Measurements of doses and fluences with online

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

ATLAS LHCC 28/11/00 A. Henriques/CERN 1 H8 : Pixel, SCT, TRT, Tiles, LAr em barrel, Muons SPS H6: EMEC, HEC, FCAL, Background studies GIF: Muons (MDT,
Plot Approval Yat Long Chan (CUHK) Igor Mandic (Ljubljana) Charlie Young (SLAC)
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Cosmic Induced Backgrounds D. Reyna Argonne National Lab.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
MDT-ASD PRR C. Posch30-Aug-01 1 Radiation Hardness Assurance   Total Ionizing Dose (TID) Change of device (transistor) properties, permanent   Single.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
1 Integrating Radiation Monitoring System for the ATLAS Detector at the Large Hadron Collider Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Gregor Kramberger 1 and.
ATLAS Radiation Monitor integrating monitor integrating monitor Igor Mandić, Vladimir Cindro, Andrej Gorišek, Gregor Kramberger, Marko Mikuž, Marko Zavrtanik.
Status of the PiN diodes irradiation tests B. Abi( OSU), R. Boyd (OU), P. Skubic (OU), F. Rizatdinova (OSU), K.K. Gan (Ohio State U.)
Radiation damage to electronic devices for LHC and Super-LHC experiments 1 Presented by Julien Mekki IES, University Montpellier II, France CERN, Geneva,
IFluka : a C++ interface between Fairroot and Fluka Motivations Design The CBM case: –Geometry implementation –Settings for radiation studies –Global diagnosis.
Online Radiation Dose Measurement System for ATLAS experiment I. Mandić a, representing ATLAS collaboration a Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, Ljubljana,
Radiation Damage in the CMS Strips Tracker Christian Barth on behalf of the CMS Tracker Collaboration.
Radiation levels in CBM Radiation effects iFluka (Fluka C++ interface to CbmRoot) Fluka Geometry Models Results Conclusion.
IFluka : a C++ interface between Fairroot and Fluka Motivations Design The CBM case: –Geometry implementation –Settings for radiation studies –Global diagnosis.
Online Radiation Dose Measurement System for ATLAS experiment I. Mandić a, V. Cindro a, I. Dolenc a, A. Gorišek a, G. Kramberger a, M. Mikuž a,b, J. Hartert.
Observation of W decay in 500GeV p+p collisions at RHIC Kensuke Okada for the PHENIX collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute February 20, /20/20101.
Radiation Tolerant Electronics New Policy? Ph. Farthouat, CERN.
High Dose Irradiation of Possible FCAL Sensors at the S-DALINAC Ch.Grah Physics and Detector Meeting DESY HH,
5th July 00PSI SEU Studies1 Preliminary PSI SEU Studies Study SEU effects by measuring the BER of the link in  /p beams at PSI. Measure the SEU rate as.
Radiation Damage in Bipolar Transistors Caused by Thermal Neutrons I. Mandić, V. Cindro, G. Kramberger, E. S. Krištof, M. Mikuž, D. Vrtačnik Jožef Stefan.
Ideas for in-situ calibration for the EMC S.Paganis, K.Loureiro ( Wisconsin ) input from+discussions with T.Carli, F.Djama, G.Unal, D.Zerwas, M.Boonekamp,
Radiation Tolerant Electronics Expected changes Ph. Farthouat, CERN.
CLIC/CLEX controls Radiation issue August 29 th, 2012 F.Locci - BE/CO-FE.
First Results from the Online Radiation Dose Monitoring System in ATLAS Experiment ______________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Residual Does Rate Analyses for the SNS Accelerator Facility I. Popova, J. Galambos HB2008 August 25-29,
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Dimitrov L.P., Iaydjiev P.S., Mitev G.M., Vankov I.V.
Initial Results from the SLAC ESTB T-506 Irradiation Study International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders University of Tokyo, November 2013 Bruce.
15 February 2007Dirk Wiedner / LHCb1 Radiation Monitors for LHCb.
FPGAs in ATLAS Front-End Electronics Henrik Åkerstedt, Steffen Muschter and Christian Bohm Stockholm University.
N. Poljak, FPD++ N. Poljak, U. of Zagreb.
Update on radiation estimates for the CLIC Main and Drive beams Sophie Mallows, Thomas Otto CLIC OMPWG.
M.Moll, M.Silari, H.Vincke – 3.April Mixed field irradiation -- Who answered ?  In total 36 forms filled / 34 persons answered: 38% 62% CERN:
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Investigating latchup in the PXL detector Outline: What is latchup? – the consequences and sources of latchup – techniques to reduce latchup sensitivity.
June , RD50 Workshop1 Jan B o hm, Jan Brož, Zdeněk Doležal, Peter Kodyš, Petr Kubík, Marcela Mikeštíková Neutron irradiation program in Prague Charles.
Radiation Damage Studies for Si Diode Sensors Subject to MRaD Doses Bruce Schum UC Santa Cruz July
ATLAS LAr Forward Calorimeters C. Zeitnitz (Universität Wuppertal) for the ATLAS LAr Community.
1 Single event upset test of the voltage limiter for the ATLAS Semiconductor tracker TSL Experiment Number: F151 distance between power supplies and modules.
The T506 Experiment: Electromagnetically-induced Radiation Damage to Solid-State Sensors Test Facilities Users Workshop SLAC, September Bruce Schumm.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
Electrons in CTB: status of data/MC comparisons LAr & Inner Detector H8 CTB groups Physics Week, CERN, 30-May-2006.
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
Integration of forward physics detectors into the LSS of the LHC D. Macina (TS/LEA) Technical Support 2004 Workshop.
Check of Calibration Hits in the Atlas simulation. Assignment of DM energy to CaloCluster. G.Pospelov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk,
Alex Dafinca, Jim Henderson & Tony Weidberg (on behalf of the ATLAS SCT Collaboration) Topical Workshop on Electronics for Particle Physics Perugia, 26.
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Data Quality Assessment and Performance
Ion Run 2015: measurements in cells 11 for P1 and P5 P–Ion Run 2016: analysis of cell 8 for P1, P5, P2 and P8 Corinna Martinella EN-EA R2E-MCWG 04/07/2017.
Integrating part of the ATLAS Radiation Monitor will measure
Development of ATLAS Radiation Monitor
Isidre Mateu Suau (EP-DT-DD)
FBK / INFN Roma, November , 17th 2009 G. Darbo - INFN / Genova
The ATLAS Zero Degree Calorimeter Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA
RADMON Salvatore Danzeca (EN/STI) on behalf of the R2E Project and RADMON team Thanks to all the RADMON Team!
Børge Svane Nielsen/JJG
Erich Varnes and Michael Shupe
TI8/WIC Incident & UJ87/UA87 Radiation Levels & Analysis
IP7 losses scaling and impact on forecast for HL-LHC era
Radiation Monitoring in LHC Experiments
Revisions and Updates, December 13. Some technical details:
Atlantis and the Inner Detector
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Interface The 8th Workshop on Electronics for LHC Experiments, Colmar, 9-13 September 2002 K. Anderson, A. Gupta, J. Pilcher, H.Sanders,
Radiation Backgrounds in the ATLAS New Small Wheel
Forward-bias operation of FZ and MCz silicon detectors made with different geometries in view of their applications as radiation monitoring sensors J.
Hiroshi Masui For the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2004
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Presentation transcript:

