Fish Passage Barriers & Salmon Recovery

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
Advertisements

Walla Walla Basin Fish Habitat Enhancement Project CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION.
Implement the Grande Ronde Model Watershed Program Administration and Habitat Restoration Projects Project Lyle Kuchenbecker, Project Planner.
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Umatilla River Basin Anadromous Fish Habitat Enhancement Project Project No Presented.
Restore Lawyer Creek Habitat: Targeting Steelhead and Chinook Salmon.
Lolo Creek Watershed Project #
Washington Department
Implement Actions to Reduce Water Temperatures in the Teanaway Basin BPA FY 2002 Columbia Plateau Province Proposal Project ID #
Project Introduction Consists of 1,760 deeded acres timber, sagebrush, and wet/dry meadow habitats. Includes Big, Lake, and McCoy Creeks.
U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Culvert Passage SM Anglea, GD Williams, KD Ham, and GA.
Restore and Protect Red River Watershed Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries Watershed Program.
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.
Little Canyon Creek Subwatershed Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project Sponsored by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Protect and Restore Little Salmon River Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries/Watershed Program By Chad Fealko.
Restore McComas Meadows /Meadow Creek Watershed Project # Restore McComas Meadows/ Meadow Creek Watershed Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries.
Restoration of Columbia River Floodplain Functions to Steigerwald Lake
Using the Open Standards to Advance Puget Sound Recovery Kari Stiles, PhD Puget Sound Partnership Conservation Measures Partnership Oct 7-9, 2014.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
2010 Squak Valley Park Restoration Project City of Issaquah.
Fish Passage in California A Species Perspective Bob Pagliuco Natural Resource Management Specialist National Marine Fisheries Service.
Drainage District #7 Pump Station Retrofits for Safe Fish Passage Ryan Bartelheimer, P.E. Snohomish Conservation District.
Cedar River Instream Flow Management Balancing Certainty and Flexibility.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Strategy Rationale Oregon Recovery Plan Washington Recovery Plan NOAA Monitoring Guidance (includes RPAs) Integrated Status & Trends Monitoring (ISTM)
Protect & Restore Northeast Oregon/Southeast Washington Project Number ISRP – Geographic Review May 1, 2013.
Clackamas River Basin Council Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementer’s Perspective August 19, 2013.
Hancock Springs A natural lab for studying the roles of physical habitat, nutrient availability, and non-native species to inform river restoration John.
Molalla River Knotweed Mapping, Outreach and Control Program Clackamas Soil & Water Conservation District.
Elk Creek Wood Replacement Phase Two Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, 2009 Katie Halvorson.
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Pataha Creek, 10% of Flow, RM 0.1 (L): 67degrees Tucannon River, 90% of Flow, RM 11 (R): 70 degrees.
Conservation of Lake Sammamish Kokanee A Briefing for the City of Bellevue Planning Commission David St. John – Lake Sammamish Kokanee Work Group
Mission, Brender, and Yaksum Creeks Habitat Conditions Low flows and associated high temperatures affect distribution and abundance of native species.
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
The Upper Lochsa and Progress Toward Restoration Rebecca A. Lloyd, NPT Watershed Division.
Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary.
Importance of the Lower Wenatchee River in Salmon Recovery* The Lower Wenatchee is a critical migration corridor for all ESA listed species Of the total.
Coos Watershed Association Watershed Restoration Projects.
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
Lake Sammamish Kokanee: Bringing Them Back from the Brink A Presentation for the Rotary Club of Issaquah David St. John – Government Relations Administrator.
Coal Creek Culvert Replacement Pacific Coast Salmon Coalition.
Population - 44,301 18% - Aged 65+ Household Median Income- $29,530 Jan.-March 2004 unemployment 14 % Demographics.
Dungeness Watershed Action Plan Olympic National Forest.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Nason Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Development, and road building have affected riparian (streamside) habitat, large woody debris and gravel recruitment.
Lake Roosevelt Rainbow Trout Habitat/Passage Improvement Project No Jason McLellan Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation January.
Tracey Yerxa Bonneville Power Administration Implementing the 2008 FCRPS BiOp Using Emerging Tools and Strategies
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
Chelan County Lead Entity Presentation SRFB 2005 Salmon Habitat Grant Cycle.
Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update City of Forks June, 2011 Rebekah Gentry Olympic Natural Resources Center.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Alameda Creek Watershed San Francisco Public Utilities Commission October 27, 2009.
Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26, 2016 James Capurso, PhD Regional Fisheries Biologist Pacific Northwest Region USDA Forest Service.
The Oregon Watershed Council Model, USA
Ladd Creek Fish Passage Project
Fish and Watershed Restoration Efforts in the Ninemile Drainage: Potential, Progress, and Opportunity Clark Fork R.
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
Crow/Quartz Creek Instream Large Wood Recruitment
Thorp Mill Ditch Assessment ( )
2016 SFEG Restoration Update
Watershed Restoration on the Lolo NF Benefits for the Clark Fork Watershed Taylor Greenup, Hydrologist, Lolo National Forest Jennifer Mickelson,
Identifying Barriers to Fish Passage in Mason County
Winter Water: A hot topic for cold fish.
Leveraging Funding from Other Sources: a Programmatic Approach
2017 SFEG Restoration Update
Tucannon River Programmatic Habitat Program (a 30 mile long project)
Presentation transcript:

