MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Nigeria Case Study HIVAIDS Specific Slides. ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA.

Advertisements

Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.

GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.

DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.

UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.

Building Capacity on Program Evaluation in Latin America: The Experience of the Partnership between Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health (INSP)

MEASURE Evaluation DATIM Data Exchange Denise Johnson

Business as Unusual: Changing the Approach to Monitoring OVC Programs Karen G. Fleischman Foreit, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.

Measuring and Evaluating Reproductive Health Programs and Initiatives Bridgit Adamou Global Maternal Health Conference 2010 August 30 th, 2010.

ADX Workflows James Kariuki, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Denise Johnson, MEASURE Evaluation August 25, 2015 Virtual OpenHIE Architecture.

PLACE Method Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts 1 1 MEASURE Evaluation, A Manual for implementing the PLACE Method.

Introduction to Group Work. Learning Objectives The goal of the group project is to provide workshop participants with an opportunity to further develop.

Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Session 1: Setting the Gender Policy Context.

Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.

Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.

MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.

MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.

Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.

Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.

Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.

Management of RHIS Resources

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:

Community Health Information System in Action in SSNPR/Ethiopia

RHIS Data Integration and Interoperability

Difference-in-Differences Models

Data Quality Assurance Workshop

Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:

RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 10:

Data Quality Assurance

Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment

Using Data to Inform Community-Level Management

Session: 8 Disseminating Results

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 8:

Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia

Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use

Right-sized Evaluation

Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation

The PLACE Mapping Tool Becky Wilkes, MS, GISP Marc Peterson, MA, GISP

Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.

ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Introduction to Comprehensive Evaluation

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:

Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool

Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification

Use of Community Health Data for Shared Accountability

Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia

Assessment Implementation

Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis

Training Content and Orientation

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:

Introduction RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Introduction to Health Informatics:

Introduction to the PRISM Framework

Information Systems for Health:

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

Information Systems for Health:

Introduction to Health Informatics:

Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output

Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

Data and Interoperability:

Use of Information for Decision Making

Measuring Data Quality

Introduction to Health Informatics

Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

EHRs and Privacy Protection in LMICs

Willis Odek, PhD Chief of Party/Senior Technical Advisor,

Presentation transcript:

MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero Photo credit: Jane Silcock / USAID Gabriela Escudero Research Associate April 2016

Project overview Global, five-year, $180M cooperative agreement Strategic objective: To strengthen health information systems - the capacity to gather, interpret, and use data - so countries can make better decisions and sustain good health outcomes over time.

Global footprint (25+ countries)

Primary health care (PHC) areas under MEASURE Evaluation Almost one-third (74/254) of our activities address PHC and focus primarily on: Organizing health services around needs Community-based care Facility-based care Reducing exclusion and social disparities Gender and key populations

Select approaches to improving PHC measurement Focus on Health Information Systems (HIS) Developing indicators of HIS performance Data quality Data use Evaluation (qualitative and quantitative) Gender and key populations interventions Development and use of innovative methods Geo-spatial methods Organizational network analysis Big data Capacity-building

Improving measurement of PHC quality in Bangladesh Testing the use of hand-held tablets by community health workers for improved health service provision and improved data quality

MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U. S MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) under terms of Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-L-14-00004 and implemented by the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with ICF International, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, Palladium, and Tulane University. The views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. www.measureevaluation.org