Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by: Denise Sjahkit SURINAME. Introduction Overview of the main policy issues Scope Current compilation practices Data-sources Requirements for.
Advertisements

Data reporting Compliance workshop: Collection and reporting of Fisheries data to IOTC Mauritius, March 2014.
Organization for the Promotion of Responsible Tuna Fisheries Private initiatives to eliminate IUU tuna Fishing Activities (1)
Agricultural Market Information System (AMIS): State of Play AMIS First Meeting of the Rapid Response Forum 11 April 2012 Mexico City Abdolreza Abbassian,
Market Design of SE Europe: Reflections from the 3rd Forum on the Way Forward 6 th Permanent High Level Group Meeting Athens, 07 December 2003.
Compliance Workshop: Collection and reporting of Fisheries data to IOTC Pearle Beach Hotel, Flic en Flac, Mauritius March 2014 Sponsored by BOBLME-IOC-SmartFish-IOTC.
A Review of the Standing Committee of Caribbean Statisticians (SCCS) as a Mechanism for Statistical Development and Harmonisation The Second Meeting of.
Where does my data go? IOTC Data Revisions. Role of the IOTC Data section  The IOTC Secretariat Data Section plays an important role in assessing the.
Billfish Fisheries In Indonesia Prepared by MAHISWARA BUDI ISKANDAR, PS. RESEARCH CENTER FOR CAPTURE FISHERIES INDONESIA.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Data compilation and management proposal for Africa Statistical Commission.
Stage 3. Consultation and Review Standard Setting Training Course 2016.
Monitoring Forest Resources for SFM in the UNECE Region
Implementation Subprogramme
Monitoring of sdgs indicators in the Russian federation
The revised Periodic Reporting Questionnaires: general features Alessandra Borchi Policy and Statutory Meetings Section UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
New EU Multi-Annual Programme
Ensuring Robust Fisheries Improvement Plans
44th Meeting of the Standing Committee Bonn, Germany, October 2015 Report on activities of the Strategic Plan Working Group Ines Verleye,
CWP / Tuna Atlas Agenda item 8.ii.a CWP activities regarding reference harmonization and data exchange; showcasing benefits with Global Tuna Atlas and.
REPORT OF THE ELECTRONIC WORKING GROUP UNEP(DEC)/CAR WG.29/INF.12
Effective Control of the Landing Obligation
FCWC-FIRMS workshop on fisheries inventories
Modular Approach to logbook in the WECAFC Region
Community Project- Guide to Coaching Sessions
The uses of data in Fisheries Management
Compliance in reporting
Setting Actuarial Standards
SESSION 5.1 Update on the status of Artisanal tuna fisheries data collection Seventh Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-7) April 2013 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Susan Zelisko, Ross Naheedy, Baimei Guo, Michael Wall, Ron Price
Addressing sustainable development by enhancing Black Sea fisheries
Sustainable Fisheries in the Black Sea European Committee of the Regions 7 June 2017, Brussels Sustainability of Black Sea fisheries and tools for fisheries.
Ensuring you are CMS compliant!
SESSION 11 Observer Data Auditing
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
SESSION 5.4 Consequences for scientific data collection/management as a result of recent WCPFC decisions Sixth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-6) April 2012.
WCPFC Ecosystem & by-catch Conservation and Management Measures
RECORDS AND INFORMATION
SESSION 4 Annual Catch Estimates Introduction/Objectives – WCPFC Obligations Seventh Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-7) April 2013 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Bycatch Mitigation Information System
EMFF Funding opportunities for the environment
SESSION 4 Annual Catch Estimates Introduction/Objectives – WCPFC Obligations Sixth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-6) April 2012 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Introduction The WCPO region comprises many different countries and territories, all of whom have direct or indirect fisheries based economic interests.
Prioritised Action Frameworks for financing Natura 2000
COMP390/3/4/5 Final Year Project Design
Review of Recommendations from TDW-4
Tuna Data Workshop 23 – 27 April 2018 SPC, Noumea
Important information about your assessment in 2017/18
Leticia Martinez Aguilar DG FISH Unit A2 June 2007
The use of Data in Fisheries Management
Fifth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-5)
WCPFC CMM Reporting Obligations & Compliance Monitoring Scheme
Unit 4 Fisheries Planning
FISHERIES AND ENVIRONMENT
Lists of commercially-exploited fish and shellfish
Working Group on Data, Information and Knowledge Exchange
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Cape Town, South Africa, November 2017
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
Working group on data & information sharing DIS under CIS of WFD
The role of MCS in the implementation of
CARICOM.
Electronic Reporting and Electronic Monitoring
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Compliance in reporting
Marine Environment and Water Industry
TDW-12: 23-27th April 2018, Noumea, New Caledonia
OBSERVER DATA MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES AND BEST PRACTICE (Agenda Item 4)
TDW-13: 8-12th April 2019, Noumea, New Caledonia
Ensuring you are CMS compliant!
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements CONSULTATION AND VALIDATION WORKSHOP ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ELECTRONIC MONITORING AND REPORTING INFORMATION SYSTEM (E-MARIS application) Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Data and Compliance Sections IOTC Secretariat