Fish Passage Barriers & Salmon Recovery Fish Passage Oversight Committee Training January 15, 2015 Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board Developed a recovery plan to restore salmon, steelhead and bull trout to healthy harvestable levels Facilitates recovery plan implementation through federal, state and local partnerships Builds public awareness and support Guides recovery investments Monitors progress Is one of 7 regional salmon recovery organization in Washington Recovery Plan was adopted by NMFS Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Lower Columbia Salmon Recovery Facts 2,280 miles anadromous streams, 268 miles of marine shoreline 89 of the 224 distinct populations reside in our 18 major subbasins. 7% of the state 5 Counties, 21 Cities, 3 Tribes 8 Dams, 4 Hydro-electric Operators Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Passage Barriers: A Salmon Recovery Priority Passage Limiting Factors Barriers due to culverts Other passage barriers: Dikes, Levees, Flow Alterations Water Quality or Channel Morphology Direct Mortality through injury or stranding Blockage from off-channel due to flow alteration, dikes, and levees Blockage due to water quality or channel morphology Direct mortality due to structures Direct mortality due to stranding in diversion channels Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Prioritizing Passage Barriers: Strategically getting work done Priorities: Primary Populations Prioritized streams Density of barriers Why Prioritize Number of Primary Populations benefited Number of barriers on the Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment (EDT) model (Mobrand, 2007) Prioritized streams Density of barriers in the watershed Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Prioritizing Passage Barriers: Strategically getting work done Primary Populations 17 of the 18 subbasins support 1 or more Primary populations Priorities: Number of Primary Populations benefited Primary = Must be restored to a High Level of Viability (<5% chance of extinction over next 100 years) Contributing = Must be restored to a Medium Level of Viability (<25% chance of extinction) Stabilizing = Must be maintained at current status, typically at low viability Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Prioritizing Passage Barriers: Strategically getting work done Prioritized Streams Of the 2280 anadromous miles in the region, 675 are considered high priority Priorities: Number of barriers on the Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment (EDT) model (Mobrand, 2007) Prioritized streams Tier 1 Through 4 Tier 1 supports the highest productivity in each basin Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Lower Columbia Regional Stats Culvert Density Strata Subbasin Name # Barriers on Tiered Reaches Primary Stocks Culvert Density* Coast Chinook** 3 0.00 Grays 21 7.52 Eloch/Skam 31 4.16 MAG 41 2.56 Cascade Lower Cowlitz 85 1 4.19 Tilton Upper Cowlitz 4 30.75 Cispus Toutle 99 5 3.11 Coweeman 32 2.88 Kalama 9 2 13.56 NF Lewis 4.67 EF Lewis 28 6.25 Salmon 60.50 Washougal 14.89 Gorge Lower Gorge Tribs 46.00 Wind Upper Gorge Tribs** Passage is the top priority in the Recovery Plan 5000 culverts ID’d 380 on tiered reaches Culvert density is based on the average number of anadromous stream miles between barriers. Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Other Priority Considerations Populations, Prioritized habitat, and Culvert Density prioritize to the subbasin level Other considerations needed to prioritize within subbasins Sequencing % passability Coordination with other barrier programs Coordination with restoration efforts Landowner willingness Habitat quality/quantity Watershed processes Cost Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Lower Columbia Regional Project Stats 1999 WDOT funded the SW WA counties to complete an inventory of county-owned culverts Since 2001 Washington Dept of Natural Resources has completed 1754 projects as part of their Road Maintenance and Abandonment Plans Since 2004, FFFPP has funded $3.8 million for 31 projects 2007 a regional culvert inventory was completed for private roads and crossings 2010 tidegates were added to the database and habitat surveys were completed 2011 USFS removal of Hemlock Dam opening passage to 12 miles of high quality habitat 2012 removal of Condit Dam opening passage to 48 miles of spawning and rearing habitat Regional Cooperative Effort to Meet Recovery Goals for Fish Passage 47 projects funded by 13 organizations USFS WDNR WDFW WDOT SRFB FFFPP PacifiCorp NFWF 5 counties Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board Project Stats 24 fish passage projects including inventories and dam removals $7,051,316 used to restore passage $4,221,014 in PCSRF Grant Funds Culverts, Dam Removals, Relic Splash Dam removal Trending toward replacing culverts with bridges. Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Project Sponsor: Cowlitz Conservation District Removing passage barriers opens habitat and restoration opportunities Case Study: Monahan Creek Project Sponsor: Cowlitz Conservation District

