Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Department of Agriculture Water Quality Monitoring Program 2009 Photo by Paul Morley.
Advertisements

SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project AQ 3 – Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report – 2008 March 3, 2009.
Middle Fork American River Project AQ 2 – Fish Population Technical Study Report Overview March 3, 2009.
Middle Fork Project AQ 6 – Fish Passage Technical Study February 3, 2009.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Contingency Sampling Protocol (Contingency Study) February 3, 2009.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
NASSCO and Southwest Marine Sediment Investigation Preliminary Results Thomas Ginn, Ph.D. Dreas Nielsen June 18, 2002.
May Middle Fork Project Project Operations Overview May 2006 PCWA MAY 16, 2006 HANDOUT #4.
Fish Mercury Project Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency DEVELOPING SAFE EATING GUIDELINES.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Update on Proposed Project.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting July 21, 2008.
METHYL MERCURY IN THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN Chris Foe Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Spokane River PCB Source Assessment Washington State Department of Ecology Spokane River Forum May
June 26, PCWA - Middle Fork Project Project Operations
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 - Attachment A California Red-legged Frog Site Assessment March 10, 2008.
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Project Description April 25, 2006.
1 Potential Project Betterments to be studied further during Relicensing June 20, 2006 Stakeholder Meeting Middle Fork American River Hydroelectric Project.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting April 8, 2008.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.
CONSTRUCTION UPDATE Napa Plant Site Central Unit.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting June 1, 2009 Handout #2.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 4, 2010 Handout #3.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
Kuskokwim Watershed Council Key Parameters for Baseline Water Quality Assessment © David Griso.
Middle Fork Project TERR 6 - Special-Status Bat Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 3, 2008.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency 2006 FMP SAMPLING PLAN FOR ADVISORY DEVELOPMENT Margy Gassel,
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Contingency Sampling Protocol (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008.
Site # 11.5: Middle Fork Feather River above confluence with Grizzly Creek Sierra Valley Dissolved Oxygen Study Summer 2008 Update Upper Feather River.
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Terrestrial Working Group November 6, 2007 TERR 1: Vegetation Communities and Wildlife.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Cottonwood’s Proposed Site-Specific Selenium Standards in the Cherry Creek Basin Comments Presented by: Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority Regulation.
Eric Ferguson King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks November 4, 2015 Existing Conditions Assessment.
All Sampling Sites March 21, Surface water sampling started February 3 rd Daily until early March Weekly since then.
Reservoir and Flow Routing Model Transect Data Collection Water Resources Study Planning Meeting January 25, 2012 Prepared by 1.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Middle Fork American River Project Recreation Resources Technical Working Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Slide 1 Agenda Item #15 Central Valley Water Board Meeting of 13 August 2009 Triennial Review Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins Betty Yee, Senior.
2014 NC Water Quality Assessment
Water quality characterization of the Pebble prospect area in Southwestern Alaska Comparison of PLP and independent science team scope, methods, and results.
Environment and Climate Change Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Regarding Doris North Project Type A Water Licence Amendment Application Nunavut.
Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Middle Fork Project Overview of 2008 Technical Study Plan Implementation April 21, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Entrainment Direct Sampling Approach (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008.
Mercury in Fish.
Water Quality in the Animas Watershed 1/24/18
Environmental Update 2018 Presentation to Business Partner’s Roundtable August 9, 2018 Bob Hitomi Environmental Specialist.
Middle Fork Project Project Description and Operations Maps
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
DETERMINING STREAM QUALITY
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
State of Calibration for California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim) CWEMF 2019 Annual Meeting Folsom, CA Presenter:
Presentation transcript:

Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008

Study Objectives Characterize physical, chemical, and bacterial water quality conditions in the bypass reaches and the peaking reach, comparison reaches, and Project reservoirs and diversion pools. Compare water quality conditions to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB 1998) Basin Plan objectives and water quality objectives.

