Information collected by Steve Barrett

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Comments on EC 2000: Why so much detail to tell us about EC 2000? Practices of Modern Engineering – Spring 2011 You learned where things (courses) fit.
Advertisements

Amy Kindschi, Patrick Eagan, Paul Ross HOTS for Independent Reading and Research ASEE June 2008.
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Creating an SLO or PLO Statement Presented by ORIE Team Summer 2013 Academy for Planning, Assessment, and Research.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
ABET The Complete Report on Your Course. ABET OUTCOME CHECKLIST.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Educational Objectives Quantifying Learning.
Formulating objectives, general and specific
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Introduction to Engineering and Urban Planning How to be a Successful Engineer.
OBE Briefing.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
The Balance Between Theoretical and Practical Work Within Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses Dr. Bahawodin Baha March Development Partnerships.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Engineering Mechanics Dr. Maisara Mohyeldin Gasim Mohamed College of Engineering Engineering Mechanics (GE 2100) COURSE OUTLINES.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Incorporating Engineering Standards in the Major Design Experience William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR Report.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
HU113_Assignment31 HU113: Technical Report Writing Prof. Abdelsamie Moet Teaching Assistant: Mrs. Rana El-Gohary Fall 2012/13 Pharos University in Alexandria.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. WHAT IS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS? ABET Required Program Outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Assessment of Industrial Internships Karyn Biasca.
ECE Assessment Program Information for Teaching Assistants & Senior Tutors Information for Teaching Assistants & Senior Tutors.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
 (noun) a specification of an object, manifested by an agent, intended to accomplish goals, in a particular environment, using a set of primitive components,
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Writing Great Learning Outcomes
Continuous Program Improvement
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Assessing Learning: Creating Outcomes
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Inculcating “Parallel Programming” in UG curriculum
Neeraj Mittal September 29, 2017
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Outcome Based Education
Information Technology (IT)
Development of ABET Syllabus
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Writing Learning Outcomes
MILITARY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Presentation transcript:

Information collected by Steve Barrett Bloom’s Taxonomy, Educational Objectives, Outcomes, and our Friends from ABET - An Engineering Case Study- Information collected by Steve Barrett

Overview Bloom’s Taxonomy Educational Objectives Educational Outcomes Some background information Relationship to Engineering Education Educational Objectives Educational Outcomes Our friends at ABET ABET is not a four letter word What is it all about? How do you fit in?

Bloom’s Taxonomy More than one type of learning—3 domains Cognitive: development of intellectual skills Affective: manner in which we deal with things emotionally (feelings, values, attitudes) Psychomotor: physical movement, coordination, motor-skill areas Bloom developed taxonomy (hierarchy) of Cognitive learning skills “Allows educators to evaluate learning of students systematically [Bloom, 1994]”

Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive Learning Skills Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge Higher Thought Processes

Bloom’s Taxonomy Knowledge: repeating verbatim List State Comprehension: demonstrating understanding of terms and concepts Explain in your own words Interpret Application: applying learned information to solve a problem Calculate Solve Higher thought processes

Bloom’s Taxonomy Analysis: breaking things down into their elements, formulating theoretical explanations or mathematical or logical models for observed phenomena Derive Explain Synthesis: creating something, combining elements in novel ways Formulate Make up Design Higher thought processes

Bloom’s Taxonomy Evaluation: making and justifying value judgments or selections from among alternatives Determine Select Critique Higher thought processes

Bloom’s Update – 1990’s Bloom 1956 Anderson et al 1990’s Bloom’s student noun to verb from: http://www.odu.edu/educ/roverbau/Bloom/blooms_taxonomy.htm

Application to Engineering Education Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge Creativity is very important for the engineering profession [Goel, 2004] Creativity requires higher thought processes (Bloom items 4-6: Analysis, Synthesis, Evaluation) [Felder et al., 2004] In many cases lectures and homework assignments focus exclusively on Bloom item 3: Application [Felder et al., 2004] “Then, if they put a high-level question on exam and the students do poorly on it, they blame the students’ lack of ability or poor study habits.” Need to include high-level tasks in learning (educational) objectives

Application to Engineering Education Need to develop high level tasks Include high-level tasks in learning objectives Share them with students Practice them in class Practice via assignments Test on examination Let’s take a closer look at objectives…

Educational Objectives Characteristics of graduates a few years after graduation Difficult to assess and measure The Program Educational Objectives for the Electrical Engineering Program are: (EE-OB1) Be able to successfully practice the profession of Electrical Engineering. (EE-OB2) Be prepared and motivated to accept challenging assignments and responsibilities and be productive members of society. (EE-OB3) Demonstrate successful career growth (e.g., professional registration, graduate school, promotion and advancement, patents, publications).

Student Outcomes -- measurable student characteristics at graduation Student outcomes are outcomes (a) through (k): (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.

Course Objectives -- Your individual course objectives supports the department’s educational outcomes and objectives Course objectives EE4490 Hardware Descriptive Language (HDL): Students shall: (PO-1) Demonstrate knowledge about the target hardware for an HDL (PO-1) Demonstrate an understanding of the fundamentals for an HDL (PO-1) Demonstrate an understanding and application of State Machine diagrams (PO-2) Implement digital design concepts from EE 2390 with an HDL (PO-4) Demonstrate an ability to take an algorithm from design specification to HDL implementation (PO-4) Demonstrate an ability to create testbenches to validate correct operation of HDL implementation (PO-4) Demonstrate an ability to correct and improve upon faulty HDL code (PO-5) Demonstrate the ability to use HDL tools correctly (PO-6) Be expected to submit assignments that clearly indicate an understanding of the lecture concepts, and provide HDL code that is easy to follow (PO-11) Do their own work, and submit design results that are consistent.

ABET/EAC/CAC Our friends at ABET ABET is not a four letter word  What is it all about? How do you fit in? ABET/EAC – Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc./Engineering Accreditation Commission Accredits engineering programs Onsite visit Oct 24-27, 2015 Due process response through July 1, 2016 EE, CPEN, COSC – Accredit to Sep 2022 Interim reports remaining programs - submitted July 1, 2017 Accredit through Sep 2018 Significant ABET revisions coming later this year.

What is it all about?

How do you fit in? University of Wyoming Mission Statement | College of Engineering Mission Statement Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Program Objectives Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Program Outcomes Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Curricula: Electrical Engineering Curriculum Electrical Engineering Curriculum/Bioengineering Option Computer Engineering Curriculum Course Objectives -- characteristics of students at the time of course completion

Summary and Conclusions Use Bloom’s Taxonomy to properly scope objectives Teach and assess at appropriate levels of the taxonomy You individual course objectives support the mission of your department, college, and the university Use Bloom’s Taxonomy to properly scope, teach, and assess course objectives ABET is everybody’s business!

References S. Goel and N. Sharda, “What do engineers want? Examining engineering education through Bloom’s Taxonomy,” 15th Annual Conference for the Australian Association for Engineering Education, AaeE2004, Sep 2004, Toowoomba, Queensland Australia S. Goel, “What is High About Higher Education?” The National Teaching and Learning Forum, Volume 13, Number 4, 2004 R.M. Felder, R. Brent, “The ABC’s of Engineering Education: ABET, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cooperative Learning, and So On,” Session 1375, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2004. Benjamin S. Bloom in “Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty-Year Retrospective,” edited by L.W. Anderson, University of Chicago Press, 1994.