University of Washington

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics: Principles with Applications, 6th edition
Advertisements

Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
Ideal Gas Law – Macroscopic Perspective. Ideal Gas Law: Macroscopic Perspective Outline/Introduction Quick Pre-Test – Start to get you thinking about.
Students’ Ideas About the State-Function Property of Entropy* Warren M. Christensen, David E. Meltzer, Thomas A. Stroman Iowa State University *Supported.
Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
Thermodynamics: the Second Law 자연과학대학 화학과 박영동 교수 The Direction of Nature and spontaneity.
Interaction Between Macroscopic Systems
P340 Lecture 5 (Second Law) THE FUNDAMENTAL POSTULATE (OF THERMAL PHYSICS) Any isolated system in thermodynamic equilibrium is equally likely to be in.
Student Learning of Calorimetry Concepts Ngoc-Loan P. Nguyen and David E. Meltzer Iowa State University Supported by NSF DUE-# Project Description:
The Link to Improved Physics Instruction through Research on Student Learning David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University.
Addressing Learning Difficulties with Circuits: An “Aufbau*” Approach David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University * “Aufbau”
Student Conceptions of Entropy in an Introductory Physics Course Warren Christensen Iowa State University April 12, 2007.
Investigations into Student Learning of Thermodynamics David E. Meltzer Department of Physics University of Washington Supported in part by NSF Grants.
Development of Active-Learning Curricular Materials in Thermodynamics for Physics and Chemistry David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy And.
Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
Identifying and Addressing Student Learning Difficulties in Calorimetry and Thermodynamics Ngoc-Loan Nguyen and David E. Meltzer Department of Physics.
Students' Ideas About Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics* Warren Christensen and David E. Meltzer Iowa State University PERG *Supported in part.
Investigating and Improving Student Learning through Physics Education Research David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University.
Recurrent Areas of Confusion in Student Learning of Thermodynamics David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy and Thomas J. Greenbowe Department.
A Perspective on Teaching Physics Courses for Future Elementary-School Teachers David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University.
The Laws of Thermodynamics
Student understanding of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics Warren Christensen Iowa State University Supported in part by NSF grants #DUE
Evolution of Students’ Ideas About Entropy David E. Meltzer Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College Arizona State University Warren M. Christensen Physics Department.
Intuitive and Rule-based Reasoning in the Context of Calorimetry Warren M. Christensen, Ngoc-Loan P. Nguyen, and David E. Meltzer Department of Physics.
Research on Student Learning in Thermal Physics David E. Meltzer College of Teacher Education and Leadership Arizona State University Mesa, Arizona, USA.
© 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is provided solely for the use of instructors in teaching their.
Students’ Conceptual Difficulties in Thermodynamics for Physics and Chemistry: Focus on Free Energies David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Learning Gains in Physics in Relation to Students' Mathematics Skills David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University.
Developing Improved Curricula and Instructional Methods based on Physics Education Research David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State.
Investigations of Learning Difficulties in Thermodynamics for Physics and Chemistry David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy And Thomas J.
Detecting and Addressing Students’ Reasoning Difficulties in Thermal Physics David E. Meltzer Department of Physics University of Washington Seattle, Washington,
Improving Instruction in Thermal Physics through Research on Students’ Thinking David E. Meltzer College of Teacher Education and Leadership Arizona State.
Chapter21 Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Applying Physics Education Research to Teaching Thermodynamics David E. Meltzer Department of Physics University of Washington
Thermodynamics Thermal Processes The 2 nd Law of Thermodynamics Entropy.
The Value and the Challenge of Interdisciplinary Research in STEM Education David E. Meltzer Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College Arizona State University.
What’s Entropy? Student Understanding of Thermodynamics in an Introductory Physics Course* Warren Christensen Iowa State University PERG David Meltzer.
Solution to Questions 1 and 2: Students' Use of Rule-based Reasoning in the Context of Calorimetry and Thermal Phenomena* Ngoc-Loan P. Nguyen, Warren M.
Research on Student Learning and the Development of Effective Curriculum Warren Christensen Iowa State University February 8, 2007.
Physics 1210/1310 Mechanics&Thermodynamics Lecture 39~40 Thermodynamics.
Addressing Students’ Reasoning Difficulties in Thermal Physics David E. Meltzer Department of Physics University of Washington Supported in part by NSF.
Student understanding of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics in an introductory physics course * Warren Christensen and David E. Meltzer Iowa.
Students’ Reasoning Regarding Fundamental Concepts in Thermodynamics: Implications for Instruction David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Students’ Reasoning About Entropy in Chemical and Physical Contexts David E. Meltzer Supported in part by U.S. National Science Foundation Grant Nos. DUE.
Investigating and Addressing Learning Difficulties in Thermodynamics David E. Meltzer Department of Physics University of Washington Seattle, Washington.
Research on Student Learning and the Development of Improved Physics Instruction David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University.
Active-Learning Curricula for Thermodynamics in Physics and Chemistry David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy And Thomas J. Greenbowe Department.
Probing Students' Mathematical Difficulties in Introductory Physics
Which statement about these two thermodynamic processes is correct?
Introduction To Thermodynamics
Heat Engines, Entropy, & the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
Laws of Thermodynamics (Part-1)
The Laws of Thermodynamics
Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
The 1st Law of Thermodynamics
Presented By Claire McKay Chow
Mechanics & Thermodynamics
The Laws of Thermodynamics
Lecture 45 Entropy Clausius theorem Entropy as a state function
Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University.
Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University.
Chapter 18,19and20 Thermodynamics.
Change in Entropy Entropy as a State Function
More Discussion of the The 1st Law of Thermodynamics.
Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
Second Law of Thermodynamics
Temperature Main Concept:
Austin Community College
Austin Community College
Presentation transcript:

University of Washington Research-Based Pedagogical Strategies in Thermal Physics: Development and Assessment David E. Meltzer University of Washington Warren Christensen Iowa State University Supported in part by NSF DUE 9981140 and PHY 0406724

Introductory Course: Iowa State (ISU) General Physics with Calculus Second-semester calculus-based physics course (mostly engineering students) at Iowa State University. Written diagnostic questions administered last week of class in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (Ntotal = 653). Detailed interviews (avg. duration  one hour) carried out with 32 volunteers during 2002 (total class enrollment: 424). [two course instructors,  20 recitation instructors]

Intermediate Course: Univ Intermediate Course: Univ. Washington Sophomore-level Thermal Physics Course Physics 224: Part of introductory sequence, but enrolls about 50% physics majors Taught by DEM, Winter 2006; heavy use of tutorials and interactive lecture with research-based question sequences Students taking both pre- and post-tests: ≈ 30

Advanced Course: ISU Junior-Senior (“Upper-Level”) Thermal Physics Course Classical macroscopic thermodynamics, and statistical thermodynamics Students enrolled [N = 33 (2003-2004)]  90% were junior or senior physics majors or physics/engineering double majors; all had studied thermodynamics (some at advanced level) Taught by DEM; heavy use of tutorials and interactive lecture with research-based question sequences

Diagnostic Questions “Two-process” question: requires use of First Law of thermodynamics “Spontaneous-process” question: probes understanding of entropy and second law

Diagnostic Questions “Two-process” question: requires use of First Law of thermodynamics “Spontaneous-process” question: probes understanding of entropy and second law

This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: [In these questions, W represents the work done by the system during a process; Q represents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.]   1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: Change in internal energy is the same for Process #1 and Process #2. [In these questions, W represents the work done by the system during a process; Q represents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.]   1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2?

This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: The system does more work in Process #1, so it must absorb more heat to reach same final value of internal energy: Q1 > Q2 Change in internal energy is the same for Process #1 and Process #2. [In these questions, W represents the work done by the system during a process; Q represents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.]   1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2?

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) Q1 > Q2

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) 1999-2001 Introductory Physics (Post-test) Written Sample (N=653) Q1 > Q2

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) 1999-2001 Introductory Physics (Post-test) Written Sample (N=653) Q1 > Q2 45%

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) 1999-2001 Introductory Physics (Post-test) Written Sample (N=653) 2002 Interview Sample (N=32) Q1 > Q2 45%

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) 1999-2001 Introductory Physics (Post-test) Written Sample (N=653) 2002 Interview Sample (N=32) Q1 > Q2 45% 34%

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) 1999-2001 Introductory Physics (Post-test) Written Sample (N=653) 2002 Interview Sample (N=32) 2003-4 Thermal Physics (Pretest) (N=33) Q1 > Q2 45% 34%

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) 1999-2001 Introductory Physics (Post-test) Written Sample (N=653) 2002 Interview Sample (N=32) 2003-4 Thermal Physics (Pretest) (N=33) Q1 > Q2 45% 34% 33%

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) 1999-2001 Introductory Physics (Post-test) Written Sample (N=653) 2002 Interview Sample (N=32) 2003-4 Thermal Physics (Pretest) (N=33) Q1 > Q2 45% 34% 33% Correct or partially correct explanation

