Literacy Across Disciplines (LAD)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Developing District Level Professional Learning Communities Woodford County Schools Jimmy Adams, Candace James and Sam Watkins.
YOUR LOGO January 13, 2014 ALL Site Coaching Session.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Macomb County Support for Priority & Focus Schools Judith P. Pritchett, PhD Chief Academic Officer Macomb Intermediate School District
Timberlane Regional School District
Parma City School District Professional Learning Model Committing to the Core Rethinking Mathematics & Literacy for the 21 st Century LITERACY COACHES.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Change and trust in moving toward RTI for all ONE DISTRICT'S EXPERIENCE SO FAR. June 10, 2015 North Dakota RTI/MTSS Conference Fargo, ND United Public.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Accountability Goals September 2014 Bristol Public Schools.
Welcome. BSI Parent Night October 13, 2016 Mrs
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program
Welcome PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING TASKS WHILE WAITING FOR THE CLASS TO BEGIN: Rate your knowledge of the MTSS process using the colored dot. Rate.
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Documented District Support Needs
Documented District Support and Needs
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
2016 Leadership Academy Beverly Hoffmaster and Robyn Lopez
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
WELCOME.
Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.
11/10/2018 Graduation Rate 93% of students will graduate within four years School & District Culture Increase the percentage of families and students who.
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program
Model Demonstration Projects
English Language Arts Program Update
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Colchester Public Schools
Connecting Fidelity Observations to Secondary Reading Coaching
MMD 2018 Summit St. Louis Union Station
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Common Core State Standards
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Deputy Superintendent of Instruction Director of Elementary Programs
Strategic Plan: Tri-Cities High School
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
DSUSD MTSS Implementation (Multi-Tiered System of Supports)
Mary Rowlandson Elementary School
Family Engagement Policy
Scoring Open-Ended Items
Everyone Can WIN with PIE Every DEIO
Student Engagement Betz Elementary.
Making Middle Grades Work
Information July 15, 2015.
CSIP/Landtrust
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Initial Implementation Riverbank Elementary, WUSD
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Summit Hill Elementary School
District Mission & Vision Cluster Mission & Vision
Presentation transcript:

Literacy Across Disciplines (LAD) via Teachers Learning Together (TLT) Project Overview

Statement of problems Nearly 50 percent of Ingham County 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students are deemed “not proficient” or “partially proficient” in reading on the M-STEP. It’s often difficult to normalize and routinize collaborative processes at our schools, given time and other constraints. PSAT data for 8th graders could not be pulled – IISD relies on districts to provide this data, and not all districts have shared it (plus it’s only been two years that it’s been given regularly and broadly – we used to focus on ACT)

More than 50 percent of students in grades 6, 7, and 8 are either “not proficient” or “partially proficient” on the ELA M-STEP assessment.

2015-16 7th Grade Science & 8th Grade Social Studies M-STEP Scores As we know, these two tests require students to read well in order to score well. At least 70 percent of 7th and 8th graders scored “not proficient” or “partially proficient” on their respective M-STEP assessments.

6th GRADE: Benchmarks scores improved throughout the year, but nearly 50 percent of students are still below the target.

7th GRADE: Benchmarks scores improved throughout the year, but more than 50 percent of students are still below the target at the end of the year.

8th GRADE: Benchmarks scores improved throughout the year, but about 50 percent of students are still below the target at the end of the year. The trend is about the same in grades 6, 7, and 8

Solving the problems Create a more highly effective school By improving collaboration  Collective teacher efficacy has an effect size of 1.57 (Hattie) Create more highly effective teachers By building teachers’ understanding and application of high-yield content reading strategies Related effect sizes (Hattie, 2015): Feedback 0.73 Teaching strategies 0.60 Direct instruction 0.60 Teacher clarity 0.75

Solving the problems, continued Source: Marzano (2003): What Works In Schools: Translating Research Into Action

Project outcomes Improve reading scores in grades 6, 7, and/or 8 by at least 5 percent on standardized assessments such as M-STEP. Positively impact the schools’ professional cultures by normalizing and routinizing the Teachers Learning Together (TLT) collaborative process. TLT is a framework that is already established in many Ingham County schools – we’re looking to build upon the work we’ve already done instead of throwing a new approach into the mix

Who we are looking for School teams of at least 4 teachers each At least one teacher from each of the four core content areas (ELA, math, social studies, science) Target grades: 6, 7, and/or 8 (middle grades) This is a multi-disciplinary approach – strengthening students’ reading is everyone’s responsibility, not just ELA teacher In elementary schools, intervention blocks are more routine, which enables struggling readers to receive extra help. In the middle grades, there is less opportunity for students to receive remediation or extra support – schools are structured differently, priorities shift and look toward high school…

The LAD plan for 2016-17 TLT framework Multi-disciplinary implementation teams High-yield content reading strategies (e.g. explicit vocabulary, summarization of informational text, citing text evidence) Observations of colleagues, with actionable feedback Modification of instruction to suit needs of students Expand in Year 2

We are counting on… Curriculum directors to: Recruit administrators and teachers to participate in LAD project Provide support to administrators as needed Attend year-end session to learn how the project went Commit to the expectations outlined in the MOU

We are counting on… BUILDING ADMINISTRATORS to: Attend LAD events Provide time for teachers to participate and to share their learning with colleagues Help plan for Year 2 implementation Commit to the expectations outlined in the MOU

We are counting on… Teachers to: Attend all events and training sessions Actively participate on implementation teams Give actionable feedback to colleagues Use feedback to modify instruction Try new approaches/strategies in classroom Commit to the expectations outlined in the MOU

Time out of classroom = 3 full days out of the classroom per teacher Each teacher will attend: 1 full day of training on content reading strategy #1 & TLT framework (October or November) 2 half-day learning walks (January and March) 1 half day of training for content reading strategy #2 (February) 1 half-day to debrief learning and plan for year 2 implementation (May) = 3 full days out of the classroom per teacher

You can count on us to… Pay for: Substitute teachers for times when TLT is meeting or when your teachers attend conferences related to the project Professional resources – books, etc. Instructional materials related to project Conference registration fees IISD consultants to support your teachers

You can count on us to… Provide: Professional learning on instructional strategies and TLTs Protocols and other tools for use within the TLT framework Coaching upon request for teachers and administrators Up to 18 SCECHs for participants

You can count on us to… Help school teams examine data to determine success of project Possible data sources: Classroom observation data Interviews Standardized assessment results Progress monitoring results Surveys Teacher participation throughout 2016-17 school year Implementation plan for Year 2

Contact us Lara Slee,EdD Tammy Shorna MTSS Coach & Academic Consultant 517-819-0929 lslee@inghamisd.org Academic Consultant 517-256-8215 tshorna@sbcglobal.net