APEX Trial design: Patients hospitalized with an acute medical illness were randomized to oral betrixaban for 35-42 days (n = 3,759) versus subcutaneous.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients Alexander T Cohen On behalf of the MAGELLAN.
Advertisements

Results: 1.Progression of thrombus length and volume (40% vs. 28%; P
Consistent Venous Thromboembolism Risk Reduction by Extended- Versus Standard-Duration Enoxaparin Prophylaxis in Subgroups of Acutely Ill Medical Patients.
DVT Prophylaxis in Medical Patients Rog Kyle, MD MUSC 6/5/12.
LIFEBLOOD THE Thrombosis CHARITY Venous thromboembolism – Treatment and secondary prevention Ulcus cruris Chronic PE PE DVT Post-thrombotic syndrome Death.
The Definitive Thrombosis Update
The EINSTEIN DVT Study 'Xarelto' for the Acute and Continued Treatment of Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis.
H.R. Buller, G. Agnelli Presented at the XXIst Congress of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) 2007 Meeting, July 6-12th in Geneva,
Rivaroxaban for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Impact on Healthcare Costs Based on the RECORD3 Study Kwong L, Lees.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
Regulation of Coagulation in Orthopedic Surgery to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism 1 (RECORD 1 ) Journal Club General Surgery Rotation.
Dabigatran Etexilate is Effective and Safe for the Extended Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Total Hip Replacement Eriksson BI, Dahl OE,
SANOFI-SYNTHELABOARIXTRA ® 1 ARIXTRA ® (fondaparinux sodium) in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip replacement surgery KA Bauer, BI Eriksson,
Oral Rivaroxaban Compared with Subcutaneous Enoxaparin for Extended Thromboprophylaxis After Total Hip Arthroplasty: The RECORD1 Trial Eriksson BI, Borris.
Dr Thomas Lloyd F1 Dr Aman Hargehandewal Wrexham Maelor Hospital
Date of download: 6/22/2016 From: Prolonged Versus Standard-Duration Venous Thromboprophylaxis in Major Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review Ann Intern.
Review on NOACs Studies DR. KOUROSH SADEGHI TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
VTE prophylaxis Sharif-Kashani,B.MD SBMU Preventing VTE Over 12 million people in the United States are at risk of VTE due to hospitalization for major.
(p for noninferiority = 0.01)
Thrombosis.TV Breaking Update: Betrixaban Approved by the FDA
Presenter: Brandon Cave, PharmD PGY-2 Cardiology Pharmacy Resident
Recommendations for Catheter-to-Vein Ratio
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis for Medical Inpatients
PRAGUE-18 Trial design: Patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were randomized to prasugrel (n = 634) versus ticagrelor (n = 596). Results (p = 0.94)
NORSTENT Trial design: Patients with obstructive coronary artery disease were randomized to a drug-eluting stent (DES) (n = 4,504) versus a bare-metal.
CORAL Trial design: Patients with renal artery stenosis and hypertension or chronic kidney disease were randomized to renal artery stenting (n = 467) vs.
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
Dr.H.Chandrashekar, Dr.A.Chaudhuri, Dr. A. Douglas, Dr. D. Lowdon
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
DAPT Trial design: Patients undergoing DES/BMS PCI, no ischemic/bleeding complications, and with documented compliance at 1 year, were randomized to receive.
RE-CIRCUIT Trial design: Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation were randomized to uninterrupted dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.
(p < for group 1 or 2 vs. group 3)
Timothy A. Brighton, M. B. , B. S. , John W. Eikelboom, M. B. , B. S
The Burden of Hospital-Associated Venous Thromboembolism
BENEFIT Trial design: Patients with positive serologic tests for T. Cruzi and cardiomyopathy were randomized to benznidazole 300 mg daily for days.
New Strategies to Prevent CV Events After Hospital Discharge
The Safety and Efficacy of Full vs
DANISH Trial design: Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were randomized to ICD implantation (n = 556) versus usual care (n = 560). Results (p = 0.28)
EUCLID Trial design: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were randomized to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (n = 6,930) vs. clopidogrel 75 mg.
