Firmware Update 29/03/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Advertisements

P.N. Burrows ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK, 14/12/091 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales Philip Burrows Glenn Christian Hamid Dabiri Khah Javier Resta Lopez.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 Preliminary resolution study results N. Blaskovic.
What have we learned so far?  When we apply a voltage, the capacitor will charge up to the applied voltage.  The capacitor charges up exponentially.
Introduction to electronics lab ENGRI 1810 Using: Solderless prototype board (white board) Digital multimeter (DMM) Power Supply Signal Generator Oscilloscope.
The Proportional-Integral-Derivative Controller
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Feb, 13, 2008.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF February-March 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
UNRELIABLE DATA, SEE FIRST SLIDE WARNING!!! Data taken on these shifts had attenuation factors set incorrectly and problems with faraday cup bunch charge.
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
Analogue BPM data analysis Calibration & resolution results.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
NLC Intra-Pulse Fast Feedback Simon Jolly Oxford University NLC Beam Delivery Meeting July 2001.
AS Wireless Automation Implementing PIDPLUS for Halvari system.
Features of the new Alibava firmware: 1. Universal for laboratory use (readout of stand-alone detector via USB interface) and for the telescope readout.
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
1Ben Constance7 th January 2010 FONT5 December 2009 feedback results During the final shift we ran K1-to-P2 position feedback 151.2ns bunch spacing, quadrupoles.
LHC LHC Wire Scanner Application Manual oOverview: 1 M. Kuhn - 12/03/2015.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis**, Colin Perry.
IPBPM issues (Limitation of resolution) Siwon Jang (KNU)
Measurements Measurements and errors : - Here, the goal is to have some understanding of the operation and behavior of electrical test instruments. Also,
S. Bota – Calorimeter Electronics overview - July 2002 Status of SPD electronics Very Front End Review of ASIC runs What’s new: RUN 4 and 5 Next Actions.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
NumberMikey Davis02 November 2012 Roundup of ATF Trip.
FONT GROUP MEETING ATF JUNE SUMMARY Neven & Talitha Talitha Bromwich - Friday, 26 June 2015.
1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.
1Ben ConstanceCTF3 working meeting – 09/01/2012 Known issues Inconsistency between BPMs and BPIs Response of BPIs is non-linear along the pulse Note –
1 EMCM Measurements Florian Lütticke, Martin Ritter, Felix Müller.
Feedback Simulations with Amplifier Saturation, Transient and Realistic Filtering Mauro Pivi, Claudio Rivetta, Kevin Li Webex CERN/SLAC/LBNL 13 September.
1/33Mikey Davis24 January 2013 Review of 23 rd of January Shift.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic.
FONT Oxford FONT REPORT NOVEMBER Neven Blaskovic Kraljevic and Talitha Bromwich Friday, 27 November
FONT5 digital feedback boards
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, R. Ramjiawan
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Roundup of Week at ATF Mikey Davis 19 April /26.
Weiming Guo Accelerator Physics Group / ASD Advanced Photon Source
1.) Acquisition Phase Task:
Further Tracking Studies and March Trip Plan
Resolution Study T. Bromwich FONT 8 September 2017.
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, P. Burrows, G. Christian, C. Perry, R
EI205 Lecture 13 Dianguang Ma Fall 2008.
Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting.
FONT Meeting 10th February 2011
MKD Waveform Measurements
Created by Luis Chioye, Art Kay Presented by Peggy Liska
Analysis of March ATF Run
ATF Shift Plans Rebecca, Talitha 08/09/2017 Friday, 08 September 2017
A Level Computing Component 2
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
Revised ATF Shift Plans
Modbus with the AKD Using Modbus Poll and Wireshark Rev. F Dec
Introduction to data converters
Introduction to data converters
Progress towards nanometre beam stabilisation at ATF2
Phase Feedforward in 2015 & Plans for 2016
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Status of Phase Feedforward Tests
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Measurements Measurements and errors :
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
Fitting to the Linear Region of I’/q
DeltaV Neural - Expert In Expert mode, the user can select the training parameters, recommend you use the defaults for most applications.
ATLAS full run-2 luminosity combination
Presentation transcript:

