to support either this.

One Size Fits All EASA’s initial intention was that MDM032 should deal with aircraft with a MTOM in the range from zero to 5.7 tonnes. Although this band was reduced, the band from zero to 2 tonnes, even divided at 1,000 kg, is still too wide. The inevitable result of trying to bring a broad range of aircraft under single regulation is that those with the heavier regulations gain while those with lighter regulations suffer an increased regulatory burden. This has nothing to do with safety but is simply the result or regulatory averaging.

Sham Consultation We are asked for our views and then ignored In the case of Part M the overwhelming call from the light end of SRA was for a Part M Light This call was rejected, apparently because of the administration problems it would cause for EASA However, EASA can claim that we participated in formulation of the rules which ignored our wishes

The EMF Position The EMF is an organisation of volunteers dedicated to defending the right of its pilots to fly in a sensible aeronautic world EASA asked for our expertise and we participated. We expect our input to be reflected in the result. Instead, EASA ignored what we said. EASA’s heavy regulations take no account of the good safety record of lightly regulated microlights.