Jerzy Jendrośka Maastricht Recommendations on Public Participation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
Advertisements

1 Strategic Environmental Assessment and SFs Operational Programmes: An assessment Jonathan Parker DG ENV ENVIRONMENT EUROPEAN COMMISSION Aarhus Workshop.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
Making Aarhus work in international forums A workshop on promoting the application of the principles of the Aarhus Convention in international forums Geneva,
“Building Effective Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context” in Bulgaria Institute for Ecological Modernisation.
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
Public consultation in EIA procedures Geert P.J. Draaijers Netherlands Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment (
Secretariat to the Espoo Convention and its Protocol on SEA
Implementing the Second Pillar of the Aarhus Convention: Problems Identified in the National Implementation Reports Magda Tóth Nagy, Senior Expert Geneva,
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context Workshop on “Making Aarhus work in international forums” Geneva, 23 February.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Jerzy Jendrośka Implementing the Aarhus Convention’s provisions in national legislation and practice: experience of countries of the UNECE region in the.
Jerzy Jendrośka Energy security and legal requirements for environmental protection, public involvement and transboundary co-operation Scientific support.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
Capacity building workshop on environment and health Public participation and the right to know: Aarhus Convention and PRTR Protocol Monica Guarinoni Sofia,
Environmental Impact Assessment in the Slovak republic.
Opole University1 Jerzy Jendrośka Public participation in the findings of the Compliance Committee The Aarhus Convention Expert Group on Public Participation.
The European SEA Directive Simon Marsden School of International Business, University of South Australia Module 1: Basics of SEA.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
1 The Protocol on Water and Health TASK FORCE ON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN DECISION-MAKING October 2010, Geneva, Switzerland Tomasz Juszczak, UNECE.
Jerzy Jendrośka Decisions on proposed activities not listed in annex 1 of the Convention (article 6 paragraph 1 (b) of the Convention) Task Force on Public.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo, 1991) Task Force on Public Participation in Decision-making Aarhus Convention,
Peter Lukáč Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic Department of Environmental Assessment.
© International Training Centre of the ILO International Labour Standards and the ILO Supervisory System: tools to defend workers’ rights Geneva,
EROL MERTCAN RAPPORTEUR, SMALL GROUP OF LEGAL EXPERTS Revision of Article 9 by the Small Group of Legal Experts following WGD-6.
Jerzy Jendrośka Aarhus Convention and its Compliance Mechanism: Challenges in the implementation of the Aarhus Convention in light of the cases under its.
process and procedures for assessments
Grade A Dairy Equivalence
UNECE Aarhus Convention Secretariat
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
New systematization of EU legal instruments in the Lisbon Treaty
Prof. Dr. Eike Albrecht Centre for Law and Administrative Sciences
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
STRESS TESTS and TAIWAN PEER REVIEW PROCESS
The Final Decision in the Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure in Ukraine as a Multilateral Agreement Tretiak Taras Associate Professor of National.
Environmental assessment system in Finland
Instance of Article 6(1)(b) in England and Wales: small electric lines
14-16 September 2016, Wrocław, Poland
European Labour Law Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli:
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Identifying, notifying concerned parties in Spain
Setting Actuarial Standards
Jerzy Jendrośka Public particiption
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
Towards Modern Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Uzbekistan
Towards Modern Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Uzbekistan
Jerzy Jendrośka Transboundary procedures
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Setting up an ERIC 11 May 2012 Richard Derksen
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Exchange and Sharing of Economic Data
Quality, efficiency and productivity: a challenge for official statistics EFTA/CROSTAT/EUROSTAT Strategic Management Seminar, Split, November 2007.
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
Presidential Permits Implementing EO 13337
Magdalena Bar Annual EELF Conference 2016
The Aarhus Convention and Biosafety
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
International Training Centre of the ILO
The Aarhus Convention Reporting Mechanism
Ratification of the UNECE Protocol on Pollutant Release
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Еxperience of EPAC in PPIF good practice and obstacles
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMANTAL AND NATURE PROTECTION
Agenda item 4(b) Compliance mechanism - Report on the Committee’s activities since the second session of the Meeting of the Parties This is a sample Title.
Presentation transcript:

