Internal MREL – consultation paper

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of AS 30 Financial Inst. & Derivatives. Flow of presentation Overview of AS 30 Derivatives Financial Instruments Hedge Accounting Key Challenges.
Advertisements

Extensibility of COREP and Compatibility between Basel II agreement and the future Directive An external analysis. Andrés Álvarez (University of Oviedo)
The Benefits and Challenges of Implementation of Basel II in Europe José María Roldán | 27 Sept 2005.
© 2005 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK registered company, limited by guarantee, and a member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
1 June 2005 Basel II and Future Supervision Kevin Davis Commonwealth Bank Group Chair of Finance The University of Melbourne Director, Melbourne Centre.
Ninth Replenishment of IFAD’s Resources Draft Resolution: Revisions made since the 2 nd Session of Consultation October 2011.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Investments 12.
Corporate Governance Reform Professor Blanaid Clarke Trinity College Dublin Law Reform Commission Annual Conference 11th December 2012.
WELCOME TO THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION SELF-INSURANCE SEMINAR.
Macro-prudential Policy and Financial Stability: Issues and Challenges 1 December 16 – 18, 2013 Amman, Jordan.
Update International Resolution Workstreams NAIC Financial Stability Task Force March 28, 2015 James Kennedy Texas Department of Insurance Representative.
Following the CA, prudential supervision responsibilities will be transferred to the ECB and resolution responsibilities to the SRB Q H H.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
8 – 12 December 2008 Bruce Le Bransky MAFC / APEC / AFDC Shanghai Conference: Session Liquidity Risk.
Introduction to Financial Statements and Other Financial Reporting Topics COPYRIGHT ©2007 Thomson South-Western, a part of the Thomson Corporation. Thomson,
IADI Annual Conference Updated Core Principles to strengthen the Financial Stability Architecture The EU regulatory framework: DGS funding and mandate.
Section 3: Medium-term risks to financial stability.
Will you be reporting equity in your balance sheet in 2005?
BASEL III – A basis for discussion Podkladový materiál k BASEL III – pracovní verze.
Hugh Tucker September 29, 2005 OWNERSHIP ARRANGEMENTS FOR INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS.
Consolidated Supervision: Managing the Risks in a Diversified Financial Services Industry Barbara Baldwin June 2001.
FASB Interpretation No. 48
Markets in Financial Instruments Directive Chris Bates September 2005 Interaction with the CRD.
Revise lecture Statement of cash flows – IAS 7 2.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
Lessons from 2008 Financial Crisis for Bank Resolution – Malaysian Experience Lim Kong Kuan, November 2011, Jodhpur, India.
Bank Resolution and Too Big To Fail Is Bail-in the best answer? October 2010 This document and the information contained therein may not be reproduced.
Investments in Associates: IAS 28
1 Cross Border Financial Positions and Exposures Juan Pablo Graf Banco de México.
Introduction to Basel Norms BCBS –Committee of Central bankers from across the world Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 capital Risk Weighted Assets.
Table 6.A Key actions to improve resilience Macroprudential tools are needed to guard against systemic risk and to ensure banks are in a stronger position.
 Road to Europe – Program of Accounting Reform and Institutional Strengthening (REPARIS) World Bank / European Commission Accounting by Small and Medium.
Banking, Investing and Insurance BUSINESS AND BANKING AND PROFITABILITY.
14 April Market discipline and financial stability Glenn Hoggarth Patricia Jackson Erlend Nier.
International coordination of resolution decisions, TLAC vs. MREL
Task Force on Banking Crisis Resolution Procedures Assonime-CEPS-Unicredit Task Force on Banking Crisis Resolution Procedures Key issues in bank crisis.
IFRS 1 First-Time Adoption of IFRS PwC. PricewaterhouseCoopers First time adoption session outline Overview Exemptions and exceptions Disclosure.
Risk Management Challenge for Basel Ⅱ & Ⅲ Chau-Jung Kuo Professor, Department of Finance, NSYSU The 19 th Annual Conference on PBFEAM.
1 IASB Risk Disclosure Proposals Russell Picot Group Chief Accounting Officer HSBC Holdings plc.
ASU , PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – GOING CONCERN (SUBTOPIC )
Identifying the Objectives and Scope for Debt Management, MTDS: Step 1
SOLVENCY II - PILLAR I Grey areas
Global Financial Crisis
Understanding your Budget, P&L statement and Balance Sheet
Ch. 3 Consolidated Financial Statements: Date of Acquisition
Analyses and Data for Bank Resolution
Public Hearing | Slavka Eley
Adam Farkas – Executive Director, EBA 28 November 2017
APP entities (organisations)
Prepared by: Carole Bowman, Sheridan College
Banking Union: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?
Annual Report: Additional Financial Statements
Gibraltar Resolution Planning Framework
SRB 2017 MREL Policy Industry Dialogue
Banks Chapter 2.
Draft Resolution: Revisions made since the 2nd Session of Consultation
Gibraltar Resolution Planning Framework
Interım fınancıal reportıng
Introduction to Banking & Finance
27 The Monetary System For use with Mankiw and Taylor, Economics 4th edition © Cengage EMEA 2017.
Introduction to Financial Statements
Elements of Corporate Resilience
Annual Report: Additional Financial Statements
Chapter 8: Consolidations – Changes in Ownership Interests
Cross-border Insolvency: The FSB Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes Eva Hüpkes Role of Deposit Insurance in Bank Resolution Framework – Lessons.
The Commission’s NPL Package and the Directive on Credit Servicers, Credit Purchasers and Collateral Recovery.
BOOKS OF ACCOUNT & FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Assessing a decade of financial regulation
Identifying the Objectives and Scope for Debt Management, MTDS: Step 1
Banking Union: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?
Presentation transcript:

