Lecture 5 (Modality) Ling 442.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Classroom Bill of Rights
Advertisements

Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Past Modals Mustafa Güneş. could + V1 was/were able to + V1 My brother was able to write at the age of 4. I could jump up to 1.60 when I was ten years.
Verb and Verb Phrase (V)
The Logic of Quantified Statements
MODAL VERBS (I): Must, have to, don’t have to, mustn’t
First-Order Logic (and beyond)
Semantics (Representing Meaning)
Kaplan’s Theory of Indexicals
1 Introduction to Linguistics II Ling 2-121C, group b Lecture 10 Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Spring 2006.
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Lecture 6 Ling 442. Exercises (part 1) Why do the following two sentences have the same truth conditions? (1)You must not smoke here. (2)You may not smoke.
David Lewis Counterfactuals and Possible Worlds. David Lewis American philosopher, lived between UCLA and Princeton Modal realism.
 A t the end of this lesson, learners will be able to :  Use the modals effectively.  Apply the acquired learning in their day to day life.  Make.
Grammar Review Topic One: Tenses.
The physical reductive explainability of phenomenal consciousness and the logical impossibility of zombies Marco Giunti University of Cagliari (Italy)
Instructor: Jully Yin Meeting Room: Room 209. Ms. Jully Yin has been instructing at National Taipei University since Education: Ms. Jully Yin has.
Theoretical basis of GUHA Definition 1. A (simplified) observational predicate language L n consists of (i) (unary) predicates P 1,…,P n, and an infinite.
HELLO THERE !.... It's great to see you ! And by the way, did you know about the previous expression ?
Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation Exercises: Modeling Fausto Giunchiglia, Rui Zhang and Vincenzo Maltese.
Lecture 13 Ling 442. Exercises (part 1) (1) p. 173 Classify the predicates into four different types. a.The door [creaked open]. b.Sam [got the joke]
Some people drink from the fountain of knowledge, others just gargle. -- Robert Anthony.
Lecture 7 Natural Language Determiners Ling 442. exercises 1. (a) is ambiguous. Explain the two interpretations. (a)Bill might have been killed. 2. Do.
1 Predicate (Relational) Logic 1. Introduction The propositional logic is not powerful enough to express certain types of relationship between propositions.
Presupposition is what the speaker assumes to be the case prior to making an utterance. Entailment, which is not a pragmatic concept, is what logically.
First Order Logic Dr. Rogelio Dávila Pérez Professor - Researcher Information Technologies Department ITESM, Campus Guadalajara.
Introductory Logic PHI 120 Presentation: “Solving Proofs" Bring the Rules Handout to lecture.
Lectures on English Grammar, 11
Lectures 8-9 Ling 442. Exercises (1) Reconstruct the original English sentence for each: 1.|birds  fly| > ½ |birds| 2.dog  bite  {} 3.student  study_hard.
TRUE or FALSE? There are 8 Modal/ Auxiliary verbs in English. can – could will – would shall – should may – might must need dare ought to.
Writing a paragraph.
Lecture 1 Ling 442.
Lecture 10 (de re/de dicto) Ling 442. Exercises Translate the following into the logical language w/ restricted quantifiers. 1.Every dog that has a bone.
Presupposition and entailment.
1 Lecture 3 The Languages of K, T, B and S4. 2 Last time we extended the language PC to the language S5 by adding two new symbols ‘□’ (for ‘It is necessary.
Quantified sentences TP NPT’ Det N’ every man smokes i.|| man || t (u) = 1 iff u  {x: x is a man in t} ii.|| smoke || t (u) = 1 iff u  {x: x smokes in.
Lecture 12 Ling Exercises (part 1) 1.Provide two scenarios for the two readings of the definite DP in the following sentence (and say which is.
Lecture 3 Ling 442. exercises 1.What is the difference between implicature and entailment? 2.What is the difference between presuppositions and entailments?
PRESUPPOSITION AND ENTAILMENT
Past simple vs. Present perfect
QUANTIFIERS. QUANTIFIERS What are quantifiers? words that are used to state quantity or amount of something without stating the exact number answer.
MODAL VERBS (I): Must, have to, don’t have to, mustn’t
Perfect Infinitive with Modal verbs or Modal Perfect
HAVE, DON’T HAVE MUST, MUSTN’T
Direct Speech and Reported Speech
Semantics (Representing Meaning)
Reported Speech UNIT 3 2 BTO.
Research Process №5.
PRESUPPOSITION and ENTAILMENT
Verbs, tense, aspect, and mood
Modals of probability And their other uses.
MUF GRAMMAR.
Modal Verbs.
REPORTED SPEECH Unit 11 – English 12.
Deduction and Probability
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
EPISTEMIC LOGIC.
Introductory Logic PHI 120
Subject + Have/has + verb ( past participle ) …
Natural Deduction.
PAST SIMPLE vs. PRESENT PERFECT
Index Notation Sunday, 24 February 2019.
Conditionals: If __________ [then] __________ statements
Modal Verbs In English.
Presupposition and Entailment
Semantics 2: Syntax-Semantics Interface
Unit 7 Present perfect.
IES LA PUEBLA DE ALFINDÉN
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 5 (Modality) Ling 442

Exercises (part1) Translate the following English sentences into Predicate Logic. Every student is serious. Mary met some candidate. Sue has a red car. All definite NPs (the …) should be treated as names (at least for now). Ten dollars should also be treated as a name.

Exercises (part 2) Identify each use of modal in terms of (i) type (epistemic or deontic) and (ii) force (possibility or necessity). i. Mary must be home by now since she left an hour ago. ii. Bill must have smoked at the party because he is a heavy smoker. iii. You may not smoke here because this building is a non-smoking facility. iv. Everybody must abide by the rules. v. Sue may or may not come. Who knows? She is so whimsical. vi. I may have lost my wallet. What should I do? vii. In order to take Semantics II, you must have taken Semantics I (already).

Possible worlds What is a possible world? A complete specification of how things are, or might be, down to the finest semantically relevant detail There is only one “real world”. By changing some details of the real world, you “create” a different possible world. Intuitively, a world is like the collection of all facts. But in our theory, a world is a primitive.

Counterfactual conditionals If kangaroos had no tails, they would topple over. Assume counterfactually that the antecedent is true. Make minimum adjustment to the actual world for this to be possible. Check to see if the consequent is true on these assumptions.

deontic vs. epistemic modality deontic modality: having to do with obligations of various sorts necessity (must) vs. possibility (may) epistemic modality: having to do with (the speaker’s) knowledge

Semantics of modal verbs Quantifiers over possible worlds (with some restrictions.