Figure 1. Schematic representation of the irradiation geometries to achieve different angles of incidence. S denotes the source; L is the distance from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Concepts in Evaluating Overall System Uncertainty Carroll S. Brickenkamp NVLAP Program Manager Panasonic Users Meeting June 2001.
Advertisements

Pencil-Beam Redefinition Algorithm Robert Boyd, Ph.D.
Radiation hazard to astronauts on Low-Earth Orbit Monika Puchalska (on behalf of the Polish MATROSHKA group) Department of Radiation Physics and Dosimetry.
Figure 2.1 Symbolic representation of flow of control through the if statement © 2003 Brooks/Cole Publishing / Thomson Learning™
MONTE CARLO RADIATION DOSE SIMULATIONS AND DOSIMETRY COMPARISON OF THE MODEL 6711 AND I BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES Mark J. Rivard Department of Radiation.
IAEA Quantities and Measurements - 3 Radiation Protection Quantities Day 3 – Lecture 1 1.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 630 Effective and Committed Effective Dose Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
Introduction The effect of air-cavities within the human body, for example in the head and neck regions, present possible sources of error when calculating.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 630 Exposure and Dose Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
At the position d max of maximum energy loss of radiation, the number of secondary ionizations products peaks which in turn maximizes the dose at that.
3/2003 Rev 1 II.2.9b – slide 1 of 40 IAEA Post Graduate Educational Course Radiation Protection and Safe Use of Radiation Sources Part IIQuantities and.
Dose Distribution and Scatter Analysis
Bologna 1st-5th September 1 Neutron dosimetry and spectrometry: problems, solutions, perspectives and the role of track detectors Carles Domingo Grup de.
SOI detector Geant4-based studies to characterise the tissue-equivalence of SOI and diamond microdosimeteric detectors, under development at CMRP S. Dowdell,
11 th RD50 Workshop, CERN Nov Results with thin and standard p-type detectors after heavy neutron irradiation G. Casse.
Monte carlo radiation transport simulation in dosimetry from environmental modeling to multimillion voxel human phantom Valery Taranenko Institute of Radiation.
Radiation Test Facilities G. Spiezia. Engineering Department ENEN Radiation tests facilities  Radiation test in the accelerator sector  External facilities.
Neutron Dose Per Fluence and Weighting Factors for Use at High Energy Accelerators (Submitted to Health Physics) J. Donald Cossairt, Ph.D., C.H.P. Kamran.
10 CFR 835 Amendment Peter V. O’Connell, CHP U.S. Department of Energy Accelerator Safety Workshop August 8, 2007 Argonne National Laboratory.
International Atomic Energy Agency ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO EXTERNAL RADIATION SOURCES AND INTAKES OF RADIONUCLIDES Dosimetric Quantities.
APHY398C 6/4/ Dosimetry   Quantifying the incidence of various biological changes as a function of the radiation dose.   Exposure Ratio of total.
Copyright © 2011 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Energy and the Environment James A. Fay / Dan S. Golomb FIGURE 8.5 The spectral distribution of the solar.
3/2003 Rev 1 II.1.2 – slide 1 of 32 IAEA Post Graduate Educational Course Radiation Protection and Safe Use of Radiation Sources Session II.1.2 Part IIQuantities.
Geant4 User Workshop, Catania, Italy, 15th October, 2009
Daniel Matthiä(1)‏, Bernd Heber(2), Matthias Meier(1),
Cumulative dose and skin damage
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
Copyright © 2011 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Energy and the Environment James A. Fay / Dan S. Golomb CHAPER 11 Global Warming and Climate Change.
3/2003 Rev 1 II.1.1 – slide 1 of 30 IAEA Post Graduate Educational Course Radiation Protection and Safe Use of Radiation Sources Session II.1.1 Part IIQuantities.
M.Moll, M.Silari, H.Vincke – 3.April Mixed field irradiation -- Who answered ?  In total 36 forms filled / 34 persons answered: 38% 62% CERN:
ASW August 12, 2008 Impact of amended 10CFR835 on neutron calculations and measurements at high energy electron accelerators A. Fassò SLAC, Radiation Protection.
Mixed field irradiation -- Who answered ?  In total 36 forms filled / 34 persons answered: 38% 62% CERN: mainly LHC related topics CERF: beside LHC topics.
24 th ICNTS Design and test of an albedo personal neutron dosemeter based on PADC detectors R. Bedogni a, A. Esposito a, G. Gualdrini b, R. Mishra c, S.
Investigation of 15kh2NMFAA steel and weld after irradiation in the “Korpus” facility on the RBT-6 reactor D. Kozlov, V. Golovanov, V. Raetsky, G. Shevlyakov,
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Photograph of a single detector module. X-rays are incident from the top of.
MAIN FEATURES FOR CALIBRATING DOSEMETERS ORAMED WP5 J.-M. Bordy Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (CEA/LIST/LNHB), France ORAMED 2011 January 2011.
E. Mezzenga 1, E. Cagni 1, A. Botti 1, M. Orlandi 1, W.D. Renner 2, M. Iori 1 1. Medical Physics Unit, ASMN-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Italy 2. MathResolution.
© Oxford University Press How are the plates moving?
EVIDOS: Optimisation of Individual Monitoring in Mixed Neutron/Photon Fields at Workplaces of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle EVIDOS: Optimisation of Individual.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic diagrams of (a) our novel wide viewing LCD, consisting of a collimated.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic diagram of the spectroscopy module attached to the endoscopy imaging.
Figure 2. Isopleths for dose rate (top) and fluence rate (bottom) as function of \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb}
Date of download: 10/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Bioinspired Graphene Nanogut
Figure 3. Count rates at the eight measurement locations at ZWILAG in the vicinity of a cask filled with spent fuel (left column) and a cask containing.
Figure 2. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for adults (18 y of age and older at the time of the.
EXAMPLE 1 Finding a Combined Area Architecture
Figure 1. (a) A set-up used for the measurements showing the head phantom and the ion chamber located in the central hole. The cylindrical phantom has.
Expressions and Equations Review Day 3
Figure 4. p-Values from Larsson et al
Figure 1. Activity found in nose swabs and early faecal excretion for each subject at the MOX facilities. From: Practical action levels for chelation therapy.
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of the DTW method
Date of download: 11/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Figure 2. Entrance dose at the detector for the clinical (light grey bars) and reference (dark bars) protocols. From: COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS.
Figure 1. Example of phase shift angles among three different terns where one of them has been taken as a reference. From: Assessment of ELF magnetic fields.
Figure 1. A decay chain normalized by the total number of nuclei in the chain. The dashed line depicts e−1/t, where e is Euler number. From:
Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System
Figure 1. The (a) anterior–posterior and (b) right-lateral fields and (c, d) the isodose distributions of two axial planes in one patient with T2 stage.
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation A
Photoelectric Solar Power Revisited
Scheme 1. Scheme of the quartz sample holder.
Figure 3. Values of the correction factor kmtx,j for the sixty energy channels j = 1,…,60. The values for ten iteration steps are shown. In addition, the.
From: String Generation for Testing Regular Expressions
Orientation of the Infrared Transition Moments for an α-Helix
Figure 1 Representative examples of three-dimensional volume-rendered CT images of AOLCA (A) and AORCA (B) with an IAC ... Figure 1 Representative examples.
Mitsuru Imaizumi Space Solar Cells -- I -- HTV-6
Intercomparison on Personal Dose Equivalent (Hp(10))
Hp(10) irradiations for personal dosimetry traceability
Figure 1. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded ... Figure 1. Estimated weight functions.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the irradiation geometries to achieve different angles of incidence. S denotes the source; L is the distance from the source to test point T, the mid-point of the front face of the phantom. From: Evaluation of two personal dosemeters in polyenergetic mono- and multi-directional neutron fields Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;113(1):14-33. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch428 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | Published by Oxford University Press 2005

