Staging in the TDR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Advertisements

Design Considerations LHC hadron beams: E p =7 TeV E A =E e  Z/A Luminosity O (10 33 ) cm -2 s -1 with Beam Power 100 MW (wall plug) Integrated e ± p.
TLCC Themes BAW-2, SLAC, 19 January 2011 Ross Walker Yamamoto 1.
Muon Collider 2011 Workshop Jun 27-July 1 in Telluride, CO Gollwitzer & Nagaitsev presented Attending: Ankenbrandt, Lebedev, Pasquinelli, Popovic, and.
The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish ILC Industrial Forum Japan 28-June-05.
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Reduced Bunch Number 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Dec. 2005E-upgrade GDE Frascati1 “Energy Upgrade Scenario TG” Report L.Lilje, T.Raubenheimer and N.Toge Full Report:
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
1 Q3 Main linac starting gradient, upgrade gradient, and upgrade path Results of WG5 discussions.
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Positron Source Relocation 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Proposed machine parameters Andrei Seryi July 23, 2010.
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
Baseline Workshop Preparation At the close of each BAW, we would like to write down a summary that is based on our common understanding of the issues.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC UPDATE Vancouver to Valencia Ewan Paterson Personal Report to SiD Collaboration Oct 27, 2006.
Global Design Effort 1 Possible Minimum Machine Studies of Central Region for 2009 Reference, ILC Minimum Machine Study Proposal V1, January 2009 ILC-EDMS.
N. Walker (for PMs) ALCPG, Univ. of Oregon, Eugene TeV Upgrade.
1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central Injector complex.
Current CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1. Main Beam Generation Complex Drive Beam Generation Complex Layout at 3 TeV D. Schulte2.
Summary of TDR Cost Reviews at KILC-12 G. Dugan KILC-12 4/26/12.
CLIC main activities and goals for 2018 Design and Implementation studies: CDR status: not optimized except at 3 TeV and not adjusted for Higgs discovery,
SINGLE-STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR FOR ILC-SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC, Jan , 2011 N.Solyak, Single-stage.
Nick Walker – SA meeting KEK Treaty Points and Costing Guidance Nick Walker 1 st System Area Managers Meeting KEK –
1 Physics Input for the CLIC Re-baselining D. Schulte for the CLIC collaboration.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
1 Update on Q2 Main linac starting gradient, upgrade gradient, and upgrade path Results of WG5 discussions after feedback from plenary on Tuesday New Option.
CLIC Energy Stages Meeting D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Nick Walker AD&I WebEx Meeting TeV Upgrade Study AD&I WebEx Meeting Nick Walker 1 Brief summary of ALCPG’11 discussions.
1 Update on Q2 Main linac starting gradient, upgrade gradient, and upgrade path Results of WG5 discussions after feedback from plenary on Tuesday New Option.
ILC Test Facility at New Muon Lab (NML) S. Nagaitsev Fermilab April 16, 2007.
ParameterL-bandS-bandX-band Length (m) Aperture 2a (mm) Gradient (Unloaded/Loaded) (MV/m)17/1328/2250/40 Power/structure (MW) Beam.
LC Scope: European View 1- Scope document should define a parameter set for a Linear Collider to be used as the European input to the world wide scope.
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Barry Barish LCWS12 Arlington, TX 22-Oct-12 ILC – Status, TDR and Costs Global Design Effort 1 22-Oct-12 LCWS12 - Arlington, TX TDR Part I: R&D TDR Part.
N. Walker, K. Yokoya LCWS ’11 Granada September TeV Upgrade Scenario: Straw man parameters.
24-July-10 ICHEP-10 Paris Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10 ILC Global Design Effort.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
Already time to think of upgrading the machine Two options presently discussed/studied Higher luminosity ~10 35 cm -2 s -1 (SLHC) –Needs changes in.
TLCC Themes BAW-2, SLAC, 19 January 2011 Ross Walker Yamamoto 1.
CLIC Re-baselining CSC, October Possible CLIC stages studied 2.
P5 Potential US Accelerator Collaboration with the ILC-in-Japan Mike Harrison Mike Harrison.
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
3.1 Main linac layout and parameters 3 SCRF Main Linacs50Yamomoto 31 Main linac layout and parameters5Adolphsen 31.1 Main Linac layout for flat site 31.2.
WG1: Overall Design personal highlights report by Nick Walker First project meeting 2/12/2004 conveners: Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK) Tor Raubenheimer (SLAC)
1 Positron Source Configuration Masao KURIKI ILC AG meeting at KEK, 2006 Jan. Positron Source Configuration KURIKI Masao and John Sheppard  BCD Description.
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
Estimate AC power for TeV Upgrade
Introduction and Meeting Objectives
ILC Accelerator Update
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
Summary of WG2 :CFS for staging
CLIC Rebaselining at 380 GeV and Staging Considerations
CLIC Klystron-based Design
DRFS and Low Energy 10 Hz Option
Collaboration New collaborators in 2016:
Future Collider Projects at CERN
High Gradient Cavities: Cost and Operational Considerations
BriXS – MariX WG 8,9 LASA December 13, 2017.
Cost Comparison of Undulator and e-Driven Systems
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Accelerator Layout and Parameters
XFEL Project (accelerator) Overview and recent developments
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Yasuhiro Okada, Executive Director, KEK
BDS civil construction Single IR upgrade scenarios discussion
MEIC Cost Estimate Overview
Overview of Day One – 29 Feb 2016
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
ILC - Global Design Effort
Presentation transcript:

Staging in the TDR

Known () Physics ~125 GeV ‘that new boson’ 173 GeV Top quark 125+91=216 GeV cm  250 GeV 173 GeV Top quark 2x173=346 GeV cm  350-400 GeV Higgs self coupling (t-coupling) ??? ≥ 500 CM (up to 650 ??) TeV and beyond….? Staging / Upgrading

250 GeV CM (as first stage) Relative to TDR 500 GeV baseline (1312 bunches) Two stage compressor (5-15 GeV) POSITRON linac straightforward ~50% ML linac cost (cryomodules, klystrons, cryo etc.) ~50% ML AC power Half linacs solution G = 31.5 MV/m ELECTRON linac needs 10Hz mode for e+ production DE = 135 GeV instead of 110 GeV (+25 GeV) ~57% ML linac cost (cryomodules, klystrons etc) 10Hz needs (1/2 linac × 10Hz/5Hz): 100% ML AC power (1/2 linac × 10Hz/5Hz) 80% cryo cost (50% static + 100% dynamic) Total Main Linac infrastructure Linac components: 50% Cryogenics: 65% RF AC power 75%

Civil Engineering (Tunnel) Build tunnel/shafts only for 250 GeV Cheapest option! Energy extension now requires major civil construction (+cost) conceptually the same as for TeV upgrade option Shorten schedule ~2 years (guess) Build full 500 GeV machine tunnel Assume install low energy linac first long 125/150 GeV transport line in ‘empty tunnel. Energy upgrade now just adds accelerator to tunnel Options for ‘adiabatic’ upgrading Implications for mass production scenarios (long term investment may now look attractive) Additional upfront costs. May need to sell/cost entire project upfront More expensive but over a longer time scale. Shorten schedule <2 years since all tunnels need to be constructed. ~70% TDR $ ~77% TDR $

Details! for discussion May consider more conservatism for ‘energy overhead’ known physics targets! (Integrated) luminosity requirement for LHF Positron polarisation for LHF? 10Hz and 25GeV additional e- linac unattractive Should certainly focus on this operational area