fundamental equations of LHC performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bunch spacing, pile up and all that Frank Zimmermann HL-LHC/LIU brainstorming Jiva Hill, 24 June 2011.
Advertisements

Crab crossing and crab waist at super KEKB K. Ohmi (KEK) Super B workshop at SLAC 15-17, June 2006 Thanks, M. Biagini, Y. Funakoshi, Y. Ohnishi, K.Oide,
Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
Beam-Beam Collision Studies for DA  NE with Crabbed Waist Crabbed Waist Advantages Results for SIDDHARTA IR P.Raimondi, D.Shatilov (BINP), M.Zobov INFN.
Towards an extremely-flat beam optics with large crossing angle for the LHC José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN Beams dep. Supervised by F. Zimmermann,
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Long-range beam-beam compensation at HL-LHC Tatiana Rijoff, Frank Zimmermann ColUSM # /03/2013.
Two Scenarios for the LHC Luminosity Upgrade Walter Scandale, Frank Zimmermann ACES workshop We acknowledge the support of the European Community-Research.
Crab cavity location for 2-mrad x-ing December 7, 2004 A.S.
Name Event Date Name Event Date 1 LHC Upgrade We acknowledge the support of the European Community-Research Infrastructure Activity under the FP6 "Structuring.
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.) DayTimeMDEiCMP Tue06: GeV  4 TeV: Ramp for chromaticity - missed A 08:00Ramp down 10: GeV: Large.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Brain Gestorme: Status of the LHeC Ring-Ring / Linac- Ring Basic Parameters I appologise to talk about things you already know...
Summary and outcome of the 1st LIU-HL-LHC brainstorming meeting (24 th June 2011) Mike Lamont This event is jointly organized by the HL-LHC and LIU projects.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Overview Run-6 - RHIC Vadim Ptitsyn C-AD, BNL. V.Ptitsyn RHIC Spin Workshop 2006 RHIC Run-6 Timeline  1 Feb – Start of the Run-6. Start of the cooldown.
Thoughts on crab cavity noise, Fritz Caspers, Bandwidth of cavity structure with loaded Q is nearly always MUCH higher than generator bandwidth.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
HL-LHC/LIU Joint workshop Goal: Progressing towards an agreed set of 450 GeV beam parameters for High Luminosity operation in LHC after LS2 & LS3. Slides.
Do We Really Need the LHC Luminosity Upgrade? O. Brüning Many thanks for help from: Ralph Assmann, Gianluigi Arduini, Christian Carli, Elena Chaposhnikova,
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
Frank Zimmermann, LHCb Upgrade Meeting Overview of LHC Machine Upgrade Plans from an LHCb Perspective - Frank Zimmermann LHCb Upgrade Meeting CERN, 5 August.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
1 RHIC II – Ion Operation Wolfram Fischer RHIC II Workshop, BNL – Working Group: Equation of State 27 April 2005.
Criteria for dynamic aperture limits and impact of the multipolar errors: summary of the simulations with beam-beam for levelling scenarios at 5 and 7.5x10.
08/11/2007M. Giovannozzi – CARE-HHH-APD IR’071 Optics issues for Phase 1 and Phase 2 upgrades Massimo Giovannozzi, CERN Outline: –Option for Phase 1 and.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Issues related to crossing angles Frank Zimmermann.
Turnaround time in modern hadron colliders & store-length optimization
Collision with a crossing angle Large Piwinski angle
CERN Upgrade Plans for the LHC and its Injectors
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
contribution to the round table discussion
Impact of running with LHCf and early Totem 90 m optics
Task 2. 5: Beam-beam studies D. Banfi, J. Barranco, T. Pieloni, A
LUMI06 preliminary conclusions
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Frank Zimmermann LHC-CC’10, Geneva, 16 December 2010
Machine parameters of SuperKEKB
Developments on Proposed
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
LHC Accelerator Upgrade
Future HERA High Luminosity Performance
Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Possible Scenarios for an LHC Upgrade
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
Beam-Beam Effects in the CEPC
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)
Frank Zimmermann & Walter Scandale
Pushing the LHC nominal luminosity with flat beams
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Brief Review of Superbunches for Hadron Colliders
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
Presentation transcript:

increasing the LHC luminosity by reducing the transverse emittance - Roland’s proposal

fundamental equations of LHC performance basic idea: reduce e to compensate for larger Piwinski angle and get the full benefit of phase-1 (or phase-2 IR) upgrade); at the same time the smaller emittance relaxes aperture constraints → possible implications for the injection design

Roland’s example parameter sets 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nominal Nominal with IR phase 1 Nominal with IR phase 1 and reduced emittance Ultimate Ultimate with b*=0.25 m Ultimate with b*=0.25 m and reduced emittance Nb (x 1011) 1.15 1.70 eN (mm) 3.75 2.54 2.60 b* 0.55 0.25 0.50 s* (mm) 16.58 11.18 9.20 15.81 9.31 Crossing angle (mrad) 0.285 0.440 0.360 0.315 0.365 sz (mm) 75.50 f (Piwinski angle) 0.65 1.49 1.48 0.75 DQbb head-on 1.00 0.67 0.99 1.42 1.43 Luminosity 1.47 2.18 2.30 3.22 4.65 Luminosity lifetime (h) 22.00 14.95 10.08 14.13 10.11 6.99

ultimate Gaussian bunches for phase 1 and 2 <L> [1034 cm-2s-1] <L> [1034 cm-2s-1] 10 h turnaround 5 h turnaround b*=0.25 m b*=0.25 m b*=0.1 m b*=0.1 m b*=0.5 m b*=0.5 m ge [mm] ge [mm] L0 [1034 cm-2s-1] DQ tot b*=0.5 m b*=0.25 m b*=0.25 m b*=0.1 m b*=0.5 m b*=0.1 m ge [mm] ge [mm] 2808 bunches with 7.55 cm length, ultimate bunch intensity 1.7x1011, 9.5 s sep.

long flat bunches for phase 2 L0 [1034 cm-2s-1] <L> [1034 cm-2s-1] 5 h turnaround b*=0.1 m b*=0.25 m b*=0.25 m b*=0.1 m b*=0.5 m b*=0.5 m ge [mm] ge [mm] DQ tot 1404 bunches with 41 cm full length, bunch intensity 4.9x1011, 8.5 s sep. b*=0.5 m b*=0.25 m b*=0.1 m ge [mm]

conclusions for Gaussian ultimate bunches and b*~0.1-0.25 m, emittance reduction from 3.75 to 2 micron yields ~40-50% higher integrated luminosity; a smaller emittance reduction to 2.6 micron gives ~22-27% av. luminosity increase for long flat bunches and b*~0.25, emittance can be reduced only to 3 micron (tune shift limit), and the luminosity gain here is 13%

conclusions cont’d for comparison the luminosity gain from crab cavities would be 40-91% for b*~0.25-0.1 m