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) 1999-2001 Introductory Physics (Post-test) Written Sample (N=653) 2002 Interview Sample (N=32) 2003-4 Thermal Physics (Pretest) (N=33) Q1 > Q2 45% 34% 33% Correct or partially correct explanation 11% 19% 30%

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) 1999-2001 Introductory Physics (Post-test) Written Sample (N=653) 2002 Interview Sample (N=32) 2003-4 Thermal Physics (Pretest) (N=33) Q1 > Q2 45% 34% 33% Correct or partially correct explanation 11% 19% 30% Most upper-level students are initially unable to apply First Law of Thermodynamics

Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question) 2003-4 Thermal Physics (Pretest) (N=33) Q1 > Q2 Correct or partially correct explanation Instruction using tutorials (Univ. Washington + Iowa State), plus interactive lectures

Heat Question: Posttest Version #1 (Verbal)

Heat Question: Posttest Version #1 (Verbal)

Correct or partially correct explanation Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question, post-test version #1) 2003-4 Thermal Physics (Pretest) (N=33) Q1 > Q2 33% Correct or partially correct explanation 30%

Correct or partially correct explanation Responses to Diagnostic Question #2 (Heat question, post-test version #1) 2003-4 Thermal Physics (Posttest) (N=33) Q1 > Q2 ≈ 65% Correct or partially correct explanation ≈ 60% After use of tutorials and interactive lectures, significant gains are seen with upper-level students.

This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: [In these questions, W represents the work done by the system during a process; Q represents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.]   1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

Intermediate students This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: [In these questions, W represents the work done by the system during a process; Q represents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.]   1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change? Intermediate students (U.W. Phys 224): 14% correct with correct explanation (pretest)

Heat Question: Posttest Version #2

Heat Question: Posttest Version #2

Heat Question: Posttest Version #2 Q1 > Q2 > Q3

Intermediate students Heat Question: Posttest Version #2 Intermediate students (U.W. Phys 224): 14% correct with correct explanation on pretest

Intermediate students Heat Question: Posttest Version #2 Intermediate students (U.W. Phys 224): 71% correct with correct explanation on posttest After use of tutorials and interactive lectures

Diagnostic Questions “Two-process” question: requires use of First Law of thermodynamics “Spontaneous-process” question: probes understanding of entropy and second law

Spontaneous Process Question For each of the following questions consider a system undergoing a naturally occurring (“spontaneous”) process. The system can exchange energy with its surroundings. During this process, does the entropy of the system [Ssystem] increase, decrease, or remain the same, or is this not determinable with the given information? Explain your answer. During this process, does the entropy of the surroundings [Ssurroundings] increase, decrease, or remain the same, or is this not determinable with the given information? Explain your answer. During this process, does the entropy of the system plus the entropy of the surroundings [Ssystem + Ssurroundings] increase, decrease, or remain the same, or is this not determinable with the given information? Explain your answer.

Introductory Physics Students’ Thinking on Spontaneous Processes Tendency to assume that “system entropy” must always increase Slow to accept the idea that entropy of system plus surroundings increases

Responses to Spontaneous-Process Questions Thermal Physics Posttest: Interactive Engagement, no focused tutorial

Thermal Physics Students’ Thinking on Spontaneous Processes Readily accept that “entropy of system plus surroundings increases” in contrast to introductory students Tendency to assume that “system entropy” must always increase similar to thinking of introductory students

Entropy Tutorial (draft by W Entropy Tutorial (draft by W. Christensen and DEM, undergoing class testing) Insulated cube at TH Insulated cube at TL Conducting Rod Consider slow heat transfer process between two thermal reservoirs (insulated metal cubes connected by thin metal pipe) Does total energy change during process? Does total entropy change during process?

Entropy Tutorial (draft by W Entropy Tutorial (draft by W. Christensen and DEM, undergoing class testing) Guide students to find that: and that definitions of “system” and “surroundings” are arbitrary Examine situation when ΔT → 0 to see that ΔS → 0 and process approaches “reversible” idealization. Preliminary results are promising…

Responses to Spontaneous-Process Questions Introductory Students

Responses to Spontaneous-Process Questions Intermediate Students (N = 32, Matched)

Summary Use of research-based materials yielded learning gains in introductory, intermediate, and advanced courses Gains in intermediate course relative to posttests in introductory course, and to pretests in advanced course So far, we lack “traditional”-course baseline data in advanced course for comparison