Gas Inflow and Cosmic Star Formation Efficiency in Galaxies at z>3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Black Holes in the Early Universe Accretion and Feedback Geoff Bicknell & Alex Wagner Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics Australian National.
Advertisements

18 July Monte Carlo Markov Chain Parameter Estimation in Semi-Analytic Models Bruno Henriques Peter Thomas Sussex Survey Science Centre.
End of Cosmic Dark Ages: Observational Probes of Reionization History Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona New Views Conference, Dec 12, 2005 Collaborators:
Molecular gas in the z~6 quasar host galaxies Ran Wang National Radio Astronomy Observatory Steward Observatory, University of Atrizona Collaborators:
Quasar Clustering from SDSS DR7: Dependencies on FIRST Radio Magnitudes Andria C. Schwortz, Sarah Eftekharzadeh, Adam D. Myers, Yue Shen Clustering is.
Luminosity Density of Star- Forming Galaxies Giavalisco et al Presented by Brandon Patel.
Universe in a box: simulating formation of cosmic structures Andrey Kravtsov Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics Center for Cosmological Physics (CfCP)
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
Weak-Lensing selected, X-ray confirmed Clusters and the AGN closest to them Dara Norman NOAO/CTIO 2006 November 6-8 Boston Collaborators: Deep Lens Survey.
Star formation at high redshift (2 < z < 7) Methods for deriving star formation rates UV continuum = ionizing photons (dust obscuration?) Ly  = ionizing.
AGN and Quasar Clustering at z= : Results from the DEEP2 + AEGIS Surveys Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona Chandra Science Workshop.
What Does Clustering Tell Us About the Buildup of the Red Sequence Tinker & Wetzel 2009 Presented by Brandon Patel.
The Near Infrared Background Excess and Star Formation in the HUDF Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation (Section 3: Galaxy Data vs. Simulations) Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael Solway.
Galaxies at High Redshift and Reionization Bunker, A., Stanway, E., Ellis, R., Lacy, M., McMahon, R., Eyles, L., Stark D., Chiu, K. 2009, ASP Conference.
Jerusalem 2004 Hans-Walter Rix - MPIA The Evolution of the High-z Galaxy Populations.
Masami Ouchi (Space Telescope Science Institute) for the SXDS Collaboration Cosmic Web Made of 515 Galaxies at z=5.7 Kona 2005 Ouchi et al ApJ, 620,
Large Area Survey of Lyman Alpha Emitters Zheng Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics Yale/WIYN One Degree Imager Survey Workshop Oct 3rd, 2009.
130 cMpc ~ 1 o z~ = 7.3 Lidz et al ‘Inverse’ views of evolution of large scale structure during reionization Neutral intergalactic medium via HI.
Luminosity and Mass functions in spectroscopically-selected groups at z~0.5 George Hau, Durham University Dave Wilman (MPE) Mike Balogh (Waterloo) Richard.
17 may 04leonidas moustakas STScI 1 High redshift (z~4) galaxies & clustering Lexi Moustakas STScI.
Gravitational Waves from Massive Black-Hole Binaries Stuart Wyithe (U. Melb) NGC 6420.
Intrinsic ellipticity correlation of luminous red galaxies and misalignment with their host dark matter halos The 8 th Sino – German workshop Teppei O.
The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High Redshift Quasars Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The University of Melbourne) (Harvard University) Fan et al. (2001)
1 Lessons from cosmic history Star formation laws and their role in galaxy evolution R. Feldmann UC Berkeley see Feldmann 2013, arXiv:
Conference “Summary” Alice Shapley (Princeton). Overview Multitude of new observational, multi-wavelength results on massive galaxies from z~0 to z>5:
The Extremely Red Objects in the CLASH Fields The Extremely Red Galaxies in CLASH Fields Xinwen Shu (CEA, Saclay and USTC) CLASH 2013 Team meeting – September.
Francisco Javier Castander Serentill Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC) Institut de Ciències de l’Espai (ICE/CSIC) Barcelona Exploiting the.
The coordinated growth of stars, haloes and large-scale structure since z=1 Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
The Accretion History of SMBHs in Massive Galaxies Kate Brand STScI Collaborators: M. Brown, A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, and the XBootes and Bootes MIPS teams.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
The star formation history of the local universe A/Prof. Andrew Hopkins (AAO) Prof. Joss Bland-Hawthorn (USyd.) & the GAMA Collaboration Madusha L.P. Gunawardhana.
How do galaxies accrete their mass? Quiescent and star - forming massive galaxies at high z Paola Santini Roman Young Researchers Meeting 2009 July 21.
Discovery of a 12 Billion Solar Mass Black Hole at Redshift 6.3 and its Challenge to the Black Hole/Galaxy Coevolution at Cosmic Dawn Xue-Bing WU Kavli.
The dynamics of the gas regulator model and the implied cosmic sSFR-history Yingjie Peng Cambridge Roberto Maiolino, Simon J. Lilly, Alvio Renzini.
Andrii Elyiv and XMM-LSS collaboration The correlation function analysis of AGN in the XMM-LSS survey.
Xiaohu Yang ( 杨小虎 ) Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Partner group of MPA Collaborators: H.J. Mo (UMass), F.C. van den Bosch (MPIA), A. Pasquali (MPiA),
How Different was the Universe at z=1? Centre de Physique Théorique, Marseille Université de Provence Christian Marinoni.
Semi-analytical model of galaxy formation Xi Kang Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS.
联 合 天 体 物 理 中 心 Joint Center for Astrophysics The half-light radius distribution of LBGs and their stellar mass function Chenggang Shu Joint Center for.
Big Bang f(HI) ~ 0 f(HI) ~ 1 f(HI) ~ History of Baryons (mostly hydrogen) Redshift Recombination Reionization z = 1000 (0.4Myr) z = 0 (13.6Gyr) z.
The non-causal origin of black hole–galaxy scaling relations (and its consequences) Knud Jahnke Andrea Macciò Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
Quasar Surveys -- From Sloan to SNAP
Interpreting the relationship between galaxy luminosity, color, and environment. Andreas Berlind (NYU, CCPP) SPH predictions: Michael Blanton (NYU) David.
Star Formation History of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
Simulating the Production of Intra-Cluster Light Craig Rudick Department of Astronomy CERCA - 02/17/05.
BULGE FRACTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF STAR FORMATION IN SAMI GALAXIES Greg Goldstein PhD student, Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University Supervisors:
Galaxy Evolution and WFMOS
A self consistent model of galaxy formation across cosmic time Bruno Henriques Simon White, Peter Thomas Raul Angulo, Qi Guo, Gerard Lemson, Volker Springel.
The interaction-driven model for the starburst galaxies and AGNs
Growth of SMBH studied through X-ray surveys
The formation and dynamical state of the brightest cluster galaxies
Sugata Kaviraj Hertfordshire Based on: Kaviraj 2014, MN, 440, 2944
Subaru UM 2010 on Mitaka First Unbiased Estimates of the Metallicity and Star-Formation Activity of Lyman Alpha Emitters Kimihiko Nakajima(U.
The Growth of Supermassive Black Holes
Paul Alexander Dave Green, Malcolm Longair, Julia Riley, Martin Krause
Jessica L. Rosenberg George Mason University
The X-ray Evolution of Young Post-Merger
Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona June 21, 2004
Tracing the Accretion History of the Universe by stacking X-rays from Red Galaxies in the NDWFS Kate Brand, NOAO, Tucson A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, M. Brown,
The Presence of Massive Galaxies at z>5
Extra-galactic blank field surveys with CCAT
A Population of Old and Massive Galaxies at z > 5
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
SDSS-IV MaNGA: The Spatial Distribution of Star Formation and its Dependence on Mass, Structure and Environment (arXiv: v1) 胡 宁
Authod: Ryan L. Sanders et al.(2018)
Mass Loss and Preprocessing of Galaxies in Dark Matter Simulations
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Presentation transcript:

Gas Inflow and Cosmic Star Formation Efficiency in Galaxies at z>3 Fuyan Bian Stromlo Fellow Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University Collaborators: Xiaohui Fan, Linhua Jiang, Ian McGreer, Dan Stark, Arjun Dey, Richard Green, Roberto Maiolino, Fabian Walter, Romeel Dave, Kyoung-Soo Lee , Yen-Ting Lin 2015 Gas Accretion on Galaxies@NRAO

Galaxy Formation Efficiency M*/Mhalo maximizes at ~3% at 1012 M⊙ halo mass. Much less than the global baryon fraction ~ 17%. Conversion of baryons to stars has maximum efficiency ~10-30% and is much smaller at higher and lower halo mass. Stellar Mass/Halo Mass Halo Mass Behroozi+2012 See also Kravstov talk

Star-Forming Band in Dark Matter Halo Halo and stellar growths are associated with each other in the star-forming band Mcrit, Mthresh, and galaxy formation efficiency(halos mass, galaxy property) are critical parameters for the galaxy formation models AGN feedback and mass quenching UV background and SN feedback from Joel Primack

Questions to Explore How does the stellar mass grows with dark mater halo? Or how do the gas accretion process and feedback regulates and the star formation in high-redshift galaxies? What is the galaxy formation efficiency (the efficiency converting baryon into stars) in high-redshift galaxies and how does it change with the redshift, galaxy luminosity, and halo mass?