Water Quality Study Objectives and Related Study Elements and Reports Study Objective Characterize physical, chemical, and bacterial water quality conditions in the bypass reaches and the peaking reach, comparison reaches, and Project reservoirs and diversion pools and compare to the CVRWQCB Basin Plan objectives and water quality standards. Complete 2007 Water Quality Field Program Conduct in-situ Field Measurement Sampling Conduct General Water Quality Sampling Conduct Coliform Sampling Conduct Fish Tissue Analysis Conduct Voluntary Enhanced Water Quality Sampling Document 2007 Water Quality Sampling Results in this report Consult with Aquatic TWG Determine if Additional Water Quality Sampling is Needed Determine if Additional Fish Tissue Analyses are Needed Determine if Additional Water Quality Sampling is Needed to Address any Macroinvertebrate Issues Develop Recommendations and Prepare Contingency Studies, if necessary Complete 2008 Contingency Water Quality Field Program, if necessary Document 2008 Water Quality Sampling Results in Water Quality Report (2009), if necessary

TSP Variances General Water Quality Sampling Fish Tissue Sampling Middle Fork American River peaking reach sampling Manganese sampling Fecal Coliform Sampling Fish Tissue Sampling Fish tissue analysis – French Meadows Reservoir Voluntary Enhancements Leakage channels and weirs Update of Basin Plan Fish tissue sampling

Existing Water Quality Objectives Water quality analytical results were compared to: The Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin Plan Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) California Toxics Rule (CTR) National Toxics Rule (NTR) Fish tissue analysis results were compared to: California’s Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) guidelines

Water Quality Results Rivers and Streams In-situ field measurements General water quality parameters Voluntary enhanced water quality sampling Coliform sampling

Water Quality Monitoring Locations

River and Stream In-situ Field Measurement Results All measurements met listed objectives or were within expected ranges, except: Dissolved oxygen Duncan Creek above Middle Fork American River confluence in spring Middle Fork American River above Duncan Creek confluence in spring Middle Fork American River below Duncan Creek confluence in spring *** These locations were not surveyed in the fall due to unsafe field conditions accessing the sampling locations.

River and Stream General Water Quality Parameter Results All general parameters and dissolved metals analyzed and total mercury samples met listed objectives or were within expected ranges, except: Dissolved manganese Middle Fork American River below French Meadows gaging station in fall

Voluntary Enhanced Water Quality Sampling Below Hell Hole Reservoir Below French Meadows Reservoir

Voluntary Enhanced Water Quality Sampling Hell Hole Dam All in-situ field measurements and general water quality parameters met listed objectives French Meadows Dam In-situ field measurements pH and dissolved oxygen did not meet water quality objectives General water quality parameters Iron and manganese concentrations exceeded water quality objectives

Fecal Coliform Sampling Locations

River and Stream Coliform Sampling All fecal coliform results in spring and fall met listed objectives, except: North Fork Long Canyon Creek (RM3.0) in fall Ralston Afterbay near the Ralston picnic area Exceeded objectives on one day during 30-day, 5 sample sampling

Reservoir Water Quality Results Reservoirs In-situ field measurements General water quality parameters

Reservoir In-situ Field Measurement Results All measurements met listed objectives or were within expected ranges, except: Dissolved oxygen Hell Hole Reservoir in fall French Meadows Reservoir in spring and fall Two locations in spring One location in fall

Reservoir General Water Quality Parameter and Fecal Coliform Results All general parameters and dissolved metals analyzed and total mercury samples met listed objectives or were within expected ranges. All fecal coliform results in spring and fall met listed objectives.

Fish Tissue Collection and Analysis for Methyl Mercury Sample Locations: Hell Hole Reservoir French Meadows Reservoir Middle Fork Interbay Ralston Afterbay Middle Fork American River near Otter Creek confluence

Fish Tissue Analysis Results Methyl mercury concentrations in at least 1 fish from each location exceeded the OEHHA screening value (0.08 mg/kg fish). 23 of 45 individual fish analyzed exceeded the screening value. Highest concentrations were measured in fish from Hell Hole Reservoir, where largest fish were caught.

Fish Tissue Analysis Results