From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Interval model (2D case)

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Parallelepiped convex model (2D case)

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Ellipsoid convex model (2D case)

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Super-ellipsoid convex model (2D case)

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Crankshaft model for a specific type of engine

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Half-crank model: (a) The 3D model and (b) the FEM

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Uncertainty domains corresponding to the manufacturing class M(1,2) and associated four convex models (solid line = before inflation; dashed line = after inflation): (a) Rectangle, (b) parallelogram, (c) ellipse, and (d) super ellipse

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Uncertainty domains corresponding to the manufacturing class M(1,3) and associated four convex models (solid line = before inflation; dashed line = after inflation): (a) Rectangle, (b) parallelogram, (c) ellipse, and (d) super ellipse

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Uncertainty domains corresponding to the manufacturing class M(1,4) and associated four convex models (solid line = before inflation; dashed line = after inflation): (a) Rectangle, (b) parallelogram, (c) ellipse, and (d) super ellipse

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Uncertainty domains corresponding to the manufacturing class M(1,5) and associated four convex models (solid line = before inflation; dashed line = after inflation): (a) Rectangle, (b) parallelogram, (c) ellipse, and (d) super ellipse

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Uncertainty domains corresponding to the manufacturing class M(2,3) and associated four convex models (solid line = before inflation; dashed line = after inflation): (a) Rectangle, (b) parallelogram, (c) ellipse, and (d) super ellipse

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Uncertainty domains corresponding to the manufacturing class M(2,4) and associated four convex models (solid line = before inflation; dashed line = after inflation): (a) Rectangle, (b) parallelogram, (c) ellipse, and (d) super ellipse

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Uncertainty domains corresponding to the manufacturing class M(2,5) and associated four convex models (solid line = before inflation; dashed line = after inflation): (a) Rectangle, (b) parallelogram, (c) ellipse, and (d) super ellipse

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Uncertainty domains corresponding to the manufacturing class M(3,4) and associated four convex models (solid line = before inflation; dashed line = after inflation): (a) Rectangle, (b) parallelogram, (c) ellipse, and (d) super ellipse

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Uncertainty domains corresponding to the manufacturing class M(3,5) and associated four convex models (solid line = before inflation; dashed line = after inflation): (a) Rectangle, (b) parallelogram, (c) ellipse, and (d) super ellipse

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Uncertainty domains corresponding to the manufacturing class M(4,5) and associated four convex models (solid line = before inflation; dashed line = after inflation): (a) Rectangle, (b) parallelogram, (c) ellipse, and (d) super ellipse

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Minimum-area rectangle described by the rotation coordination

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Minimum-area parallelogram described by the rotation coordination

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: Minimum-area super ellipse and its circumscribed rectangle

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: von Mises stress contour under rectangle-shaped uncertainty domain

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: von Mises stress contour under parallelogram-shaped uncertainty domain

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: von Mises stress contour under ellipse-shaped uncertainty domain

From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. 2015;1(4):041002-041002-14. doi:10.1115/1.4030436 Figure Legend: von Mises stress contour under super ellipse shaped uncertainty domain