Figure 2. Personal neutron dose-equivalent responses of the Siemens EPD-N2 and Saphymo Saphydose-n dosemeters, as a function of neutron energy. Filled symbols: EPD-N2 data [taken from Refs (2) and (18)]. Open symbols: Saphydose-n [taken from Refs (3) and (4)]. The dashed lines are only guides and do not represent fits to the data. From: Evaluation of two personal dosemeters in polyenergetic mono- and multi-directional neutron fields Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;113(1):14-33. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch428 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | Published by Oxford University Press 2005

Figure A2. Distributions of the neutron fluence in each angle bin, as a function of energy, for the (a) CANDU-like I field and (b) CANDU-like II field. From: Evaluation of two personal dosemeters in polyenergetic mono- and multi-directional neutron fields Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;113(1):14-33. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch428 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | Published by Oxford University Press 2005

Figure A2. Distributions of the neutron fluence in each angle bin, as a function of energy, for the (a) CANDU-like I field and (b) CANDU-like II field. From: Evaluation of two personal dosemeters in polyenergetic mono- and multi-directional neutron fields Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;113(1):14-33. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch428 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | Published by Oxford University Press 2005

Figure A3. Distributions of personal dose equivalent in each angle bin, as a function of energy, for the (a) CANDU-like I field and (b) CANDU-like II field. From: Evaluation of two personal dosemeters in polyenergetic mono- and multi-directional neutron fields Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;113(1):14-33. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch428 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | Published by Oxford University Press 2005

Figure A3. Distributions of personal dose equivalent in each angle bin, as a function of energy, for the (a) CANDU-like I field and (b) CANDU-like II field. From: Evaluation of two personal dosemeters in polyenergetic mono- and multi-directional neutron fields Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;113(1):14-33. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch428 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | Published by Oxford University Press 2005

Figure A1. Personal dose-equivalent conversion coefficients, as a function of neutron energy, for angles of incidence 0° (upper curve) and 75° (lower curve). Symbols: data from ICRP74; lines: interpolated data. From: Evaluation of two personal dosemeters in polyenergetic mono- and multi-directional neutron fields Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;113(1):14-33. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch428 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | Published by Oxford University Press 2005

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.