CLEMSON UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

LibQUAL+ and Library Summit: The Clemson Experience Joe Boykin Dean of Libraries Clemson University JISC/CNI Conference Brighton, England July 8-9, 2004.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
the UNCG University Libraries ASERL Meeting November 13, 2012 Atlanta, GA Kathryn Crowe Associate Dean for Public Services
New Dean Mentoring Administration, Finances, and Strategic Planning Sarah Rajala Dean, College of Engineering James and Katherine Melsa Professor in Engineering.
1 The Florida International University Faculty Senate Meeting Operating Budget FY07-08 & Budget Reduction Plan September 18, 2007.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
Board Retreat Discussion and Review Non Profit Board Retreat Review and Discussion April 5, :30 AM- 11:30 AM Diana A. Bing 4/5/2011.
Holly R. Bullard, Ed.D. EquipLCU Director 2012 West Texas Assessment Conference.
Chapter 8 Orientation to the Engineering Education System.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Collaborative Strategic Leadership: A Dynamic 21 st Century Approach to Strategic Planning Presented by Sherry Schiller 1 Ryman Ballroom D Friday, October.
Planning Alignment Joseph A. Alutto Executive Vice President and Provost.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
A project of the President’s Emerging Leaders Program in collaboration with the Administrative Services Task Force.
LIBQUAL+ and Library Summit: The Clemson Experience.
CEBP Learning Institute Fall 2009 Evaluation Report A collaborative Partnership between Indiana Department of Corrections & Indiana University November.
Margaret Martin Gardiner Assessment Librarian The University of Western Ontario LibQUAL+2007 Canada 25 October 2007.
LibQUAL+ and the Library Summit Concept London February 3, 2006 Fred Heath Vice Provost and Director, University of Texas Libraries
Think Academics: Academic Visioning David Marker Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Developing a QEP that is Relevant to the Institutional Vision and Mission SACS/COC 2005 Dr. Robert R. Bell, PRESIDENT Dr. Leo McGee, Associate Vice-President.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Looking Ahead: Developing YOUR State Agenda Incorporating the NACM National Agenda into Your State Association Agenda Presentation at BLANK LOCATION DATE.
October 25, 2007 Charting the IT Path: Unifying IT Strategic Planning with Central and Decentralized IT Goals EDUCAUSE 2007 Annual Conference October 23-26,
Using LibQUAL+ to Rethink Public Services June 2003.
A Presentation for the Annual Conference of the Missouri Community College Association November 6, 2003 Larry McDoniel Ann Campion Riley Assessment of.
Shared Governance In the past four years, there has been a significant, positive change in the collaborative and collegial relationship between the Provost,
HOUSE RULES PARTICIPANTS ARE REQUESTED TO SIT AT THEIR ASSIGNED AREAS WRITE DOWN ALL AREAS OF CONCERN QUESTIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED AFTER ALL PRESENTORS.
1 Preparing Your Academic File for Tenure and Promotion December 14, am: - 12:00 noon Anatomical Pathology, 7th Floor, Mackenzie Building.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Town Road Improvement Project Plan
Academic integrity at UB: Report & recommendations
Thoughts on How to Initiate An Academic Career - Research
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
Research from the NCCSD: What’s new and exciting?
The Year-one Report: Principles, Issues, Implications
Types of Community Engagement Forms among Participating Institutions
Standard II Curriculum.
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Customer Services Excellence (CSE) workshop
Faculty Senate Meeting September 20, 2016
NMUSD Adult School Professional Growth Plan Martha Rankin
2016 GOVERNANCE GROUP UPDATE
The Tenure Process at Babson College: The Fourth-Year Review
Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki, Finland
IT Governance Planning Overview
Guidelines for Tenure and Promotion
Jane Ashdown, Adelphi University 2/14/2013 & 2/26/2013
Responsibility Centered Management (RCM): A New Budget Model
INSPIRE Conference April 11, 2017 Michael T. Stephenson
Orientation to the Engineering Education System
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
Dr Kate Whittington, Prof Sally Barnes and Associate Prof Anne Lee
Serving Different Communities through Extension Services
What is Project Human Resource Management (PHRM)?
Periodic Review Departmental Review.
School Community Councils
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Medical Students Documenting in the EMR
Orientation to the Engineering Education System
Professional Learning Network
Fort Valley State University
Getting Organized Governance Structures of Statewide OER Projects
Quality Matters Overview
Staff Turnover and Silos in Our State, Oh My!
Presentation transcript:

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES LIBRARY SUMMIT CONCEPT Joe Boykin Dean of Libraries Clemson University jboykin@clemson.edu

Clemson University Libraries Clemson University In Context: Land-grant university for South Carolina 17,000 students (13,500 undergrad and 3,500 graduate) 900 faculty Majority of doctoral programs in sciences and engineering Main library and branch for architecture

Clemson University Libraries The Clemson Summit Concept Concept initiated by President Summits are organized around a university function Bring university constituents together to focus on one area

Clemson University Libraries The Clemson Summit Concept continued: Library Summit I was the second university summit and was designed to identify major themes for the Libraries in the future. Attendees included: faculty, students, staff, trustees, former president, administrators including President and Provost. We followed Library Summit I with Library Summit II which consisted of the entire library staff.

Clemson University Libraries Results from Library Summits I and II: Strategic Plan for 2000-2004 Business Plan for 2000-2004 Included detail tasks and dollar amounts Resulted in the Library being included in the Academic Affairs “Road Map Funds” for the next four years. Received $1 Million the first Year and $500K each of the next 4 years Library continues in the future as a major component of the “Road Map Funds”

Clemson University Libraries LIBQUAL+ and Clemson University Libraries First LIBQUAL+ followed Library Summits I and II Used LIBQUAL+ results to determine if the choices we made from the summits were correct. We determined that the LIBQUAL+ results validated the themes and detailed objectives resulting from the summits.

Clemson University Libraries 2003 LIBQUAL+ Results Received our 3rd LIBQUAL+ Results Paid close attention to the results of questions where either the perceived level was below minimum levels Also paid attention to the results of questions which were above minimum but were showing a declining number.

Clemson University Libraries “Disconfirming Expectancy” Increased credibility by providing negative information. We wanted help from faculty and students to understand the 2003 LIBQUAL+ results. Because of success of Library Summit I and II decided to have Library Summit III.

Clemson University Libraries Summit Planning: Planning Committee Determined date and location (university conference center) Determined schedule (3:00PM – 7:00PM) Determined meal Set Agenda Recommended participants (by group) 60 total Organized discussion topics Prepared and sent formal invitations

Clemson University Libraries Summit Goals: Verify improvements since 2000 summits Use ideas generated to extend existing Strategic and Business Plans Use ideas generated to allocate 2003-2004 Road Map Funding

Clemson University Libraries Summit Process: Organized around three LIBQUAL+ areas: Information control, affect of service, Library as Place Had two tables of 10 participants per topic At half way point had participants change tables. Table leaders where library staff who also recorded ideas. Each table was asked to come up with 9 ideas plus one “off the wall” suggestion.

Clemson University Libraries Summit Process: Provided the participants with the 2003 Libqual results. Had a smaller “results” document that highlighted the areas which were below minimum levels or showed decline and asked them to concentrate on these areas for their suggestions for improvement. We also provided them with a brief explanation of the Libqual charts and tables.

Clemson University Libraries What Happened: Providing “negative” information from LIBQUAL+ results was very positive. University supports and rewards honest examination of opportunities to improve. A real “assessment culture” at Clemson which looks to “close the loop.”

Clemson University Libraries

Clemson University Libraries

Clemson University Libraries Library Town Meetings: Critical to success of Summit Had 3 Town Meetings with Library Staff Staff added ideas and enhanced many of those suggested at the Summit.

Clemson University Libraries Benefits of a Summit Library plans based on LibQual+ survey results and Summit discussions provide good structure for showcasing positive outcomes in assessment. Participants tend to take ownership of their ideas An organization that makes its weaknesses public and asks for advice gains positive regard. Input from Summit participants provides richer and more detailed data.

Clemson University Libraries What we learned: Have less library staff, more users Shorten second session somewhat Provide more training to table leaders Schedule so President and Provost can participate.