Syllogisms and so much more!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Advertisements

1 Section 1.5 Rules of Inference. 2 Definitions Theorem: a statement that can be shown to be true Proof: demonstration of truth of theorem –consists of.
Phil 148 Explanations. Inferences to the Best Explanation. IBE is also known as ‘abductive reasoning’ It is the kind of reasoning (not deduction) that.
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Review: Logic. Fallacy: Appeal to Novelty New is better.
Logos Formal Logic.
This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"
AST 101 Lecture 3: What is Science. “In the space of one hundred and seventy-six years the Lower Mississippi has shortened itself two hundred and forty-
Scientific Thinking - 1 A. It is not what the man of science believes that distinguishes him, but how and why he believes it. B. A hypothesis is scientific.
The Scientific Method Timothy G. Standish, Ph. D..
+ The Process of Life Scientific Method. + Observation Scientists believe: That nature is orderly and measurable That natural laws do not change over.
Chapter 1 Scientific Method. Chapter The Process of Life A. Scientific Method 1. Biology is the scientific study of life. 2. The general process.
Chapter 1 Scientific Method. Chapter The Process of Life A. Scientific Method The general process of science is said to be characterized by a sequence.
1 Sections 1.5 & 3.1 Methods of Proof / Proof Strategy.
Theory and Research Neuman and Robson Ch. 2. What is Theory? “a statement of relationships between concepts” “a roadmap for organizing ideas and knowledge.
Chapter 10 Re-expressing the data
Designing for People. Designing a good building may not start with drawing. It starts with an understanding of people.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
The construction of a formal argument
Scientific Communication Timothy G. Standish, Ph. D.
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. FOUNDATIONS.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
The Nature of Science and The Scientific Method Chemistry – Lincoln High School Mrs. Cameron.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
Scientific Method. The Process of Life A. Scientific Method 1. Biology is the scientific study of life. 2. The general process of science is said to be.
Occam's razor: states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference to any.
The Chinese Room Argument. I believe that in about fifty years' time it will be possible, to programme computers… to make them play the imitation game.
But first… Scientific Worldview  There are physical causes for events  “Physical causes” refers to interactions of matter and energy governed by.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
SYLLOGISM - FORM & LOGICAL REASONING. WHAT IS A SYLLOGISM? Syllogism – the formal structure of logical argument. Three statements - Major Premise, Minor.
Logic and Reasoning.
Deductive reasoning.
Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts (Please read book.)
Valid and Invalid Arguments
What makes a Good Argument?
Identifying/ Reconstructing Arguments
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
Disjunctive Syllogism
Inductive Argument Forms
Demonstrating the validity of an argument using syllogisms.
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Thinking Like a Scientist
Chapter 1  4.1 Scientific Method.
Chapter 1  Scientific Method.
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Chapter 1  Scientific Method.
Rules and fallacies Formal fallacies.
5 Categorical Syllogisms
The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
Reasoning about Reasoning
Logic, Philosophical Tools Quiz Review…20 minutes 10/31
William Ockham (c. 1285–1349) is remembered as an influential nominalist but his popular fame as a great logician rests chiefly on the maxim attributed.
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
Logical Forms.
…or, “Stop your lippy attitude.”
Theory Vs. Law.
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 6 Categorical Syllogisms
Philosophy and Logic Section 4.3
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
Patterns of Informal Non-Deductive Logic (Ch. 6)
Deductive vs Non-Deductive Arguments
Rules of inference Section 1.5 Monday, December 02, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Syllogisms and so much more! Deductive Reasoning Syllogisms and so much more!

Pico, Fermi, Bagel Let’s play a game PFB (Pico, Fermi, Bagels) is a number guessing game. For each guess, you will be told: Fermi -a correct digit placed correctly Pico - a correct digit placed incorrectly Bagels - no digits are correct Pico, Fermi, Bagel

749 Let’s play as a class

Syllogism review 4 valid types: Modus Ponens Modus Tollens Hypothetical Syllogism Disjunctive Syllogism Syllogism review

Fallacies in Syllogisms Fallacy of Equivocation Fallacy of the undistributed middle Fallacy of illicit major/minor Fallacy of exclusive premises Fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from negative premise (or vice versa) Existential fallacy Fallacies in Syllogisms

Mrs. Hooten: So Tommy, what do you do. Tommy Corn: I'm a firefighter Mrs. Hooten: So Tommy, what do you do? Tommy Corn: I'm a firefighter. Mr. Hooten: Congratulations, you're a hero. Tommy Corn: I'm no hero. We'd all be heroes if we stopped using petroleum I (heart) Huckabees

What is the fallacy? Fallacy of Equivocation Tommy Corn and Mrs. Hooten are using the word “Hero” in a different sense What is the fallacy?

Bernard: One, your mind is always occupied on something Bernard: One, your mind is always occupied on something. So it might as well be something useful... Two, there is no such thing as you and me. Albert: So then there's nothing? Bernard: Three, there is no such thing as nothing. There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.

What’s the Fallacy? Fallacy of the Illicit Minor The word nothing is used as the predicate in the minor premise and is not distributed What’s the Fallacy?

I heart Huckabees clip https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJNVwpjU2RY

Dawn Campbell: Why don't you like my spots Dawn Campbell: Why don't you like my spots? Marty: Honey, this look is hurting you, and it's hurting Huckabees. Dawn Campbell: This is myself. Marty: Then you won't speak at the benefit as yourself. That is not Huckabees. Dawn Campbell: I am still Huckabees. Marty: Not in that bonnet. Dawn Campbell: It's in my eyes, Marty. It's like that story of the cave. Marty: What in God's name is happening to you? We trusted you. We took care of you. We made you into a national icon. Pulled you out of a mall. Eh, you've been given everything by Huckabees. Dawn Campbell: Fuck-a-bees!

What fallaci(es) are demonstrated in this scene?

Deductive vs Inductive Reasoning Deductive – General to Specific Inductive – Specific to General Deductive arguments can be valid or invalid Inductive arguments can be weak or strong Examples? Deductive vs Inductive Reasoning

Ockhams/ Occam’s Razor William of Ockham, 14th century Franciscan friar and logician The principle states that "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily."  Sometimes it is quoted in one of its original Latin forms to give it an air of authenticity: "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate" "Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora" "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem" Ockhams/ Occam’s Razor

Ockhams/ Occam’s Razor Occam's razor is often cited in stronger forms than Occam intended, as in the following statements. . . "If you have two theories that both explain the observed facts, then you should use the simplest until more evidence comes along" "The simplest explanation for some phenomenon is more likely to be accurate than more complicated explanations." "If you have two equally likely solutions to a problem, choose the simplest." "The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct." Ockhams/ Occam’s Razor

Ockhams/ Occam’s Razor In other words – KISS Keep it simple, stupid Ockhams/ Occam’s Razor