Value-added indicator fiches (common result and impact indicators)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Advertisements

Wrap-up session for Module 2.1 (Additionality) Presenters: UNFCCC secretariat, MP member, PD Forum, and TÜV SÜD 1 st Sustainable Development Mechanisms.
CMEF Requirements for the Monitoring tables as part of the Annual Report RD committee 24/10/2007.
Research and Innovation Summary of MS questions on the Commission's proposal for DG Research & Innovation Research and Innovation Rules for Participation.
How to measure the CMEF R2 Indicator about Gross Value Added in agricultural holdings without reliable accounting data ? A methodological proposal applied.
Biodiversity/HNV indicators and the CAP Zélie Peppiette Rural Development Evaluation Manager DG AGRI, European Commission UK seminar on HNV farming policy,
Measuring the Impact of the RDP Issues being addressed at an EU level with regards to measuring the impact of the Rural Development programmes B. Schuh.
Ana Garcia Saguar Fusion Agreements Research DG European Commission Renewal of the Mobility Agreement.
ISO 9001:2015 Revision overview - General users
EULITA / Liese Katschinka Copyright (c) An ISO Standard for Interpreting Services in Judicial Settings Opatija, 20 March
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
2_Monitoring and Evaluation of CAP 2014 – 2020 Approach of PII
18 March th meeting of the Evaluation Expert Committie 1 Thematic Working Group „Ex post Evaluation Guidelines” State of play Jela Tvrdonova.
Monitoring and Evaluation for the CAP post 2013 – impact indicators Y. PLEES – Agri L.4.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
What is the Best Indicator of Work Performed in Agriculture? IACS-4 Beijing October 2007 Pál Bóday - Éva Laczka.
STRATEGIC PLANS, BUDGETS AND ANNUAL REPORTS Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Arts and Culture 11 March 2008.
1 Meeting of the OECD Short-term Economic Statistics Expert Group June 2002 REVIEW OF CONCEPTS AND NATIONAL EXPERIENCES IN THE COMPILATION OF: DEMAND.
Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy
Regional Co-operation Council Workshop on enhancing women entrepreneurs in SEE Milena Corradini Sarajevo, 1 October 2009.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
Common ESF Indicators in the Current Programming Period.
Teagasc: National Farm Survey An Overview Agricultural Statistics Liaison Group (ASLG) Date: Wednesday October 12th, 2011 Time: 1.30pm Venue: Department.
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH Research DG European Commission Expressions of interest / Dedicated call mechanism.
9 th Euroindicators Working Group Luxembourg, 4 th & 5 th December 2006 Eurostat - Unit D1 Key Indicators for European Policies.
European Instrument for Democracy & Human Rights (EIDHR) Country Based Support Scheme (2012/2013) CfP Ref. EuropAid /L/ACT/ET Information session.
112/16/2015 ISIC / CPC revision process United Nations Statistics Division.
Performance Indicators Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive Trade Statistics May.
Agriculture and Rural Development SFC2014 and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) management Petr Lapka DG Agriculture and Rural Development Unit "Consistency.
Evaluation of NRNs Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor.
REPORT TO GRPE 69 TH SESSION EVE IWG 1 Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG) Informal document GRPE th GRPE, 5-6 June 2014 Agenda item.
UNCC 11 November 2013 Request for Clarification on AUG Rules Fiona Cottam.
New developments related to ISIC Ralf Becker UN Statistics Division August 2015.
Needs on input use Guido Castellano, DG AGRI L2, Economic Analysis of EU Agriculture FSS working party meeting February 2010, Luxembourg.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation Common monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluation of rural development programs.
#ICANN50 Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) Activities Update to the GNSO Council ICANN-50 London Meeting 21 June 2014.
A Better Consumer Regulatory Framework The Review of the consumer Acquis: Background and state of play.
Evaluation Experts Meeting, DG AGRI L4, Brüssel, The Monitoring- and Evaluation System of the Austrian RDP Karl M. Ortner (AWI) Otto.
Montenegrin FADN FAO project Szilárd Keszthelyi, PhD.
International competitiveness
Social Dialogue Plenary Meeting
Common Monitoring and Evaluation System for Rural Development
New Work Programme and mandates 2005/2006
Performance Framework
European Commission ECCP II WG 1: ECCP Review
Development of a methodological framework (EEA contributions)
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON REGIONAL PRODUCTS & INCOME ACCOUNTS
Strategic development group Update on education and lifelong learning statistics 17/6/2009.
Preparatory Action 2011 European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps Call for proposal
Summary Working Paper drafted by DG REGIO on options for the future of additionality. Conclusions of the first experts meeting on 26 May Conclusions.
South East Europe 2020 indicators
DG AGRI, Unit F6 Bioenergy, biomass, forestry and climatic changes
Environmental goods and services sector
Amending the Performance Framework
D 4 Food webs Process: two open workshops WGGES consultation
EC initiative on water reuse
Counterfactual Impact Analysis applied in the ESF-Evaluation in Austria (period ) Contribution to the Expert-Hearing: Member States Experiences.
Relevance of GNB for CAP monitoring and evaluation system
Guidance document on ex ante evaluation
Policy needs for rural development statistics and data analysis
Support Tools for ESF Evaluation
The CAP post-2013: statistical needs in the field of rural development
Comments on SIEC by the Expert Group on International Economic and Social Classifications UNSD.
Printer Working Group Face-to-Face Meeting 19 February 2007
AEI where DG AGRI is in the lead
Proposal to Change IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Methodology for assessment of Natura 2000 costs
Forestry Statistics Working Group February 2015, Luxembourg "Current and future requirements for forestry data– DG AGRI" Tamas Szedlak AGRI H4 DG.
European Socioeconomic Groups (ESeG) Agenda point 8
Presentation transcript:

