Alexandra Lansky, MD Professor of Medicine, Section of Cardiology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Advertisements

QUALITY CONTROL IN HEMATOLOGY
Clinical QA Data Audits A GCP Point of View Linda Del Paggio GCP Compliance BioBridges, LLC.
Distal Protection: PRIDE, CAPTIVE Symbiot III, AiMI Dr James Cotton MD MRCP Heart and Lung Centre Wolverhampton.
FDA’s Critical Path to New Medical Product Development Opportunities from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health Larry Kessler, Sc.D., Director.
Clinical Pharmacy’s Role in Research Trials Sheree Miller Pharm.D. Investigational Drug Service University of Washington Medical Center.
Protocol Complexity as a Factor in Vendor Management Compliance Risk
Qualification Process for Standard Scripts Hosted in the Open Source Repository ABSTRACT Dante Di Tommaso 1 and Hanming Tu 2 Tehran 1 F. Hoffmann-La Roche.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
A Food Analysis1 Food Analysis. A Food Analysis 2 Definition Process of assessing the physical, chemical, and or microbiological properties.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
Trial Design Issues Associated with Evaluation of Distal Protection Devices in Diseased Saphenous Vein Grafts Bram D. Zuckerman, MD, FACC Medical Officer,
UNIT-II CLINICAL DATA. UNIT-II CLINICAL DATA: Clinical Data, Application, Challenges, Solutions, Clinical Data Management System.
24 Nov 2007Data Management and Exploratory Data Analysis 1 Yongyuth Chaiyapong Ph.D. (Mathematical Statistics) Department of Statistics Faculty of Science.
The SAFER Trial Evaluation of the Clinical Safety and Efficacy of the PercuSurge GuardWire in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention As presented at TCT 2000.
Assessing Logistics System Supply Chain Management 1.
Research Documentation Betty Wilson, CIP, MS Senior Compliance Manager MU IRB Lori Wilcox, EdD Director of Academic Compliance, Corporate Compliance.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Philippe Généreux, MD for the Tryton Bifurcation Trial Investigators Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City.
End points in PTCA trials. A successful angioplasty is defined as the reduction of a minimum stenosis diameter to
Durable Polymer DES: 5 Year Outcomes RESOLUTE Update Sigmund Silber, MD FESC, FACC, FAHA Heart Center at the Isar Munich, Germany On Behalf of the RESOLUTE.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
Disrupt CAD Study Design
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
5 Different Observational Datasets: Pros & Cons
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
European Registry Update
Final Five-Year Follow-up of the SYNTAX Trial: Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease and/or Left Main Disease Patrick.
Angiographic Features of Atherosclerotic Superficial Femoral Artery Disease in Diabetics and Non-diabetics Presenting with Claudication Atif Mohammad,
BRS Next Large Trials: What is on the Horizon?
The Adjudicators: Role and Responsibility of the CEC
Medical Device Evaluation Division,
Data Managers’ Forum What’s in it for us?
Longevity of transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients with severe aortic stenosis and lower surgical risk Lars Sondergaard,
SFA Access for TASC D lesions.
The Tryton Bifurcation Trial:
Deputy Director, Division of Biostatistics No Conflict of Interest
TAXUS IV Trial Slow-rate release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with bare stent in patients with single de novo coronary lesions Presented.
Larry L. Wood Corporate Vice President Edwards Lifesciences
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
OCT-Guided PCI What needs to be done to establish criteria?
MACE Trial Rationale, Study Design, and Current Status
Erica Takai, PhD for Andrew Farb, M.D.
PMA Analysis of the CREST Trial Approvability of the RX Acculink Carotid Stent System for Revascularization of Carotid Artery Stenosis in Standard Surgical.
NHLBI Perspective Yves Rosenberg, M.D, M.P.H.
Crucial Statistical Caveats for Percutaneous Valve Trials
The Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial (CIRT)
METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS
EDUCATE: A NESTcc Demonstration Project Regulatory Perspective
How and why this study may change my practice ?
Quality Assurance Documentation
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds: 2-year Outcomes of the EVERBIO.
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Raimund Erbel
SIRIUS: A U.S. Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the SIRolImUS-Eluting Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Lesions Presented at TCT 2002.
Food Analysis A Food Analysis.
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
TAXUS – Myonecrosis and sidebranch patency concerns are short-term issues with no long-term consequences, and the benefits are undeniable Jeffrey J. Popma,
12-month clinical and 13-month angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. metallic drug-eluting.
Translation Pathway for Coronary Stent Development- Clinical Endpoints
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Presented at TCT 2006.
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Trial Organization Core Laboratories A Crucial Component of Clinical Research Alexandra Lansky, MD Professor of Medicine, Section of Cardiology Yale School of Medicine

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest I, Alexandra Lansky, DO NOT have a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with one or more organizations that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the context of the subject of this presentation.