Firmware Update 29/03/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan

First Shift 15/06/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan

Data taken on shift Confirmed can trigger kicker amplifier and kick the beam. Trouble with acquisition rate of data ~10 times slower (subsequently fixed by Doug) so limited the amount of data we could take. Kicker scan and gain calculation. Data taken with single sample, integration window of 10 and of 15. Data all taken at 10dB. Rebecca Ramjiawan

User Errors One of the two gains in the wrong place. Should have been non zero gains in K1P2, K1P3 but was K1P2, K2P2. Correlation between two signals that were switched: 79% Should have redone the kicker scan with integration window set to 10 to account for different signal droop (DAC values set time depends on sample integration window). Rebecca Ramjiawan

Waveforms from single sample correction Waveforms from ipfbRun7 (15/06/2017). Feedback incorrectly performed using AI and BI. K1P2 -5073, K2P2 3311. BI and BQ signals very large – we were just focussing on centring in IPA. IPA (I and Q) IPB (I and Q) and q K1P2: -5073 K2P2: 3311 Rebecca Ramjiawan

ipfbRun8 Waveforms from ipfbRun7 (15/06/2017). Feedback incorrectly performed using AI and BI. IPA ( I and Q) IPB (I and Q) and q Rebecca Ramjiawan

Correct Calculation Performed by Firmware Manually calculated DAC values (from 9 channels of data) given the sample locations and incorrect gain settings used during the shift. Shows 100% correlation with .dac file. (Largest deviation from expected value 1.7 DAC counts – from rounding errors). Rebecca Ramjiawan

Performance on first shift Owl shift 15/06/2017 ipfbRun7 (single sample), ipfbRun8 (integrated 10 samples), jitRun3 (fb off). Feedback using a single sample Feedback integrating over 10 samples Rebecca Ramjiawan

Correlation 1 sample 10 sample Correlation 1 sample: 99% to -10%, (ipfbRun7) Correlation 10 sample: 99% to 40%. (ipfbRun8) Not really enough triggers to get a decent estimate of correlation (errors 16% and 30%) Rebecca Ramjiawan

Correlation as a Function of Sample Number Red – 10 sample integration (under correction), ipfbRun8 Blue – 1 sample integration (over correction), ipfbRun7 Limited improvement to correction by incorrect gain location. Rebecca Ramjiawan

Correlation as a Function of Sample Number Feedback was unintentionally operated with one gain using data from IPA (I) and IPB (I), not IPA (I and Q). ipfbRun7 Single Sample Correction – blue ipfbRun8 10 Sample Integrated Correction - red Rebecca Ramjiawan

Second Shift 20/06/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan

Data taken on shift Attempt single loop FB correcting at IPB: Scan across gains – measure jitter and correlation across gain scan. Attempt to run 2 BPM feedback correcting at IPB: In single sample mode: stabilises most triggers but with saturation of feedback signal on others. Didn’t manage to successfully run 2 BPM feedback with 10 sample integration due to time constraints. Rebecca Ramjiawan

Problems on shift Working at 30dB because of static erratic feature made centring beam within kicker dynamic range difficult. Tried running with waist on IPB but correlation too low so work just off waist. Exceeding dynamic range of kicker for many of the triggers when working with 2 BPM feedback. Introduce saturation if value overflows +/- 4095 to prevent values wrapping round. ✔ We had problems with the second bunch trajectory changing meaning we had to recalibrate etc. Rebecca Ramjiawan

ipfbRun12 - second bunch 100 % correlation between predicted DAC values and actual DAC values. Single sample FB. Rebecca Ramjiawan

ipfbRun12 – Bunch One Gradient of line: 1 Kick calculated from first bunch for all data from owl shift 20/06/2017 shows offset ~600 from expected value. Should have 100% correlation with line of best fit passing through 0. Rebecca Ramjiawan

ipfbRun12 Single BPM feedback correction at IPB Correlation: 91% down to -21%. Jitter reduction bunch two: 1.72 um to 0.74 um. Rebecca Ramjiawan

ipfbRun12 Correlation Nominal gain – produced smallest jitter but not best correction of correlation (which was with gain -10%). Sample number 21 used for single loop FB correcting at IPB. Rebecca Ramjiawan

