Markus Hämäläinen, Tatu Manninen & Veli-Jussi Vuorinen

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Cross-Border Tax Arbitrage Examples. Dual Resident Corporations Without Arbitrage Structure: U.K. group earns $100 and faces U.K. tax of $30 (30%);
Advertisements

1 ESC-Dijon- Pole Finance – EU Tax – A. Ashta 1 EU Taxation 4. Parent-Subsidiary Directive Arvind Ashta ESC Dijon: Pole Finance.
Int’l & EU Tax Law 2007/2008 Exam Discussion (first sit)
1 International Taxation on the Road to Economic Recovery Clemens Fuest University of Oxford IFA Trilateral Meeting London, November 3 rd, 2010.
Case C-303/07 Aberdeen Property Susanna Kuisma Pepe Tamminen.
Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law Dr Mario Tenore Vienna University of Economics and Business Brussels, 28 September.
The EU Regulatory Framework for Tax
(c) G.M.M. Michielse EU Harmonization: An Obstacle for Alternative Corporate Income Tax Systems? Geerten M.M. Michielse Technical Assistance Advisor,
TAXATION TAXATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
CJEU CASE C-338/11 – Santander Asset Management SGIIC and Others Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 May European Tax Law 32E22000 Mikko.
Trade mission Hungarian construction sector 19 April 2012.
C-342/10 Commission v. Finland Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Free movement of capital – Article 63 TFEU – EEA Agreement – Article 40.
President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform Integration of Corporate and Individual Income Taxes Alvin Warren Harvard Law School May 12, 2005.
CYPRUS – LITHUANIA TAX STRUCTURING
INTRODUCTION: In recent years integration has been achieved through tax harmonisation and through European Court of Justice (ECJ) case law This integration.
Case Diana Elisabeth Lindman v Skatterättelsenämnden (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Ålands Förvaltningsdomstol (Finland)) Case C-42/02 Lindman.
Ministry of Economy and Finance Public Revenues and Taxes Department Main features of the new Income Tax Law December 2009.
Lesson 10 GST on Import & Export Business Li, Jialong
1 Impatriates: French tax regime CABINET SEVESTRE, 71 avenue Marceau – PARIS Tél : 33 (0) – Fax : 33 (0)
Case C-446/03 Marks & Spencer
Farm Business Arrangement Alternatives AAE 320 Based on work of Philip E. Harris Center for Dairy Profitability Dept. of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
EUROPEAN TAX LAW (32E22000) JAKI TAALAS & JOEL KERÄNEN SGI, C-311/08 TRANSFER PRICING.
The Dutch B.V. For Tax Planning By Robert Hek
CFC rules & Cadbury Schweppes case C-196/04
CYPRUS – THE IDEAL HOLDING COMPANY LOCATION, ADVANTAGES OF THE CYPRUS TAX SYSTEM By Marios Efthymiou Senior Partner Dinos Antoniou & Co Ltd Certified Public.
Question 1, Case A (Part 1) The case „Saint-Gobain“ was about a French company having a PE in Germany that held participations in foreign companies incl.
Johan Boersma TAXATION OF COMPANIES IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
1 © #1 F LOTT & C O. PC - A TTORNEYS DOING BUSINESS IN THE US – TAX CONSIDERATIONS Doing Business in the U.S. Tax Considerations American-Hellenic.
CJEU Case C-231/05, AA Oy Finnish Corporate Contribution System Antti Lehtola
The Balanced Allocation of Taxing Powers in EU Law
Johan Boersma TAXATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
Free Movement and Taxation of Companies Piet Van Nuffel Court of Justice of the EC, Katholieke Universiteit Brussel 15 November th Annual Conference.
TAXATION TAXATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
1 CHANGES TO CORPORATE INCOME TAX RULES IN THE CONTEXT OF EU INTEGRATION Sylwia Sobowiec Sławomir Boruc ( presentation prepared with the help of Baker.
Amsterdam, 6 February 2009 Bas Opmeer, tax partner Personal deductions and income tax, recent developments.
FISCAL. Article 03 Tax Fiscal Year Explanation 3.1 Income tax applies to income within a defined period which is the solar year. Except as is provided.
Horlings is a world-wide network of independent accountants and consultants firms 6 February 2009 The Dutch co-operative Nexia European Tax Group Meeting.
1 Panel 2 “Acte Clair” in ECJ Decisions on direct tax discrimination The example of host state discrimination against foreign owned permanent establishments.
R.Greaves Freedom of Establishment & Cross-border Provision of Services.
9 juin 2008 French Tax on Real Estate. 2 Speaker Christophe Le Bon International Tax Partner TAJ (Deloitte member firm) Paris My main message Taxes on.
CTC Seminar on secondment and expatriates Expatriate case studies by Vikas Garg Head of Services & L&D Broadening Horizons Services Private Limited India.
Chapter – 3 setoff and carry forward of losses
Fiscal aspects on insolvency Hans Eppink KroeseWevers Enschede, The Netherlands september 2008.
KHO:2008:23 Finnish Dividend Taxation of EU Individuals.
Tax Treaties vs. National Law Tax Credit vs. Deductibility: The Société Céline Case CE, 12 th March 2014, Société Céline, n° , A IATJ 6 th Assembly.
Cyprus Companies in International Tax Planning International Business Structuring The Cyprus Jurisdiction.
THE NETHERLANDS Daamen & van Sluis. 1 Speaker Name: Jeroen in ‘t Hout Title: International tax partner CompanyDaamen & van Sluis – Rotterdam Mobile:+
Cross-border merger and final losses (C-123/11 A Oy, KHO 2013:155)
Schedule D Case III Sources of Income
Intra-Group Financial Transfers
Corporation Tax Corporation Tax
EU tax law and tax treaties - Rights of a permanent establishment
Farm Business Arrangement Alternatives
European and International Tax Law
Group Members: Lim Zhen Ting (619352) Cheryl Yap (619747)
CASE C-196/04 Cadbury Schweppes plc, Cadbury Schweppes Overseas Ltd v
Discussion Group Meeting
Circularity between measures Questions regarding financial instruments
CASE C-446/03 Marks & Spencer plc
European and international tax law
Schedule D Case III Sources of Income
Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies
EU Taxation 9. Taxation of Mergers Arvind Ashta Introduction
CADBURY SCHWEPPES CASE C-196/04, 12 SEPTEMBER 2006.
Jacques Malherbe Professor emeritus, Catholic University of Louvain
Valentin Savov Attorney of Law (LL.M. Leiden)
Provisions of Turkey Tax Amnesty Law
Hybrid mismatch arrangements
Methods for avoidance of double taxation
UNITED KINGDOM.
Presentation transcript:

Markus Hämäläinen, Tatu Manninen & Veli-Jussi Vuorinen Case: Denkavit BV Markus Hämäläinen, Tatu Manninen & Veli-Jussi Vuorinen

Facts Denkavit Internationaal BV, Netherlands (Parent company) Denkavit France SARL (+Agro Finance SARL) (Subsidiaries) France, the Netherlands, EU-Comission, EFTA The French subsidiaries paid dividends (14,5M French francs) to Denkavit in 1987– 1989. Tax officers of France taxed these dividends, based on tax treaty between France (FR) and the Netherlands (NL) with amount of 5% (725t French francs)

Facts Denkavit Internationaal BV & France filed a lawsuit against the government of France The national law of France (CGI) stands; a parent company who is resident in France and gains dividends from its French subsidiary -> The dividends are tax exempt Denkavit protested: The national tax law of France is in conflict with the freedom of establishment because a parent company which is resident in another member state – is tax liable of subsiadary’s dividends Whereas the French parent company is not The tax treaty between FR & the NL admits; a host state of subsidiary can tax these dividends by 5% But the resident state of the parent company – must deduct these paid taxes in parent company’s final taxes

Facts The government of France claims: CGI is not against the freedom of establishment because a foreign parent company can attain the very same tax benefits - it only needs to have a PE in France And if there is no PE in France and France don’t have a justification to tax these dividends -> There may be situations where it is possible that these dividends are entirely tax exempt Additionally, the tax treaty between France and the Netherlands allows the taxation If the taxation is denied by CJEU, the EU intervenes the right of France and the Netherlands to determine their own tax laws

Source: Tomi Viitala / Aalto

Issues to CJEU stated by Conseil d´État (1/2) 1) Is the tax system of France against the freedom of establishment? In case where a parent company is a resident in another member state and based on the CGI – the parent company is tax liable of obtained dividends from its subsidiaries – whereas a parent company which is resident in France is exempt of these taxes 2) Is the described tax system against the Freedom of Establishment (Article 43 EC) Or does the tax treaty between France & the Netherlands, which allows French tax authorities to tax these dividends and in the same time the very same tax treaty; determines these parent companies to deduct these paid taxes in their resident state

Issues to CJEU stated by Conseil d´Ètat (2/2) 3) If the second question is accepted; Is the fact that the tax treaty is valid; enough to justify the taxation? Is it just a way to distribute the taxable incomes between France and the Netherlands or should that fact be taken in to account that in some cases the parent company which is taxed in France, cannot deduct the paid taxes in its resident state The case can be realised in situations, where the resident state have a legislation, which gives the tax exemption to obtained dividends which the parent company receives from abroad

The judgement of CJEU / Question 1 The national legislation is incompatible with the Articles 43 and 48 EC. The national legislation discriminates the freedom of establishment For example if the parent company has residence abroad (in this case in the Netherlands) it would be responsible of the taxation of dividends even though the French parent companies are exempted

The judgement of CJEU / Question 2 The national legislation is incompatible with the Articles 43 and 48 EC Only parent companies residenced abroad are tax liable of subsidiaries’ dividends - whereas parent companies which have a PE are not The tax treaty between the two member states (France and the Netherlands) says that there is a possibility to deduct taxes paid in another member state Overall, in this case because of the national legislation the parent company in another member state is incapable to do this, because these (dividends obtained from foreign subsidiaries) incomes are tax exempted already in the Netherlands.