Internal MREL – consultation paper Andrew Gracie, Executive Director 19th October 2017

Contents Context: MREL What is internal MREL for? The policy Scope Calibration Eligibility Operational Continuity in Resolution Other MREL policy (MPE, deductions, disclosure, reporting) Revised Approach to Resolution publication

Context: MREL

Bank of England’s Statement of Policy on MREL The Bank set out its ‘MREL’ policy in November 2016. This sets a minimum amount of capital and debt firms must hold. MREL ensures there are enough resources at the resolution entity to absorb losses so that critical functions can continue to be provided.

MREL calibration

CMGs, resolution colleges Why is internal MREL policy needed now? Interim MREL Jan 2020 iMREL SoP H1 2018 G-SIB FSB TLAC deadline 1 Jan 2019 Final MREL Jan 2022 MREL SoP Nov 2016 iMREL CP Oct 2017 CMGs, resolution colleges SoP = Statement of Policy CP = Consultation Paper The consultation runs from 2 October to 2 January 2017.

How does internal MREL facilitate effective resolution?

How does internal MREL work? Material entities within a group structure are set internal MREL. Internal MREL is set on an individual basis for material subsidiaries. Internal MREL is set on a sub-consolidated basis for a material sub-group.

Losses absorbed by MREL: internal and external (3) Losses at the Operating company result in equity write-downs at the Holding company (4) The Bank of England triggers a write-down of the internal debt in the Operating company to recapitalise it, so it can continue to be authorised and deliver critical functions. (5) The Bank of England puts the group into resolution. The Bank ‘bails in’ external MREL at the Holding company, so restoring the Holding company’s capital position. (1) An Operating company experiences losses. (2) Losses use up Operating company’s capital – it is now failing. The group now meets capital requirements and is no longer failing or likely to fail.

How does internal MREL facilitate effective resolution? Resources where they’re needed most External MREL is applied to holding companies – but losses are experienced at operating companies. Internal MREL ensures operating companies have sufficient resources to be recapitalised in resolution. Removes incentive to run Internal MREL is subordinated to operating liabilities and so protects them from loss. That removes the incentive for depositors and market counterparties to run from a stressed firm. Facilitates home-host co-operation Provides assurance that resources are at the right places in the group to support critical functions.