Gain Scan Blue -15% Green -10% Yellow -5% Orange 0% Red 5% Pink 10% Under-correcting Gain Scan Blue -15% Green -10% Yellow -5% Orange 0% Red 5% Pink 10% Purple 15% Over-correcting Rebecca Ramjiawan

Single BPM feedback at IPB Varying gains for single loop feedback stabilising at IPB. Correlation scan optimum performance at -10% is consistent with the 90% correlation before feedback is applied. Rebecca Ramjiawan

Interleaving Feedback Interleaving fb doesn’t correspond well to always having full buckets? E.g FB Interleaved 1010101010101010101010101010101010 Beam 2020200202020200202020202002020020202020202 Ends up kicking empty triggers. ipfbRun25 1000 triggers, 500 kicks, 233 kicks to bunches vs 267 kicks to empty triggers. Possibility we are losing data packets periodically? We ran with ‘empty trigger blk’ on, and ‘trig max cnt’ 1, and ‘trig seq sel’ 0. Rebecca Ramjiawan

Double Loop FB 20/06/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan

ipfbRun25 Dual Loop –bunch one Predicted DAC values vs actual DAC values for dual loop fb. 99.7 % Correlation between bunch one position and actual DAC value. In single loop mode has offset from zero and non 100% correlation. Rebecca Ramjiawan

Simulation of firmware Simulation using the current firmware – first trigger analysed. Output from firmware on shift: 2820. Output from MATLAB analysis of .dat data: 2653. Output from firmware simulation: 2652. Firmware simulation agrees with expected DAC output but not with DAC values calculated on shift. Rebecca Ramjiawan

Effects of Saturation Working at 30dB with large static erratic signal centring the beam was problematic. 20 0-3000 0-5000 As signals are saved as two’s complement anything that overflows the +/- 4096 range will flip sign and be kicked in the wrong direction. 0-4000 Fb Off Fb On Bunch Two Position (um) 10 1000 4095 Bunch One Position (um) Rebecca Ramjiawan

Saturation (with island at +20) Any triggers with a position exceeding 10um are stabilised to a different location (20um). ipfbRun20. 20 island: 19% correlation. 0 island: -3% correlation. Values are saturating and wrapping round. Rebecca Ramjiawan

Saturation (with island at -20) Any triggers with a position exceeding -10um are stabilised to a different location (-20um). ipfbRun24 (20/06/2017) FB off correlation: 92%. 0 island: -39% correlation. -20 island: 14 % correlation. Rebecca Ramjiawan

ipfbRun25 We then re-centred the beam so none of the triggers exceeded the kicker’s dynamic range. FB Off Correlation: 87 %. FB On Correlation: -67 %. Rebecca Ramjiawan

Drift in Calibration Constant? Bunch to bunch correlation with feedback on has been drifting across the data runs. ipfbRun20: Correlation -3% fb on. (Correlation 90% fb off) Time stamp 08:08:04 ipfbRun21: Correlation -11 % fb on. (Correlation 90% fb off) Time stamp 08:16:30 ipfbRun23: Correlation -15 % fb on. (Correlation 87% fb off) Time stamp 08:33:32 (only 50 triggers) ipfbRun24: Correlation -39 % fb on. (Correlation 90% fb off) Time stamp 08:34:21 ipfbRun25: Correlation -67 % fb on. (Correlation 92% fb off) Time stamp 08:42:37 Requires analysis into why feedback performance degrading if ‘correlation-off-feedback’ is not. (So far all I have noticed is that CQ waveform for second bunch is drifting.) Rebecca Ramjiawan

Reasons for DAC offset in Bunch One Nine control register values change between shifts: Two are unused. (19 and 21) One is interleaved on/off. (43) One is bpm_sel – which BPMs to use as input to feedback. (90) One is sample hold off. (91) One is Trig in delay. (92) Two are the bunch strobes for dipole and reference. (67 and 83) And one is number of bunches to calculate a kick from. (124) Between our shifts - some features were changed in the DAQ that concern display of windows with/without bunches. Possibility something wrongly connected after this? Check using simulation that the values we got during shift aren’t expected behaviour of the firmware/bugs in the code etc. Rebecca Ramjiawan

Additional Slides Rebecca Ramjiawan

- Rebecca Ramjiawan

ipfbRun21 – bunch two Rebecca Ramjiawan