Proving Your Value: The Librarian’s Contribution to the Promotion and Tenure Process ACRL 2013

Contact Information Susan Ariew sariew@usf.edu Twitter: @EdLib Vera Lux vlux@bgsu.edu Twitter: @thetruelight Matt Torrence torrence@usf.edu Twitter: @torrence42 Welcome and panelists each introduce themselves

Check out our LibGuide for additional resources Join the Discussion on Twitter #acrlimpact Check out our LibGuide for additional resources http://guides.lib.usf.edu/acrl2013

The Value of the Academic Librarian to the Promotion/Tenure Process Offers expertise and information in using bibliometric tools Helps researchers decide where to submit manuscripts for publication Provides direct support to faculty in preparing promotion/tenure portfolios Keeps abreast of new trends Matt

The Importance of Understanding Impact Scholarly Impact The value of faculty research for purposes of retention, promotion, tenure decisions. “Research visibility that enhances institutional stature among peers.” (Alpert, 1985) Vera--Introductory content before we move into specifics. The first and most important point to be made along the way here is the fact that librarians need to understand impact and why it is such an important part of faculty survival at higher education institutions. Becoming an expert in the tools and measures related to impact is key to “proving your value” to faculty. Susie I would like to talk out the key points of this and the following slide. I just want to make sure I know everything we want to get across here. Thanks for the notes Susie! --Vera Vera will add to this to further emphasize the value of librarians (Matt 03082013)

Understanding Impact Bibliometrics A set of methods used to study or measure texts and information, often toward to goal of assessing scholarly impact. “Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better… and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation.” (Garfield, 2007) More introductory content before we move into specifics. Vera

Common Impact Measures Cited references to an author’s work Who is citing that author as an authority How much or how often an author is cited Journal rankings Quantitative data about journals, including impact factors Reviews of an author’s work Qualitative information on the quality of more extensive works, such as books and portfolios. Matt

Measuring Impact Across the Disciplines Traditional bibliometric tools remain essential for faculty, despite flaws and disciplinary variance. Alternative bibliometric tools become a widely acceptable means of capturing impact, particularly in the social sciences and humanities. Altmetrics are a fast-emerging area with high potential for digitally savvy faculty, but are still imperfect and untested in most tenure cases. Topic: thoughts on the value of metrics, the future of metrics, disciplines & metrics. Matt

How To Vote via PollEv.com/ACRLimpact This slide is for display to the audience to show them how they will vote on your polls in your presentation. You can remove this slide if you like or if the audience is already comfortable with texting and/or voting with Poll Everywhere. Sample Oral Instructions: Ladies and gentlemen, throughout today’s meeting we’re going to engage in some audience polling to find out what you’re thinking, what you’re up to and what you know. Now I’m going to ask for your opinion. We’re going to use your phones or laptops to do some audience voting just like on American Idol. So please take out your mobilephones or laptops, but remember to leave them on silent. You can participate by submitting an answer at PollEv.com/username on your laptop or a mobile phone. The service we are using is serious about privacy. I cannot see who you are or who voted. EXAMPLE

How To Vote via Texting EXAMPLE This slide is for display to the audience to show them how they will vote on your polls in your presentation. You can remove this slide if you like or if the audience is already comfortable with texting and/or voting with Poll Everywhere. Sample Oral Instructions: Ladies and gentlemen, throughout today’s meeting we’re going to engage in some audience polling to find out what you’re thinking, what you’re up to and what you know. Now I’m going to ask for your opinion. We’re going to use your phones to do some audience voting just like on American Idol. So please take out your cell phones, but remember to leave them on silent. You can participate by sending a text message. This is a just standard rate text message, so it may be free for you, or up to twenty cents on some carriers if you do not have a text messaging plan. The service we are using is serious about privacy. I cannot see your phone numbers, and you’ll never receive follow-up text messages outside this presentation. There’s only one thing worse than email spam – and that’s text message spam because you have to pay to receive it! EXAMPLE

How To Vote via Twitter EXAMPLE This slide is for display to the audience to show them how they will vote on your polls in your presentation. You can remove this slide if you like or if the audience is already comfortable with texting and/or voting with Poll Everywhere. Sample Oral Instructions: Ladies and gentlemen, throughout today’s meeting we’re going to engage in some audience polling to find out what you’re thinking, what you’re up to and what you know. Now I’m going to ask for your opinion. We’re going to use Twitter to do some audience voting. So please take out your cell phones or laptops, but remember to leave them on silent. The way you will be able to participate is by tweeting a response to @poll. Your followers won’t be bothered by this message. EXAMPLE

Which of the following disciplines places the most importance on publishing in books/monographs? Medical & Biological Sciences Physical Sciences & Maths Engineering & Computing Social Sciences, Business & Economics Humanities Education & Sport Interdisciplinary

Poll: Which of the following disciplines place... http://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/9RGK2qLIryUJgaR If you like, you can use this slide as a template for your own voting slides. You might use a slide like this if you feel your audience would benefit from the picture showing a text message on a phone. Poll: Which of the following disciplines place...