Core Laboratories in Clinical Trials: Standardize Data Collection and Endpoints Independent Core Laboratory ensures standardized, reproducible and unbiased evaluation of endpoints Definitions: Standard well accepted/consensus Measurements: Systematic and validated Methodology: Accepted and validated for reproducible endpoints Understanding the patho-biology of endpoints Impact of timing of event assessment Impact of intervening test measures on clinical endpoints

Guidance for Industry and FDA: Heart Valve IDE and PMA applications ECHO Core Laboratory Guidance for Industry and FDA: Heart Valve IDE and PMA applications ISO 5840:2005 annex H provides information regarding the echocardiography protocol (recording studies, data collection, and core laboratory calculations and analysis). In addition FDA recommends: An echocardiography core laboratory for the central review of all echocardiographic data. A supervising director experienced in valve echocardiography. Use of a written echocardiography protocol Blinded interpretation of the echocardiograms The core laboratory interpretation of echocardiograms takes precedence over site reads

Core Laboratories in Clinical Trials: Provide Reliable Endpoint Measures Primary or secondary endpoint measures: Efficacy surrogates (LLL, RS) Safety measures (Aortic regurgitation after TAVI) Adjudication of Clinical Events Revascularization Stent thrombosis Myocardial Infarction Mechanistic insights of performance IVUS/OCT ECHO

Angiographic Core Laboratory PCI/Stent Trials Independent Adjudication of all Revascularizations TLR vs TVR vs Non TVR Thrombosis Surrogate measures of device efficacy Validated surrogate Restenosis LLL Stent versus Lesion/segment Identify qualifying angiogram for endpoint measure In case of multiple follow-up angiograms, identify which angiogram is used for endpoint measurement

Core Laboratories in Clinical Trials: Standardize Data Collection and Endpoints CRF Design Design of CRF (endpoint measures) tailored to protocol and knowledge of software capabilities for valid reproducible analysis CRF programming requires validation and build in cross checks Data entry requires 100% QC if single entry, less if double entry Site training > 50% of endpoint measurement variability can come from differences in site acquisition Provide detailed, but easy to use instructions to the sites to acquire samples/media in a standard manner to ensure data consistency and quality

Core Laboratories in Clinical Trials: Site Training and Feedback Acquisition Guidelines for Sites We require the following information from the sites to ensure quality and accurate data from the echocardiographic images: A simultaneous ECG with a clearly defined R-wave. At least 2 two beat loops for all image acquisition. Doppler waveforms recorded at sweep speeds of 50 or 100 mm/sec. If 2 contiguous segments of the myocardium is not well visualized contrast injection should be used and labeled in each contrast image.

Core Laboratories in Clinical Trials: Standardize Data Collection and Endpoints Core Lab analysis Trained personnel with current training records, daily feedback, weekly training sessions, and annual training updates Establish a standard process for the Core lab cycle: receiving, labeling, analyzing, reviewing, managing data, and communicating with data management group and sponsor QC of analysis varies: US standard is 100% review of technical aspects of analysis Inter and Intra reader validation with measurement accuracy and precision of quantitative and qualitative measures Process, validations, analysis must be detailed in SOPs and maintained current

Core Laboratories in Clinical Trials: Standardize Data Analysis, Definitions Qualitative analysis: Lesion morphology Lesion length Blood flow Distal run-Off Complications: Thrombus Dissections Abrupt closure Perforation No reflow Spasm Distal embolisation Quantitative analysis Proximal RVD Distal RVD Interpolated RVD Minimum lumen diameter

Core Laboratories in Clinical Trials: Standardized Process 1 Image Acquisition 2 Recording and Sending 3 Tracking Media 4 Data Analysis 5 Data Entry (Database)

MRI Core Laboratory Inter-reader Intra-reader -10 10 20 30 40 50 60 10 20 30 40 50 60 ROI(g)a-2nd 70 ROI(g)c Y = -.006 + .978 * X; R^2 = .99 Regression Plot -10 10 20 30 40 50 60 ROI(g)a-1st ROI(g)a-2nd Y = .318 + .955 * X; R^2 = .992 Regression Plot

Conclusions Central Laboratories Important component of most clinical trials Provides independent unbiased analysis Laboratory qualifications and validation ensures consistent reproducible results Assists in the accurate and independent adjudication of clinical events