Fig. 1. Timing framework of decisions and outcomes for the nth R&D firm. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Role of the Land Grant University in Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Randy Woodson Agricultural Research Programs Purdue University.

Advertisements

From: An open day in the metric space

Fig. 1 Flow chart of the COBRA-light trial and its extension study

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Index Funds, Financialization, and Commodity Futures Markets

Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Source: Authors. From: Strategic behaviour of research groups within the entrepreneurial university policy rhetoric: the Estonian biotechnology sector.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

Figure 1. Financial income in Germany (% of GDP)

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Figure 1 Theoretical link between welfare state policy and fear of crime From: Social Insecurities and Fear of Crime: A Cross-National Study on the Impact.

Source:Ellerman, Convery, and de Perthuis (2010). Figure 6. 2, p

Figure 1 A decision tree diagram for problems and its German correspondences From: Corresponding lexical domains: A new resource for onomasiological.

Source: compiled from various sources.

Fig. 1. By-production representation with two sub-technologies, one for the good output (Ty) and one for the bad output (Tb). From: Greenhouse gas emissions.

Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment

Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

From: What Drives Local Food Prices

Fig. 1 Flow of ascertainment of cases with incident childhood IgA vasculitis reported by four sources From: Incidence of IgA vasculitis in children estimated.

Figure 2. Illustration of minimum cross-sectional area (a) and measurements for oropharynx and soft palate in sagittal plane (b, c). From: Airway volume.

Fig. 1. Geographic locations of Shenzhen and Dongguan

Fig. 1 Proportion of study participants with ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics by self-rated health. Ideal category of Cardiovascular Health Metrics.

Figure 1. Southern Italy's agriculture falling behind (I)—declining share of national output. Source: Own elaboration based on regional output estimates,

Fig 1 Respiratory support escalation strategies for study patients

Fig. 2: I looked out when I got on the train, and this is what I saw—no shelter for passengers on a rainy day. This is the environment in which you must.

Fig. 1. Global risk of establishment of codling moth using MaxEnt model. From: Assessing the Global Risk of Establishment of Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera:

Fig. 1. Timeline of the CPAP in Ghana study.

From: Where do we go from here

From: A European Disease

Example 14. Schubert, Quartet in G Major, D

Figure 1. Relationship between Log Transfers and Age of Eldest HH Member(a) Bandwidth 0.05(b) Bandwidth 0.1(c) Bandwidth 0.5 From: The Effect of a Transfer.

Figure 1. Shares on “world” trade, current prices Sources: Federico and Tena-Junguito (2016). From: American divergence: Lost decades and Emancipation.

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of patient selection and study design.

Figure 1. Academic productivity and high academic income: top earners vs. the rest of academics. The average number of ‘peer-reviewed article equivalents’

Figure 1 Effects of time constant and time-varying characteristics on occupational status at the start of a career and at the time of change in the time.

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

Fig 1 Coding search and excluded records.

Figure 1. Examples of e-cigarette discussions in social media

Figure 1 The conceptual framework for assessing women's participation in aided self-help rural community development projects in Ndokwa agricultural zone.

From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery

Figure 1. Fractional polynomial regression of household WTP to stabilize at their means the prices of the seven commodities retained for analysis on household.

Figure 3. Visualisation of ESMO-MCB scores for curative and non-curative setting. A & B and 5 and 4 represent the grades with substantial improvement.

Figure 1. Dosage and administration route of drugs used in the BMD study. Each cycle was proposed every 28 days (‘base’ schedule) or 35 days (‘weekly’

From: Dynamic Dependence and Diversification in Corporate Credit*

Figure 1 Study flow chart

From: Consumer Bankruptcy, Bank Mergers, and Information *

Figure 2 Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between true NC-FET and modified NC-FET. Odds ratio (OR) adjusted for clinical pregnancy (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.73–1.12)

Figure 7. Left–right and immigration preferences of insider and outsider groups. Notes: Predicted values with 95% confidence intervals. Based on OLS models.

Figure 1. Progression-free survival and overall survival for FL/DLBCL patients. From: Clinicobiological features and prognostic impact of diffuse large.

Fig. 1. Effects of P. fimata on germinating lettuce seeds exposed after 7 d in assays (a) without soil and P. fimata, (b) without soil but with P. fimata,

Figure 1. Patterns of HER2–PET/CT confronted with FDG–PET/CT, Maximum intensity projection. Lesion uptake was considered pertinent when visually higher.

Date of download: 2/22/2017 © The European Society of Cardiology All rights reserved. For permissions please

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Take home figure The protective role of CNP/NPR-B/NPRC.

Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses

Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1 Patient selection.

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Presentation transcript:

Fig. 1. Timing framework of decisions and outcomes for the nth R&D firm. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and forms of protection Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2015;43(1):1-29. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv007 Eur Rev Agric Econ | © Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com

Fig. 2. Aggregate equilibrium genetic improvement under PVP and patents. (A) PVP and (B) patents. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and forms of protection Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2015;43(1):1-29. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv007 Eur Rev Agric Econ | © Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com

Fig. 3. Aggregate equilibrium genetic improvement under patents minus aggregate equilibrium genetic improvement under PVP. (A) Three-dimensional representation and (B) two-dimensional representation. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and forms of protection Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2015;43(1):1-29. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv007 Eur Rev Agric Econ | © Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com

Fig. 5. Equilibrium net benefits to society (excluding profits to R&D sector) under patents minus equilibrium net benefits to society (excluding profits to R&D sector) under PVP. (A) Three-dimensional representation and (B) two-dimensional representation. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and forms of protection Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2015;43(1):1-29. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv007 Eur Rev Agric Econ | © Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com

Fig. 6. Equilibrium profits to R&D sector under PVP and patents Fig. 6. Equilibrium profits to R&D sector under PVP and patents. (A) PVP and (B) patents. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and forms of protection Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2015;43(1):1-29. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv007 Eur Rev Agric Econ | © Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com

Fig. 7. Equilibrium profits to R&D sector under patents minus equilibrium profits to R&D sector under PVP. (A) Three-dimensional representation and (B) two-dimensional representation. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and forms of protection Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2015;43(1):1-29. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv007 Eur Rev Agric Econ | © Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com

Fig. 4. Equilibrium net benefits to society (excluding profits to R&D sector) under PVP and patents. (A) PVP and (B) patents. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and forms of protection Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2015;43(1):1-29. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv007 Eur Rev Agric Econ | © Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com

Fig. 9. Aggregate equilibrium genetic improvement under patents with licensing minus aggregate equilibrium genetic improvement under patents without licensing. (A) Three-dimensional representation and (B) two-dimensional representation. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and forms of protection Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2015;43(1):1-29. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv007 Eur Rev Agric Econ | © Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com

Fig. 8. Aggregate equilibrium genetic improvement under 5-year patents minus aggregate equilibrium genetic improvement under 10-year patents. (A) Three-dimensional representation and (B) two-dimensional representation. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and forms of protection Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2015;43(1):1-29. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv007 Eur Rev Agric Econ | © Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com

Fig. 10. Aggregate equilibrium genetic improvement under patents with licensing minus maximum aggregate equilibrium genetic improvement under all other regimes. (A) Three-dimensional representation and (B) two-dimensional representation. From: Intellectual property in plant breeding: comparing different levels and forms of protection Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2015;43(1):1-29. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv007 Eur Rev Agric Econ | © Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com