The Importance of Monographs and Conference Presentations/Posters Susie Visual example of the differences in the value of certain scholarly outputs by discipline. The point to librarians is that you need to know the impact measures most important to the disciplines you serve in order to be able to assist faculty. From Research Information Network, “Communicating Knowledge” (2009)

Traditional Bibliometric Tools and Citation Counts Here's a sample from an ISI-based data set for citations of Canadian-authored articles published between 1981 and 2000. The number for each discipline is the average number of citations per published article (both article and citations in ISI-listed journals). Philosophy: 1.11 Literature: 0.33 Oncology: 26.73 Economics: 6.74 Biochemistry: 23.54 Art and Architecture: 0.35 Neuroscience: 21.41 Susie How each discipline is unique in number of cites that occur and how faculty publish—the variations particularly with ISI Posted by: Tom Hurka, December 06, 2007 from the Leiter Report

The Importance of Journal Articles Added slide (Matt 03082013) Susie can continue with this slide From Research Information Network, “Communicating Knowledge” (2009)

Traditional Bibliometric Tools that Favor the Sciences Web of Science, aka Web of Knowledge A combination of resources and resource types A database that does more than just “find” articles Tracking the articles that cite other articles… Links to articles contained in these bibliographies (some are outside the ISI “universe”) Journal Citation Reports (JCR) Matt: Topic: Traditional bibliometric tools – Web of Science/Knowledge & Journal Citation Reports General discussion of how this product combines databases with bibliometric tools and citation information

Traditional Bibliometric Tools – Web of Science Journal Citation Reports Presents quantifiable, statistical data that provides a systematic way to evaluate the world’s leading journals. Covers more than 10,000 from more than 25 million cited references indexed every year No Arts and Humanities edition Journal Impact Factor Computed by calculating the average number of citations to articles in the journal during the preceding two years from all articles published that given year See http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/ IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf Matt Traditional bibliometric tools – Web of Science/Knowledge & Journal Citation Reports (also mention Book Citation Index) Intro about ISI’s JCR. Don’t need to go into detail because some schools have these tools and some don’t, but do want to talk about ISI’s role as the first and the most prestigious, especially at the beginning when metrics creeped into the promotion/tenure process. Susie: Caveats about SSCI and JCR--criteria and reasons for inclusion/exclusion of journals in SSCI and the JCR. Currently there are now 1181 journals indexed in ERIC and the percentage in SSCI and ISI coverage is only about 20-25%. 206 r “Education and Educational Research” another 37 under “Education, Special” and another 51 under “Psychology, Educational.” 304 total.

Traditional Bibliometric Tools – Web of Science Per our discussion, I removed the image of the Book Citation Index. Matt will put in new images, etc. I also moved this to follow the intro slide (Matt 03082013)

Traditional Bibliometric Tools - SCOPUS Scopus & SciVerse  A database known as an alternative to Web of Knowledge Offers similar metrics, but uses slightly different algorithms SCImago Journal Rankings (SJR) Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) Offers a much wider range of journals, but still fairly limited for humanities scholars Topics: Traditional bibliometric tools extended – Scopus, Book Citation Index, Data Citation Index Vera: Scopus, SJR, Move Web of Knowledge points to another slide Matt

Traditional Bibliometric Tools - SCOPUS Topics: Traditional bibliometric tools extended – Scopus, Book Citation Index*, Data Citation Index, Vera Needs images screen shot from Vera (Matt 03082013) Scopus Author Evaluator

Alternative Bibliometric Tools Books & Book Chapters Google Books Google Scholar Citations WorldCat Identities Anne Harzing’s Publish or Perish Susie Topics: Shift from traditional bibliometrics to alternative bibliometrics based on scholarly needs. These are tools mostly used with monographs more than with book chapters which present unique challenges for authors in terms of demonstrating impact.