Jerzy Jendrośka Maastricht Recommendations on Public Participation Seminar “How to use the Aarhus Convention for the Protection of Space and Nature” Pula, 2-3 June, 2016 This seminar is part of the project “Increasing Transparency in Water and Space Management” financed by the EU and co-financed by the Croatian Government Office for NGOs Jerzy Jendrośka

Full tittle Maastricht Recommendations on Promoting Effective Public Participation in Decision-making in Environmental Matters Jerzy Jendrośka

Legal basis Request by the Aarhus Convention Meeting of the Parties, at its second extra-ordinary session (Geneva, 19 and 22 April 2010) for the Task Force on Public Participation (decision EMP.II/1, paragraph 2(c)) Adopted by the Task Force and presented during the Fifth session of the Aarhus Convention Meeting of the Parties (Maastricht, the Netherlands, 30 June and 1 July 2014 - ECE/MP.PP/2014/8 Jerzy Jendrośka

Character practical, user-friendly non-binding, non-exhaustive tool to improve the implementation of the Convention’s provisions on public participation in decision-making Jerzy Jendrośka

Purpose To assist: Parties in designing their legal framework on public participation in environmental decision-making under the Convention public officials on a day-to-day basis when designing and carrying out public participation procedures in environmental decision-making under the Convention. Jerzy Jendrośka

Process Metings 3 consultation rounds (altogether about 1200 comments) With Water Convention experts With Espoo EIA/SEA experts With ANCLI nuclear safety experts 3 consultation rounds (altogether about 1200 comments) All comments and revisions publicly available Jerzy Jendrośka

Sources Opinions of the Aarhus Compliance Committtee Best practice Views expressed during meetings written consultations Jerzy Jendrośka

Content General Recommendations, inter alia on Complex decision-making and „0” option Delegating responsibility for public participation Defining and identifying the public which may participate Foreign public Specific Recommendations on public participation under Articles 6,7 and 8 Annex – Table: delagating the tasks in public participation procedure Altogether 190 recommendations 55 pages Jerzy Jendrośka

Exemplary recommendation for the Parties - recommendation on the zero option (no16) In line with the Convention’s requirement for the public to have an opportunity to participate when all options are open, the public should have a possibility to provide comments and to have due account taken of them, together with other valid considerations required by law to be taken into account, at an early stage of decision-making when all options are open, on whether the proposed activity should go ahead at all (the so-called zero option). This recommendation has special significance if the proposed activity concerns a technology not previously applied in the country and which is considered to be of high risk and/or to have an unknown potential environmental impact. The opportunity for the public to provide input into the decision-making on whether to commence use of such a technology should not be provided only at a stage when there is no realistic possibility not to proceed Jerzy Jendrośka

Exemplary recommendation for the officials - recommendation on methods of notifying the public (no 64) As a guide, public notice should be placed: (a) In a public place in the immediate vicinity of the proposed activity (e.g., on a prominent fence or signpost on the site of the proposed activity, etc.); (b) On a publicly accessible physical noticeboard at the public authority competent to take the decision, and on a prominent and publicly accessible part of the competent public authority’s website (if such a website exists); (c) In the newspaper(s) corresponding to the geographical scope of the potential effects of the proposed activity and which reaches the majority of the public who may be affected by or interested in the proposed activity; (d) In places highly frequented by the public concerned and customarily used for the purpose (e.g., noticeboards in community halls, post offices, shops and commercial centres, places of worship, schools, kindergartens, sports halls and meeting places for marginalized groups, as well as at bus stops, sports fields, etc.); (e) On the notice boards and websites of all local authorities in the area potentially affected. Jerzy Jendrośka