Outline of this presentation Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Outline of this presentation Introduction Why? Who? What? When? Requirements Data reporting constraints and specifications Current state of the art Expectations vs. reality e-MARIS and its implications for CPCs Enable proper reporting and increase the level of compliance References Other documents and food for thoughts

Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Introduction Why it is important to report statistical data to the Secretariat? They are the basis for the assessments of all stocks and for the eventual definition of sound management advices (WP reports); They are also crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of currently implemented measures and policies as they are in place (e.g. Resolution 17/01); Who is responsible for their collection and submission? Detailed data must be provided by the industry to the flag states, for amalgamation and submission by the latter to the Secretariat (Res 15/02); What should be collected and reported? Depending on the species and gears considered, as well as on the currently standing resolutions, a number of different data sets might be required (Resolutions 15/01, 15/02 and others); When should data be reported? The Secretariat should receive all the mandatory statistical data by June 30th each year. Updates for longline fleets are expected by December 31st

Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Over the years, a number of different resolutions directly related to data collection and reporting have been defined and implemented by the Secretariat; Beside the need of setting and improving current data management standards, some of these resolutions were also required to increase the understanding of changes in fishery operations and sensitive species status, as well as addressing new and outstanding issues; As of today, the main resolutions dealing with data collection and reporting are: 15/01 – On the recording of catch-and-effort data by fishing vessels (…) 15/02 – Mandatory statistical reporting requirements for IOTC CPCs 12/02 – Data confidentiality policy and procedures Resolutions 15/01 and 15/02 set the standards in terms of how operational data should be collected and reported, while Resolution 12/02 establishes the minimum confidentiality policies to ensure that sensitive data is not publicly disseminated (unless properly aggregated) once it is received by the Secretariat.

Requirements (continued) Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Requirements (continued) A number of other active Resolutions currently complements the previous three: 17/08 – Procedures on a Fish Aggregating Devices management plan (…) 17/05 – On the conservation of sharks 15/05 – On conservation measures for Striped Marlin, Black Marlin and Blue Marlin 17/01 – On an interim plan for rebuilding the Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna stock (…) 11/04 – On a Regional Observer Scheme 12/04 – On the conservation of marine turtles 12/06 – On reducing the incidental bycatch of seabirds in Longline fisheries 13/04 – On the conservation of cetaceans 13/05 – On the conservation of whale sharks 16/06 – On measures applicable in case of non fulfilment of reporting obligations (…) Voluntary reporting requirements do also exist that are not related to any specific Resolution (e.g. reporting of fishing crafts, fish prices and socio-economic indicators).

IOTC Observer templates Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements How do the reporting requirements apply according to current IOTC resolutions RETAINED DISCARDED OBSERVER DATA Resolution 15/02 Resolution 11/04 IOTC Species Nominal Catch Form 1RC Catch & Effort Forms 3CE / 3AR (3FA / 3SU) Size & Freq.cy Form 4SF Discards Form 1DI GN / PS LL / GN GN / PS LL PL / GN PS / LL IOTC Observer templates ROS e-reporting Sharks Voluntary Other species Res 13/05 Whale sharks Res 12/06 Seabirds Res 13/04 Marine mammals Res 12/04 Marine turtles

Current state of the art Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Current state of the art The IOTC Secretariat promotes the adoption of a number of recommended data reporting templates (in Excel format) to facilitate the compilation and submission of the mandatory statistical information by CPCs. These templates reduce the possibility of mistakes in their compilation, by incorporating updated references to all IOTC standard codes and by adopting basic error checking routines. Templates for the submission of all mandatory statistical information are available for download from the IOTC web pages, including: Form 1_RC: Retained catches in live weight Form 1_DI: Discard levels in live weight or number Form 2_FC: Number of fishing crafts by type of fishery, craft and size Form 3_CE / AR: Catch-and-effort in live weight or numbers Form 3_SU: Number and characteristics of support vessels Form 3_FA: Number and characteristics of FADs, positive catches in live weight or no. Form 4_SF: Size data by species and class (length or weight) Form 7_PR: Average fish prices by type of product, currency and market

Overview of current IOTC forms and corresponding data sets Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Current state of the art (continued) Overview of current IOTC forms and corresponding data sets Form Dataset Time resolution Area resolution Notes 1_RC* Retained catches in live weight Year / Quarter IO areas (W/E) 1_DI* Discard levels in live weight or numbers Year 3_CE Catch-and-effort in live weight or numbers Month 1°x1° grids surface fisheries 5°x5° grids longline fisheries 3_AR Any coastal fisheries 3_FA FAD numbers, interactions and catches 3_SU Number of support vessels and effort (days at sea) PS fisheries 4_SF Size-frequency data * currently subject to revisions

Current state of the art (continued) Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Current state of the art (continued) As these data reporting templates are NOT mandatory, the Secretariat has to deal with whatever format is commonly used by CPCs, including – but not limited to – CSV and text files, Word and PDF documents as well as non-standard, proprietary Excel files. This wide variety of data reporting formats adopted by CPCs has been historically addressed by the Secretariat’s staff through custom validation and data extraction procedures, at the expense of a reduced time to market for the incorporation of the received updates. Furthermore, many of the mandatory and relevant data reporting constraints (e.g. minimum geographical grid sizes for catch-and-effort and size-frequency information) are not always fulfilled, therefore reducing the effectiveness and completeness of the reported information. Data submissions are currently performed through personal communication (e- mails) between responsible officers from each CPCs and the Data Section of the Secretariat: this relatively informal approach is asynchronous and depends on the physical availability of the involved entities (i.e. it can happen only during office hours).