Galaxy Formation Efficiency at High-z Galaxy formation efficiency = SFR/Gas accretion rate SFR: from SFR indicators (dust-corrected UV luminosities) Gas accretion rate = Ωb/Ωd × dark matter accretion rate Dark matter accretion rate: a function of redshift (z) and halo mass (Mhalo) (e.g. EPS theory, Neistein 2008). Request a sample of high-z galaxies with known SFRs, redshifts, and halo masses.

Luminous Z~3 Lyman Break Galaxies in the Deep and Wide Field Surveys Fuyan Bian Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University Collaborators: Xiaohui Fan (Arizona), Linhua Jiang (KIAA), Ian McGreer (Arizona), Dan Stark (Arizona), Arjun Dey (NOAO), Richard Green (LBTO), Lisa Kewley (ANU) Roberto Maiolino (Cambridge), Fabian Walter (MPIA), Romeel Dave (Steward), Kyoung-Soo Lee (Purdue), Yen-Ting Lin (ASIAA) Select high-z star-forming galaxies effectively. Well-understood redshift distribution based-on broad-band photometry. 2015 Tsinghua Seminar

NOAO Deep and Wide Field Survey NOAO Deep Wide-Field Survey (Jannuzi & Dey 1999) is a deep multicolor survey which covers two 9 deg2 areas: Bootes Field and Centus field. The Bootes field is also covered by the new U- and Y- band data with the LBT/LBC (Bian+2013). Multi-wavelength coverage in the Bootes field from X-ray to radio.

Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) in Bootes Field U Bw R With the large survey volume, 15,000 bright LBGs at z~3 are selected in the Bootes field.

Clustering of z~3 Luminous LBGs Redshift Distribution Angular Correlation Function ω(θ) θ (arcsec) 2D angular correlation function + Redshift distribution =>Clustering (3D distribution) of two subsample of LBGs (L*- 1.5L* and 1.5L*-2.5L*) with r0=5.14h-1Mpc and r0=5.77h-1Mpc

Dark Matter Halo Mass of Luminous LBGs ω(θ) θ (arcsec) Galaxy distributions trace underlying dark matter distributions Dark matter halo power spectrum + halo occupation distribution function to fit the galaxy clustering. The average hosting dark matter halo masses are: 3x1012M⊙ for 1.5L* LBGs, 5x1012M⊙ for 2.5L* LBGs Occupy high halo mass end.

Dark Mater Halo Mass of Faint LBGs LBGs at z~4 0.2-0.4 L* in GOODS field (Lee+06): Halo mass 4-8x1011M⊙ LBGs at z~5 0.4-1.0L* in GOODS field (Lee+06): Halo mass 2-4x1011M⊙ LBG at z~4 0.2-1L* in Subaru/XMM-Newton field (Ouchi+05): Halo mass 4x1011-2x1012M⊙ The existing LBG samples allow us to probe the halo mass from 2x1011 to 5x1012M⊙

Baryonic Gas Accretion on Galaxies The baryonic gas accretion rate depends on redshift and halo mass (Dekel+2009) . Lilly+2013

Galaxy formation efficiency in LBGs A tight relation between redshift- scaled SFR and halo mass in LBGs. The SF process in high-z LBG is feed by the gas accretion process. The galaxy formation efficiency is 5%-20%. This efficiency does not change significantly with redshift, galaxy luminosity, halo mass (2x1011- 5x1012 M⊙) Bian+2013

Conclusion A tight relation between the redshift-scaled SFR and hosting halo mass in LBGs at z>3, which follows the slope predicted by the baryonic flow accretion. This relation suggests that the star formation process is regulated by the gas accretion process in high-z galaxies The galaxy formation efficiency is 5%-20%, and does not change with redshift, galaxy luminosity and halo mass.