Case Study: Monahan Creek Two 10’ wide concrete box culverts 5’ drop on outlet, depth, and velocity led to passage issues Coho is a Primary Population for recovery Fall Chinook, winter steelhead, Chum spawning Collaborated on design with WDFW Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Case Study: Monahan Creek 32’ wide arch culvert 450’ of reconstructed channel to control velocities through the culvert and downstream Opens 4.8 miles of anadromous habitat Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Case Study: Monahan Creek Subsequent Restoration in the Area Japanese Knotweed Removal from 2.3 miles of stream bank, 150 acres Large wood structures to provide stability and habitat. Knotweed and other invasive riparian plants decimate the riparian zone contributing to reduced large wood inputs, reduced shade, higher water temperatures and simplified stream habitat. Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Case Study: Monahan Creek Subsequent Restoration Established native trees and shrubs to provide cover, competition, shade/temperature control 2 year management plan, landowner continues to spot-treat Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Case Study: Monahan Creek Subsequent Restoration Stream channel continued to respond downstream over the next decade Sediment that deposited upstream of culvert was moving Stream channel continued to respond downstream 10+ years after Sediment that deposited upstream of culvert was moving Lateral migration was negatively impacting farmland and riparian vegetation planted during knotweed project LWD Project to protect property by routing sediment, slowing lateral migration, protect riparian vegetation, and provide habitat Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Case Study: Monahan Creek Subsequent Restoration Lateral migration was negatively impacting farmland and riparian vegetation planted during knotweed project Large wood to protect property by routing sediment, slowing lateral migration, protect riparian vegetation, and provide habitat Stream channel continued to respond downstream 10+ years after Sediment that deposited upstream of culvert was moving Lateral migration was negatively impacting farmland and riparian vegetation planted during knotweed project LWD Project to protect property by routing sediment, slowing lateral migration, protect riparian vegetation, and provide habitat Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Logistical Issues Funding Period Permitting and Access - 2 months to 1 year (or longer) WDFW USACE DNR Cultural Resources Ecology NMFS – Section 7 consultation Match Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Biological Benefits Make it Worth it. Opening habitat Strategically allows further work to be done Upstream AND downstream benefits Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

How Can We Help? Available to provide priorities for barrier removal Interested in partnering with you ensure recovery goals and priorities are a part of your decision making Offer a link to local governments, organizations, and landowners Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board

Jeff Breckel, Executive Director jbreckel@lcfrb.gen.wa.us 360-425-1553 Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board Jeff Breckel, Executive Director jbreckel@lcfrb.gen.wa.us 360-425-1553 Karen Adams – Habitat Coordinator kadams@lcfrb.gen.wa.us 360-425-3274 The End