Current state of the art (examples – standard IOTC) Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Current state of the art (examples – standard IOTC)

Current state of the art (examples - non standard) Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Current state of the art (examples - non standard)

e-MARIS: implications for CPCs Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements e-MARIS: implications for CPCs e-MARIS aims at fulfilling the recommendation – originating from the Performance Review Panel – that IOTC “further develop an online reporting tool to facilitate reporting by CPCs and to support the Secretariat through the automation of identification of non-compliance” (PRIOTC02). It is the first concrete attempt at streamlining and harmonizing the data reporting process for both compliance and statistical purposes and – as such – it requires strong collaborative efforts from all stakeholders. The IOTC Secretariat is well aware of the multiple data collection and data reporting issues common to many CPCs, and also acknowledges the inherent limitations in the current standard forms for statistical data reporting. Yet, e-MARIS is aiming at enabling all CPCs to self-report all required information and get as much (automated) feedback as possible at the earliest stage of the process, thus reducing the need for human intervention to a minimum once the system is successfully in place. For this to happen in the foreseeable future, it is crucial to define standard reporting formats and processes and ensure their adoption by all CPCs.

e-MARIS: implications for CPCs (continued) Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements e-MARIS: implications for CPCs (continued) Member countries should assess their current state-of-the-art – in terms of mandatory statistical data collection and reporting – by asking themselves the following questions: “Can we collect the mandatory statistical information down to the level of detail required by the different IOTC resolutions?” “Can we timely submit this information to the IOTC Secretariat using the recommended data submission forms?” If the answer to any of the two questions is NO, and it is not likely to change in the near future, then there is a problem that NEEDS to be solved. In such circumstances, proper actions at national level should be taken, while at the same time consulting with the Secretariat in due time to ensure that the minimum required level of reporting could be reached (e.g. through capacity building activities and / or on-site data support and compliance missions).

Requirements / actions Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements e-MARIS: implications for CPCs (continued) The two approaches compared Requirements / actions Current process e-MARIS Data reporting deadlines Circulars and reminders Automated e-mails Availability Offline (asynchronous) Online (24/7) Data submissions e-mail attachment File upload Data updates Data validation feedback (QA) e-mail / personal comm. Report upon upload Data container (file types) Any (including IOTC forms) Fixed (IOTC forms*) CPC data compliance status Updated before COM Realtime * Or any other standard format that might be deemed as adequate by the e-MARIS stakeholders

e-MARIS: integration with the IOTC SWS Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements e-MARIS: integration with the IOTC SWS

e-MARIS: implications for CPCs (continued) Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements e-MARIS: implications for CPCs (continued) Report of the 19th Session of the Working Party on Tropical Tuna: (Para. 20): “ACKNOWLEDGING the substantial gaps in reporting of mandatory IOTC datasets by many CPCs to the IOTC Secretariat, which increases the uncertainty of stock assessments and management advice based on these data, the WPTT strongly RECOMMENDED the Commission strengthen the penalty mechanisms adopted in Resolution 16/06 On measures applicable in case of non- fulfilment of reporting obligations in the IOTC to improve compliance by CPCs in terms of the submission of basic fishery data in accordance with Resolution 15/01 and 15/02” (the text in the final adopted report may slightly vary) !!! e-MARIS !!!

Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements References Guidelines for the reporting of fisheries statistics to the IOTC http://www.iotc.org/sites/default/files/Guidelines_Data_Reporting_IOTC1.pdf Forms for the submission of requested fisheries statistics http://www.iotc.org/data/requested-statistics-and-submission-forms IOTC Resolution 12/02 – “On data confidentiality policy and procedures” http://www.iotc.org/cmm/resolution-1202-data-confidentiality-policy-and-procedures IOTC Resolution 15/02 – “On mandatory statistical requirements” http://www.iotc.org/cmm/resolution-1002-mandatory-statistical-requirements-iotc-members-and-cooperating-non-contracting IOTC Resolution 16/06 – “On measures applicable in case of non-fulfilment of reporting obligations in the IOTC” http://www.iotc.org/cmm/resolution-1606-measures-applicable-case-non-fulfilment-reporting-obligations-iotc Implementation sheets for current IOTC Resolutions

Thank you for your attention! Understanding the statistical data reporting requirements Thank you for your attention! Questions?