PAC for Condensed Matter Physics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IKON7, Instrument clip session, September 2014, ESS Headquarters and Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden A cold neutron beamline for Particle
Advertisements

Tomsk Polytechnic University1 A.S. Gogolev A. P. Potylitsyn A.M. Taratin.
Student Practice in JINR Fields of Research Dubna Vlasta Zdychová, Martina Benešová CTU in Prague Czech Republic Pavol Blahušiak, Alexander.
Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Determination of the residual stress tensor in textured zirconium alloy by neutron.
Performance of the new high flux neutron source FRM-II IGORR10, Gaithersburg, 13. September 2005 Physics Department FRM-II Winfried Petry, Technische Universität.
Kaschuck Yu.A., Krasilnikov A.V., Prosvirin D.V., Tsutskikh A.Yu. SRC RF TRINITI, Troitsk, Russia Status of the divertor neutron flux monitor design and.
Progress on the New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer, MACS C. Broholm 1,2, T. D. Pike 1,2, P. K. Hundertmark 1,2, P. C. Brand 2, J. W. Lynn 2,
Recommendations Programme Advisory Committee for Condensed Matter Physics (33rd meeting, 27–28 January 2011) P. Alekseev 109th Session, of the JINR Scientific.
Neutron Diffraction Studies at the IBR2 Reactor Status and Future Geologisches Institut, Universität Freiburg, Albertstr. 23b, Freiburg, Germany.
Measurement of Delayed-Neutron Yield from 237 Np Fission Induced by Thermal Neutrons Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics - Dubna G.
Applications of neutron spectrometry Neutron sources: 1) Reactors 2) Usage of reactions 3) Spallation sources Neutron show: 1) Where atoms are (structure)
Gizo Bokuchava Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics Joint Institute for Nuclear Research STI 2011, J UNE 6-9, D UBNA.
HYSPEC HYSPEC INSTRUMENT DESIGN – OUTLINE  The two “models” considered for HYSPEC – inside & outside (Mark)  A breakdown of the components of the two.
Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target (BURAN) for benchmark studies Pavel Tichý Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target.
The system of neutron optics for the diffractometer E PSILON and SKAT K.Walther A. Bulkin A.Frischbutter V. Kudryashov Ch. Scheffzük F. Schilling.
MACS –a New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer at NIST February 17, 2003Timothy D. Pike1 Developing MACS A Third Generation Cold Neutron Spectrometer.
Simulations of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS) Aleksander Polanski Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia. The Andrzej Soltan Institute for.
5th workshop on scientific collaboration/JINR/Dubna HJL Basis HFR IBR-2 user policy collaboration Project REMUR: Investigation of the structure.
1 Advanced neutron spectrometers for condensed matter studies at the IBR-2M reactor Anatoly M. Balagurov Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, JINR, Dubna,
Experimental studies of spatial distribution of neutron production around thick lead target irradiated by 0.9 GeV protons Antonín Krása&Vladimír Wagner.
Recommendations of the Programme Advisory Committee for Condensed Matter Physics 25th meeting, November 2006 Wojciech Nawrocik JINR Scientific Council,
Building MACS  Goals of the MACS project  Funding and time line  Technical overview  Possible IDG contributions  Process for IDG involvement in MACS.
Neutron Beam Intensity for the Spallation Neutron Source Beamline 13: The NPDGamma Experiment Analysis and Results Jeremy Stewart University of Tennessee.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft POW-HOW guide investigation Up-date Nicolò Violini Lund, 24 th October 2012.
1 Recommendations of the Programme Advisory Committee for Condensed Matter Physics 26th meeting, April 2007 Wojciech Nawrocik JINR Scientific Council,
1,2 Tshepo Dinoko, 3 Vasilij Andrianov, 3 Pavel Sedyshev 1 iThemba LABS, Somerset West 7129, South Africa 2 University of the Western Cape, Bellville 7535,
Recommendations of the Programme Advisory Committee for Condensed Matter Physics 20th meeting, April 2004 Wojciech Nawrocik JINR Scientific Council,
Stability Requirements for Superconducting Wiggler Beamlines
HYSPEC HYSPEC: A High Performance Polarized Beam Hybrid Spectrometer at the SNS Beamline 14B I.Zaliznyak 1, S. Shapiro 1, L. Passell 1, V. Ghosh 1, W.
Status of JRA6 - MCNSI Kim Lefmann NMI3, ISIS, 28/9-05.
Beam test possibilities at JINR and Fermilab V. Pronskikh Fermilab 02/15/2012.
Absolute neutron yield measurement using divertor NFM Kaschuck Yu.A., Krasilnikov A.V., Prosvirin D.V., Tsutskikh A.Yu. SRC RF TRINITI, Troitsk, Russia.
The Resolution of Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS): Theory and the Experimental Authors: E. L. Maweza (University of Fort Hare in SA) A. KUKLIN (Supervisor:
Parameters of the new diffractometer “ARES” Aleksey E. Sokolov PNPI NRC “KI”
High-energy background at the Cold Neutron Chopper Spectrometer at the SNS Georg Ehlers Quantum Condensed Matter Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Recommendations Programme Advisory Committee for Condensed Matter Physics (34th meeting, 27–28 June 2011) O. Belov 110th Session, of the JINR Scientific.
Neutron Scattering Group February, 2001 A High Performance Instrument for the Single Crystal Spectroscopy at the Pulsed SNS. n What is the spectrometer.
MCNSI meeting, February 2006 Contents: People –V. Ryukhtin left for part time only Multichannel focusing benders – continuation –resolution functions.
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Contents: Overview of new capabilities of the RESTRAX software Numerical optimizations of TAS parameters Virtual.
A New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer at NIST J. A. Rodriguez 1,3, P. Brand 3, C. Broholm 2,3, J.C. Cook 3, Z. Huang 3, P. Hundertmark 3, J. Lynn.
Parameters of the new diffractometer TEX Responsible: Yu.Kibalin, I.Golosovsky.
Plan for future GaAs samples for TestBeam measurements JINR DLNP group (presented Z. Krumshteyn) JINR DLNP group (presented Z. Krumshteyn) FCAL Collaboration.
Peter Konik Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, Russia Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Small angle neutron scattering
Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS Supervisor Dr A. I. Kuklin Rafał Idczak University of Wrocław JINR.
Systematical Analysis of Fast Neutron Induced Alpha Particle Emission Reaction Cross Sections Jigmeddorj Badamsambuu, Nuclear Research Center, National.
HYSPEC IDT Polarized Beam Mode for the Hybrid Spectrometer (HYSPEC) at the Spallation Neutron Source. Outline Polarization analysis and the HYSPEC place.
Werner Schweika, Nicolo Violini, Earl Babcock Michael Meissner Andreas Houben, Philipp Jacobs Gunnar Svennson, Xiaodong Zou, Niklas Hedin, Mats Johnsson,
Priorities in the development of spectrometers for IBR-2М D.P.Kozlenko FLNP JINR, Dubna, Russia.
Implication of gamma-gamma on 14mr tunnels discussion (questions for discussion with WG-C and WG-A) Valery Telnov Budker INP IRENG07, Sept.19, 2007, SLAC.
October, 2001 Hybrid Spectrometer for Single Crystal Studies at the Pulsed SNS: an update. n Principal features of the proposed hybrid spectrometer. n.
Three years of cross-section measurements of (n,xn) threshold reactions at TSL Uppsala and NPI Řež O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová,
Programme Advisory Committee for Condensed Matter Physics (30th meeting, 25–26 June2009) Implementation of the recommendations of the 29th PAC meeting.
At IBR-2 there exists an unique complex of spectrometers We need in further development of the complex. Evaluation of the proposals for spectrometers.
Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics Joint Institute for Nuclear Research RESIDUAL STRESS STUDIES IN ELECTRON AND LASER BEAM WELDING USING NEUTRON DIFFRACTION.
General Guidelines of the User Policy for the Spectrometers Complex of IBR-2М Reactor D.P. Kozlenko Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics,
Simulation of Luminosity Variation
Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions
A cold neutron beam facility for particle physics at the ESS
for collaboration “Energy plus transmutation”
Proposals into the Plan for Development of JINR for
Mitja Majerle NPI CAS Řež, Czech Republic
Outside the nucleus, the beta decay {image} will not occur because the neutron and electron have more total mass than the proton. This process can occur.
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová, V. Wagner
Monte Carlo simulations for the ODIN shielding at ESS
MAGiC Shielding Simulations
Path to BEER upgrades STAP meeting – Phase 2.
Pohang Neutron Facility (First Presentation of Prof. Cho’s Class)
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