Value-added indicator fiches (common result and impact indicators) Guido Castellano Agri L 4 - Evaluation of measures applicable to agriculture; studies Evaluation Expert Committee meeting, 23 June 2009

Background Requests for clarification on the measurement of the value added indicators included in the CMEF have been submitted by the Member States to the Helpdesk during the last months A working group has been set up in DG AGRI, supported by the Helpdesk, to address these questions

Concerned indicators result indicator # 2, “increase in gross value added in supported holdings/businesses”, measured by gross value added of supported agricultural, food or forestry holdings; result indicator # 7, “increase in non-agricultural gross value added in supported businesses”, measured by gross value added of supported businesses; impact indicator # 1, “economic growth”, measured by the net additional value added (PPS); impact indicator # 3, “labour productivity”, measured by gross value added per full time equivalent.

Main issues raised by the Member States result indicators #2 and #7 do not reflect the gross value added concept but rather the measurement of profit; result indicators #2 and #7 allow only for a limited use of FADN data; methodological problems for the measurement of result indicators #2 and #7 (e.g. how to determine the labour costs to be deducted); terms such as turnover, sales and output are used interchangeably in the result indicators #2 and #7 and impact indicator #1 fiches (problems of interpretation); the measurement of impact indicator #1 (net additional value added) can lead to possible misinterpretations (i.e. gross/net value added versus gross/net effects of the policy intervention)

Approach followed for tackling these issues Ensuring the overall consistency of the CMEF Simplification Supporting the possibility of comparing and aggregating data at the EU level Enhancing possibilities for the Member States to make use of FADN information as data source for the quantification of these indicators

Amendments to the indicator fiches definitions of result indicators #2 and #7 brought in line with the measurement of gross value added definitions of result indicators #2 and #7 brought in line with the FADN methodology Minor revisions of the definition of impact indicators #1 and # 3 (consistency in terminology)

New definitions Result indicator #2:

New definitions Result indicator #7:

New definitions Impact indicator #1:

New definitions Impact indicator #3:

Timing The proposed modifications in the measurement of the value added result indicators would apply from the year 2010 onwards. Detailed explanations concerning the above-mentioned modifications of the indicator fiches will be made available through the web page of the Helpdesk.