ATLANTIC Trial design: Participants with STEMI being transported for primary PCI were randomized in the ambulance to ticagrelor 180 mg (n = 909) vs. placebo.
Global Burden of VTE. Preventing Thrombosis During and Post-Hospitalization: New Paradigms in Clinical Care.
LEVO-CTS Trial design: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized to infusion of levosimendan 0.2 µg/kg/min.
(p for noninferiority = )
INOVATE-HF Trial design: Patients with heart failure (HF) were randomized to device implant for vagus nerve stimulation (n = 436) versus optimal medical.
New Oral Anticoagulants and VTE Management
Risk for subsequent venous thromboembolic complications in carriers of the prothrombin or the factor V gene mutation with a first episode of deep-vein.
PARTNER 2A Trial design: Intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis (STS PROM score 4-8%) were randomized to undergo either TAVR or SAVR, stratified.
Compare-Acute Trial design: STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were randomized to fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization (n.
PARADIGM-HF Trial design: Participants with NYHA class II-IV and LVEF ≤40% were randomized to LCZ mg twice daily (n = 4,187) vs. enalapril 10 mg.
PRECISION Trial design: Patients with arthritis and increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to celecoxib 100 mg twice daily (n = 8,072) vs. ibuprofen.
ANTARCTIC Trial design: Patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing stenting were randomized to tailored antiplatelet therapy (n = 435) versus conventional.
Symptomatic venous thromboembolism after femoral vein harvest
SIGNIFY Trial design: Participants with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure and resting heart rate >70 bpm were randomized to.
FAMOUS-NSTEMI Trial design: Participants with NSTEMI were randomized to an FFR-guided strategy (n = 176) vs. a coronary angiography-guided strategy (n.
Modified Rankin score 0-2
ATMOSPHERE Trial design: Patients with symptomatic heart failure were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either aliskiren 300 mg once daily, enalapril 5.
APEX: Primary Efficacy and Safety Results
NIPPON Trial design: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (6 months; n.
ZEUS Trial design: Patients who were deemed uncertain DES candidates due to bleeding, thrombotic, or restenosis risk were randomized to receive either.
FOURIER Trial design: Patients with established cardiovascular disease on statin therapy were randomized to evolocumab 140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks.
(p < for noninferiority)
(p = for noninferiority)
Incidence of (A) recurrent VTE and (B) major bleeding in select randomised clinical trials of LMWH for the treatment and secondary prevention of VTE in.
SOLID-TIMI 52 Trial design: Participants within 30 days of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were randomized to darapladib 160 mg daily (n = 6,504) versus.
Primary safety endpoint
MOMENTUM 3 Trial design: Patients with advanced heart failure were randomized to a centrifugal-flow pump (n = 152) vs. an axial-flow pump (n = 142). Results.
IMPRESS Trial design: Patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI and cardiogenic shock were randomized in a 1:1 to either Impella CP or IABP. They were.
(p for noninferiority = 0.01)
MATRIX: Radial vs. Femoral
CIRCUS Trial design: Patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to IV cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg (n = 475) vs. placebo (n = 495) immediately before coronary.
Presentation transcript:

APEX Trial design: Patients hospitalized with an acute medical illness were randomized to oral betrixaban for 35-42 days (n = 3,759) versus subcutaneous enoxaparin for 10 days (n = 3,754). (p = 0.054) Results Asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis or symptomatic venous thromboembolism: 6.9% of the betrixaban group versus 8.5% of the enoxaparin group (p = 0.054) Major bleeding: 0.7% versus 0.6% (p = 0.55), respectively, for betrixaban versus enoxaparin 8.5 % 6.9 Conclusions Among patients hospitalized with an acute medical illness, extended-duration betrixaban was not superior to short-duration enoxaparin in preventing thrombotic complications Bleeding was similar between the groups Betrixaban Enoxaparin Cohen AT, et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:534-44