PAC for Condensed Matter Physics A proposal for a bent neutron guide at beam line 7A of the modernized fast pulsed reactor IBR-2M for the diffractometers EPSILON-MDS and SKAT Christian Scheffzük Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics Dubna & FU Berlin PAC for Condensed Matter Physics Dubna, April 16, 2007 1/23

outline scientific subject instrumentation at beamline 7A: EPSILON-MDS SKAT neutron guide at present state new neutron guide: requirements simulations conclusions 2/23

mainly investigation of geological samples: scientific subject mainly investigation of geological samples: - better understanding of deformation processes - strain-stress distributions / redistibutions - formation of texture as a result of applied stresses - texture / strain relation EPSILON-MDS: - in-situ applied strain - residual strain distribution - surface strain - acoustic emission during deformation processes SKAT: - bulk texture determination - in-situ texture changes - deconvolution of deformation history 3/23

beam layout at channel 7A 4/23

Experimental hall with neutron diffractometers EPSILON SKAT NSWR NERA 5/23

The EPSILON-MDS strain/stress diffractometer 3He detectors and preamplifiers sample goniometer 6/23

SKAT at present by Ullemeyer, K. 7/23

Intended improvement of SKAT by Ullemeyer, K. 8/23

Present state of the neutron guide construction of the neutron guide in the mid-eighties the neutron guide is straight starts at a long distance from the surface of the moderator ( > 6 m distance) 9/23