Measurements of doses and fluences with online radiation monitoring system in the Inner Detector More info about the system in the note (and in references there): I. Dawson et al., “Fluence and dose measurements in the ATLAS inner detector and comparison with simulation.” ATL-INDET-INT-2011-004 http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1322208

Total Ionizing Dose (TID) vs Total Ionizing Dose (TID) vs. time at 4 sets of locations in the Inner Detector. For each location dose is estimated as the average form several sensors (RadFETs) (they are at different angles Phi and ±z). On PST 3 sensors are used, on IDEP (r = 54) 3 , and IDEP (r=80) 3 and on Cryostat wall 2 sensors. The error bars (colloured region) are RMS of measurements and 10% systematic error . Simulated line: Dose = Integrated_luminoisty* proportionality_factor  proportionality factors (Gy/pb-1 ) from: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/Atlas/BenchmarkingAtTheLHC (Fluka simulations I. Dawson, L. Nicolas et al.) or http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1322208

Non Ionizing Energy Loss NIEL (equivalnet fluence of 1 MeV neutrons) measured from forward current increase in PIN diodes.

similar plots as on previous slides showing 2010 and 2011 data in log scale

very preliminary measurements with DMILL bipolar transistors (input transistor of the ABCD3T chip) base current at given collector current measured  first signs of base current increase in the DMILL transistors  thermal neutron fluence is estimated from the base current change

Plots show FLUKA simulated 1 MeV equivalent neutron fluences and ionizing doses per pb-1 of integrated luminosity for 7 TeV beam in the inner detector More info: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/Atlas/BenchmarkingAtTheLHC#FLUKA_simulations_for_the_Inner

there is a similar but simplified online radiation monitoring system also in subdetectors outside of the Inner Detector same types of radiation sensors as in the ID are placed at 48 locations , near electronic equipment of subdetectors: 16 locations in Muon detector, 16 in Lar, 6 in Tile calorimeter and 10 on patch panel 2 sensors are read out once per hour, values are stored in DCS database in the Common Infrastructure Control (CIC) part. The drawings (FSM screens) show schematically the locations of sensors. Muons Calorimeters PP2

plots show integrated doses vs. time at different locations plots show integrated doses vs. time at different locations. Each line represents on e sensor. The doses are very low and are on the limit of sensitivity of the system. It can be seen that the there exists a correlation between accumulated dose and integrated luminosity (except on PP2 where measured doses are consistent with 0).