Internal MREL: the policy

Internal MREL – main contents of policy Internal MREL should: implement FSB’s TLAC Standard and support cross-border co- operation contribute to feasible and credible resolution plans; leave a readily-available unallocated surplus MREL at group level; and apply the same eligibility criteria to regulatory capital as eligible liabilities. Scope Calibration Form

Scope Internal MREL will be set for material subsidiaries in the UK. Internal MREL in excess of regulatory capital requirements will be set for subsidiaries that are ‘material’. If these entities fail, groups may not be able to support them and may have to be resolved. Internal MREL* is not set No Is the subsidiary otherwise material to delivery of critical functions? No Does the subsidiary make up more than 5% of the group by RWAs, leverage exposure, or operating profits? In exceptional circumstances, internal MREL* set Yes Yes Internal MREL* set * above regulatory capital requirements

Scope We will set internal MREL in excess of regulatory requirements for subsidiaries and top entities in existing consolidations. We could make exceptions. Solo and sub-consolidations We will set internal MREL For solo (or solo consolidated) balance sheets For the top entities of existing consolidations or sub-consolidations based on consolidated balance sheet, e.g. RFB sub-groups UK sub-groups of overseas firms Exceptionally we might: Set internal MREL above regulatory capital requirements for a sub-group with material parts of the group in small subsidiaries where no prudential sub-consolidation exists. Allocate internal MREL above minimum capital requirements to overseas subgroups of UK firms where there are no host requirements.

Calibration Scaling internal MREL to leave a readily deployable surplus at group level.

Calibration To meet internal MREL, subsidiaries will need to issue internal instruments to the holding company to have most of what they need in a crisis. Internal MREL will be 75-90% of the external MREL an entity would be set – in line with FSB’s TLAC standard 75% 90% 100% Start at 75% and increase if… The Bank has doubts about the resolution strategy The group lacks readily available resources to support the subsidiary High scaling is applied by overseas authorities … except ring-fenced banks - start at 90% and decrease if satisfied group has enough readily deployable resources to support it … and except groups with simple structures: no scaling No double-counting of internal MREL in subsidiaries

Calibration Apart from scaling, internal MREL will be based on the same calibration and timetable as external MREL.

Subordinated long-term debt Form The Bank will be able to convert internal MREL resources into equity, or write them down, if necessary Subordination Contractual triggers Deposits An internal MREL instrument must provide the resolution authority of the subsidiary with the right to write it down or convert it to equity, where: The resolution authority determines that the subsidiary is failing or likely to fail and will, disregarding any write-down and/or conversion of the instruments, continue to be so; and, for non-UK groups, the home authority consents or does not object; or A resolution entity within the group is subject to resolution proceedings. Uncovered deposits Derivatives Other liabilities Senior liabilities Subordinated long-term debt Internal MREL Regulatory capital Internal MREL can be met through regulatory capital and other subordinated ‘eligible liabilities’.

Loss-absorbing capacity for operational continuity Purpose: After entry to resolution a firm may need to be restructured. Group service providers may need to incur costs as operations are re-sized. Each provider of critical services will need loss absorbing capacity to cover losses. Scope For regulated UK entities, we will require extra MREL. For unregulated critical service providers in UK groups we will require the regulated parent to downstream LAC. Calibration Providers will need to maintain LAC to cover at least 25% of annual operating costs of providing services; or more as the Bank deems necessary for a firm. Form LAC for OCIR must meet the same eligibility criteria as internal MREL. We may allow it to be maintained at the top of a servco sub-group.

Revised Approach to Resolution publication

Why did we revise the ‘Purple Book’? (1) Significant changes in the regime since 2014 These include: Legislative developments Policy developments Widened scope of the regime “ The Bank of England’s Approach to Resolution, from October 2014, is indeed the most readable of all the documents [on the UK resolution regime], but it is now clearly out of date. – Lord Tunnicliffe, 12 December 2016 ” (2) Provide greater clarity on what resolution entails Encourage greater public understanding of the regime Provide a useful reference for markets, media and analysts on resolution

What’s new in this version? Reflects our approach to resolvability including standards for loss absorbency (MREL), operational continuity and stays. Provides greater detail on our bail-in mechanic – that is, how we intend to implement a bail-in in practice. Outlines the Bank approach to funding in resolution.

Questions