Present state of the neutron guide construction of the neutron guide in the mid-eighties the neutron guide is straight starts at a long distance from the surface of the moderator ( > 6 m distance) d. the neutrons have to fly a path through between moderator and neutron guide head e. misfit of the moderator surface size ([HxW]: 270 x 200 mm2) and the cross section of the neutron guide ([HxW]: 170 x 50 mm2) 10/23

Moderator size and neutron guide cross section distance: moderator – neutron guide: 6 m limitation by: Liouville-Theorem: beam cross section x beam divergency = const. 11/23

Present state of the neutron guide construction of the neutron guide in the mid-eighties the neutron guide is straight starts at a long distance from the surface of the moderator ( > 6 m distance) the neutrons have to fly a path through between moderator and neutron guide head misfit of the moderator surface size ([HxW]: 270 x 200 mm2) and the cross section of the neutron guide ([HxW]: 170 x 50 mm2) f. at a distance of about 47 m from the moderator is an interrupt (pillar) -> gap g. misfit of beam cross section and sample dimensions 12/23

Neutron guide and sample dimensions 13/23

Neutron intensity distribution view to the neutron source by Churakov, A.V. & Bogdsel, A.A. 14/23

Present state of the neutron guide construction of the neutron guide in the mid-eighties the neutron guide is straight starts at a long distance from the surface of the moderator ( > 6 m distance) the neutrons have to fly a path through between moderator and neutron guide head misfit of the moderator surface size ([HxW]: 270 x 200 mm2) and the cross section of the neutron guide ([HxW]: 170 x 50 mm2) at a distance of about 47 m from the moderator is an interrupt (pillar) -> gap low neutron flux => the experimental possibilities by improved diffractometers can not be used to full capacity 15/23

Basic requirements for the new neutron guide improvement of the resolution (low divergency) b) increasing of the neutron flux at sample position: i) effective use of the interface moderator – neutron guide head for intensity gain ii) adaptation of the neutron guide exit cross section to sample‘s dimensions => splitting of the neutron guide into two sub-beams => different exit cross sections for SKAT: 50 x 50 mm2 EPSILON-MDS: [HxB]: 40 x 5 mm2 iii) neutron guide splitter for beams 7A and 7B c) reduction of the background (removal of the fast neutrons) => bent neutron guide 16/23

Horizontal cross section of the reactor IBR-2M and the environment VII VII VII VIII VIII VIII 2 4 2 1 1 1 2 2 5 3 3 3 at 5.95 m at 6.05 m at 6.0625 m 1 - surface of the orthogonal beam line No. 7 2 - comb-shaped water moderator 3 - pre-moderator 4 - post-moderator 5 - cryogenic mesithylen moderator by Kulikov, S.A. & Shabalin, E.P. 17/23

by Kulikov, S.A. & Shabalin, E.P. Differential neutron density as function of energy and wavelength: beamline 7, IBR-2M by Kulikov, S.A. & Shabalin, E.P. 18/23

Thermal neutron distribution: beam line 7, IBR-2M 0.957 meV 2.1 meV 23.5 meV 5 meV modified after Kulikov, S.A. & Shabalin, E.P. 19/23

Simulations of neutron distribution: beamline 7, IBR-2M E < 0.957 meV 0.957 meV < E < 2.1 meV (a) (b) 2.1 meV < E < 5 meV 5 meV < E < 23.5 meV (c) (d) view from the neutron source by Kulikov, S.A. & Shabalin, E.P. 20/23

I. As conclusion: favourite neutron guide  incident cross section: 50 mm (w) x 125 mm (h) cold source (mesithylen 20 K) neutron flux: 2.3 x 1014 n / (cm2 s)  exit cross section: - EPSILON-MDS: [HxW]: 40 x 5 mm2 - SKAT: 50 x 50 mm2  10 m straight neutron guide (m = 1) ([HxW]: 125 x 50 mm2)  88 m bent neutron guide ([HxW]: 125 x 50 mm2), r = 13,400 m (m=1) - including 10 m „anti-trumpet“ (focusing element) for vertical reduction for the SKAT-neutron guide: condenser: from [HxW]: 125 x 50 mm2 down to 50 x 50 mm2 - at the end: neutron guide segments with lower cross-section for the EPSILON-neutron guide: [HxW]: 40 x 5 mm2  neutron flux: 2.6 x 109 n / (cm2 s)  Divergence: Δα = 0.008 rad. (0.45°), Δβ = 0.016 rad. (0.9°) 21/23

II. As conclusion: geometry of the favourite neutron guide distance, mm horizontal shift : 1.2 m 22/23

Acknowledgement - K. Walther (FU Berlin) A. Frischbutter, F. Schilling (GFZ Potsdam) V.M. Pusenkov, V.A. Ulyanov (PNPI Gatchina) A.I. Ioffe (FZ Jülich) V.V. Zhuravlov, A.V. Churakov, A.A. Bogdsel, S.A. Manoshine, S.A. Kulikov & E.P. Shabalin (JINR Dubna) the BMBF Germany and the FLNP Dubna for support 23/23