Alternative Bibliometric Tools Other Tools for Non-Ranked Journals Cabell’s or Ulrich’s Journal Profiles Journal acceptance rates Publication type (e.g. scholarly, trade) Abstracting & indexing Readership information WorldCat Journal holdings Other tools used to profile publications. Here I can show journal profiles table. --SAA

Alternative Bibliometric Tools Susie Topic: Google Scholar Profiles, Harzing’s Publish or Perish Harzing example. I can’t show the software live on my computer. This slide is hard to read, though. Harzing’s Publish or Perish

Google Scholar Profiles Alternative Bibliometric Tools Friendlier to Social Sciences & Humanities Susie Topic: Google Scholar Citations, Harzing’s Publish or Perish Google Scholar Citations feature is proving to be very popular with faculty in all fields, but particularly education, humanities, social sciences. The h-index is an index that attempts to measure both the productivity and impact of the published work of a scientist or scholar. The index is based on the set of the scholar’s most cited papers and the number of citations that they have received in other publications. The index can also be applied to the productivity and impact of a group of scientists, such as a department or university or country, as well as a scholarly journal. The index was suggested by Jorge E. Hirsch, a physicist at UCSD, as a tool for determining theoretical physicists' relative quality[1] and is sometimes called the Hirsch index or Hirsch number. Google Scholar Profiles

Emerging Altmetrics Tools  The creation and study of new metrics based on the Social Web for analyzing, and informing scholarship “We rely on filters to make sense of the scholarly literature, but the narrow, traditional filters are being swamped. However, the growth of new, online scholarly tools allows us to make new filters; these altmetrics reflect the broad, rapid impact of scholarship in this burgeoning ecosystem.” (Altmetrics.org) Vera Not sure how much of this material we actually want to cover in depth.

Emerging Altmetric Tools Article-Level Metrics PLoS Article-Level Metrics (Views & Downloads) SSRN (Views & Downloads) Altmetric It Bookmarklet Social Media Metrics Twitter API Impact Story (aka Total Impact) Readership Metrics Mendeley API Again, look at this and decide what we might include and revise accordingly. Matt? Vera? Based on our discussion, I removed the two slides (Impact Story and Altmetric It Bookmarklet). Vera can do both slides on Altmetrics here, and/or add more. If not, I’m happy to talk about some elements, or just Mendeley (Matt 03082013)

Would altmetrics be acceptable measures of impact for the tenure and promotion process at your institution? Yes No Depends on the department/discipline Maybe in the future

Poll: Would altmetrics be acceptable measures ... http://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/7PUohWoSnsAKs9z If you like, you can use this slide as a template for your own voting slides. You might use a slide like this if you feel your audience would benefit from the picture showing a text message on a phone. Poll: Would altmetrics be acceptable measures ...

Outreach Promoting Professional Expertise on Campus through LibGuides Library and Information Resources Related to Promotion and Tenure (USF) Who’s Citing Me? (Bowling Green) Vera

LibGuide Example USF SAA

LibGuide Example BGSU Vera

Workshops/Orientations Orientations for New Faculty Workshops for upper level graduate students and junior faculty members. USF’s “Beyond the Basics” series, “Documenting Scholarly Impact with Cited References, Journal Rankings, and Bibliometrics.” Susie “This Webinar is for faculty and graduate students interested in how scholars can profile the impact of their work through cited references and journal rankings. The session will cover bibliometric tools that assist researchers in deciding where to submit their manuscripts, how to determine the impact of their journal publications, and finally how to build a strong tenure/promotion portfolio in documenting their cited references.” Matt and Susie

Consultations One-on-One meetings with faculty who need support looking up journal rankings and using bibliometric tools to document (and target) their citations. Might want to talk about the number of consults we do and the purpose of those consults. Susie, Vera

Providing Services--Challenges Available resources Gaining a reputation on campus as the impact “expert” Scale and size of outreach Faculty expectations

How do librarians at your institution support faculty with the promotion tenure process? LibGuides/Tutorials Workshops Consultations Nothing currently Other/Not sure

Poll: How do librarians at your institution su... http://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/vnxKC4GHZsqlSTb If you like, you can use this slide as a template for your own voting slides. You might use a slide like this if you feel your audience would benefit from the picture showing a text message on a phone. Poll: How do librarians at your institution su...

Works Cited Alpert, D. (1985). Performance and paralysis: the organizational context of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 241-281. Garfield E. (2007). Journal impact factor: A brief overview. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8), 979–80. Retrieved August 21, 2012, from www.cmaj.ca/content/161/8/979 Hurka, T. (6 December 2007). ISI Philosophy journals and promotion decisions. Leither Reports: A Philsophy Blog. Retrieved December 3, 2012 from http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2007/12/isi-philosophy.html Research Information Network (19 September 2009). Communicating knowledge: How and why UK researchers publish & disseminate their findings. JISC. Retrieved December 1, 2012 from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/research/2009/communicatingknowledgereport.aspx Do we want to create a LibGuide? A handout? Where do we want to highlight more resources?

http://guides.lib.usf.edu/acrl2013

Questions?